throbber
Sumitra A Pillai et al J Pharm Sci
`
`Res Vol 82 2016 103111
`
`ISSN09751459
`
`Journal of Pharmaceutical
`
`Sciences
`
`and Research
`
`wwwjp srphanna
`
`Pharmaceutical Glass Interactions A Review of
`Possibilities
`
`Sumitra A Pillail2 Dhawal Chobisal Dileep UrimilNagasuri Ravindra
`
`2
`
`IPDO Innovation Plaza Dr Reddys Laboratories Ltd Hyderabad 500090 India
`Deparhnent ofPharmacy PAHER University Udaipur 313024 India
`3 Chilkur Balaji College of Pharmacy Hyderabad 500075 India
`
`Abstract
`
`occurrences have observed over
`formulation from years Various untoward
`Glass is used as packaging material for parenteral
`the period of time with glass containers which leads to therapeutic
`failures or even toxicity to the patients Glass has been the
`primary choice for packaging of parenteral
`losses during stability have forced
`formulations unexpected
`degradation or product
`leading to a larger understanding of some of the untoward properties
`many researchers to evaluate the underlying mechanisms
`of glass Oxides of various metal ions viz aluminium arsenic barium iron etc are added in glass to modify its physico
`reasons and
`ions could leach from the glass structure due to several
`chemical properties based on specific requirements Metal
`could lead to generation of particulate matter could cause metal
`ion toxicity or act as catalyst
`to hasten drug degradation
`Delamination or formation of glass flakes
`is one of the major problems currently under high scrutiny by the regulators
`Similarly some molecules have an affinity to adsorb to glass leading to a low potency
`in the administered drug Interaction
`between glass and drug product depends upon compositiontype of glass processing of glass and formulation variables such as
`pH buffer properties of drug sterilization cycles storage conditions etc This review describes
`several possible means of
`interaction of glass and drug product encountered by researchers under a gamut of conditions
`Keywords Glass delamination leachables and extractables particulate matter
`
`Abbreviations
`Al aluminium As arsenic Ba barium Fe iron Ca calcium Mg magnesium Mn manganese Si silica SiO2 silicon
`dioxide B2O3 boron oxide P2O5 phosphorus oxide Ge02 germanium oxide Fe2O3 Ferric oxide Ti203 titanium oxide MnO
`manganese oxide NaC1 sodium chloride KC1 Potassium chloride MgC12 magnesium chloride ZnSO4 zinc sulphate ETAAS
`spectroscopy AAS atomic absorption spectroscopy
`SEM scanning
`electron microscopy
`atomic absorption
`electrothermal
`SEMEDX scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive Xray spectroscopy EDX energy dispersing Xray analysis FDA
`Food and Drug Administration ICPOES inductively
`coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Wide ranges of packaging material are being used for
`types of dosage forms Selection of packaging
`different
`material mainly depends on
`Type of dosage form
`Mode of application
`Physicochemical
`
`properties
`
`of
`
`formulation
`
`being
`
`review of such reported interactions
`present a consolidated
`of glass with the drug product
`leading
`challenge andor
`a potential or obvious
`
`toxicity to the
`
`to a stability
`
`patient
`
`Glass As pharmaceutical packaging component
`Commercial glasses are an inorganic material mostly
`silicates or mixture of materials that have been heated to a
`molten liquid state then cooled without crystallization to a
`solid state Several metallic oxides have
`the property to
`cool without crystallization eg 5i02 B203 P205 and
`Ge02 These oxides are used as backbone in glass 5i02 is
`the most commonly used oxide including containers
`for
`
`sterile dosage forms 3
`Mechanism of glass formation
`form of
`Silicate glasses are made up of Siat
`tetrahedral
`Si in which each Si atom attached with four oxygen atoms
`has bonding with two Si atoms via
`and each oxygen
`covalent bonds Due to this type of 3D arrangement and
`the melted silicates
`viscosity of
`interactions
`spatial
`increase rapidly during cooling phase which do not allow
`the transition from random structure of
`liquid state
`to
`
`ordered crystalline structure 3 4
`
`packed into
`Physicochemical properties of material being used for
`
`packaging
`
`also vary with the intended
`Regulatory requirements
`like for eg packaging for
`application of the drug product
`regulatory requirements
`parenteral products poses stringent
`is a major concern there pl FDA also
`since sterility
`recommends
`specific quality controls and requirements of
`based on intended use of dosage
`components
`packaging
`forms Glass containers
`have been widely used for packing
`of parenteral preparations
`since many years
`Glass
`containers
`used
`in pharmaceutical
`are widely
`industry but cannot be considered completely inert Various
`could arise when products come in contact with
`exchange
`surfaces
`ion
`glass
`including
`leaching
`precipitation glass dissolution surface layer exfoliation
`
`interactions
`
`and corrosion 2
`
`Various authors have reported different potential leachables
`from glass containers and effect of formulation and process
`factors on total
`leachables The purpose of this article is to
`
`Types Of Glass
`Various minerals are added to improve the industrial
`feasibility and physical properties of the glass Based upon
`
`103
`
`Abraxis EX2031
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`Sumitra A PiIlai et al J Pharm Sci
`
`Res Vol 82 2016 103111
`
`the minerals which are
`
`incorporated glass families are
`
`respectively
`
`the
`
`broadly classified into two 5 6
`A Soda limesilicate glasses or Soda lime glasses
`In this type of glass soda ash sodium carbonate and lime
`are added as a source of sodium
`stone calcium carbonate
`and calcium oxide
`oxide
`to modify
`properties These comprise of 25 by weight Magnesium
`and potassium may be used as their oxides to reduce the
`melting point Soda lime glass has poor chemical
`resistance
`because of chances of leaching of mobile nature of sodium
`and potassium cations
`A1203 is added to improve chemical durability of the glass
`because Ar3 ions are able to form covalent bonds and
`to leaching Fe203 is added to provide
`hence more resistant
`light protection It absorbs ultraviolet wavelengths more
`
`effectively than colourless glass 3
`B Borosilicate glasses
`B203 is used in replacement of some sodium and Ca ions
`Borosilicate glasses have exceptional
`chemical durability
`sudden
`resistance
`high heat
`resistance including
`and
`shock
`thermal
`Borosilicate
`changes
`temperature
`glasses are most commonly used for parenteral containers
`due to its high resistance to thermal processes including
`and terminal sterilization
`depyrogenation lyophilization
`and low alkali extractable Fe203 and Ti203 or MnO can be
`added to produce amber borosilicate glasses for protection
`from ultraviolet
`
`to
`
`light
`
`Mechanism Of Interaction Of Glass With Product
`A Ion exchange
`important mechanism of
`the most
`Ion exchange
`interaction between glass and product Na+ ions which are
`in glass can be replaced by the H30+ ions of the
`present
`solution This reaction is dominant
`in neutral and acidic
`
`is
`
`solutions
`
`B Attack on glass by reactive groups
`Hydroxyl groups and alkaline species present
`in product as
`well as glass itself can attack the glass leads to breaking of
`Si0 bonds This reaction depends upon various factors like
`glass formulation pH of product
`ingredients of product
`etc eg chelating agents are more aggressive toward glass
`because
`the various metal ions out of
`they are able to pull
`the surface It means guidelines
`for selection of glass for
`parenteral products based on pH alone are not sufficient
`C Additional mechanisms
`Process involved in manufacturing of containers has effect
`on composition and physicochemical
`the
`parameters of
`surface eg during manufacturing of ampules and vials the
`temperature of inner surface can exceed the boiling point of
`low boiling point
`ingredients mainly sodium and boron
`During cooling they could condense as sodium borate
`Complete removal of sodium borate from containers may
`not be possible during washing of containers This alkaline
`residue can again affect
`the product by three mechanisms
`residue may react directly with
`Firstly this alkaline
`product Secondly exchange of Na +
`ions with H30+ ions
`loss of H30+ ions in the solution can increase the pH of
`the interaction can
`product Thirdly in extreme
`cases
`the formation of an unstable layer of silica gel
`trigger
`which can slough off as delaminated glassy particles
`
`to
`
`the type all glasses have the potential
`Irrespective of
`into the product
`leach alkali
`related components
`upon
`the stability of that product and
`storage which may affect
`this varies depending on storage conditions type of glass
`used for the storage type and nature of the product being
`stored There is high probability of more leachable content
`coming into the product at higher pH ie pH > 9 Most
`common extractables
`from glass includes silicon sodium
`and boron which take major part in contamination and or
`
`degradation of drug product 4
`Despite of the presence of various inorganic leachables viz
`Al Si B Ba ions etc and interaction with different buffers
`viz acetate citrate phosphate etc glass is most widely
`used
`formulations
`packaging material
`for parenteral
`Glasses can be modified by various techniques to better suit
`the formulation like amber colour glass for photo sensitive
`drugs Selection of glass and the type of modification
`depends upon the formulation and storage
`Some researchers showed that elements of the drug and
`like pH buffers
`formulation
`variables
`etc
`causes
`degradation of glass ultimately contaminating the product
`in patients Amount of
`which leads to adverse effects
`various ions which could leach in the formulation varies
`depending upon the affinity of drug and or excipients
`specific ions
`In this paper we have broadly classified major probable
`mechanisms of drug product contamination by glass into 4
`
`for
`
`categories
`
`A Glass delamination
`B Metal ions interaction
`C Interaction with buffers
`D Adsorption of drugs or formulation components on
`
`glass surfaces
`
`A Glass delamination or generation of glass flakes
`Glass delamination or generation of glass flakes is a major
`
`that use glass vials for
`concern with parenteral products
`their storage and these glass flakes may or may not be
`inspection and the products which contain
`visible for direct
`these glass particles when injected directly may lead to
`embolic thrombotic and other vascular events 7 Possible
`reasons contributing to glass delamination is 8 91 i
`in manufacturing process of glass vials ie
`Differences
`moulding or formation from glass tubing
`higher chance of
`delamination is associated with vials produced by tubing
`process due to the utilization of higher temperatures during
`ii
`Nature of
`formulation being stored
`production
`Alkaline and certain buffer solutions citrate and tartrate
`have higher
`the
`process of
`tendency
`iv
`delamination iii
`terminal
`process
`Presence or absence of ammonium sulfate coating on inner
`surface of glass vials where
`the treatment with sulfur
`enhances the chances of delamination iv Storage duration
`and storage conditions
`Storage at room temperature
`believed to have higher chance of glass delamination over
`cold storage conditions
`process differences and the nature of
`Glass manufacturing
`product seem to be the most dominant factors that enhance
`glass delamination characterized by pH changes
`active
`moiety degradation formation of visible particles
`
`is
`
`and
`
`to
`
`aggravate
`
`sterilization
`
`104
`
`

`

`Sumitra A PiIlai et al J Pharm Sci
`
`Res Vol 82 2016 103111
`
`increased extractable levels ultimately affecting the product
`
`quality adversely
`Ronald et al investigated
`the delaminationcorrosion of
`pH of 82
`glass by a pharmaceutical
`product
`having
`Authors have used three type I borosilicate glass vials from
`vendors of which two vials ammonium
`two different
`sulfate treated and the other one untreated were kept
`in
`contact with the product with pH of 82 and the remaining
`were used as a control Vials were stored under 2 different
`temperature conditions 40°C and 30°C Visible particulate
`matter was observed in vials contained product after 30
`days and 8 weeks of storage at 40°C and 30°C respectively
`The particulate matter was found to be glass as identified
`using field emission environmental SEM equipped with X
`ray analysis capabilities NJ
`Richard et al investigated
`the effect of formulation and
`on the delamination process They also
`process variables
`studied the impact of the glass manufacturing process
`on delamination
`and glass
`surface treatment
`supplier
`process They used Type 1 borosilicate tubing vials from 3
`different suppliers total 18 lots and studied the effect of
`formulation pH and moist heat
`terminal sterilization on
`delamination They filled glass vials with Vistide® Injection
`75 mgmL cidofovir
`for Injection USP and to
`in Water
`study the impact of pH solutions pH were adjusted to pH
`60 70 74 80 and 85 with sodium hydroxide or
`hydrochloric acid The filled vials were subjected to either
`three sterilization cycles 123°C for 19 min
`one or
`following which the vials were charged on stability at
`25°C 30°C realtime storage
`and
`40°C
`condition
`They monitored
`testing condition
`accelerated
`delamination by
`particulate matter
`visual
`inspection
`and microscopic methods
`quantification light obscuration
`Vials that were stored at 40°C after autoclaving
`showed the
`presence of glass particles which could be visually seen and
`increased amounts of the same was seen with prolonged
`storage time increasing pH sulfate treatment
`and higher
`number of
`cycles At
`same
`time
`the
`between
`were
`differences
`in the behaviour
`observed
`suppliers and presence or absence of sulfur coating Real
`of
`time stability data indicated
`that presence or absence
`visible glass particles mainly depends on glass type from
`various
`due
`differences
`to
`in processing
`suppliers
`and composition of the glass Visible particles
`conditions
`were found to be containing
`silicon dioxide and sodium
`which are major components of type I glass as determined
`by SEMEDX 10
`Ronald et al
`the factors
`contributing to
`investigated
`delamination which was demonstrated using hippuric acid
`glutaric acid and pemexetred and three type I borosilicate
`types studied were ammonium
`types The vial
`glass vial
`sulfate coated on its inner surface from one vendor and
`two vials sourced from different vendors where one
`other
`type was uncoated and other
`type contained
`dioxide coating Empty vials were initially
`subjected for
`at 250°C and 350°C followed by filling
`depyrogenation
`and sterilization of the filled vials by no or two terminal
`sterilization cycles at 122125°C for 15min The vials posts
`the treatments were stored at 5°C 25°C 40°C and 60°C
`pH measurements
`in pH values
`showed
`a
`decrease
`
`the
`
`sterilization
`
`vial
`
`silicon
`
`compared to initial high pH values >8 and this decrease
`in
`pH was prominent at higher storage temperatures the
`the drop in pH values was not
`authors
`concluded
`that
`test solution but because of
`because of degradation of
`ICPOES analysis revealed the
`degradation of glass itself
`in vials with ammonium
`presence of higher amount of Si
`sulfate treatment
`than that of silicon dioxide treated vials
`followed by uncoated vials Presence of higher amount of
`in the test solutions is indicative
`of
`loss of glass
`Si
`durability or onset of glass delamination which may lead to
`formation of particulate matter or glass flakes The authors
`have finally attributed the delamination to higher pH of
`product and anionic nature of test solutions at this higher
`pH 11
`
`acid
`
`forms e g Zoledronic
`Bisphosphonate
`dosage
`solution can be administered intravenously as an infusion
`These biphosphonate
`dosage forms are highly sensitive to
`di and polyvalent cations especially Ca Ba magnesium
`Al boron
`and
`silicon which are
`in glass
`present
`composition Precipitate formation can be seen as a result
`of reaction between them which affect
`the quality of the
`final product and may cause severe toxicological problems
`Formation of precipitation can be seen upon longer contact
`time of product with glass during storage or during terminal
`the
`sterilization since sterilization process could enhance
`ions from the glass containers There are
`leaching of metal
`some marketed
`formulations which
`are
`lyophilized
`that needed reconstitution
`of bisphosphonates
`products
`before use where chances of precipitation are not absent
`because of presence of trace levels of metal ion impurities
`in saline solutions for infusion preparation
`Alexandra et al took a step to address the current
`and invented a container
`that contains polymeric coating
`internally which is resistant
`towards the bisphosphonate
`the bottle itself can be terminally
`drug solution Moreover
`drug solutions can be
`sterilized by which bisphosphonate
`stored for prolonged time periods 12
`
`issue
`
`B Metal
`ions interaction
`from delamination of glass
`Apart
`surfaces
`important mechanism
`of drug product
`involves
`interaction with metal ions Various metal oxides
`are added in glass during manufacturing process to impart
`and chemical
`These metal
`ions
`physical
`properties
`including Al As Ba Fe etc have
`tendency to leach out
`Some
`and
`the product
`attack
`ion
`important metal
`are discussed here
`
`another
`
`deterioration
`
`interactions
`Aluminium
`Al is the third most abundant mineral on earth and found in
`It has been reported that
`almost every animal and plant
`most adults ingest between 3 and 5 mg Al daily which gets
`excreted in urine However Al is a body constituent
`ingested in higher amount Al
`toxicity was first
`toxic if
`renal
`in patients with chronic
`failure Clinical
`include impaired bone growth in adults and
`development
`in metal
`in neonates
`Parenteral
`delays
`nutrition is a considerable source of Al Therefore in July
`2004 the FDA mandated manufacturers
`to include amount
`of Al
`in label Limit of Al for large volume parenterals
`should be not more than 25
`jigL for small volume
`
`reported
`
`manifestations
`
`it
`
`is
`
`105
`
`

`

`Sumitra A PiIlai et al J Pharm Sci
`
`Res Vol 82 2016 103111
`
`to be different from delamination of glass The particles
`comprised majorly of Al P and 0 however
`these particles
`were
`devoid of Si With raise in temperature of
`the
`formation increased
`these vials upon
`solution particulate
`storage showed decreased amount of Al upon storage at
`5°C for 6 months indicating the presence of Al in particles
`formed in the solution Upon addition of Al chelating agent
`ie citrate there was effective reduction in the formation of
`indicated the presence of interaction between
`the particles
`leached Al from glass vials and phosphate buffer
`in the
`vials This was further evidenced by the formation of white
`upon addition Al ions at concentration of more
`particles
`than 5Oppb
`to the phosphate buffer Sulfur treatment of
`a good mean to
`inner surface of glass bottles provides
`reduce the particle formation Thus great care needs to be
`taken for the storage of dosage forms containing phosphate
`buffer in glass containers 18
`et al studied how the nature of substance can
`Bohrer
`the Al release from glass containers They evaluated
`the pharmaceutical
`for parenteral
`use containing
`products
`salts sodium and potassium chlorides glucose heparin
`and albumin All products were stored in glass and plastic
`containers Al content was determined
`in glass as well as
`containers at different storage time by AAS They
`plastic
`found that glass was the major contributor to Al content
`Besides Al contamination
`highly depended on the nature
`of substance which was in contact with glass surface Table
`1 shows the content of Al extracted by different substances
`after 60 days of storage 19
`
`affect
`
`Table 1 Al extracted by various substances after 60 days
`of storne
`
`Al content ugL
`400
`
`150
`
`500
`
`500
`
`Substance
`
`Salts
`
`Glucose
`
`Albumin
`
`Heparin
`
`SNo
`
`1 2 3 4
`
`sterilization
`
`They found that all products
`containers
`stored in plastic
`contained not more than 20 ugL of Al whereas in glass Al
`reached 1000 ugL and all of them showed an
`content
`increase in Al content with age
`In another study Bohrer et al evaluated the interaction of
`container and chemicals with glass container during heat
`commercial solutions for
`stored 30
`
`They
`nutrition in glass ampoules in contact with
`parenteral
`rubber stopper and plastic container All containers were
`subjected to heat at 121 °C for 30 minutes and Al content
`was determined They found Al content of 157 in glass
`005 in plastic
`and 454 in rubber Also total Al
`and
`released depended on the interaction of chemicals
`containers Various substances showed different Al content
`with glass ampoules and rubber stoppers and the data was
`shown in Table 2 pot
`interaction of glass with chemicals
`They concluded
`that
`and alkalis could
`be explained
`by ion
`salts acids
`exchange properties effect of formulation pH and affinity
`of chemicals especially amino acids for Al pot
`
`106
`
`parenterals the label should state the potential maximum
`In cases where Al intake is
`amount at expiry of the product
`more than 45 pskgd in patients with impaired renal
`the label
`together with premature
`function
`neonates
`they may experience central
`should include a warning that
`nervous system and bone toxicity 1315
`Al can easily get eliminated through urine however higher
`levels of Al pose significant
`risk problems to ones body
`like bone
`in patients with renal
`growth impairment
`impairment and delayed mental development
`in neonates
`in neonates 13
`since the renal system is underdeveloped
`Al
`is a compositional part of glass and added during its
`as aluminium oxide and sometimes this may
`manufacture
`get leached into the product which is being stored in it and
`Few studies
`can contaminate
`the product
`the
`report
`presence of Al in parenteral nutrition due to storage in glass
`containers Content of Al increases with storage time and
`also depends on the nature of the substance in contact
`like
`heparin and albumin Product pH values at extremes also
`the Al release
`adversely affect
`et al evaluated
`the amount of Al
`leached in
`Bohrer
`parenteral nutrition containing amino acids They used 19
`amino acids and commercial nutrition formulation to check
`the effect of binding of amino acids from Al of glass
`material They stored solutions of amino acids in type II
`glass flasks and Al content was measured periodically for
`by ETAAS They
`400
`concluded
`the
`days
`that
`contamination with Al was observed with cysteine cystine
`aspartic acid and glutamic acid only Leaching of Al from
`glass because of amino acids mainly depends upon stability
`of formed Al amino acid complex ie higher the stability
`of complexes higher the ability of amino acids to release Al
`16
`Toni et al studied the release of Al from borosilicate
`glass vials and the effect of different buffers like phosphate
`citrate acetate and histidine buffer at different pH on the
`and precipitation of Al The
`release behaviour
`vials
`showed the presence
`different buffer solutions
`containing
`of Al and Si upon heating at any pH which demonstrated
`the Al from glass
`the ability of all buffers in extracting out
`and which depended upon
`containers
`concentration
`of
`solution time of contact and storage temperature Higher
`amounts of Al and Si were observed in glass vials with
`citrate buffer and in comparison to this lower amounts were
`and histidine buffers
`observed with phosphate
`acetate
`Upon storage particle formation was observed in phosphate
`and acetate buffers while no particulate matter was seen
`with citrate buffer which was attributed to its chelating
`property This was supported by the reduction in Al content
`acetate and histidine buffer upon addition of
`in phosphate
`Al ions during storage At the end the authors concluded
`the possibility of formation of Al containing
`that
`was much higher in phosphate buffer
`other buffer solutions 17
`In an interesting study by Tom et al authors
`the
`of
`investigated
`inorganic
`characteristics
`particles
`formed in phosphate buffer filled glass vials Upon storage
`of the glass vials which are compendially recommended
`for injectable products filled with phosphate buffer visible
`particles were seen and authors deliberated these particles
`
`particles
`
`in comparison
`
`to
`
`have
`
`

`

`Sumitra A PiIlai et al J Pharm Sci
`
`Res Vol 82 2016 103111
`
`Table 2 Value of Al content
`
`Substances
`
`Leucine ornithine and lysine solutions
`Solutions of basic phosphates and bicarbonate
`
`Cysteine aspartic acid glutamic acid and cystine solutions
`
`SNo
`
`1 2 3
`
`in different products stored in contact with glass ampoules and nibber stopper
`Al content ugL
`20
`
`Container
`
`Glass ampoules
`
`Glass ampoules
`
`Rubber stoppers
`
`1500
`
`500
`
`is clear
`
`that glass can be a
`Based on available literature it
`source of Al when products
`stored in glass
`are being
`the extent of contamination may vary
`containers
`but
`depending upon the type of product eg liquid form or
`form
`powder
`Marlei et al investigated
`the Al contamination in liquid
`and lyophilized
`forms of Erythropoietin which were
`contained in glass bottles sealed with rubber closures The
`authors have found that glass and rubber were the sources
`of Al contamination after storage of formulation in contact
`with glass as well as rubber at 4 ± 2°C As determined by
`spectrometry higher Al contamination
`atomic absorption
`was
`found in glass vials with liquid formulation
`as
`compared to glass vials containing lyophilized form of the
`product When stored in liquid form citrate and phosphate
`buffers extracted most of the Al present as contamination
`source of Al
`The
`container
`a
`glass
`fact
`that
`is
`contamination can be supported by 19 fold increase in Al
`contamination after reconstitution in the same vials in 12
`months
`contamination before
`compared with the
`as
`reconstitution Moreover Al contamination after one month
`lyophilized form is more than the
`of reconstitution of
`contamination in lyophilized form after storage for 2 years
`in glass vials The authors have concluded that
`lyophilized
`its solution form
`form of erythropoietin is preferred over
`for patients with chronic kidney disease 21
`Nakamura et al studied minodronic acid formulations
`and
`compositions and their stability
`different
`having
`tendency to generated particles upon storage at 60°C for 4
`weeks Upon characterization the formed precipitate was
`found to be a complex between minodronic acid and Al
`leached from the glass of the ampoules
`ions apparently
`The best protection in terms of stability as well
`as
`matter was
`inhibition
`of
`afforded
`to
`particulate
`formulations buffered by citric acid and tartaric acid citrate
`the two particularly providing
`buffer was better amongst
`to 5 where no
`results at a solution pH of 3
`optimal
`particulate generation was observed 22
`the same authors
`demonstrated
`Further
`formulation containing 05 mgml minodronic acid 40 mM
`pH 45 citrate and sodium chloride stored in flint glass
`at 25 40 50 and 60 degrees C showed
`ampoules
`at 25C but not at higher
`particulate matter generation
`particulate matter by
`temperatures Analysis of
`the
`SEMEDX revealed that
`the particulate matter contained Al
`and phosphorus Storage in plastic
`and 5i02
`containers
`treated glass ampoules did not show the rise in number of
`the particulate matter A spike of minodronic acid solution
`with Al ions led to the particulate
`generation proving the
`and Al ions to
`interaction of minodronic acid molecules
`form a complex and resulting in particulate matter Regular
`ampoules were found to be the source of leached Al 23
`
`that
`
`a
`
`liquid
`
`Arsenic
`
`Transparency
`
`glass
`
`suitable
`
`ulceration
`
`presence of As V in higher amount
`
`This
`
`is one of the great properties which make
`and storage of many of
`for packaging
`products mainly in case of parenteral
`pharmaceutical
`dosage forms To make glass more transparent
`fining
`agents like arsenic oxide III may be added This added
`arsenic oxide may get released out of glass into the product
`which is being
`stored
`under
`certain
`conditions
`like
`sterilization temperature and nature of substance Released
`As can contaminate
`and upon intravenous
`the product
`administration it severely induces the toxic effects like skin
`cancer mucosal membrane
`damage
`skin
`etc 24 Allowable limit of As species
`in
`keratosis
`products for IV administration should be less than or equal
`to 01 mgL
`et al in a study investigated
`the release of As
`Bohrer
`both AsV and AsIII from glass containers by action of
`intravenous nutrition formulation constituents after heating
`the ampoules at 121°C for 30min using hydride generation
`atomic absorption spectrometry HG AAS Before heating
`the ampoules containing nutrition formulation As content
`of both the substances used in formulation as well as glass
`ampoules was determined
`and the results
`showed
`the
`in glass than As III
`that during heating As is getting
`study indicated
`and the
`from the
`containers
`solution
`released
`glass
`composition decides the type and amount of As species
`getting released Ampoules containing water for injection
`and solutions of NaC1 KC1 phosphates
`indicated
`the
`presence of AsV only whereas
`ampoules
`containing
`amino acids glucose gluconate
`and vitamins showed
`higher concentration of AsIII since these can reduce the
`AsV to AsIII due to their reducing behaviour 25
`the presence of different As
`et al evaluated
`Bohrer
`species arsenite and arsenate in several of the commercial
`solutions of amino
`formulations that
`included
`parenteral
`acids salts vitamins and lipids and the measurements of
`As species were done using hydride generation
`atomic
`and results of which showed the
`absorption spectrometry
`presence of As in both the forms in all
`formulations
`Presence of higher As contamination with varied ratios of
`AsVAsIII was evidenced in Calcium gluconate sodium
`bicarbonate heparin and vitamin solutions Interestingly
`the vials with water for injection and salt solutions showed
`only the presence of AsV species but
`the ones with
`and glucose
`showed
`solutions of vitamins gluconate
`AsIII primarily the reason being the conversion of AsV
`to AsIII
`since these sugars are
`reducing
`was
`Evidence
`by
`phenomenon
`demonstrated
`of
`the
`complete absence of As III
`in pure water and sodium
`for 15 minutes and
`chloride solution upon autoclaving
`the same predominantly in solutions with
`occurrence of
`upon autoclaving 26
`reducing substances
`
`in nature
`
`107
`
`

`

`Sumitra A PiIlai et al J Pharm Sci
`
`Res Vol 82 2016 103111
`
`in comparison to
`
`to
`
`storage
`
`significantly
`
`in amber color ampules
`higher extent
`clear ampules The authors found that
`the degradation by
`oxidation was a free radicalmediated process which was
`being enhanced by the presence of metal ion contaminants
`The source of these metal ion impurities was found to be
`the amber coloured glass ampoules which contained higher
`than the clear glass ampules Addition of 01
`Fe content
`wv edetate
`disodium prior
`rate 31
`reduced the decomposition
`Kassem et al and Lipper et al reported similar kind of
`degradation of ascorbic acid and thimersol
`in presence of
`metalions upon storage in amber coloured glass ampoules
`30 32 33
`Reed et al determined
`degradation of
`the photochemical
`citrate buffered formulations of phenyl ether based drug
`sensitive when
`which were found
`to be light
`to ICHdefined
`though
`conditions
`the
`light
`molecule
`as well as the components of the formulation
`were not absorbing in the 300700 nm exposure regions
`The pathway
`for degradation was proven to be interaction
`between Fe+2 and dissolved oxygen to form superoxide
`radical when then protonated in water to generate hydoxy
`recombined
`radicals which eventually
`peroxyl
`to give
`reacted with Fe to give hydroxyl
`hydrogen peroxide that
`
`according
`
`studied
`
`radicals
`
`These
`
`hydroxyl
`
`react with drug to
`radicals
`Fe levels
`in the
`produce
`phenol
`degradate
`present
`formulation were contributed by the raw materials used in
`the formulation as well as the glass vials the amount of Fe
`for product being stored in glass increases with storage
`time and it could be due to Fe leaching from borosilicate
`glass vials The combination of citrate from the formulation
`to reduction of Fe Thus major
`and light
`contributed
`contributors to the observed photosensitivity were the
`citrate buffer parts per billion ppb levels of Fe oxygen
`and light exposure level At a particular Fe concentration
`was
`formation
`of
`primary
`photodegradate
`linearly
`to the amount of light exposure Moreover at
`proportional
`a fixed amount of light exposure photodegradate
`formation
`to the amount of
`was nearly linear proportional
`through 200 ppb levels 34
`Quarry et al evaluated the degradation of compounds of
`the 4 5epoxymorphinan series eg naloxone nalbuphine
`and oxymorphone which are known to be light sensitive in
`glass HPLC vials
`solution when
`in amber
`stored
`compounds of the same
`Investigation of the degradation
`lot of Naloxone HC1 Injection 002 mgml at
`laboratories in amber
`vials and
`glass
`a Fe+3
`proved that
`vials wrapped with foil
`colourless
`leaching from the amber glass vials because of Fe oxide
`was catalysing
`the degradation Similar degradation was
`observed in naloxone nalbuphine and oxymorphone that
`The author
`were stored in amber glass
`conclude
`that
`though amber glass are routinely used to pr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket