`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.,
`Appellee
`
`ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF
`COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2019-1202
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-
`01622.
`
`______________________
`
`ORDER
`______________________
`
`PER CURIAM.
`In light of this court’s decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith
`& Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), and the
`
`Polaris Ex. 2025
`1 Kingston v. Polaris, IPR2016-01622, Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Case: 19-1202 Document: 79 Page: 2 Filed: 01/27/2020
`
`2
`
`
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED v. KINGSTON
`TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
`
`fact that Polaris Innovations Limited raised an Appoint-
`ments Clause challenge in its opening brief in the above
`captioned case,
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`(1) The oral argument scheduled for March 2, 2020 is
`cancelled and the case is removed from the calendar.
`(2) The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision in
`No. IPR2016-01622 is vacated and the case is remanded to
`the Board for proceedings consistent with the court’s deci-
`sion in Arthrex.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` FOR THE COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`
`
` January 27, 2020
` Peter R. Marksteiner
` Date
` Clerk of Court
`
`Polaris Ex. 2025
`1 Kingston v. Polaris, IPR2016-01622, Page 2 of 2
`
`