`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Brocade Communication
`Systems, Inc. and Netgear, Inc.,
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
`ChriMar Systems, Inc.,
`Patent Owner
`U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838
`Filing Date: September 14, 2012
`Issue Date: April 28, 2015
`Inter Partes Review No. 2017-00720
`
`Title: A CENTRAL PIECE OF NETWORK EQUIPMENT
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MATTHEW S. YUNGWIRTH IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`RUCKUS Ex. 1018 - pg. 1
`
`
`
`Declaration of Matthew S. Yungwirth in Support of
`Petitioners’ Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`
`IPR2017-00720
`U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838
`
`I, Matthew S. Yungwirth, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest to
`
`the following:
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner in the law firm of Duane Morris LLP, working in the
`
`firm’s office in Atlanta, Georgia.
`
`2..
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of Georgia (#783597), as
`
`well as the following Federal Courts:
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`d)
`
`3.
`
`USDC, Northern District of Georgia;
`
`USDC, Eastern District of Texas;
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit; and
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`5.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`In the last three years, I have not applied to appear pro hac vice before
`
`the Office except for the concurrently submitted Motions for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission in IPR2017-00718, -00719, and -00790.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RUCKUS Ex. 1018 - pg. 2
`
`
`
`Declaration of Matthew S. Yungwirth in Support of
`Petitioners’ Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`
`IPR2017-00720
`U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838
`
`7.
`
`I have never had any court or administrative body impose sanctions or
`
`contempt citations against me.
`
`8.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board's Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code
`
`of Federal Regulations.
`
`9.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 11.19(a).
`
`10.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney, with experience in many
`
`litigations involving patent infringement in District Courts across the country,
`
`including experience with fact and expert document and deposition discovery,
`
`claim construction, Markman hearings, motion practice, trials and hearings, and
`
`investigations before the International Trade Commission.
`
`11.
`
`I have been lead counsel for Petitioners Ruckus Wireless, Inc. and
`
`Netgear, Inc. in the ongoing litigation matters captioned Chrimar Systems, Inc. et
`
`al. v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-00186 and Chrimar Systems, Inc. et
`
`al. v. Netgear, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-00624, since their inception and have been
`
`actively involved in all aspects of these co-pending litigation matters, which
`
`respectively relate to and involve the same patent at issue in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RUCKUS Ex. 1018 - pg. 3
`
`
`
`Declaration of Matthew S. Yungwirth in Support of
`Petitioners’ Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`Specifically, as part of my participation in these ongoing litigation matters, I have
`
`IPR2017-00720
`U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838
`
`been actively involved in: (1) the preparation of invalidity contentions against the
`
`claims of the subject patent and related patents, and (2) the evaluation of Patent
`
`Owner’s infringement contentions alleging that Petitioners Ruckus Wireless, Inc.
`
`and Netgear, Inc. infringe the claims of the subject patent and related patents.
`
`12.
`
`I am also knowledgeable regarding Petitioners’ technology and the
`
`state of the art relevant to this proceeding based on my prior experience
`
`representing Petitioners in patent litigation matters. Thus, I am familiar with the
`
`subject matter at issue in this proceeding as a result of my representation of
`
`Petitioners in the aforementioned related litigation matters.
`
`13.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements are made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`and the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of
`
` /
`
`
`
` Matthew S. Yungwirth /
`Matthew S. Yungwirth
`msyungwirth@duanemorris.com
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`1075 Peachtree Street, NE
`Suite 2000
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`
`Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`Dated: February 14, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RUCKUS Ex. 1018 - pg. 4
`
`
`
`Declaration of Matthew S. Yungwirth in Support of
`Petitioners’ Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`
`IPR2017-00720
`U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838
`
`
`
`
`
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RUCKUS Ex. 1018 - pg. 5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
