throbber
Comparison of physioochcmical characteristics and stability ot'tnrec novel tormulanons or pacutaxcl: Abraxane, manoxei, ana usnexoi rm -...
`
`rage I. on .4
`
`AACR Meeting
`Abstracts Online
`
`HOME HELP FEEDBACK HOW TO CITE ABSTRACTS ARCHIVE CME INFORMATION SEARCH
`
`Cancer Research
`
`Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers 3. Prevention
`Molecular Cancer Research
`
`Cancer Prevention Journals Portal
`Annuai Meeting Education Book
`
`Clinical Cancer Research
`
`Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
`Cancer Prevention Research
`
`Cancer Reviews Online
`Meeting Abstracts Oniine
`
`Institution: IHCYTE CORPORAHON | Sign In via User NamegPasswwd
`
`QUICK SEARCH:
`
`[advance
`
`{RI-film”
`El '9"
`
`Keywordts):
`
`99th AACR Annual Meeting-- Apr 12-16, 2008; San Diego, CA
`
`This Article
`
`,........W Services I
`
`Drug Delivery and Targeting: Poster Presentations
`Proffered Abstracts
`'
`
`Abstract #5622
`
`Comparison of physicochemical
`characteristics and stability of three novel
`formulations of paclitaxel: Abraxane,
`Nanoxel, and Genexol PM
`
`I Simil rartici s n if
`ur al
`as Download to citag'gn manager
`600319 Scholar
`
`? _L_s_v_miceb R.9_.._nN-
`I Artiglgg by; Desai, N.
`
`Pqu
`I
`1g,_r'j;igle§ 91 Ron, N.
`0,3,, "-
`, Mich,
`
`Niles Ron, Jon Cordia, Andrew Yang, Sherry Ci, Phjthi Nguyen, Melissa Hughs and Neil Desai
`
`Abraxis Bioscience, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
`
`Background: Abraxane (Abraxis BioScicncc, Inc, Los Angclcs, CA, approved in USA and Canada),
`
`Nanoer (Dabur Pharma, H.P., India, approved in India), and Gencxol PM (Samyang Pharmaceuticals,
`Seoul, Korea, approved in Korea) are 3 commercially approved, novel formulations of paclitaxel.
`
`Abraxanc consists of albumin-bound injectablc nan0particlcs of paclitaxcl, while Gcncxol and Nanoxel
`(utilizing cosolvents) are polymeric-micellc formulations. Abraxane and Genexol are lyophilized
`
`products approved for 25°C :I: 2°C storage, while Nanoer is a liquid formulation approved for 2-8°C
`
`storage. This study investigated the physicochemical characteristics and short-term stability of the 3
`
`products under recommended clinical use conditions and under accelerated conditions.
`
`Methods: The drugs were reconstituted and prepared per the instructions provided in the respective
`
`package inserts. Abraxane and Genexol were reconstituted using the recommended saline diluent, while
`
`Nanoer was mixed and diluted in 10% dextrose. Each drug was reconstituted to 0.7 mg/mL and 5
`
`mg/mL. Physical stability was monitored both visually and microscopically; particle size was measured
`and monitored over time at room temperature (RT, measured to be 23°C) and 40°C using photon
`
`correlation spectroscopy (PCS) (Zetasizer 3000, Malvcrn, UK). Chemical purity was measured by
`reduced reversed-phase HPLC (Shimadzu Scientific Instnnnents, MD).
`Results: Following reconstitution, Abraxane was determined to be stable both physically and chemically
`
`Abraxis EX2022
`
`Actavis LLC v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`|PR2017-01100
`
`

`

`Comparison ofphysioochemical characteristics and‘stability of three novel formulations ofpsclitaxel: Abraxane, Nanoer, and Genexol PM -...
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`at RT and 40°C over 24 hrs, with no evidence ofnanoparticle size growth at either 0.7_ mg/mL or 5
`mg/mL. While reconstituted Genexol was stable at RT over 24 hrs, micelle instability resulting in
`
`precipitation of paclitaxel in the form of large needle-like crystals for both 0.7 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL
`
`formulations was seen betWeen 2 to 4 hrs at 40°C. These observations were confirmed using orthogonal
`
`techniques, visual assessment from photomicrographs, and PCS particle size measurement. For Nanoer
`
`at 0.7 mg/mL, a minor, but consistent, increase in particle size was observed at RT over 24 hrs.
`
`However, significant aggregation, particle-size growth, and crystallization were seen within 4 hrs at 40°
`
`C. HPLC data comparing pre- and post-filtration confirmed that the crystal formation for both Nanoer
`
`and Gencxol resulted from paclitaxel precipitation and aggregation, In addition, analytical results
`
`showed that Nanoer had slightly lower paclitaxel purity as compared to either Abraxane or Genexol.
`
`Conclusions: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, Abraxane, showed excellent physicochemical
`
`stability as compared to the micellar formulations, Nanoer and Genexol. Particle size growth and
`
`crystal formation were readily apparent in Nanoer and Genexol, especially in the short term under
`accelerated conditions.
`
`This Article
`
`Services
`
`I Similar articles In this journal
`I Downloag to citation manager
`
`Google Scholar
`
`H A '
`
`fish
`
`n N.
`
`I Articles by, Qgsai. N.
`
`PubMed
`
`H Articles by RonI N.
`'11 Articlesb Desai N.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket