`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.,
`Appellee
`
`ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF
`COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2019-1202
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-
`01622.
`
`______________________
`
`ON PETITIONS FOR PANEL REHEARING AND
`REHEARING EN BANC
`______________________
`
`Polaris Ex. 2026
`1 Kingston v. Polaris, IPR2016-01622, Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Case: 19-1202 Document: 94 Page: 2 Filed: 04/14/2020
`
`
`2
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED v. KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY
`COMPANY
`
`Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER*, LOURIE,
`DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO,
`CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
`PER CURIAM.
`
`O R D E R
` Appellant Polaris Innovations Limited and Appellee
`Kingston Technology Company, Inc. separately filed
`petitions for rehearing en banc. Intervenor Andrei Iancu
`also filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and
`rehearing en banc. The petitions were referred to the
`panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petitions
`for rehearing en banc were referred to the circuit judges
`who are in regular active service.
` Upon consideration thereof,
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`
`
`The petitions for panel rehearing are denied.
`
`The petitions for rehearing en banc are denied.
`
`The mandate of the court will issue on April 21, 2020.
`
`
`
` /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`
`
`
` April 14, 2020
` Peter R. Marksteiner
` Date
` Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` FOR THE COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* Circuit Judge Mayer participated only in the deci-
`sion on the petition for panel rehearing.
`
`Polaris Ex. 2026
`1 Kingston v. Polaris, IPR2016-01622, Page 2 of 2
`
`