`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 6
`Entered: November 10, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`TIVO INC.
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________
`Case IPR2016-01524 Patent 6,233,389
`Case IPR2016-01552 Patent 7,558,472
`Case IPR2016-01553 Patent 7,558,472
`Case IPR2016-01554 Patent 8,457,476
`Case IPR2016-01555 Patent 8,457,476
`Case IPR2016-01712 Patent 6,233,389
`
`
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, and CARL L.
`SILVERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PER CURIAM
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01524 Patent 6,233,389
`Case IPR2016-01552 Patent 7,558,472
`Case IPR2016-01553 Patent 7,558,472
`Case IPR2016-01554 Patent 8,457,476
`Case IPR2016-01555 Patent 8,457,476
`Case IPR2016-01712 Patent 6,233,389
`
`
`This order extends the deadline one month for Patent Owner’s
`
`preliminary response for the following cases: IPR 2016-01524, IPR 2016-
`
`01552, IPR 2016-01553, IPR 2016-01554, and IPR 2016-01555.
`
`On November 9, 2016, the parties referred to “Pending settlement in
`
`IPR2016-01524, IPR 2016-01552, IPR 2016-01553, IPR 2016-01554, and
`
`IPR 2016-01555” and submitted the following request:
`
`The Parties have reached an agreement in principle to
`resolve their disputes, including settlement of all matters in
`controversy between the Parties related thereto. The Parties
`are now working on detailed written agreements
`that
`implement the terms of this agreement.
` The Parties
`respectfully request a stay of thirty (30) days of all unreached
`deadlines in the IPR, in which time the Parties will focus on
`finalizing the settlement agreement. The Parties plan to file
`dismissal papers with the Board soon thereafter. In the
`interim, the Parties jointly request that the Board refrain from
`issuing any decision on institution before the statutory
`deadline.
`
`
`Based on the parties’ statement, the Board finds it appropriate to
`
`allow Patent Owner one additional month to file its preliminary response in
`
`IPR 2016-01524, IPR 2016-01552, IPR 2016-01553, IPR 2016-01554, and
`
`IPR 2016-01555. No change is made to the preliminary response due date
`
`for IPR2016-01712 inasmuch as the current due date for this case should
`
`be sufficient.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the deadline for Patent Owner’s preliminary
`
`response for IPR 2016-01524, IPR 2016-01552, IPR 2016-01553, IPR 2016-
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01524 Patent 6,233,389
`Case IPR2016-01552 Patent 7,558,472
`Case IPR2016-01553 Patent 7,558,472
`Case IPR2016-01554 Patent 8,457,476
`Case IPR2016-01555 Patent 8,457,476
`Case IPR2016-01712 Patent 6,233,389
`
`
`01554, and IPR 2016-01555 is extended one month; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that no additional extensions of time for the
`
`filing of Patent Owner’s preliminary response for IPR 2016-01524, IPR
`
`2016-01552, IPR 2016-01553, IPR 2016-01554, and IPR 2016-01555 will
`
`be granted.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`W. Karl Renner,
`Jeremy Monaldo
`Stuart A. Nelson
`Timothy Riffe
`Brian Goldberg
`I-Wei Hsieh
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`jjm@fr.com
`snelson@fr.com
`riffe@fr.com
`bgoldberg@fr.com
`ahsieh@fr.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`
`Ben J. Yorks
`Benjamin Haber
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`byorks@irell.com
`bhaber@irell.com
`
`
`
`
`3