`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: April 11, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NFL ENTERPRISES LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OPENTV, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-02092
`Patent 6,233,736 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and
`MICHAEL R. ZECHER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02092
`Patent 6,233,736 B1
`
`On March 28, 2018, Petitioner filed a motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Hilary L. Preston (Paper 9), along with her declaration (Exhibit
`1026), and a motion for pro hac vice admission of Rachael P. McClure
`(Paper 10), along with her declaration (Exhibit 1027). The motions are
`unopposed. The motions are granted.
`Upon consideration, Petitioner has demonstrated that Ms. Preston and
`Ms. McClure possess sufficient legal and technical qualifications to
`represent Petitioner in this proceeding, and the Board recognizes that there is
`a need for Petitioner to have Ms. Preston and Ms. McClure as back-up
`counsel. Ex. 1026 ¶ 9; Ex. 1027 ¶ 9. In summary, Petitioner has established
`good cause for their admission. Ms. Preston and Ms. McClure will be
`permitted to appear pro hac vice in the proceeding as back-up counsel only.
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Hilary L. Preston and Rachael P. McClure are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Preston and Ms. McClure are
`authorized to represent Petitioner as back-up counsel only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent Petitioner as lead counsel for this
`proceeding; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Preston and Ms. McClure are to
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal
`Regulations, and to be subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02092
`Patent 6,233,736 B1
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`For PETITIONER:
`VINSON & ELKINS LLP
`Stephen C. Stout
`Hilary L. Preston
`Rachael P. McClure
`sstout@velaw.com
`hpreston@velaw.com
`rmcclure@velaw.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Joshua L. Goldberg
`Erika H. Arner
`Daniel C. Tucker
`Cory Bell
`joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`erika.arner@finnegan.com
`daniel.tucker@finnegan.com
`cory.bell@finnegan.com
`
`
`3
`
`