throbber
UNITED STA 1ES p A 1ENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`13/506,208
`
`04/04/2012
`
`Ji Shen
`
`PIT-114US
`
`3359
`
`7590
`23122
`RATNERPRESTIA
`P.O. BOX980
`VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0980
`
`11/06/2012
`
`EXAMINER
`
`RUST, ERICA
`
`ART UNIT
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`2674
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`11/06/2012
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 1 of 13
`
`

`

`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`
`13/506,208
`
`Examiner
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`SHEN ET AL.
`
`Art Unit
`
`2674
`ERIC A. RUST
`-- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address -(cid:173)
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE ;J MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1 )IZ! Responsive to communication(s) filed on 26 September 2012.
`2a)0 This action is FINAL.
`2b)[8J This action is non-final.
`3)0 An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`__ ;the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)0 Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 C. D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`5)[8J Claim(s) 1-20 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s) __ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`6)0 Claim(s) __ is/are allowed.
`7)[8J Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-20 is/are rejected.
`8)0 Claim(s) __ is/are objected to.
`9)0 Claim(s) __ are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway
`program at a participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`htt.Q:I/www.us_gto.gov/Qatents/init events/ooh/index.jsQ or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@us..Qto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`
`1 0)0 The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11 )IZ! The drawing(s) filed on 26 September 2012 is/are: a)IZ! accepted or b)O objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)0 Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`a)O All b)O Some * c)O None of:
`1.0 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.0 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. __ .
`3.0 Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment{s)
`1) [8J Notice of References Cited (PT0-892)
`
`2) [8Jinformation Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 04/04/2012.
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Off1ce
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 09·12)
`
`3) 0 Interview Summary (PT0-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date. __ .
`4) 0 Other: __ .
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20121031
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 2 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`1.
`
`Claims 1-20 are pending in this application.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Page 2
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`2.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 1 03(a) which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set
`forth in section 1 02 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and
`the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the
`invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
`Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1-2 and 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 1 03(a) as being unpatentable
`
`over U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0012830 A 1 to Aiso in view of U.S.
`
`Patent No. RE42,898 E to Shimizu et al. (hereinafter, Shimizu).
`
`In regard to claim 1, Aiso discloses a method of acquiring an image of a target
`
`to provide an output video image comprising a plurality of frame images, the method
`
`comprising: connecting a slave digital image sensing unit to a master personal
`
`processor, the master personal processor receiving a series of frame images from the
`
`slave digital image sensing unit (Aiso, Abstract, and Fig. 7);
`
`displaying and/or storing the manipulated series of frame images as an output
`
`video image without changing resolution of the output frame images (Aiso, Abstract,
`
`Fig. 7, and [0043]),
`
`wherein the slave digital image sensing unit is removably connected to the
`
`master personal processor via a master personal processor port (Aiso, [0043]).
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 3 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 3
`
`Aiso does not disclose using the master personal processor to manipulate the
`
`series of frame images, including zooming in or out without changing resolution of the
`
`frame images.
`
`Shimizu, however, discloses manipulating images, including zooming in or out
`
`without changing resolution of the frame images (Shimizu, col. 5, lines 30-51,
`
`preserve zoom image with same size and resolution).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to combine the disclosure of Shimizu with the disclosure of Aiso in order to
`
`preserve output images to the same size and resolution to the standard angle view
`
`(Shimizu, col. 5, lines 30-51).
`
`In regard to claim 2, which depends from claim 1, neither Aiso nor Shimizu
`
`disclose executing the manipulation in response to a user request in real time.
`
`The Examiner, however, takes Official Notice that executing the manipulation in
`
`response to a user request in real time is well known and expected in the art, and it
`
`would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to
`
`modify the cited references for such.
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the cited
`
`references in such a way so as to give the user more options.
`
`In regard to claim 4, which depends from claim 3, Aiso discloses wherein the
`
`personal processor is housed in an external personal computer, further comprising
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 4 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 4
`
`using an external personal computer to provide the processor used to manipulate the
`
`series of frame images (Aiso, Fig. 1 and Fig. 3).
`
`In regard to claim 5, which depends from claim 4, Aiso discloses wherein the
`
`manipulation further comprises at least one of the operations selected from the group
`
`consisting of: re-sizing the image; panning the image in a selected direction; rotating the
`
`image in a selected direction and annotating the image (Aiso, Fig. 3, correct
`
`positional shift).
`
`4.
`
`Claims 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 1 03(a) as being unpatentable over Aiso
`
`and Shimizu in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0177783 A 1 to
`
`Agrawala et al. (hereinafter, Agrawala).
`
`In regard to claim 6, which depends from claim 5, neither Aiso nor Shimizu
`
`disclose wherein annotating an image is conducted during re-sizing the image.
`
`Agrawala, however, discloses wherein annotating an image is conducted during
`
`re-sizing the image (Agrawala, [0043]- [0043]).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to combine the disclosure of Agrawala with the disclosure of Shimizu and Aiso
`
`in order to enable the user to add annotations similar in size to the existing document
`
`information (Agrawala, [0042]).
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 5 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 5
`
`In regard to claim 7, which depends from claim 5, Shimizu discloses wherein
`
`the at least one operation is conducted without changing a resolution of the output
`
`frame images (Shimizu, col. 5, lines 30-51 ).
`
`5.
`
`Claims 8-9, 12-13, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 1 03(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Aiso in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0206912
`
`A 1 to Megawa et al. (hereinafter, Megawa).
`
`In regard to claim 8, Aiso discloses a method of acquiring an image of a target
`
`comprising:
`
`capturing a video image comprising the series of frame images in one
`
`instantaneous snapshot of a subject's entire surface area without line-by-line scanning
`
`(Aiso, Abstract, Fig. 7)
`
`Aiso does not disclose using an external processor to compare a resolution of
`
`each frame image of the video image with the reference resolution and adjusting the
`
`resolution of each frame image to correspond to the reference resolution; and
`
`determining a reference resolution at which each frame image of a series of frame
`
`images will be maintained and storing the reference resolution in a non- transitory
`
`medium; after comparing the resolution of each frame image, storing and/or displaying
`
`in real-time each frame image on a display.
`
`Megawa, however, discloses setting a resolution for images (Megawa, [0041]).
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 6 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 6
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to combine the disclosure of Megawa with the disclosure of Aiso in order to
`
`enable the user to add annotations similar in size to the existing document
`
`information (Agrawala, [0042]).
`
`In regard to claim 9, which depends from claim 8, Aiso discloses wherein the
`
`external processor is housed in a personal computer (Aiso, Fig. 1 and Fig. 3).
`
`In regard to claim 12, which depends from claim 8, Aiso does not specifically
`
`disclose displaying panning the image in a selected direction without changing a
`
`resolution of the output frame images.
`
`The Examiner, however, takes Official Notice that executing the manipulation in
`
`response to a user request in real time is well known and expected in the art, and it
`
`would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to
`
`modify the cited references for such.
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the cited
`
`references for such so that a user because it is common practice in the art of cameras.
`
`In regard to claim 13, which depends from claim 8, Aiso discloses further
`
`comprising when displaying each frame image on a display rotating the image in a
`
`selected direction without changing a resolution of the output frame images (Aiso, Fig.
`
`3, correct positional shift).
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 7 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 7
`
`In regard to claim 16, which depends from claim 8, Aiso discloses further
`
`comprising when displaying each frame image on a display, performing an image
`
`manipulation selected from the group consisting of: re-sizing the image, re-sizing a
`
`selected portion of the frame to provide a visual effect of rotating the image in three
`
`dimensions, panning the image in a selected direction, rotating the image in a selected
`
`direction, and annotating the image (Aiso, Fig. 3, correct positional shift).
`
`6.
`
`Claims 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 1 03(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Aiso and Megawa in view of Shimizu.
`
`In regard to claim 10, which depends from claim 8, neither Aiso nor Megawa
`
`specifically disclose further comprising when displaying each frame image on a display
`
`re-sizing the image without changing a resolution of the output frame images.
`
`Shimizu, however, discloses manipulating images, including zooming in or out
`
`without changing resolution of the frame images (Shimizu, col. 5, lines 30-51,
`
`preserve zoom image with same size and resolution).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to combine the disclosure of Shimizu with the disclosure of Megawa and Aiso
`
`in order to preserve output images to the same size and resolution to the standard
`
`angle view (Shimizu, col. 5, lines 30-51 ).
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 8 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 8
`
`In regard to claim 11, which depends from claim 10, Aiso discloses further
`
`comprising re-sizing a selected portion of the frame to provide a visual effect of rotating
`
`the image in three dimensions (Aiso, Fig. 3).
`
`7.
`
`Claims 14-15 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 1 03(a) as being unpatentable
`
`over Aiso and Megawa in view of Agrawala.
`
`In regard to claim 14, which depends from claim 8, neither Aiso nor Megawa
`
`disclose further comprising when displaying each frame image on a display annotating
`
`the image without changing a resolution of the output frame images.
`
`Agrawala, however, discloses wherein annotating an image is conducted during
`
`re-sizing the image (Agrawala, [0043]- [0043]).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to combine the disclosure of Agrawala with the disclosure of Megawa and
`
`Aiso in order to enable the user to add annotations similar in size to the existing
`
`document information (Agrawala, [0042]).
`
`In regard to claim 15, which depends from claim 14, Agrawala discloses
`
`wherein annotating an image is conducted during a step of re-sizing the image
`
`(Agrawala, [0042]).
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 9 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 9
`
`In regard to claim 17, which depends from claim 16, Agrawala discloses
`
`wherein annotating an image is conducted during a step of re-sizing the image
`
`(Agrawala, [0042]).
`
`8.
`
`Claims 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 1 03(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Aiso and Shimizu in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,894,529 toTing.
`
`In regard to claim 18, Ting discloses a document imaging apparatus comprising
`
`a miniaturized digital image sensing unit externally coupled to a computer
`
`comprising optics having an infinite focal length (Ting, Fig. 3);
`
`a suspension arm for supporting the digital imaging unit at a distance from a
`
`target to be imaged (Ting, Fig. 3).
`
`Ting does not specifically disclose a personal computer containing a software
`
`programming unit wherein the personal computer is configured to control all actions of
`
`the miniaturized digital image sensing unit and cause the digital imaging unit to; a
`
`display for displaying the images; and
`
`Aios, however, discloses a personal computer containing a software
`
`programming unit wherein the personal computer is configured to control all actions of
`
`the miniaturized digital image sensing unit and cause the digital imaging unit to; a
`
`display for displaying the images (Aiso, Abstract, and Fig. 7).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to combine the disclosure of Aios with the disclosure of Ting in order to create
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 10 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 10
`
`high-resolution image data from multiple image data of comparatively low resolution
`
`(Aiso, [0002]).
`
`Neither Aiso nor Shimizu specifically disclose zooming in or zoom out in real-time
`
`while maintaining a resolution value of each of the real-time images constant.
`
`Shimizu, however, discloses manipulating images, including zooming in or out
`
`without changing resolution of the frame images (Shimizu, col. 5, lines 30-51,
`
`preserve zoom image with same size and resolution).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to combine the disclosure of Shimizu with the disclosure of Aiso and Ting in
`
`order to preserve output images to the same size and resolution to the standard angle
`
`view (Shimizu, col. 5, lines 30-51).
`
`In regard to claim 19, which depends from claim 18, Ting discloses wherein the
`
`processor is housed in a folding suspension arm (Ting, Fig. 3, item 16).
`
`In regard to claim 20, which depends from claim 18, Aiso discloses wherein the
`
`processor is housed in an external personal computing system (Aiso, Fig. 1 and Fig.
`
`3).
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 11 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 11
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`9.
`
`Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would
`
`be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base
`
`claim and any intervening claims.
`
`1 0.
`
`The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: the cited
`
`references do not anticipate or render obvious identifying a first resolution for the
`
`received plurality of frame images; identifying a second resolution for the reference
`
`resolution; in the case of a manipulated frame image having a higher resolution, as
`
`manipulated, than the second resolution, reducing the resolution of the frame image to
`
`that of the second resolution; in the case of the manipulated frame image having a
`
`lower resolution, as manipulated, than the second resolution, using the processor to
`
`further manipulate the frame image to reduce pixilation.
`
`Conclusion
`
`11.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to ERIC A. RUST whose telephone number is (571 )-270-
`
`3380. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday- Friday, 8:00a.m.- 5:00
`
`p.m., EST.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Benny Tieu can be reached on (571 )-272-7 490. The fax phone number for
`
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-270-4380.
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 12 of 13
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/506,208
`Art Unit: 267 4
`
`Page 12
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`/ERIC A RUST/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 267 4
`
`10/31/2012
`
`AVER EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 13 of 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket