`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 11
`Entered: August 2, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00038
`Case IPR2017-000391
`Patent 6,195,302
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, KEVIN F. TURNER, and JOHN A. HUDALLA,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This Order pertains to both of these cases. Therefore, we exercise our
`discretion to issue a single Order to be filed in each case. The parties are
`authorized to use this style heading in responding to this order.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00038, IPR2017-00039
`Patent 6,195,302
`
`A conference call in above-cited inter partes reviews occurred on
`
`August 1, 2017. Respective counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner, and
`
`Judges Lee, Turner, and Hudalla were on the call. The purpose of the call
`
`was to discuss proposed changes to the Scheduling Order.
`
`Petitioner indicated that Patent Owner’s Responses (Paper 10) in both
`
`proceedings do not raise any substantive arguments other than reserving
`
`Patent Owner’s rights pending the outcome of the Supreme Court granting
`
`certiorari in Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. Greene’s Energy Grp., LLC,
`
`No. 16-712, 2017 WL 2507340 (U.S. June 12, 2017). On the conference
`
`call, Patent Owner did not dispute the characterization. Based on this,
`
`Petitioner asserted that these proceedings are ripe for issuance of final
`
`written decisions.
`
`On the conference call, both parties indicated that they do not intend
`
`to request oral hearing, and that there are no subsequent filings to be made
`
`by the parties, save short Replies to Patent Owner’s Responses to be filed in
`
`short order by Petitioner. After conferring, the panel indicated that the
`
`parties may file a joint notice of stipulation as to the remaining Due Dates,
`
`including Due Dates 6 and 7. That stipulation should also memorialize that
`
`both parties are waiving their right to seek an oral hearing in these
`
`proceedings in conjunction with Due Date 7.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that both parties shall file a joint notice of stipulation as to
`
`the remaining Due Dates in these proceedings; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint notice of stipulation must
`
`indicate that both parties waive their rights to oral hearing in these
`
`proceedings.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00038, IPR2017-00039
`Patent 6,195,302
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph E. Palys
`Chetan Bansal
`Arvind Jairam
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`chetanbansal@paulhastings.com
`arvindjairam@paulhastings.com
`PH-Samsung-Promos1-IPR@paulhastings.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Craig R. Kaufman
`Kevin C. Jones
`TECHKNOWLEDGE LAW GROUP LLP
`ckaufman@tklg-llp.com
`kjones@tklg-llp.com
`
`
`3
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
