throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 30
`Entered: August 10, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ANDRX CORPORATION,
`ANDRX LABORATORIES, INC.
`ANDRX LABORATORIES (NJ), INC.
`ANDRX EU LTD.
`ANDRX PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
`Patent Owner(s).
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01648
`Patent 6,866,866 B1
`____________
`
`
`Before SUSAN L.C. MITCHELL, TINA E. HULSE, and
`DEVON ZASTROW NEWMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`NEWMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01648
`Patent 6,866,866 B1
`
`
`
`The Scheduling Order for this proceeding provided that an oral
`
`hearing would be conducted if the hearing is requested by the parties and
`
`granted by the Board. Paper 15. Patent Owner and Petitioner each
`
`requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 28, 29. The
`
`requests are granted.
`
`Each party will have forty-five (45) minutes of total time to present
`
`argument. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s
`
`claims at issue are unpatentable. Thus, Petitioner will open the hearing by
`
`presenting its case regarding the challenged claims for which we instituted
`
`trial. Petitioner may reserve some, but not more than one-half, of its
`
`argument time for rebuttal. Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to
`
`Petitioner’s presentation.
`
`The hearing will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on Monday,
`
`September 24, 2018, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600
`
`Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. The oral argument will be open
`
`to the public for in-person attendance, which will be accommodated on a
`
`first-come, first-served basis.1 The Board will provide a court reporter for
`
`the hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of
`
`the hearing and will be entered in the record.
`
`Furthermore, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must
`
`be served at least seven (7) business days before the hearing date. The
`
`parties also shall provide the demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least two
`
`
`
`1 The oral hearing is currently scheduled to occur in Hearing Room D, which
`has few publicly available spaces. The daily schedule will reflect any
`changes in location.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01648
`Patent 6,866,866 B1
`
`business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`Despite the requirement in § 42.70(b) for parties to file demonstratives, the
`
`parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in this case without prior
`
`authorization from the Board. A hard copy of the demonstratives should be
`
`provided to the panel and court reporter at the hearing.
`
`
`
`The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc.
`
`v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041
`
`(PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), regarding the appropriate content of
`
`demonstrative exhibits. The Board expects that the parties will meet and
`
`confer in good faith to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits, but
`
`if such objections cannot be resolved, the parties may file any objections to
`
`demonstratives with the Board at least two business days before the hearing.
`
`The objections should identify with particularity which portions of the
`
`demonstrative exhibits are subject to objection and include a one-sentence
`
`statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider any objections and
`
`schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`
`reserve ruling on the objections. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits
`
`that is not timely presented will be considered waived.
`
`The parties are advised that at least one member of the panel will be
`
`attending the hearing from a remote location. The parties are reminded that
`
`the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative
`
`exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the hearing to
`
`avoid confusion and ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s
`
`transcript and the ability of the judge(s) participating remotely to follow the
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01648
`Patent 6,866,866 B1
`
`presenter’s arguments. The parties should note that the remote judge(s) will
`
`not be able to see what is projected on the screen in the hearing room.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`
`argument. If either party expects that its lead counsel will not be attending
`
`the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference
`
`with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to
`
`discuss the matter.
`
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`
`directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. The Board acknowledges the
`
`parties’ requests for audio-visual equipment at the hearing, and instructs that
`
`the parties additionally notify Trials@uspto.gov of the requests five (5) days
`
`in advance of the hearing date. Any requests not sent specifically to that
`
`email address will not be considered timely. If the request is not received
`
`timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01648
`Patent 6,866,866 B1
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Steven J. Moore
`John Winterle
`Hans Peter Hoffmann
`Alan Gardner
`WITHERS BERGMAN LLP
`steven.moore@withersworldwide.com
`john.winterle@withersworldwide.com
`peter.hoffmann@withersworldwide.com
`alan.gardner@withersworldwide.com
`IPG-AUR@withersworldwide.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Jonathan Ben-Ur Roses
`WILMER HALE
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`jonathan.roses@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket