throbber
Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`UNILOC USA, INC. and
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`UBISOFT, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`












`
`Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-781
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs, Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (together “Uniloc”), as and
`
`for their complaint against defendant, Ubisoft, Inc. (“Ubisoft”), allege as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Uniloc USA, Inc. (“Uniloc USA”) is a Texas corporation having a principal place
`
`of business at Legacy Town Center I, Suite 380, 7160 Dallas Parkway, Plano Texas 75024.
`
`Uniloc also maintains a place of business at 102 N. College, Suite 603, Tyler, Texas 75702.
`
`2.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. (“Uniloc Luxembourg”) is a Luxembourg public limited
`
`liability company having a principal place of business at 15, Rue Edward Steichen, 4th Floor, L-
`
`2540, Luxembourg (R.C.S. Luxembourg B159161).
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Ubisoft is a California corporation having a
`
`principal place of business in San Francisco, California and offering its products, including those
`
`accused herein of infringement, to customers and/or potential customers located in Texas and in
`
`the judicial Eastern District of Texas. Ubisoft may be served with process through its registered
`
`agent: Stephen Smith, 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067.
`
`06096768
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 2
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`4.
`
`Uniloc brings this action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) and 1367.
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and
`
`1400(b). Upon information and belief, Ubisoft is deemed to reside in this judicial district, has
`
`committed acts of infringement in this judicial district, and/or has purposely transacted business
`
`involving the accused products in this judicial district, including sales to one or more customers
`
`in Texas.
`
`6.
`
`Ubisoft is subject to this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the
`
`Texas Long Arm Statute due at least to its substantial business in this State and judicial district,
`
`including: (A) at least part of its past infringing activities, (B) regularly doing or soliciting
`
`business in Texas and/or (C) engaging in persistent conduct and/or deriving substantial revenue
`
`from goods and services provided to customers in Texas.
`
`COUNT I
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,489,974)
`
`Uniloc incorporates paragraphs 1-6 above by reference.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg is the owner, by assignment, of U.S. Patent No. 6,489,974
`
`
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`(“the ’974 Patent”), entitled BUOY ICON NOTIFICATION OF OBJECT INTERFACE
`
`ACCESSIBILITY IN MULTITASKING COMPUTER ENVIRONMENT that issued on
`
`December 3, 2002. A true and correct copy of the ’974 Patent is attached as Exhibit A hereto.
`
`9.
`
`Uniloc USA is the exclusive licensee of the ’974 Patent with ownership of all
`
`substantial rights therein, including the right to grant sublicenses, to exclude others, and to
`
`enforce, sue and recover past damages for the infringement thereof.
`

`
`2
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 3
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`

`
`3
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 4
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`

`
`4
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`

`
`5
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`15. Ubisoft has directly infringed, and continues to directly infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’974 Patent in this judicial district and elsewhere in Texas, including at least
`
`Claims 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 13, 15 and 19 literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by or
`
`through making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling its Uplay software platform
`
`during the pendency of the ’974 Patent, which software platform inter alia practices a method,
`
`and is a system, implemented on a multitasking computer that comprises first and second
`
`objects, providing notification of a status of said first object on said computer, comprising the
`
`steps of and/or a means for: providing a representation of the first object on a user interface of
`
`the computer, with the representation supporting user interaction with the first object; executing
`
`the first object; while the first object is executing, enabling the second object to support user
`
`interaction with the second object; while the second object is enabled to support user
`
`interaction, determining when the first object ceases executing; and providing a notification on
`
`the user interface when the first object ceases executing by suddenly displaying a notification
`
`icon on the user interface while maintaining the representation of the first object, said
`
`notification being in a location that is separate from the representation of the first object.
`
`16.
`
`In addition, should Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform be found to not literally
`
`infringe the asserted claims of the ‘974 Patent, Ubisoft’s accused system would nevertheless
`
`infringe the asserted claims of the ’974 Patent. More specifically, the accused Uplay software
`
`platform performs substantially the same function (providing notification of an idle status of an
`
`executing object on a multitasking computer), in substantially the same way (by suddenly
`

`
`6
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 7
`
`displaying a notification in a location separate from the representation of the first object), to
`
`yield substantially the same result (alerting the user that a first object is now accessible while a
`
`second object is enabled to support user interaction). Ubisoft would thus be liable for direct
`
`infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`17.
`
`Ubisoft may have infringed the ’974 Patent through other software utilizing the
`
`same or reasonably similar functionality, including other versions of its Uplay software platform.
`
`Uniloc reserves the right to discover and pursue all such additional infringing software.
`
`18.
`
`Uniloc has been damaged, reparably and irreparably, by Ubisoft’s infringement of
`
`the ’974 Patent and such damage will continue unless and until Ubisoft is enjoined.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Uniloc requests that the Court enter judgment against Ubisoft as follows:
`
`(A)
`
`(B)
`
`that Ubisoft has infringed the ’974 Patent;
`
`awarding Uniloc its damages suffered as a result of Ubisoft’s infringement of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘974 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`
`
`(C)
`
`enjoining Ubisoft, its officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees,
`
`divisions, branches, subsidiaries and parents, and all others acting in concert or privity with it
`
`from infringing the ’974 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283;
`
`
`
`
`
`(D)
`
`(E)
`
`proper.
`
`
`

`
`awarding Uniloc its costs, attorneys’ fees, expenses and interest, and
`
`granting Uniloc such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and
`
`
`
`7
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 7
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 8
`
`
`
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Uniloc hereby demands trial by jury on all issues so triable pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38.
`
`
`Dated: _July 15, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Craig Tadlock
`Craig Tadlock
`Texas State Bar No. 00791766
`Keith Smiley
`Texas State Bar No. 24067869
`TADLOCK LAW FIRM PLLC
`2701 Dallas Parkway, Suite 360
`Plano, TX 75093
`Tel: (903) 730-6789
`Email: craig@tadlocklawfirm.com
`Email: keith@tadlocklawfirm.com
`
`Paul J. Hayes
`Kevin Gannon
`CESARI AND MCKENNA, LLP
`88 Black Falcon Ave
`Suite 271
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 951-2500
`Facsimile: (617) 951-3927
`Email: pjh@c-m.com
`Email: ktg@c-m.com
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR THE PLAINTIFFS
`
`8
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket