throbber
Paper No. __
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO., LTD,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2017-018411
`Patent 7,893,501
`____________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`1 Case IPR2017-01842 has been consolidated with this proceeding(cid:15916)
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 (“Patent Owner”), by and through
`
`their attorneys, respectfully requests oral argument, currently scheduled for
`
`September 6, 2018. Patent Owner requests a total of 60 minutes to present its
`
`arguments for IPR2017-01841.
`
`The oral argument for IPR2017-01843 is also scheduled for September 6,
`
`2018 and involves the same patent—U.S. Patent No. 7,893,501. In IPR2017-
`
`01843, Patent Owner is also requesting a total of 60 minutes to present its
`
`arguments. If the oral arguments are consolidated for IPR2017-01841 and
`
`IPR2017-01843, Patent Owner still requests a total of 120 minutes to present its
`
`arguments for both proceedings. Patent Owner requests this amount of time for
`
`such a consolidated hearing because the prior art, disputed limitations, and issues
`
`in IPR2017-01841 are different from those in IPR2017-01843.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.70(a), and without intending to waive any issue
`
`not specifically identified, Patent Owner identifies the following issues to be
`
`argued:
`
`1. The proper construction of “the MISFET: includes an active region of
`
`the semiconductor substrate;”
`
`2. Failure of Petitioner to meet its burden of proving obviousness of
`
`claims 1, 4-7, 9–12, 14–19, 21, and 23–25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in
`
`view of Igarashi and Woerlee;
`
`1
`
`

`

`3. Failure of Petitioner to meet its burden of proving obviousness of
`
`claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of Igarashi, Woerlee, and
`
`Hokazono;
`
`4. Exclusion of Petitioner’s improper new arguments in its Reply as
`
`identified in Paper No. 27;
`
`a. Petitioner’s improper new theory that it would have been
`
`obvious to modify Igarashi’s Fifth Embodiment to add isolation
`
`regions in view of Igarashi’s disclosure of isolation regions in
`
`its First Embodiment.
`
`b. Petitioner’s improper new theory that it would have been
`
`obvious to modify Igarashi’s Fifth Embodiment to add isolation
`
`regions in view of Woerlee.
`
`c. Petitioner’s improper new argument that transistors without
`
`isolation region share an active region.
`
`d. Petitioner’s improper new argument that the entire area between
`
`the two STI in Petitioner’s modified Igarashi Figure 12 meets
`
`the claimed active region.
`
`5. Petitioner’s improper new argument that the area between the two STI
`
`in Petitioner’s modified Igarashi Figure 12 includes multiple active
`
`regions.
`
`2
`
`

`

`6. Exclusion of Exhibit 1026, paragraph 18 of Exhibit 1027, and certain
`
`portions of the July 25th deposition transcript of Petitioner’s expert
`
`(Ex. 2026) as set forth in Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude
`
`Evidence;
`
`7. Any issues specified by Petitioner in its request for Oral Argument;
`
`8. Any motions or issues that remain pending at the time of the hearing;
`
`9. Any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`decision.
`
`Dated: August 9, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`
`By /Joshua J. Miller/
`Gerald B. Hrycyszyn, Reg. No. 50,474
`Richard F. Giunta, Reg. No. 36,149
`Edmund J. Walsh, Reg. No. 32,950
`Joshua J. Miller (admitted pro hac vice)
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Ave.
`Boston, MA 02210-2206
`Tel: 617-646-8000/Fax: 617-646-8646
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.6 (e)(4)
`
`I certify that on August 9, 2018 I will cause a copy of the foregoing
`
`document, including any exhibits referred to therein, to be served via electronic
`
`mail, as previously consented to by Petitioner, upon the following:
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`
`David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`
`Dominic E. Massa
`
`Dominic.Massa@wilmerhale.com
`
`Michael H. Smith
`
`MichaelH.Smith@wilmerhale.com
`
`Date: August 9, 2018
`
`/MacAulay Rush/
`MacAulay Rush
`Patent Paralegal
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket