throbber
Paper 12
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: April 11, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NFL ENTERPRISES LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OPENTV, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-02092
`Patent 6,233,736 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and
`MICHAEL R. ZECHER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-02092
`Patent 6,233,736 B1
`
`On March 28, 2018, Petitioner filed a motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Hilary L. Preston (Paper 9), along with her declaration (Exhibit
`1026), and a motion for pro hac vice admission of Rachael P. McClure
`(Paper 10), along with her declaration (Exhibit 1027). The motions are
`unopposed. The motions are granted.
`Upon consideration, Petitioner has demonstrated that Ms. Preston and
`Ms. McClure possess sufficient legal and technical qualifications to
`represent Petitioner in this proceeding, and the Board recognizes that there is
`a need for Petitioner to have Ms. Preston and Ms. McClure as back-up
`counsel. Ex. 1026 ¶ 9; Ex. 1027 ¶ 9. In summary, Petitioner has established
`good cause for their admission. Ms. Preston and Ms. McClure will be
`permitted to appear pro hac vice in the proceeding as back-up counsel only.
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Hilary L. Preston and Rachael P. McClure are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Preston and Ms. McClure are
`authorized to represent Petitioner as back-up counsel only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent Petitioner as lead counsel for this
`proceeding; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Preston and Ms. McClure are to
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal
`Regulations, and to be subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-02092
`Patent 6,233,736 B1
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`For PETITIONER:
`VINSON & ELKINS LLP
`Stephen C. Stout
`Hilary L. Preston
`Rachael P. McClure
`sstout@velaw.com
`hpreston@velaw.com
`rmcclure@velaw.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Joshua L. Goldberg
`Erika H. Arner
`Daniel C. Tucker
`Cory Bell
`joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`erika.arner@finnegan.com
`daniel.tucker@finnegan.com
`cory.bell@finnegan.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket