throbber
C Taylor Francis
`
`Frarx Group
`
`Taylor
`
`Drying
`lichnblogy
`
`Drying Technology
`
`ISSN 07373937 Print 15322300 Online Journal homepage httpwwwtandfonlinecomloildrt20
`
`Preparation and Dissolution Profiles of the
`Amorphous Dihydrated Crystalline and
`Anhydrous Crystalline Forms of Paclitaxel
`
`SangHyun Pyo JinSuk Cho HoJoon Choi
`
`ByungHee Han
`
`To cite this article SangHyun Pyo JinSuk Cho HoJoon Choi
`ByungHee Han
`2007 Preparation and Dissolution Profiles of the Amorphous Dihydrated Crystalline and
`Anhydrous Crystalline Forms of Paclitaxel Drying Technology 2510 17591767 DOI
`10108007373930701593180
`
`To link to this article httpdxdoiorg10108007373930701593180
`
`I
`
`I
`
`MEN
`
`Published online 10 Dec 2007
`
`Submit your article to this journal 2
`
`11111 Article views 109
`
`View related articles 2
`
`Qj Citing articles 6 View citing articles C
`
`Full Terms Conditions of access and use can be found at
`
`httpwwwtandfonlinecomactionjournalInformationjournalCode=ldrt20
`
`Download by American Red Cross Mr Barbara Burke
`
`Date 23 May 2017 At 0837
`
`Abraxis EX2056
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`0 Taylor
`
`Francis
`
`Taylor Francis Group
`
`Drying Technology 25 1759
`1767 2007
`Copyright © 2007 Taylor
`Francis Group LLC
`ISSN 07373937 print15322300 online
`DOT 1010SO07373930701593180
`
`Preparation and Dissolution Profiles of the Amorphous
`Dihydrated Crystalline and Anhydrous Crystalline Forms
`of Paclitaxel
`
`SangHyun Pyo12 JinSuk Cho1 HoJoon Choi1 and ByungHee Han2
`Bio Research Center YusungGu Daejeon South Korea
`1Samyang Genex Food
`2
`Department of Chemistry Chungnam National University YusungGu Daejeon South Korea
`
`The
`
`selection of pharmaceutical polymorphisms in the final
`in terms of product
`production step is very important
`recovery
`and storage The amorphous dihydrated crystalline
`properties
`and anhydrous
`crystalline forms of paclitaxel were prepared
`using
`spray drying and colloid formation methods These
`precipitation
`methods were found to be highly efficient and convenient giving
`time and good stability as com
`high recovery short processing
`pared with conventional methods such as freeze drying evaporation
`recrystallization and melting The polymorphic natures of
`the
`resulting paclitaxel samples were confirmed by XRPD IR TGA
`DSC and SEM The dissolution rates of the paclitaxel
`samples
`were studied in pharmaceutical solvents which included cotton seed
`tricaprylin and tributyrin For each solvent all of the
`oil corn oil
`amorphous paclitaxel samples showed much higher dissolution rates
`than the dihydrated crystalline anhydrous crystalline and commer
`forms and can be used for clinical applications that demand
`cial
`improvements in drug delivery
`
`Keywords
`
`Amorphous paclitaxel Anhydrous crystalline paclitaxel
`Dissolution
`rate
`Dihydrated
`Morphology
`
`crystalline paclitaxel
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Paclitaxel which is
`that was isolated
`a diterpenoid
`originally from the bark of Taxus brevifolia11 is one of
`agents this is due to its
`the most
`important anticancer
`unique cytotoxicity mechanism that involves the promotion
`of the assembly of tubulin and stabilization of the resulting
`microtubules241Paclitaxel
`is produced commercially by a
`iso
`semisynthetic method using 10deacetylbaccatin III
`lated from the leaves of yew trees and also by a plant cell
`culture method The selection in the final production step
`of polymorphic products such as the amorphous anhydrous
`crystalline and hydrated crystalline forms of paclitaxel
`very important with regard to product recovery properties
`
`is
`
`Correspondence Sang Hyun Pyo Department of Chemistry
`Chungnam National University 220 Gung Dong Yusung Gu
`Daejeon 305 764 South Korea E mail shpyocnuackr
`
`usage and storage and needs to be controlled with a view to
`the intended application Generally the amorphous form
`has the advantage of better solubility in pharmaceutical
`solvents while the crystalline form is more stable under
`storage conditions However
`little information is available
`on the optimal preparation methods Amorphous paclitaxel
`can be dissolved in pharmaceutical solvents
`to increase its
`clinical efficacy Paclitaxel which is a lipophilic anticancer
`drug has extremely low solubility in aqueous
`and most
`pharmaceutical solvents51 In previous attempts to increase
`solubility paclitaxel has been formulated in a vehicle com
`posed of a 5050 blend of Cremophor EL CrEL and absol
`ute ethanol and subsequently diluted with normal saline or
`
`dextrose solution 5 before administration61 However
`
`serious side effects such as hypersensitivity neurotoxicity
`nephrotoxicity and extraction of plasticizers from intra
`venous infusion line catheters have been noted for this for
`mulation781 Thus alternative
`delivery systems which
`and microspheres have
`involve liposomes cyclodextrins
`been examined to increase
`the solubility of
`lipophilic
`drugs9111 Particle formation methods in the final pro
`duction step are very important
`in determining the final
`product specifications and properties12131 On the other
`hand amorphous paclitaxel can be used to increase the
`solvents How
`solubility of paclitaxel
`in pharmaceutical
`there is little information available on the methods
`ever
`of preparation and the properties of amorphous paclitaxel
`In previous reports amorphous paclitaxel was prepared by
`heating it up to the melting temperature of 221°C followed
`involve evaporation
`by quench cooling5141 Protocols that
`and recrystallization
`low
`produce large size particles at
`yield151 In the patented invention of Janicki et al161
`amorphous paclitaxel possibly with crystalline additive
`was prepared by freeze drying at 50°C a system that
`requires a very low temperature and a long processing time
`The anhydrous crystalline and dihydrated crystalline
`forms of paclitaxel have better storage properties than the
`
`1759
`
`

`

`1760
`
`PYO ET AL
`
`amorphous form According to the US patent of Sharma
`et al171 hydrated paclitaxel and docetaxel which is
`a
`agent can be obtained with a
`paclitaxelderived anticancer
`yield of 84 by dissolving and stirring in acetonitrile at
`60°C followed by the addition of water and crystallization
`Unfortunately these methods use very harsh conditions
`that can result in product degradation in addition they are
`unsuitable for largescale production and they give low
`yields in the final purification step Therefore
`is
`largescale methods for the pro
`necessary to develop novel
`in the amorphous form as well as in
`duction of paclitaxel
`the dihydrate crystalline and anhydrous crystalline forms
`In the current study we describe
`various methods for
`obtaining paclitaxel of desired morphology and solubility
`These methods which involve spray drying precipitation
`and colloid formation are remarkably efficient and con
`as compared with the conventional methods
`venient
`described above We expect
`that
`improvements in dissol
`ution rates achieved using amorphous fine particles of
`as well as new methods for the production of
`paclitaxel
`the crystalline form of paclitaxel will
`facilitate largescale
`
`it
`
`production of this drug for clinical applications
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`Cells of Taxus chinensis were cultured in suspension
`Paclitaxel >995 purity was purified from the cultured
`cell using solvent extraction precipitation ODSHPLC
`and silicaHPLC as described previously Tributyrin
`tricaprylin corn oil and cotton seed oil were purchased
`from Sigma Chemical Co St Louis MO Highperformance
`liquid chromatography HPLCgrade solvents and water
`were used to prepare paclitaxel
`specimens with various
`morphologies for dilution and HPLC analysis
`
`Methods
`
`Chromatography Analysis
`Quantitative analyses of solubility were performed using
`a HPLC system HP1090 HewlettPackard Palo Alto
`CA together with a Curosil PFP column Phenomenex
`46 mm x 250 mm dp = 5 jam Elution was performed
`within 30 min with water and acetonitrile using a gradient
`from 6535 to 3565 flow rate = 10 mLmin The eluent
`at 227 nm with a photo diode array
`was monitored
`detector The content of residual solvent was analyzed in
`a GC system HP 5890 HewlettPackard using a Supelco
`fused silica capillary column 30 m x 053mm x 50 jam film
`thickness SigmaAldrich St Louis MO
`
`Spectrometry
`
`Xray powder diffraction XRPD was performed with a
`Model DMax3B diffractometer Rigaku Tokyo Japan in
`the 5 to 40° 20 range at a rate of 2° 20min using CuKa radi
`ation 45 kV 40 mA as the Xray source The appearance
`
`and size of the products were analyzed by scanning electron
`microscopy SEM JSM6635F Jeol Tokyo Japan
`Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy FTIR was per
`formed with a model FTS165
`spectrometer Digilab
`Division BioRad Cambridge MA using the potassium
`bromide KBr pellet technique
`
`Thermal Analysis
`Thermograms were generated with a differential
`scan
`ning calorimeter DSC DSC7 Perkin Elmer Wellesley
`MA which was calibrated with indium Approximately
`5 mg of each sample was placed on the aluminum pan
`The
`cell was purged with nitrogen at
`a flow rate of
`40 mLmin All measurements were carried out
`in the
`range of 25 300°C with a scan rate of 20°Cmin Thermo
`gravimetric analysis TGA was performed with the TGA7
`system Perkin Elmer Norwalk CT Approximately 5 mg
`and heated to 700°C at a rate
`of each sample was weighed
`of 20°Cmin under a nitrogen purge
`
`Preparation of the Amorphous Dihydrated Crystalline and
`Anhydrous Crystalline Forms of Paclitaxel
`The amorphous dihydrated crystalline and anhydrous
`crystalline forms of paclitaxel were prepared by evapor
`ation precipitation colloid formation or spray drying
`The first method was carried out using a rotary evaporator
`Rotavapor R124 Biichi Flawil Switzerland in a water
`bath at 35°C Paclitaxel was dissolved at a concentration
`
`acetone or ethyl acetate
`of 10°A in dichloromethane
`reduced
`pressure The
`under
`followed
`by evaporation
`that coated the surface of the evaporation flask
`
`paclitaxel
`
`was recovered and crushed Table 1 samples A J and K
`
`The second method of preparation used precipitation
`with two types of solvent Paclitaxel was dissolved at a con
`centration of 10°A in a solvent such as dichloromethane
`tetrahydrofuran THF or acetone and the solution was
`added slowly to a precipitation solvent such as nhexane
`n pentane or water at a 10 to 15 fold ratio to obtain
`the precipitate which was filtered Table 1 samples B C
`D E G H and L
`
`The
`third method of preparation
`involved
`colloid
`formation Paclitaxel was dissolved in acetone and evapo
`rated under reduced pressure to remove residual solvents
`The colloidal solution was formed by adding acetone at a
`ratio of 100 wv while rotating the evaporation bowl
`
`Paclitaxel was dispersed but not dissolved and the white
`using the same method Fine parti
`solution was evaporated
`cles were easily recovered from the evaporation bowl without
`the coating problem in the first method Table 1 sample I
`fourth method involved spray drying Table 1
`The
`sample F201 Paclitaxel was dissolved at a concentration
`of 10 in dichloromethane and loaded onto a mini spray
`dryer B191 Bfichi Flawil Switzerland which was
`temperature Table 1 sample F
`to 75°C inlet
`heated
`The spray drying was carried out at
`
`the liquid feed rate
`
`

`

`Sample
`A
`
`A
`DCM
`DCM
`DCM
`THF
`THF
`DCM
`
`Hexane
`
`Pentane
`
`Hexane
`
`Pentane
`
`THF
`
`Water
`
`Acetone
`
`Water
`
`Acetone
`
`Acetone
`
`EA
`
`Evaporation
`
`Precipitationb
`
`Precipitationb
`
`Precipitationb
`
`Precipitationb
`
`Spray dryd
`
`Precipitationb
`
`Precipitationb
`
`Colloid formation
`
`Evaporation
`
`Evaporation
`
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Dihydrate
`
`crystalline
`
`Dihydrate
`
`crystalline
`
`Anhydrous
`
`crystalline
`
`Anhydrous
`
`crystalline
`
`Anhydrous
`
`crystalline
`
`Anhydrous
`
`4109
`222
`345
`610
`112
`415
`
`4151
`
`116
`
`117
`
`3774
`
`24376
`
`1083
`
`145
`
`543
`570
`
`1317
`
`MORPHOLOGIES AND DISSOLUTION PROFILES OF PACLITAXEL
`
`1761
`
`Solvent condition
`
`TABLE 1
`Comparison of conditions for the preparation of the various morphologies of paclitaxel
`Residual solvent ppm
`Solvent A
`
`Bf
`
`Preparation method
`
`Morphology
`
`Solvent B
`
`Precipitationb
`
`Acetone
`Pentane
`After dissolving in solvent A the solution was evaporated
`bAfter dissolving in solvent A the solution was added to solvent B to obtain the precipitate which was filtered
`After formation of the colloid in solvent A the solution was evaporated
`dAfter dissolving in solvent A the solution was loaded onto a spray dryer
`Solvent A is the dissolving solvent DCM dichloromethane THF tetrahydrofuran EA ethylacetate
`Solvent B is the precipitation solvent
`
`crystalline
`
`<100
`
`of 10 mLmin drying aspiration flow rate of 25 m3h and
`nitrogen spray flow rate of 600 m3h To
`compressed
`remove residual solvents the paclitaxel samples obtained
`using the four different methods were dried in a vacuum
`dryer for 3 days at 40°C
`
`that
`
`described
`
`Determination of Dissolution Rates
`The method used for studying the dissolution rates of
`a modified version of
`paclitaxel was
`from each preparation
`samples
`previously1°1 Paclitaxel
`protocol were added to the selected pharmaceutical sol
`the solution for 2 mm
`vents followed by vortexing of
`solution was centrifuged at 10000 x g for 10 min
`The
`and diluted in meth
`and the supernatant was withdrawn
`for the HPLC analysis of paclitaxel
`anol or npropanol
`solubility The dissolution rate profile of paclitaxel
`in cot
`ton seed oil was obtained by analysis of samples that were
`shaken at 150 rpm for 48h at 20°C
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Preparation and Residual Solvent
`Paclitaxel of >995 purity which was obtained from
`and subjected
`cell cultures81
`to purification as
`
`plant
`
`described previously was used in all
`the experiments
`the different methods of paclitaxel
`The comparisons of
`preparation are summarized in Table 1 The properties of
`these samples were analyzed and confirmed by XRPD
`thermal analysis FTIR SEM and solubility testing Sam
`ples of the various paclitaxel morphologies were obtained
`by the application of various solvents and methods Under
`conditions that used the same solvent
`the physicochemical
`properties which include particle size appearance and
`amount of residual solvent differed In the case of dichlor
`omethane amorphous paclitaxel was obtained using every
`protocol The dihydrated crystalline form of paclitaxel was
`obtained by precipitation in water after dissolving in either
`acetone or THF followed by filtration Anhydrous crystal
`line paclitaxel was also obtained by these methods using
`other solvents such as acetone and ethylacetate
`The recovery of paclitaxel by evaporation under reduced
`pressure is much more difficult
`than recovery by the pre
`cipitation method due to sample coating of
`the surface
`of the flask However paclitaxel
`recovery in the precipi
`tation method was easily achieved by simple filtration In
`addition the anhydrous paclitaxel obtained by colloid for
`mation was of small particle size and had lower residual
`solvent content after vacuum drying Unlike the other
`
`

`

`1762
`
`PYO ET AL
`
`solvents the acetone formed colloidal
`solution of pacli
`taxel was evenly dispersed at a paclitaxel concentration of
`
`100 wv and the colloid form of highly concentrated
`paclitaxel >11 wv was evenly dispersed The resulting
`colloidal paclitaxel was easily recovered
`by evaporation
`reduced
`pressure without product coating of
`under
`the
`surface of the flask
`
`levels of
`
`The
`solvents were analyzed after
`vacuum drying for 3 days Table 1 Paclitaxel for clinical
`use should be dried to minimize the amount of residual
`
`residual
`
`solvent
`
`in accordance with the International Conference
`on Harmonization ICH guideline Q3C titled Impuri
`ties Residual Solvents Which Depend
`on Solvents
`Thus the effective
`removal of
`is an
`residual
`solvents
`
`be
`
`readily
`
`In samples A J and K
`factor
`important processing
`which were prepared by the conventional method there
`were high levels of residual solvents although these levels
`in the ICH
`than the recommended levels
`were lower
`guideline Samples B C D E G H and L which were
`obtained by the precipitation method tended to have low
`levels with the exception of sample G
`residual solvent
`Sample F which was
`by the
`spray drying
`obtained
`method and sample I which was obtained by colloid for
`mation showed low levels of residual solvents In general
`crystalline form contains 447 ± 072
`the dihydrated
`ww moisture which can
`removed by
`
`it
`
`the product
`
`simple vacuum drying
`Using the different preparation methods precipitation
`spray drying and
`colloid formation the amorphous
`anhydrous crystalline and dihydrated crystalline form of
`paclitaxel were obtained with high yields short processing
`times good reproducibility and high efficacy In previous
`studies5141 amorphous paclitaxel was prepared by heating
`to the melting temperature of 221°C followed by quench
`cooling as well as by freeze drying at 50°C Melting at
`221°C constitutes a harsh treatment
`that may lead to pro
`and freeze drying involves subjecting
`duct decomposition
`to 50°C for long periods of time
`and
`the crystalline forms of paclitaxel
`In general
`docetaxel have been prepared by dissolving at 40 60°C in
`a solvent such as methanol ethanol acetone or acetoni
`followed by recrystallization
`days
`for
`several
`at
`trile
`0 4°C172122 In these methods paclitaxel becomes oversa
`turated when subjected to high temperature and stirring for
`1 h ie the conditions necessary for high yields after crys
`tallization However
`is unstable especially in
`paclitaxel
`solutions of methanol ethanol and acetonitrile
`as well
`solutions91 Paclitaxel may be
`as in non neutral aqueous
`and epimerized under
`these conditions which
`degraded
`involve dissolving heating and stirring at 60°C for at least
`1 h In reality paclitaxel
`is rapidly degraded and epimerized
`and
`such as 10deacetylpaclitaxel
`to various compounds
`in methanol and acetonitrile solutions at
`7epipaclitaxel
`50°C data not shown Therefore these methods are not
`
`low yields
`suitable for
`production
`largescale
`give
`have poor
`longterm storage and can generate degraded
`paclitaxel due to the high temperatures used It
`to produce paclitaxel of >995 purity using
`difficult
`these methods which have been claimed as unique and
`useful technologies172122
`Thus the methods of spray drying precipitation and
`colloid formation are remarkably efficient and convenient
`when compared with conventional methods
`techniques
`such as evaporation recrystallization and melting
`
`is very
`
`in
`
`X Ray Powder Diffraction Thermal Analysis
`and FTIR Analysis
`All of the sample morphologies were confirmed by the
`XRPD technique
`are shown
`representative spectra
`Fig 1 The XRPD patterns of the amorphous and crystal
`line forms were significantly different The pattern of the
`amorphous form showed a broad line while many sharp
`peaks were noted for the dihydrate and anhydrous crystal
`line forms Taking into consideration the previous study51
`between
`and
`the
`differences
`in
`patterns
`dihydrate
`anhydrous paclitaxel can be easily confirmed by comparing
`the peak intensities eg 61 95 132 138° 20
`The DSC data for all of
`the samples were obtained
`between 25 and 250°C Fig 2 The DSC thermograms of
`the amorphous dihydrated crystalline and anhydrous crys
`talline forms were significantly different These results are in
`accordance with those of the previous study51 There was
`no significant single melting endotherm around 223°C as seen
`the anhydrous crystalline form and there were no
`for
`significant peaks at 70 140°C as noted for the dihydrate
`
`500
`
`1000
`
`2000
`
`020
`
`3000
`
`FIG 1 XRPD analysis of paclitaxel morphologies Representative
`spectra are shown for amorphous
`
`paclitaxel B dihydrated crystalline
`paclitaxel H anhydrous crystalline paclitaxel I and mixed crystalline
`paclitaxel N
`
`

`

`MORPHOLOGIES AND DISSOLUTION PROFILES OF PACLITAXEL
`
`1763
`
`3656 C
`are
`
`8878 C
`
`5144
`156408
`
`15550 C 00
`
`15E57 t
`
`15867
`
`151169 C
`
`789769V18810 C
`
`191150 C
`
`11405
`
`22330
`
`210137
`
`22028 t
`
`Temperabre t
`paclitaxel H anhydrous crystalline paclitaxel I and mixed crystalline paclitaxel N
`
`1bo
`
`163
`
`FIG 2 DSC analysis of paclitaxel morphologies Representative thermograms
`
`are shown for amorphous
`
`paclitaxel B dihydrated
`
`crystalline
`
`crystalline form Weight
`loss due to water evaporation was
`<10 for the amorphous and anhydrous crystalline forms
`according to the nonstructural water used in the TGA analy
`sis On the other hand weight loss for the dihydrated crystal
`line form was around 45 while the theoretical water
`is 405 Sample N which
`content of dihydrated paclitaxel
`a mixture of the dihydrated crystalline form and
`contained
`anhydrous crystalline form Figs 1 and 2 showed a weight
`loss of 24 These weight
`losses of samples were good
`agreement with theoretical water content
`respectively
`FTIR analysis was also used to distinguish the different
`morphologies Fig 3 In particular the peak pattern in the
`1700 cm 1
`range gave distinctive results for the different
`morphologies The peak patterns for the amorphous dihy
`drated crystalline anhydrous crystalline and commercial
`Sigma forms were broad singlet slightly doublet doublet
`and
`were
`confirmed
`whose morphologies
`doublet
`
`respectively
`
`Appearance and Size
`All of the samples were analyzed for shape appearance
`and size using SEM Figs 4 and 5 The particle sizes
`
`conventional method
`by
`samples
`of
`obtained
`the
`were >30 lam after crushing and these were hard particles
`
`4000
`
`3500
`
`3000
`
`2500
`
`2000
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`Wavenumber cm
`
`FIG 3 FT IR analysis of paclitaxel morphologies Representative spec
`
`tra are shown for amorphous paclitaxel B dihydrated crystalline pacli
`taxel H anhydrous crystalline paclitaxel I and anhydrous crystalline
`paclitaxel M
`
`

`

`1 764
`
`PYO ET AL
`
`SEI
`
`50W
`
`X800
`
`lflum WO 15 Omm
`
`after dissolving in dichloromethane A precipitation in
`FIG 4 Scanning electron micrographs of amorphous paclitaxel obtained by evaporation
`hexane after dissolving in dichloromethane B precipitation in pentane after dissolving in dichloromethane C precipitation
`ing in tetrahydrofuran D precipitation
`in pentane after dissolving in dichloromethane E spray drying after dissolving in dichloromethane F
`
`in hexane after dissolv
`
`Fig 4 A and Fig 5 J and K Clusters of fine amorphous
`particles were obtained by precipitation Fig 4 B C D
`and E Particles in the shape of broken empty spheres were
`obtained by spray drying Fig 4 F Meanwhile clusters of
`
`fine dihydrate or anhydrous
`
`crystalline particles were
`or colloid formation
`
`obtained either by precipitation
`
`Fig 5 G H I and L For example sample I obtained
`and sample L
`formation using acetone
`using acetone and npentane
`obtained by precipitation
`showed
`regular needle shapes and regular plate shapes
`
`by colloid
`
`respectively Fig 5 I and L
`
`Dissolution Rates of the Amorphous Dihydrated
`Crystalline and Anhydrous Crystalline Forms of Paclitaxel
`The dissolution
`rates in cotton seed oil corn oil
`tricprylin and tributyrin were compared under conditions
`of vortexing with the temperature set at 20°C for 2 min
`
`The dissolution rates of the amorphous dihydrated crystal
`line and anhydrous crystalline forms of paclitaxel prepared
`by the different methods are summarized in Table 2 All of
`samplesFalseTable 2 A F
`the amorphous paclitaxel
`showed higher dissolution rates than the dihydrated and
`anhydrous crystalline forms for all of the applied solvents
`the solubility of the
`For example in cotton seed oil
`amorphous sample F was 43 fold or 130 fold higher than
`that of the crystalline sample I or M respectively The
`dissolution rate of the amorphous sample A obtained by
`vacuum evaporation was lower than those of the amorph
`ous samples B F obtained by either precipitation or spray
`drying under all conditions This tendency which may
`be due to the large particle size and hardness of sample A
`Fig 4 A also held true for corn oil
`tricaprylin and
`tributyrin Meanwhile the dissolution rates of dihydrated
`crystalline samples 0 and H were lower
`than those of
`
`

`

`MORPHOLOGIES AND DISSOLUTION PROFILES OF PACLITAXEL
`
`1765
`
`precipitation
`
`Scanning electron micrographs of dihydrated crystalline paclitaxel obtained by precipitation in water after dissolving in tetrahydrofuran G
`FIG 5
`in water after dissolving in acetone H Scanning electron micrographs of anhydrous crystalline paclitaxel obtained by colloid formation
`after dissolving in ethylacetate K
`in acetone followed by simple evaporation I evaporation
`after dissolving in dichloromethane J evaporation
`in pentane after dissolving in actone L
`
`precipitation
`
`in tributyrin and were higher
`the amorphous forms except
`I and
`than those of the anhydrous crystalline samples
`L Anhydrous crystalline sample I with a regular needle
`shape and sample L with a regular plate shape showed
`J and K which
`lower dissolution
`rates
`than samples
`were obtained by evaporation under reduced pressure The
`crystalline form of paclitaxel which has a unique structure
`and appearance may cause the solubility to decrease As we
`the paclitaxel samples purchased from Sigma and
`expected
`Hauser which have large crystalline structures had the
`
`lowest dissolution rates Table 2 samples M and N
`
`Dissolution Profiles of the Amorphous Dihydrated
`Crystalline and Anhydrous Crystalline Forms of Paclitaxel
`The dissolution profiles of the amorphous dihydrated
`crystalline and anhydrous crystalline forms of paclitaxel
`in cotton seed oil are shown in Figs 6 and 7 The dissolution
`
`profiles of the amorphous samples were similar to each
`other However
`the dihydrated and anhydrous crystalline
`samples had very low dissolution rates with the exception
`of samples J and K which were prepared by evaporation
`Although samples J and K were crystalline forms of pacli
`they showed higher dissolution rates because they
`taxel
`resembled sample A with respect
`to surface properties
`and appearance which was also prepared by evaporation
`Figs 4 and 5 Since these samples had no regular crystal
`structures and a hard appearance the dissolution rates were
`expected to be similar The dissolution rates of sample F
`were the fastest while those of sample I and the commercial
`samples M and N were the lowest
`Crystalline structure is an important factor
`ution rate as well as for particle size Although paclitaxel
`that was formulated in a vehicle composed of a 5050 blend
`of Cremophor EL and ethanol showed promising clinical
`
`for dissol
`
`

`

`1766
`
`PYO ET AL
`
`TABLE 2
`Comparison of dissolution rates for the various forms of paclitaxel
`Solubility mgmL
`
`Solvent
`
`Morphology
`
`Preparation method
`
`Cotton seed oil
`
`Corn oil
`
`Tricaprylin
`
`Tributyrin
`
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Amorphous
`Dihydrated
`
`Dihydrated
`
`Anhydrous
`
`Anhydrous
`
`Anhydrous
`
`Anhydrous
`
`Evaporation
`
`Precipitation
`
`Precipitation
`
`Precipitation
`
`117
`
`180
`
`190
`
`180
`
`Precipitation
`
`Spray dry
`
`Precipitation
`
`Precipitation
`Colloid formation
`
`Evaporation
`
`Evaporation
`
`Precipitation
`Commercial
`
`121
`205
`171
`
`187
`214
`367
`040
`049
`013
`139
`
`146
`033
`004
`
`318
`386
`371
`403
`382
`400
`220
`186
`17
`329
`337
`79
`030
`
`490
`613
`642
`651
`683
`634
`666
`686
`175
`507
`494
`313
`298
`
`Sample
`A
`B
`C
`D
`E
`F
`G
`H
`
`I
`
`J
`
`K
`L
`Nib
`Nb
`
`170
`260
`025
`051
`006
`126
`132
`031
`002
`004
`Commercial
`The morphologies of the amorphous dihydrated crystalline and anhydrous crystalline forms of paclitaxel were analyzed by
`XRPD
`bSamples M and N were purchased
`
`from Sigma and Hauser
`
`respectively
`
`effects Cremophor EL induced significant side effects such
`neurotoxicity nephrotoxicity and the
`as hypersensitivity
`extraction of plasticizers from the intravenous
`infusion
`catheter781 To overcome these obstacles numerous alter
`native pharmaceutical
`formulations such as
`liposomes
`and microspheres have been proposed9111
`cyclodextrins
`Solubility and dissolution rate are important
`factors for
`the development of drug delivery systems and these factors
`have been studied with regard to low solubility pharmaceu
`ticals in the presence of carriers cosolvents and surfac
`the solubility of valdecoxib was
`tants For example
`
`significantly by using PEG 4000 as the carrier
`enhanced
`ethanol as the cosolvent and sodium lauryl sulfate as the
`The
`surfactant231
`solubility of
`aqueous
`entacapone
`increased with increasing pH241 The dissolution rate of
`rofecoxib was enhanced by using solid dispersions SDs
`in urea as the carrier251 However
`these successes were
`achieved by changing the properties of the solution or by
`the inclusion of additives In this study the dissolution rate
`of paclitaxel was enhanced
`by the generation of
`the
`amorphous form
`
`12
`
`18
`
`G m H a 1
`
`30
`
`24
`Time hr
`K
`
`J
`
`42
`
`48
`
`M
`
`N
`
`E 6
`
`E 5
`
`LI
`
`4
`
`2 3
`
`min
`
`2 0 2
`
`Co
`
`FIG 7 Dissolution profiles of the dihydrated crystalline and anhydrous
`crystalline forms of paclitaxel
`in cotton seed oil
`
`2 min
`
`12
`
`18
`
`24
`
`30
`
`Time hr
`
`A
`
`B
`
`C
`
`42
`
`F
`
`FIG 6 Dissolution profiles of amorphous paclitaxel
`
`in cotton seed oil
`
`

`

`MORPHOLOGIES AND DISSOLUTION PROFILES OF PACLITAXEL
`
`1767
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`Most of the paclitaxel supplied commercially is in the
`anhydrous crystalline form which has a low dissolution
`rate and
`be
`used
`in formulation and
`can
`delivery
`studies26271 However
`there have been few reports on the
`controlled release of amorphous paclitaxel
`In the present
`study we conclude
`the dissolution rate of paclitaxel
`is one of the most
`in pharmaceutical
`important
`solvents
`factors in developing new delivery systems Paclitaxel with
`a high dissolution rate could be applied in various ways
`and at higher concentrations We expect
`that studies of
`delivery systems with controlled release of amorphous
`paclitaxel will overcome
`the clinical problems associated
`with the use of Cremophor EL and will
`facilitate the
`development of more effective
`formulation systems
`
`that
`
`REFERENCES
`1 Wani MC Taylor HL Wall ME Coggon P McPhail AT
`Plant antitumor agents VI The isolation and structure of taxol a
`from Taxus brevifolia
`and antitumor agent
`novel antileukemic
`Journal of the American Chemical Society 1971 93 2325 2327
`2 McGuire WP Rowinsky EK Rosenshein NB Grumbine FC
`Ettinger DS Armstrong DK Donehower RC Taxol A
`
`investigational antimicrotubule
`Institute 1990 82 1247 1259
`
`in advanced
`agent with significant
`activity
`unique antineoplastic
`ovarian epithelial neoplasms Annals of Internal Medicine 1989
`273 279
`3 Rowinsky EK Cazenave LA Donehower RC Taxol A novel
`agent Journal of the National Cancer
`4 Arbuck SG Christian MC Fisherman JS Cazenave LA
`Sarosy G Suffness M Adams J Canetta R Cole KE
`Friedman MA Clinical development
`National Cancer Institute Monographs
`5 Liggins RT Hunter WL Burt HM Solid state characteriza
`
`of Taxol
`Journal of
`1993 15 11 24
`
`the
`
`Journal of Pharmaceutical
`
`Sciences
`
`1997 86
`
`tion of paclitaxel
`1458 1463
`
`extraction
`
`of
`
`diluted
`
`in
`
`6 Waugh WN Trissel LA Stella VJ Stability compatibility and
`taxol NSC 125973 injection
`plasticizer
`infusion solutions and stored in various containers American Journal
`of Hospital Pharmacy 1991 48 1520 1544
`
`7 Onetto N Canett R Winograd B Catane R Dougan M
`
`Grechko J Overview of Taxol safety Journal of the National Cancer
`Institute Monographs 1993 15 131 139
`8 Mazzo D Nguyen Huu JJ Pagniez S Denis P Compatibility
`of docetaxel and paclitaxel
`solutions with polyvinyl
`infusion materials American
`of Health System
`chloride
`Journal
`Pharmacy 1997 54 566 569
`
`in intravenous
`
`9 Crosasso P Ceruti M Brusa P Arpicco S Dosio F Cattel L
`
`Preparation
`
`characterization
`
`and properties of sterically
`
`stabilized
`
`paclitaxel containing liposomes Journal of Controled Release 2000 63
`19 30
`
`10 Dordunoo SK Burt HM Solubility and stability of toxol Effects
`
`International
`
`Journal of Pharmaceutics
`
`of buffer and cyclodextrins
`1996 33 191 201
`11 Re M I Formulating drug delivery systems by spray drying Drying
`Technology 2006 24 433 446
`12 Kemp IC Drying in the context of the overall process Drying
`Technology 2004 22 377 394
`13 Beaudry C Raghavan GSV Ratti C Rennie TJ Effect of four
`
`drying methods on the quality of osmotically dehydrated cranberries
`Drying Technology 2004 22 521 539
`14 Hancock BC Parks M What
`is the true solubility advantage
`
`for
`
`amorphous
`397 404
`
`pharmaceuticals
`
`Pharmaceutical
`
`Research
`
`2000 7
`15 Lee JH Gi U S Kim J H Kim Y Kim S H Oh H MM B
`
`induced dihydrated
`The Bulletin of the Korean
`
`and characterization
`of solvent
`Preparation
`and amorphous paclitaxel
`anhydrous
`Chemical Society 2001 22 925 928
`
`Paclitaxel
`Trihydrate
`6838569 B2 2005
`
`and Docetaxel
`
`for Preparation of
`
`16 Janicki S Sznitowska M Karas W Mroczek Z Tyrala A
`form of an anticancer drug
`Czarnecka
`I Stable pharmaceutical
`WO 0235582 Al 2002 or EP 1363892 Bl
`17 Sharma AP Sarkar S Mahanty JS Process
`Trihydrate US Patent
`18 Choi H K Adams TL Stahlhut W Kim S I Yun J H
`Song B K Kim J H Song J S Hong S S Lee H S Method
`for Mass Production of Taxol by Semi Continuous Culture with Taxus
`chinensis Cell Culture US Patent 5871979 1999
`19 Pyo SH Park HB Song BK Han BH Kim JH A large scale
`
`from cell cultures of Taxus chinensis Process
`purification of paclitaxel
`Biochemistry 2004 39 1985 1991
`20 Pyo SH Kim MS Cho JS Song BK Han BH Choi HJ
`An efficient
`purification and morphology
`characterization
`of
`from cell cultures of Taxus chinensis Journal of Chemical
`
`paclitaxel
`Technology a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket