throbber
Paper: 29
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: October 18, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01622
`Patent 6,850,414 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JEAN R. HOMERE, and
`KEN B. BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01622
`Patent 6,850,414 B2
`
`Patent Owner filed in this case a Motion to Amend the patent.
`
`Paper 18. Briefing on that motion has proceeded serially, with the filing of
`Petitioner’s Opposition (Paper 20), Patent Owner’s Reply (Paper 23), and
`Petitioner’s Surreply (Paper 28). On October 4, 2017, and after Patent
`Owner’s Reply but before Petitioner’s Surreply, the Court of Appeals for the
`Federal Circuit issued its decision in Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, No.
`2015-1177, 2017 WL 4399000 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2017) (“Aqua Products”).
`
`Patent Owner argued during a recent conference call with the Board
`that there remains, after Aqua Products, an open issue as to whether Patent
`Owner bears a burden in a Motion to Amend. See Ex. 2014 (Transcript of
`October 5, 2017, Conference Call), 9. Patent Owner, in its Contingent
`Request for Oral Argument (Paper 27), requests time during the oral
`argument “to address issues on which Patent Owner bears the burden . . .
`which may include the following: [w]hether Patent Owner has satisfied its
`burdens such that its Motion to Amend (Paper 18) should be granted; and []
`[a]ny other issues on which Patent Owner bears the burden.”
`
`Out of an abundance of caution and in order to allow the parties and
`the panel to better prepare for oral argument, we offer Patent Owner the
`opportunity to brief the impact of Aqua Products on this proceeding and to
`address only that for which Patent Owner contends it bears a burden. Patent
`Owner is not to present in such a brief any arguments directed to those
`issues for which Petitioner bears the burden, and such arguments by Patent
`Owner in the brief will not be considered.
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file a brief, no more
`than four pages, addressing only the impact of Aqua Products on this
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01622
`Patent 6,850,414 B2
`
`proceeding and that for which Patent Owner contends it bears a burden, no
`later than November 1, 2017.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01622
`Patent 6,850,414 B2
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`David Hoffman
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`IPR37307-0007IP1@fr.com
`hoffman@fr.com
`
`Martha Hopkins
`LAW OFFICES OF S.J. CHRISTINE YANG
`IPR@sjclawpc.com
`mhopkins@sjclawpc.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kenneth Weatherwax
`Nathan Lowenstein
`Parham Hendifar
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`weatherwax@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`lowenstein@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`hendifar@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket