throbber
IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`MDI
`
`110 :2
`
`.
`E 402 9
`
`§ 402 :2
`
`TRANSMIT
`DEV CE
`UNDIER
`TEST
`
`PG
`
`Em
`
`*Resistor matching to 1 part in 100.
`
`23.5.1.3 Receiver specifications
`
`The PMA shall provide the Receive function specified in 23.4.1.3 in accordance with the electrical specifica-
`tions of this clause. The patch cables and interconnecting hardware used in test configurations shall meet
`Category 5 specifications as in ISO/IEC 11801: 1995.
`
`The term worst-case UTP model, as used in this clause, refers to lumped—element cable model shown in fig-
`ure 23-23 that has been developed to simulate the attenuation and group delay characteristics of 100 m of
`worst-case Category 3 PVC UTP cable.
`
`This constant resistance filter structure has been optimized to best match the following amplitude and group
`delay characteristics, where the argumentfis in hertz, and the argument x is the cable length in meters. For
`the worst-case UTP model, argument x was set to 100 m, and the component values determined for a best
`least mean squared fit of both real and imaginary parts of H(fi x) over the frequency range 2 to 15 MHz.
`
`NOTE—This group delay model is relative and does not includes the fixed delay associated with 100 111 of Category 3
`cable. An additional 570 ns of fixed delay should be added in order to obtain the absolute group delay.
`
`PropagationImag(f, x) = j(—l0)
`
`Pr0pagationReal(f, x) = —(7.1 i% + 0.701L()6)(%)
`
`PropagationImag(f, x) + Propagatz'0nReal(f, x)
`20
`
`H(f,x) = 10
`
`23.5.1.3.1 Receiver differential input signals
`
`Differential signals received on the receive inputs that were transmitted within the constraints of 23.5.1.2,
`and have then passed through a worst-case UTP model, shall be correctly translated into one of the
`PMA_UNITDATA.ir1dicate messages and sent to the PCS. In addition, the receiver, when presented with a
`
`This is anlegrchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0140
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`R13
`50
`
`R14
`
`50
`
`
`Receive side
`
`L's :I: 10%
`C's 1: 5%
`R's 11%
`
`link test pulse generated according to the requirements of 23.4. 1 .2 and followed by at least 3T of silence on
`pair RX_D2, shall accept it as a link test pulse.
`
`Both data and link test pulse receive features shall be tested in at least two configurations: using the worst-
`case UTP model, and with a connection less than one meter in length between transmitter and receiver.
`
`A receiver is allowed to discard the first received packet after the transition into state LINK_PASS, using
`that packet for the purpose of fine-tuning its receiver equalization and clock recovery circuits.
`
`NOTE—Implementors may find it practically impossible to meet the requirements of this subclause without using some
`form of adaptive equalization.
`
`23.5.1.3.2 Receiver differential noise immunity
`
`The PMA, when presented with 8B6T encoded data meeting the requirements of 23.5.1.3.1, shall translate
`this data into PMA_UNITDATA.indicate (DATA) messages with a bit loss of no more than that specified in
`23.4.1.3.
`
`The PMA Carrier Sense function shall not set pma_carrier=ON upon receiving any of the following signals
`on pair RX_D2 at the receiving MDI, as measured using a l00BASE-T4 transmit test filter (23.5. 1 .2.3):
`
`a) All signals having a peak magnitude less than 325 mV.
`b) All continuous sinusoidal signals of amplitude less than 8.7 V peak-to-peak and frequency less than
`1.7 MHZ.
`
`c) All sine waves of single cycle or less duration, starting with phase 0° or 180°, and of amplitude less
`than 8.7 V peak-to-peak, where the frequency is between 1.7 MHz and 15 MHz. For a period of
`7 BT before and after this single cycle, the signal shall be less than 325 mV.
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stanqigrd.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0141
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`cl)
`e)
`
`Fast link pulse burst (FLP burst), as defined in clause 28.
`The link integrity test pulse signal TP_IDL_l00.
`
`23.5.1.3.3 Receiver differential input impedance
`
`The difierential input impedance as measured at the MDI for each receive input shall be such that any reflec-
`tion due to differential signals incident upon each receive input from a balanced cable having an impedance
`of 100 S2 is at least 17 dB below the incident signal, over the fiequency range of 2.0 MHz to 12.5 MHz. This
`return loss shall be maintained at all times when the PHY is firlly powered.
`
`With each receiver connected as in figure 23-19, and with the source adjusted to simulate eopl and eop4
`(50% duty cycle square wave with 3.5 V amplitude, period of 480 ns, and risetime of 20 ns or faster), the
`amount of droop on each receive pair as defined in figure 23-18 shall not exceed 6.0%.
`
`23.5.1 .3.4 Common-mode rejection
`
`While receiving packets from a compliant l00BASE—T4 transmitter connected to all MDI pins, a receiver
`shall send the proper PMA_UNITDATA.indicate messages to the PCS for any differential input signal Es
`that results in a signal Edif that meets 23.5.1.3.1 even in the presence of common-mode voltages Em
`(applied as shown in figure 23-24). Ecm shall be a 25 V peak—to—peak square wave, 500 kHz or lower in fre-
`quency, with edges no slower than 4 ns (20%—80%), connected to each of the receive pairs RX_D2, BI_D3,
`and BI D4.
`
`“'0'
`
`RECEIVE
`DEVICE
`UNDER
`TEST
`
`
`
`* Resistor matching to 1 part in 1000.
`
`23.5.1.3.5 Receiver fault tolerance
`
`The receiver shall tolerate the application of short circuits between the leads of any receive input for an
`indefinite period of time without damage and shall resume normal operation after such faults are removed.
`Receivers shall withstand without damage a 1000 V common-mode impulse of either polarity (Ecm as indi-
`cated in figure 23-25). The shape of the impulse shall be 0.3/50 us (300 ns virtual front time, 50 us virtual
`time of half value), as defined in IEC 60.
`
`23.5.1.3.6 Receiver frequency tolerance
`
`The receive feature shall properly receive incoming data with a ternary symbol rate within the range
`25.000 MHz i 0.01%.
`
`This is anlétrchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0142
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`Mm
`
`RECEIVE
`DEVICE
`UNDER
`
`TEST
`
`§ 402 :2’
`49.9 Q
`-v\,—o
`
`110 Q
`
`Ecm .
`
`§4o2 9*
`
`I||—O8
`
`* Resistor matching to 1 part in 100.
`
`
`
`23.5.2 Power consumption
`
`Afier 100 ms following PowerOn, the current drawn by the PHY shall not exceed 0.75 A when powered
`through the M11.
`
`The PHY shall be capable of operating from all voltage sources allowed by clause 22, including those cur-
`rent limited to 0.75 A, as supplied by the DTE or repeater through the resistance of all permissible MII
`cables.
`
`The PHY shall not introduce extraneous signals on the M11 control circuits during normal power-up and
`power-down.
`
`While in power-down mode the PHY is not required to meet any of the 100BASE-T4 performance require-
`ments.
`
`23.6 Link segment characteristics
`
`23.6.1 Cabling
`
`Cabling and installation practices generally suitable for use with this standard appear in ISO/IEC
`11801: 1995. Exceptions, notes, and additional requirements are as listed below.
`
`a)
`b)
`
`c)
`
`100BASE-T4 uses a star topology. Horizontal cabling is used to connect PHY entities.
`100BASE-T4 is an ISO/IEC 11801: 1995 class C application, with additional installation require-
`ments and transmission parameters specified in 23.6.2 through 23.6.4. The highest fundamental fre-
`quency transmitted by 8B6T coding is 12.5 MHz. The aggregate data rate for three pairs using 8B6T
`coding is 100 Mb/s.
`100BASE-T4 shall use four pairs of balanced cabling, Category 3 or better, with a nominal charac-
`teristic impedance of 100 Q.
`d) When using Category 3 cable for the link segment, clause 23 recommends, but does not require, the
`use of Category 4 or better connecting hardware, patch cords and jumpers. The use of Category 4 or
`better connecting hardware increases the link segment composite NEXT loss, composite ELFEXT
`loss and reduces the link segment insertion loss. This lowers the link segment crosstalk noise, which
`in turn decreases the probability of errors.
`The use of shielded cable is outside the scope of this standard.
`
`e)
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stanqigrd.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0143
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`23.6.2 Link transmission parameters
`
`Unless otherwise specified, link segment testing shall be conducted using source and load impedances of
`100 Q.
`
`23.6.2.1 Insertion loss
`
`The insertion loss of a simplex link segment shall be no more than 12 dB at all frequencies between 2 and
`12.5 lVlHz. This consists of the attenuation of the twisted pairs, connector losses, and reflection losses due to
`impedance mismatches between the various components of the simplex link segment. The insertion loss
`specification shall be met when the simplex link segment is terminated in source and load impedances that
`satisfy 23.5.1.2.4 and 23.5.l.3.3.
`
`NOTE—The loss of PVC-insulated cable exhibits significant temperature dependence. At temperatures greater than
`40 °C, it may be necessary to use a less temperature-dependent cable, such as many Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene
`(FEP), Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or Perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) plenurn-rated cables.
`
`23.6.2.2 Differential characteristic impedance
`
`The magnitude of the differential characteristic impedance of a 3 m length of twisted pair used in a simplex
`link shall be between 85 Q and 115 Q for all frequencies between 2 MHz and 12.5 MHz.
`
`23.6.2.3 Coupling parameters
`
`In order to limit the noise coupled into a simplex link segment from adjacent simplex link segments, Near-
`End Crosstalk (NEXT) loss and Equal Level Far-End Crosstalk (ELFEXT) loss are specified for each sim-
`plex link segment. In addition, since three simplex links (TX_Dl, Bl_D3, and Bl_D4) are used to send data
`between PHYS and one simplex link (RX_D2) is used to carry collision information as specified in 23.1.4,
`Multiple-Disturber NEXT loss and Multiple-Dist11rber ELFEXT loss are also specified.
`
`23.6.2.3.1 Differential Near-End Crosstalk (NEXT) loss
`
`The differential Near-End Crosstalk (NEXT) loss between two simplex link segments is specified in order to
`ensure that collision information can be reliably received by the PHY receiver. The NEXT loss between each of
`the three data carrying simplex link segments and the collision sensing simplex link segment shall be at least
`24.5 — 15><log10(f/12.5) (wherefis the fi'equency in MHz) over the frequency range 2.0 MHz to 12.5 MHz.
`
`23.6.2.3.2 Multiple-disturber NEXT (MDNEXT) loss
`
`Since three simplex links are used to send data between PHYS and one simplex link is used to carry collision
`information, the NEXT noise that is coupled into the collision, sensing simplex link segment is from multi-
`ple (three) signal sources, or disturbers. The MDNEXT loss between the three data carrying simplex link
`segments and the collision sensing simplex link segment shall be at least 21.4 — l5xlog10(f/ 12.5) dB (where
`f is the frequency in MHz) over the frequency range 2.0 to 12.5 MHz. Refer to 12.7.3.2 and Appendix A3,
`Example Crosstalk Computation for Multiple Disturbers, for a tutorial and method for estimating the MDN-
`EXT loss for an n-pair cable.
`
`23.6.2.3.3 Equal Level Far-End Crosstalk (ELFEXT) loss
`
`Equal Level Far-End Crosstalk (ELFEXT) loss is specified in order to limit the crosstalk noise at the far end of
`a simplex link segment to meet the BER objective specified in 23.1.2 and the noise specifications of 23.6.3.
`Far-End Crosstalk (FEXT) noise is the crosstalk noise that appears at the far end of a simplex link segment
`which is coupled from an adjacent simplex link segment with the noise source (transmitters) at the near end.
`ELFEXT loss is the ratio of the data signal to FEXT noise at the output of a simplex link segment (receiver
`input). To limit the FEXT noise fi'om adjacent simplex link segments, the ELFEXT loss between two data car-
`
`This is anlegrchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0144
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`rying simplex link segments shall be greater than 23.1 —20><1og10(f/12.5) dB (where f is the frequency in
`MHz) over the frequency range 2.0 lVlHz to 12.5 MHz. ELFEXT loss at frequencyfand distance I is defined as
`
`V
`ELFEXT_Loss ()’,l) = 20 X loglo (ids) — SLS_Loss (dB)
`Vpm
`
`where
`
`Vpds
`Vpcn
`SLS_Loss
`
`is the peak voltage of disturbing signal (near—end transmitter)
`is the peak crosstalk noise at the far end of disturbed simplex link segment
`is the insertion loss of the disturbing simplex link segment
`
`23.6.2.3.4 Multiple-disturber ELFEXT (MDELFEXT) loss
`
`Since three simplex links are used to transfer data between PHYS, the FEXT noise that is coupled into an data
`carrying simplex link segment is fi'om multiple (two) signal sources, or disturbers. The MDELFEXT loss
`between a data carrying simplex link segment and the other two data carrying simplex link segments shall be
`greater than 20.9 — 20><log10(f/ 12.5) (where fis the frequency in MHz) over the frequency range 2.0 lV[I-Iz to
`12.5 lVlHz. Refer to 12.7.3.2 and Appendix A3, Example Crosstalk Computation for Multiple Disturbers, for a
`tutorial and method for estimating the MDELFEXT loss for an n-pair cable.
`
`23.6.2.4 Delay
`
`Since T4 sends information over three simplex link segments in parallel, the absolute delay of each and the
`differential delay are specified to comply with network round-trip delay limits and ensure the proper decod-
`ing by receivers, respectively.
`
`23.6.2.4.1 Maximum link delay
`
`The propagation delay of a simplex link segment shall not exceed 570 ns at all flequencies between 2.0 lVlHz
`and 12.5 NH-Iz.
`
`23.6.2.4.2 Maximum link delay per meter
`
`The propagation delay per meter of a simplex link segment shall not exceed 5.7 ns/m at all frequencies
`between 2.0 MHz and 12.5 MHz.
`
`23.6.2.4.3 Difference in link delays
`
`The difference in propagation delay, or skew, under all conditions, between the fastest and the slowest sim-
`plex link segment in a link segment shall not exceed 50 ns at all frequencies between 2.0 MHz and
`12.5 MHz. It is a further functional requirement that, once installed, the skew between all pair combinations
`due to environmental conditions shall not vary more than i 10 ns, within the above requirement.
`
`23.6.3 Noise
`
`The noise level on the link segments shall be such that the objective error rate is met. The noise environment
`consists generally of two primary contributors: self—induced near—end crosstalk, which affects the ability to
`detect collisions, and far-end crosstalk, which affects the signal-to-noise ratio during packet reception.
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stanqigrd.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0145
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`23.6.3.1 Near-End Crosstalk
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`The MDNEXT (Multip1e—Disturber Near-End Crosstalk) noise on a link segment depends on the level of the
`disturbing signals on pairs TX_D1, BI_D3, and BI_D4, and the crosstalk loss between those pairs and the
`disturbed pair, RX_D2.
`
`The MDNEXT noise on a link segment shall not exceed 325 mVp.
`
`This standard is compatible with the following assumptions:
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`Three disturbing pairs with 99th percentile pair—to—pair NEXT loss greater than 24.5 dB at 12.5 lVlHz
`(i.e., Category 3 cable).
`Six additional disturbers (2 per simplex link) representing connectors at the near end of the link seg-
`ment with 99th percentile NEXT loss greater than 40 dB at 12.5 MHZ (i.e., Category 3 connectors
`installed in accordance with 23.6.4.1).
`All disturbers combined according to the MDNEXT Monte Carlo procedure outlined in Appendix A3,
`Example Crosstalk Computation for Multiple Disturbers.
`
`The MDNEXT noise is defined using three maximum level 100BASE-T4 transmitters sending uncorrellated
`continuous data sequences while attached to the simplex link segments TX_Dl, BI_D3, and BI_D4 (disturb-
`ing links), and the noise measured at the output of a filter connected to the simplex link segment RX_D2.
`(disturbed link). Each continuous data sequence is a pseudo-random bit pattern having a length of at least
`2047 bits that has been coded according to the 8B6T coding rules in 23.2.1.2. The filter is the 100BASE-T4
`Transmit Test Filter specified in 23.5 .1.2.3.
`
`23.6.3.2 Far-End Crosstalk
`
`The MDFEXT (Multiple-Disturber Far-End Crosstalk) noise on a link segment depends on the level of the
`disturbing signals on pairs TX_Dl, BI_D3, and BI_D4, and the various crosstalk losses between those pairs.
`
`The MDFEXT noise on a link segment shall not exceed 87 mVp.
`
`This standard is compatible with the following assumptions:
`
`a)
`
`Two disturbing pairs with 99th percentile ELFEXT (Equal Level Far-End Crosstalk) loss greater
`than 23 dB at 12.5 MHz.
`
`b) Nine additional disturbers (three per simplex link) representing connectors in the link segment with
`99th percentile NEXT loss greater than 40 dB at 12.5 MHz.
`All disturbers combined according to the MDNEXT Monte Carlo procedure outlined in Appendix A3,
`Example Crosstalk Computation for Multiple Disturbers.
`
`c)
`
`The MDFEXT noise is defined using two maximum level 100BASE-T4 transmitters sending uncorrellated
`continuous data sequences while attached to two simplex link segments (disturbing links) and the noise mea-
`sured at the output of a filter connected to the far end of a third simplex link segment (disturbed link). Each
`continuous data sequence is a pseudo-random bit pattern having a length of at least 2047 hits that has been
`coded according to the 8B6T coding rules in 23.2.1.2. The filter is the 100BASE-T4 Transmit Test Filter
`specified in 23.5.1.2.3.
`
`This is anlegchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0146
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`23.6.4 Installation practice
`
`23.6.4.1 Connector installation practices
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`The amount of untwisting in a pair as a result of termination to connecting hardware should be no greater
`than 25 mm (1.0 in) for Category 3 cables. This is the same value recommended in ISO/IEC 11801: 1995 for
`Category 4 connectors.
`
`23.6.4.2 Disallow use of Category 3 cable with more than four pairs
`
`Jumper cables, or horizontal runs, made from more than four pairs of Category 3 cable are not allowed.
`
`23.6.4.3 Allow use of Category 5 jumpers with up to 25 pairs
`
`Jumper cables made from up to 25 pairs of Category 5 cable, for the purpose of mass—terminating port con-
`nections at a hub, are allowed. Such jumper cables, if used, shall be limited in length to no more than 10 In
`total.
`
`23.7 MDI specification
`
`This clause defines the MDI. The link topology requires a crossover function between PMAs. Implementa-
`tion and location of this crossover are also defined in this clause.
`
`23.7.1 MDI connectors
`
`Eight-pin connectors meeting the requirements of section 3 and figures 1-5 of IEC 603-7: 1990 shall be used
`as the mechanical interface to the balanced cabling. The plug connector shall be used on the balanced
`cabling and the jack on the PHY. These connectors are depicted (for informational use only) in figures 23-26
`and 23-27. The table 23-6 shows the assignment of PMA signals to connector contacts for PHYs with and
`without an internal crossover.
`
`pin 1
`
`23.7.2 Crossover function
`
`It is a functional requirement that a crossover function be implemented in every link segment. The crossover
`function connects the transmitters of one PHY to the receivers of the PHY at the other end of the link seg-
`ment. Crossover functions may be implemented internally to a PHY or elsewhere in the link segment. For a
`PHY that does not implement the crossover function, the MDI labels in the last colunm of table 23-4 refer to
`its own internal circuits (second column). For PHYs that do implement the internal crossover, the MDI
`labels in the last column of table 23-4 refer to the internal circuits of the remote PHY of the link segment.
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stanqlgrd.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0147
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`Table 23-6—MDl connection and labeling requirements
`
`
`
`Additionally, the MDI connector for a PHY that implements the crossover function shall be marked with the
`graphical symbol “X”. Internal and external crossover functions are shown in figure 23-28. The crossover
`fimction specified here for pairs TX_D1 and RX_D2 is compatible with the crossover fimction specified in
`14.5.2 for pairs TD and RD.
`
`When a link segment connects a DTE to a repeater, it is recommended the crossover be implemented in the
`PHY local to the repeater. If both PHYs of a link segment contain internal crossover functions, an additional
`external crossover is necessary. It is recommended that the crossover be visible to an installer from one of
`the PHYS. When both PHYS contain internal crossovers, it is further recommended in networks in which the
`topology identifies either a central backbone segment or a central repeater that the PHY furthest from the
`central element be assigned the external crossover to maintain consistency.
`
`Implicit implementation of the crossover function within a tvvisted-pair cable, or at a wiring panel, while not
`expressly forbidden, is beyond the scope of this standard.
`
`23.8 System considerations
`
`The repeater unit specified in clause 27 forms the central unit for interconnecting 100BASE—T4 tvvisted-pair
`links in networks of more than two nodes. It also provides the means for connecting 100BASE—T4 twisted-
`pair links to other 100 Mb/s baseband segments. The proper operation of a CSMA/CD network requires that
`network size be limited to control round-trip propagation delay as specified in clause 29.
`
`23.9 Environmental specifications
`
`23.9.1 General safety
`
`All equipment meeting this standard shall conform to IEC 950: 1991.
`
`This is anlggchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0148
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`1 TX_D1+
`_[: 2 TX_D1—
`3 RX_D2+
`6 RX_D2—
`it
`%4 Bl D3+
`:%7 B|_D4+
`
`5 B|_D3—
`
`8 B|_D4—
`PHY
`
`TX_D1+
`1
`TX_D1— 2:]_
`RX_D2+ 3
`I:
`RX_D2— 5
`B|_D3+ 4g
`B|_D4+ 7g
`
`Bl_D3— 5
`
`B|_D4— 3
`PHY
`
`a) Two PHYs with external crossover function
`
`MD|-X Label
`MD|
`1
`TX_D1+ — TX_D1+ 1
`_l;2 TX_D1— Z TX_D1— 2
`3 RX_D2+: RX_D2+ 3
`_<]:5 Rx_D2—j RX_D2— 6
`4 BI_D3+ — Bl_D3+
`4
`
`5
`
`Bl_D3— j Bl_D3— 5
`
`%7 Bl_D4+ : Bl_D4+
`
`5
`
`Bl_D4— — Bl_D4— 8
`
`7
`
`Internal Signal
`
`
`
`b) PHY with internal crossover function
`
`23.9.2 Network safety
`
`This clause sets forth a number of recommendations and guidelines related to safety concerns; the list is nei-
`ther complete nor does it address all possible safety issues. The designer is urged to consult the relevant
`local, national, and international safety regulations to ensure compliance with the appropriate requirements.
`
`LAN cable systems described in this clause are subject to at least four direct electrical safety hazards during
`their installation and use. These hazards are as follows:
`
`Direct contact between LAN components and power, lighting, or communications circuits
`a)
`Static charge buildup on LAN cables and components
`b)
`c) High-energy transients coupled onto the LAN cable system
`d)
`Voltage potential differences between safety grounds to which various LAN components are
`connected
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0149
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`Such electrical safety hazards must be avoided or appropriately protected against for proper network instal-
`lation and performance. In addition to provisions for proper handling of these conditions in an operational
`system, special measures must be taken to ensure that the intended safety features are not negated during
`installation of a new network or during modification or maintenance of an existing network.
`
`23.9.2.1 Installation
`
`It is a mandatory fimctional requirement that sound installation practice, as defined by applicable local codes
`and regulations, be followed in every instance in which such practice is applicable.
`
`23.9.2.2 Grounding
`
`Any safety grounding path for an externally connected PHY shall be provided through the circuit ground of
`the MH connection.
`
`WARNING—It is assumed that the equipment to which the PHY is attached is properly grounded, and not left floating
`nor serviced by a “doubly insulated, ac power distribution system.” The use of floating or insulated equipment, and the
`consequent implications for safety, are beyond the scope of this standard.
`
`23.9.2.3 Installation and maintenance guidelines
`
`It is a mandatory functional requirement that, during installation and maintenance of the cable plant, care be
`taken to ensure that noninsulated network cable conductors do not make electrical contact with unintended
`
`conductors or ground.
`
`23.9.2.4 Telephony voltages
`
`The use of building wiring brings with it the possibility of wiring errors that may connect telephony voltages
`to 100BASE-T4 equipment. Other than voice signals (which are low voltage), the primary voltages that may
`be encountered are the “battery” and ringing voltages. Although there is no universal standard, the following
`maximums generally apply.
`
`Battery voltage to a telephone line is generally 56 Vdc applied to the line through a balanced 400 9 source
`impedance.
`
`Ringing voltage is a composite signal consisting of an ac component and a dc component. The ac component is
`up to 175 V peak at 20 Hz to 60 Hz With a 100 9 source resistance. The dc component is 56 Vdc with a 300 Q
`to 600 9. source resistance. Large reactive transients can occur at the start and end of each ring interval.
`
`Although 100BASE-T4 equipment is not required to survive such wiring hazards without damage, applica-
`tion of any of the above voltages shall not result in any safety hazard.
`
`NOlI‘E—Wh1'ng errors may impose telephony voltages differentially across 100BASE-T4 transmitters or receivers.
`Because the termination resistance likely to be present across a receiver’s input is of substantially lower impedance than an
`off-hook telephone instrument, receivers will generally appear to the telephone system as off-hook telephones. Therefore,
`full-ring voltages will be applied for only short periods. Transmitters that are coupled using transformers will similarly
`appear like ofi‘-hook telephones (though perhaps a bit more slowly) due to the low resistance of the transformer coil.
`
`23.9.3 Environment
`
`23.9.3.1 Electromagnetic emission
`
`The twisted-pair link shall comply with applicable local and national codes for the limitation of electromag-
`netic interference.
`
`This is anlggrchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0150
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`23.9.3.2 Temperature and humidity
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`The twisted—pair link is expected to operate over a reasonable range of environmental conditions related to
`temperature, humidity, and physical handling (such as shock and vibration). Specific requirements and val-
`ues for these parameters are considered to be beyond the scope of this standard.
`
`It is recommended that manufacturers indicate in the literature associated with the PHY the operating envi-
`ronmental conditions to facilitate selection, installation, and maintenance.
`
`23.10 PHY labeling
`
`It is recommended that each PHY (and supporting documentation) be labeled in a manner visible to the user
`with at least these parameters:
`
`a) Data rate capability in Mb/s
`b)
`Power level in terms of maximum current drain (for external PHYs)
`c) Any applicable safety warnings
`
`See also 23.7.2.
`
`23.11 Timing summary
`
`23.11.1 Timing references
`
`All MII signals are defined (or corrected to) the DTE end of a zero length MII cable.
`
`NOTE—With a finite length M11 cable, TX_CLK appears in the PHY one cable propagation delay earlier than at the
`MII. This advances the transmit timing. Receive timing is retarded by the same amount.
`
`The phrase adjustedfor pair skew, when applied to a timing reference on a particular pair, means that the
`designated timing reference has been adjusted by adding to it the difference between the time of arrival of
`preamble on the latest of the three receive pairs and the time of arrival of preamble on that particular pair.
`
`PMA_UNITDATA request
`
`Figures 23-29, 30, 31, and 32. The implementation of this abstract message is not specified.
`Conceptually, this is the time at which the PMA has been given full knowledge and use of the
`ternary symbols to be transmitted.
`
`PMA_UNITDATA.indicate
`
`Figure 23-33. The implementation of this abstract message is not specified. Conceptually, this is
`the time at which the PCS has been given full knowledge and use of the ternary symbols received.
`WAVEFORM
`
`Figure 23-29. Point in time at which output waveform has moved 1/2 way from previous nominal
`output level to present nominal output level.
`
`TX EN
`
`Figure 23-30. First rising edge of TX_CLK following the rising edge of TX_EN.
`
`NOT_TX_EN
`
`Figures 23-31 and 32. First rising edge of TX_CLK following the falling edge of TX_EN.
`
`CRS
`
`Figure 23-33. Rising edge of CRS.
`
`CARRIER_STATUS
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0151
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`Figure 23-33. Rising edge of cam'er_status.
`
`NOT_CARRIER_STATUS
`
`Figure 23-34. Falling edge of carn'er_status.
`
`RX_DV
`
`COL
`
`No figure. First rising edge of RX_CLK following rising edge of RX_DV.
`
`No figure. Rising edge of COL signal at MII.
`
`NOT_COL
`
`No figure. Falling edge of COL signal at MII.
`
`PMA_ERROR
`
`No figure. Time at which rxerror_status changes to ERROR.
`
`This is anlgirrchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`bit 1025
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`0152
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`23.11.2 Definitions of controlled parameters
`
`PMA_OUT
`
`Figure 23-29. Time between PMA_UNITDATA request (tx_code_vector) and the WAVEFORM
`timing reference for each of the three transmit channels TX_Dl, BI_D3, or BI_D4.
`
`TEN_PMA
`
`Figures 23-30, 31, and 32. Time between TX_EN timing reference and MA_UNITDATA request
`(tx_code_vector).
`
`TEN_CRS
`
`Figure 23-30. Time between TX_EN timing reference and the loopback of TX_EN to CRS as
`measured at the CRS timing reference point.
`
`NOT_TEN_CRS
`
`Figures 23-31 and 32. Time between NOT_TX_EN timing reference and the loopback of TX_EN
`to CRS as measured at the NOT_CRS timing reference point. 111 the event of a collision (COL is
`raised at any point during a packet) the minimum time for NOT_TEN_CRS may optionally be as
`short as 0.
`
`RX_PMA_CARR]ER
`
`Figure 23-33. Time between the WAVEFORM timing reference, adjusted for pair skew, of first
`pulse of a normal preamble (or first pulse of a preamble preceded by a link test pulse or a partial
`link test pulse) and the CARRIER_STATUS timing reference.
`
`RX_CRS
`
`Figure 23-33. Time between the WAVEFORM timing reference, adjusted for pair skew, of first
`pulse of a normal preamble (or first pulse of a preamble preceded by a link test pulse or a partial
`link test pulse) and the CRS timing reference.
`NOTE—The input waveform used for this test is an ordinary T4 preamble, generated by a compliant T4
`transmitter. As such, the delay between the first and third pulses of the preamble (which are used by the car-
`rier sense logic) is very nearly 80 ns.
`
`RX_NOT_CRS
`
`For a data packet, the time between the WAVEFORM timing reference, adjusted for pair skew, of
`the first pulse of eopl, and the de-assertion of CRS. For a collision fragment, the time between the
`WAVEFORM timing reference, adjusted for pair skew, of the ternary symbol on pair TX_D2,
`which follows the last ternary data symbol received on pair RX_D2, and the de-assertion of CRS.
`
`Both are limited to the same value. For a data packet, detection of the six ternary symbols of eopol
`is accomplished in the PCS layer. For a collision fragment, detection of the concluding seven
`ternary zeroes is accomplished in the PMA layer, and passed to the PCS in the form of the
`carrier_status indication.
`FAIRNESS
`
`The difference between RX_NOT_CRS at the conclusion of one packet and RX_CRS on a
`subsequent packet. The packets used in this test may arrive with an IPG anywhere in the range of
`80 to 160.
`
`RX_PMA_DATA
`
`Figure 23-33. Time between the WAVEFORM timing reference, adjusted for pair skew, of first
`pulse of a normal

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket