throbber
Phase Ill Trial Shows Improved Progression-Free Survival With Fulvestrant vs Anastrozo... Page 1 of 6
`
`ADVERTISEMENT
`
`Phase III Trial Shows Improved
`Progression-Free Survival With
`fulvestrant vs Anastrozole in
`,Advanced Breast Cancer
`
`3 B
`
`y Matthew Stenger
`
`March 10, 2017
`
`IWQECWEEEQE
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`'-
`_
`
`v
`
`,
`.
`
`“
`
`r
`'
`
`
`
`‘ ’
`
`'
`
`' ,,
`w L
`
`In the international phase III FALCON trial, reported in The Lancet, Iohn
`F.R. Robertson, MD, of the University of Nottingham, United Kingdom,
`and colleagues found that progression—free survival was improved with
`intramuscular fulvestrant (Faslodex) vs oral anastrozole in endocrine
`
`therapy—naive womenwith hormone receptor (HR)—positive locally
`
`advanced or metastatic breast cancer.1
`
`Study Details
`
`In the double—blind trial, 462 patients from 113 sites in 20 countries in Asia, Europe, North
`
`America, South America, and South Africa were randomly assigned between October 2012 and
`
`July 2014 to receive fulvestrant (n : 230) or anastrozole (n : 232). Fulvestrant was given as
`
`500—mg intramuscular injections on days 0, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter; anastrozole
`
`was given at 1 mg orally daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the
`
`intent—to—treat population.
`
`For the fulvestrant and anastrozole groups, median age was 64 and 62 years (47% and 39% 2
`
`65 years); 76% and 75% were white, and 16% and 15% were Asian; time from diagnosis was 2
`
`1 year for 30% and 29%; 76% and 77% were estrogen receptor— and progesterone receptor
`
`http://wwwascopost. com/issues/march- 1 0-20 1 7/phase-iii-t1ial-shows-improved-progressio. .. 3/28/2017
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2156 p. l
`InnoPharma Licensing LLC v. AstraZeneca AB IPR2017-00905
`
`

`

`Phase Ill Trial Shows Improved Progression-Free Survival With Fulvestrant vs Anastrozo... Page 2 of 6
`
`“ Fulvestrant has superior
`efficacy and is a preferred
`
`treatment option for patients
`
`with hormone receptor
`
`—positive locally advanced or
`metastatic breast cancer
`
`—positive; 88% and 86% had metastatic disease;
`
`59% and 51% had Visceral disease; 84% and 84%
`
`had measureable disease;16% and 19% had received
`
`chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic
`
`disease; and 23% and 22% had received
`
`radiotherapy.
`
`who have not received
`
`Progression—Free Survival
`
`previous endocrine therapy
`
`compared with a third-
`
`generation aromatase
`
`inhibitor, a standard of care
`
`for first-line treatment of
`
`these patients.
`
`— John F. R. Robertson,
`
`MD, and colleagues
`
`Median progression—free survival was 16.6 months
`
`(95% confidence interval [CI] : 13.83—20.99
`
`months) in the fulvestrant group vs 13.8 months
`
`(95% CI : 11.99—16.59 months) in the anastrozole
`
`group (hazard ratio [HR] : 0.797, (95% CI : 11.99
`
`—16.59 months) in the anastrozole group (hazard
`
`ratio [HR] : 0.797, 95% CI : o.637—o.999, P
`
`: .0486). Among patients with measurable disease,
`
`an objective response was observed in 46% (89/193)
`
`of fulvestrant recipients and 45% (88 /196) of
`
`anastrozole recipients (odds ratio : 1.07, 95% CI : 0.72—1.61, P : .7290); the median duration
`
`of response was 20.0 (95% CI : 15.90—27.63) vs 13.2 (95% CI : 10.64—16.72) months.
`
`Hormone Therapy in Advanced
`Breast Cancer
`
`The magnitude of progression—free survival
`benefit with fulvestrant was consistent across
`
`most prespecified subgroups, except for patients
`
`- Fulvestrant improved progression-free
`
`with previous chemotherapy for locally advanced
`
`survival vs anastrozole among patients
`
`or metastatic disease, patients with
`
`with no prior endocrine therapy.
`- The benefit of fulvestrant vs
`
`anastrozole was more marked in
`
`patients with nonvisceral disease.
`
`nonmeasurable disease, patients who were not
`
`estrogen receptor— and progesterone receptor
`
`—positive, and patients with Visceral disease. For
`
`example, hazard ratios were 0.59 (95% CI : 0.42
`
`—0.84; median progression—free survival : 22.3
`
`[95% CI : 16.62—32.79] vs 13.8 months [95% CI : 11.04—16.59]) among patients with
`
`nonvisceral disease and 0.99 (95% CI : 0.74—1.33; median progression—free survival : 13.8
`
`[95% CI : 11.04—16.53] vs 15.9 [95% CI : 11.27—16.89]) among those with visceral disease
`
`(post hoc interaction test P : .0092).
`
`Median overall survival could not yet be calculated. At data cutoff, death had occurred in 29%
`
`of the fulvestrant group vs 32% of the anastrozole group (HR : 0.88, 95% CI : 0.63—1.22, P
`
`=.4277)
`
`Adverse Events
`
`http://wwwascopost. com/issues/march- 1 0-20 1 7/phase-iii-t1ia1-shows-improved-progressio. .. 3/28/2017
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2156 p. 2
`
`

`

`Phase Ill Trial Shows Improved Progression-Free Survival With Fulvestrant vs Anastrozo... Page 3 of 6
`
`The most common adverse events of any grade were arthralgia (17% in fulvestrant group vs
`
`10% in anastrozole group) and hot flushes (11% vs 10%). Grade 2 3 adverse events occurred in
`
`22% vs 18%. Serious adverse events occurred in 13% vs 13%. Adverse events of special
`
`interest—ie, joint disorders and back pain—occurred in 26% vs 18%. Adverse events led to
`
`discontinuation of treatment in 7% vs 5%. A total of 3% of patients in each group died, but
`
`none of the deaths were considered to be related to study treatment.
`
`The authors concluded: “Fulvestrant has superior efficacy and is a preferred treatment option
`
`for patients with hormone receptor—positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who
`
`have not received previous endocrine therapy compared with a third—generation aromatase
`
`inhibitor, a standard of care for first—line treatment of these patients.” I
`
`Disclosure: The study was funded by AstraZeneca. For full disclosures of the study authors,
`visit www.thelancet.com.
`
`Reference
`
`1. Robertson IF, Bondarenko 1M, Trishkina E, et a1: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1
`
`mg for hormone receptor—positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON 1: An international,
`
`randomised, double—blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 388:2991—3005, 2016.
`
`Related Articles
`
`FALCON Trial Informs the Evolving Role of Fulvestrant in Advanced
`Hormone Receptor—Positive Breast Cancer
`
`Endocrine therapy for breast cancer has evolved over the years. Initial
`
`endocrine therapies consisted of ablative procedures (oophorectomy,
`
`adrenalectomy, and hypophysectomy). With the availability of
`
`pharmaceutical estrogens, progestins, and androgens, ablative...
`
`
`
`Aman U. Buzdar, MD,
`FACP
`
`ADVERTISEMENT
`
`http://wwwascopost. com/issues/march- 1 0-20 1 7/phase-iii-t1ial-shows-improved-progressio. .. 3/28/2017
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2156 p. 3
`
`

`

`Phase III Trial Shows Improved Progression-Free Survival With Fulvestrant vs Anastrozo... Page 4 of 6
`
`ADVERTISEMENT
`
`y
`
`lmmunotherapiea for Lung Cancer
`
`“"2? TODAY IN ONCOLOGY
`
`ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario Update Guideline on Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
`
`New Study Finds That Most Cancer Mutations Are Due to Random DNA Copying Errors
`
`Hypofractionated vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
`
`Impact of 70-Gene Signature on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Breast Cancer
`
`Analysis of High-Risk Subgroup in ASSURE Trial of Sunitinib or Sorafenib in Renal Cell Carcinoma
`
`New Supportive Care Resources From NCCN Help Patients With Cancer Confront Distress
`
`Major Pharmaceutical Companies Collaborate in NCCN Research Project
`
`Delays in Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer in Insured and Indigent Populations
`
`http://wwwascopost.com/issues/march-10-2017/phase-iii-t1ia1-shows-improved-progressio. .. 3/28/2017
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2156 p. 4
`
`

`

`Phase 111 Trial Shows Improved Progression-Free Survival With Fulvestrant vs Anastrozo... Page 5 of 6
`
`ADVERTISEMENT
`
`VIEW MORE >
`
`MOST READ STORIES
`
`ASCO Releases Its State of Cancer Care in America: 2017 Report
`
`-| Jennifer Ho, MD, on Thoracic Cancers: Reirradiation With IMPT
`
`FDA Approves Avelumab for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma
`
`Adding Temozolomide to Short-Course Radiotherapy in Older Patients With Glioblastoma
`
`Dexamethasone Mouthwash in Preventing Everolimus-Related Stomatitis in Women With Breast
`Cancer
`
`Pembrolizumab Affords Long-Term Survival to One-Fourth of Selected Patients With NSCLC,
`Alternative Statistical Model Suggests
`
`-[ Shraddha M. Dalwadi, MBA, on Stage I NSCLC: Racial Disparities in Treatment and Outcome
`
`Implications of SWOG SO77? and the Future of Combination Treatments for Multiple Myeloma
`
`Association of Metformin Use for Diabetes With Outcomes in HER2—Positive Breast Cancer
`
`CAR T-Cell Therapy Emerging in Multiple Myeloma
`
`© 2016 HSP News Service, L.L.C.
`
`http://wwwascopost.com/issues/march-10-2017/phase-iii-t1ia1-shows-improved-progressio. .. 3/28/2017
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2156 p. 5
`
`

`

`Phase III Trial Shows Improved Progression-Free Survival With Fulvestrant vs Anastrozo... Page 6 of 6
`
`
`Advertising Disclosures Contact Privacy Policy Disclaimer
`
`http://wwwascopost.com/issues/march-10-2017/phase-iii-tria1-shows-improved-progressio. .. 3/28/2017
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2156 p. 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket