CERTIFICATION UNDER 37 C.F.R. §l .8
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence and any attachment thereto are being transmitted to
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office via the Electronic Filing System of the U.S. Patent
`
`and Trademark Office under 37 CFR §i .6(a)(4) on the date indicated below.
`
`Vflmgézé
`
`Michelle Martinez
`
`4 «Z7»//A
`
`Date
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Appl. No.:
`Applicant(s):
`Filed:
`
`13/653,095
`Donald Andrew Burris
`10/16/2012
`
`Confirmation No.: 3288
`
`Art Unit:
`
`Examiner:
`
`Title:
`
`283 3
`
`Jean Duverne
`
`COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTOR WITH INTEGRAL RFI PROTECTION
`
`Docket No.:
`
`11112-1 17
`
`Customer No.:
`
`21495
`
`Mail Stop Amendment
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313 -1450
`
`Sir:
`
`REPLY PURSUANT TO
`
`37 CFR § 1.111
`
`In response to the Office Action mailed February 28, 2014, please find enclosed
`
`Applicant’s reply:
`
`Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of claims beginning on page 2.
`
`Remarks begin on page 7 of this paper.
`
`PPC Exhibit 2022
`
`Coming v. PPC
`|PR2016—O1569
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`In the Claims:
`
`1.
`
`(Currently Amended) A coaxial cable comiector for coupling an end of a coaxial cable to a
`
`terminal, the coaxial cable comprising an inner conductor, a dielectric surrounding the inner
`
`conductor, an outer conductor surrounding the dielectric, and a jacket surrounding the outer
`
`conductor, the comiector comprising:
`
`a coupler adapted to couple the connector to the terminal;
`
`a body assembled with the coupler, and
`
`a post assembled with the coupler and the body, wherein the post is adapted to receive an end
`
`of a coaxial cable, and
`
`wherein the coupler and post provide RF shielding such that RF signals external to the
`
`coaxial cable connector are attenuated such that the integrity of an electrical signal transmitted
`
`through coaxial cable connector is maintained regardless of the tightness of the coupling of the
`
`connector to the terminal, and without a separate continuity member.
`
`2.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 1, wherein RF signals are attenuated by at
`
`least about 50dB in a range up to about l0OOMHz.
`
`3.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 1, wherein a transfer impedance measured
`
`from the outer conductor of the coaxial cable to the terminal through the connector averages less
`
`than about 0.24 ohms.
`
`4.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 1, wherein the RF signals external to the
`
`connector comprise RF signals that ingress into the connector.
`
`5.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 1, wherein the RF signals external to the
`
`connector comprise RF signals that egress out from the connector.
`
`6.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 1, wherein the coupler comprises,
`
`a step, and
`
`a lip,
`
`2ofl0
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`and wherein the post comprises,
`
`a flange,
`
`a contacting portion
`
`and a shoulder.
`
`7.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 6, wherein a first circuitous path is
`
`established by at least one of the step, the lip, the flange, the contacting portion and the shoulder, and
`
`wherein the first circuitous path attenuates of RF signals external to the connector.
`
`8.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 6, wherein the contacting portion is integral
`
`and monolithic with at least a portion of the post.
`
`9.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 1, wherein the terminal comprises an
`
`equipment connection port, and wherein the coupler comprises a threaded portion adapted to connect
`
`with a threaded portion of the equipment connection port, and wherein at least one thread on the
`
`coupler has a pitch angle different than a pitch angle of at least one thread of the equipment
`
`connection port.
`
`10.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 9, wherein the pitch angle of the thread of
`
`the coupler is about 2 degrees different than the pitch angle of the thread of the equipment
`
`connection port.
`
`11.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 9, wherein the pitch angle of the thread of
`
`the coupler is about 62 degrees, and the pitch angle of the thread of the equipment connection port is
`
`about 60 degrees.
`
`12.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable comiector of claim 9, wherein the threaded portion of the
`
`coupler and the threaded portion of the equipment connection port, establish a second circuitous
`
`path, and wherein the second circuitous path attenuates RF signals external to the connector.
`
`3oflO
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`13.
`
`(Currently Amended) A coaxial cable connector for coupling an end of a coaxial cable to an
`
`equipment connection port, the coaxial cable comprising an inner conductor, a dielectric surrounding
`
`the inner conductor, an outer conductor surrounding the dielectric, and a jacket surrounding the outer
`
`conductor, the connector comprising:
`
`a coupler adapted to couple the connector to the equipment connection port;
`
`a body assembled with the coupler, and
`
`a post assembled with the coupler and the body, wherein the post is adapted to receive an end
`
`of a coaxial cable, and wherein the post comprises an integral contacting portion, and wherein the
`
`contacting portion is monolithic with at least a portion of the post, and
`
`wherein when assembled the coupler and post provide at least one circuitous path resulting in
`
`RF shielding such that RF signals external to the coaxial cable connector are attenuated, such that
`
`the integrity of an electrical signal transmitted through coaxial cable connector is maintained
`
`regardless of the tightness of the coupling of the connector to the terminal and without a separate
`
`continuity member.
`
`14.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 13, wherein RF signals external to the
`
`coaxial connector comprise at least one of RF signals that ingress into the connector and RF signals
`
`that egress out from the connector.
`
`15.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 13, wherein RF signals are attenuated by at
`
`least about 50dB in a range up to about l000MHz.
`
`16.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 13, wherein a transfer impedance averages
`
`about 0.24 ohms.
`
`17.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 13, wherein the at least one circuitous path
`
`comprises a first circuitous path and a second circuitous path.
`
`4of10
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`18.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 17, wherein the coupler comprises a lip and a
`
`step, and the post comprises a flange and a shoulder, and wherein the first circuitous path is
`
`established by at least one of the step, the lip, the flange, the contacting portion and the shoulder.
`
`19.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 17, wherein the terminal comprises an
`
`equipment connection port, and wherein the coupler comprises a threaded portion adapted to connect
`
`with a threaded portion of the equipment connection port, and wherein the threaded portion of the
`
`coupler and the threaded portion of the equipment connection port establish a second circuitous path.
`
`20.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 19, wherein at least one thread on the coupler
`
`has a pitch angle different than a pitch angle of at least one thread of the equipment connection port.
`
`21.
`
`(Currently Amended) A coaxial cable connector for coupling an end of a coaxial cable to an
`
`equipment connection port, the coaxial cable comprising an inner conductor, a dielectric surrounding
`
`the inner conductor, an outer conductor surrounding the dielectric, and a jacket surrounding the outer
`
`conductor, the connector comprising:
`
`a coupler adapted to couple the connector to the equipment connection port, wherein the
`
`coupler has a step, and wherein the coupler comprises a threaded portion adapted to connect with a
`
`threaded portion of the equipment connection port, and wherein at least one thread on the coupler
`
`l1as a pitch angle different than a pitch angle of at least one thread of the equipment connection port;
`
`a body assembled with the coupler;
`
`a post assembled with the coupler and the body, wherein the post comprises a flange, a
`
`contacting portion and a shoulder, and wherein the post is adapted to receive an end of a coaxial
`
`cable, and wherein the contacting portion is integral and monolithic with at least a portion of the
`
`post, and
`
`wherein a first circuitous path is established by the a step, the flange, the contacting portion
`
`and the shoulder, and wherein a second circuitous path is established by the threaded portion of the
`
`coupler and the threaded portion of the equipment connection port, and wherein the first circuitous
`
`path and the second circuitous path provide for M shielding of the assembled coaxial cable
`
`connector such that RF signals external to the coaxial cable connector are attenuated by at least
`
`5of10
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`about 50dB in a range up to about IOOOMHZ, and wherein a transfer impedance averages about 0.24
`
`ohms, and wherein the integrity of an electrical signal transmitted through coaxial cable connector is
`
`maintained regardless of the tightness of the coupling of the connector to the equipment connection
`
`port and without a separate continuity member.
`
`22.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 21, wherein the pitch angle of the thread of
`
`the coupler is about 2 degrees different than the pitch angle of the thread of the equipment
`
`connection port.
`
`23.
`
`(Original) The coaxial cable connector of claim 22, wherein the pitch angle of the thread of
`
`the coupler is about 62 degrees, and the pitch angle of the thread of the equipment connection port is
`
`about 60 degrees.
`
`6ofl0
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`REMARKS
`
`This paper is responsive to the Office Action mailed February 28, 2014 (hereinafter
`
`“Office Action”). Applicant would like to thank the Examiner for a timely and thorough review
`
`of the above-referenced patent application. Claims 1, 13 and 21. Claims 1-23 remain pending.
`
`It is respectfully submitted that in light of the remarks below, all of the claims are now in
`
`condition for allowance.
`
`Rejection ofClaims 1, 4-9, 12-14 and 17-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) -Purdy
`
`Claims 1, 4-9, 12-14 and 17-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over U.S. Patent
`
`Application Publication No. 2010/0255719 to Purdy (hereinafter “Purdy”).
`
`In order to reject a
`
`claim under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), “[t]he reference must teach every element of the claim” MPEP §
`
`2131.
`
`It is respectfully submitted that Purdy does not disclose every feature of the rejected
`
`claims. Thus, Applicant respectfully traverses this rejection for at least the reasons set forth
`
`below.
`
`Amended claim 1
`
`recites the limitation “wherein the coupler and post provide RF
`
`shielding such that RF signals external to the coaxial cable connector are attenuated such that the
`
`integrity of an electrical signal
`
`transmitted through coaxial cable connector is maintained
`
`regardless of the tightness of the coupling of the connector to the terminal and without a separate
`
`continuity member.” Emphasis added. Amended claims 13 and 21 recite a similar limitation.
`
`Purdy requires a separate continuity member 70. See Figs. 1-9. Moreover,
`
`it is due to the
`
`separate continuity member that continuity and grounding in Purdy are maintained:
`
`“The pre-load condition of the continuity member 70 involving a constant moment and
`continuous motive contact between the oppositely tapered surfaces 35 and 45 of the nut
`30 and the post 40 facilitates an electrical ground path between the post 40 and the nut
`Q.” Purdy, 110029 Emphasis added.
`
`and
`
`“With continued reference to the drawings, FIG. 9 depicts a perspective cut—away View of
`an embodiment of a continuity connector having an attached coaxial cable, the connector
`in a not fully tightened position on an interface port. As depicted, the connector 100 is
`only partially installed on the interface port 20. However, while in this partially installed
`state, the continuity member 70 maintains an electrical ground path between the mating
`
`7of10
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`port 20 and the outer conductive shield (ground 14) of cable 10. The ground path, among
`other things, results from the continuous physical and electrical contact of the continuity
`
`member 70 as compressed by forces resulting in a moment between the oppositely
`tapered surfaces 35 and 45 of the nut 30 and the post 40, when the continuity connector
`10 is in an operably assembled state. The ground path extends from the interface port 20,
`to and through the nut 30, to and through the continuity member 70, to and through the
`post 40, to the conductive grounding shield 14. This continuous grounding_path provides
`operable functionality of the continuity connector 100, even when the connector 100 is
`not fully tightened onto an interface p_ort 20. Id. 110035 Emphasis added.
`
`Therefore, Purdy does not teach every element of the claims 1 and 13. Accordingly, for
`
`at
`
`least
`
`these reasons, claims 1 and 13 are allowable and Applicant respectfully requests
`
`withdrawal of the rejection of claims 1 and 13. Applicant further respectfully requests
`
`withdrawal of the rejection of claims 4-9, 12, 14 and 17-20 as depending, either directly or
`
`indirectly, from claim 1 or claim 13. Because of these dependencies, it is not necessary to
`
`address the additional features presented in claims 4-9, 12, 14 and 17-20. However, Applicant
`
`reserves the right to do so in the future.
`
`In addition, though, Applicant would like to address the rejection of claim 8 in this
`
`response. Claim 8 recites the limitation “wherein the contacting portion is integral and
`
`monolithic with at least a portion of the post.” At page 3, the Office Action contends that “[i]t
`
`has been held that the term “integral” is sufficiently broad to embrace constructions united by
`
`such means as fastening and welding.
`
`In re Hotte, 177 USPQ 326, 328 (CCPA 1973).”
`
`However In re Hotte does not support the Office Action’s rejection of claim 8, and, further,
`
`assuming that it did, a point which Applicant does not concede, it does not address all of the
`
`limitations of claim 8,
`
`In particular, Purdy’s continuity member 70 is neither “fastened” nor “welded” to the
`
`post 40:
`
`“Turning now to FIGS. 2-4, an embodiment of a continuity connector 100 is shown
`during assembly and as assembled. A continuity member 70 may positioned around an
`external surface of the post 40 during assembly, while the post 40 is axially inserted into
`position with respect to the nut 30. The continuity member 70 should have an inner
`diameter sufficient to allow it to move _L_ip the entire length of the post body 40 until it
`contacts the tapered surface 45 of the flange 44 (as depicted in FIG. 3).” I_d. 110027
`Emphasis added.
`
`and
`
`8of10
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`the continuity member is disposed between and contacts both the
`Once assembled,
`tapered surface 35 of the internal lip 34 of the nut 30 and the correspondingly oppositely
`tapered surface 45 of the flange 44 of the post 40, so that the continuity member 70
`resides in a pre—load condition wherein the continuity member 70 experiences constant
`compression force(s) exeited upon it by both the tapered surface 35 of the lip 34 of the
`nut 30 and the tapered surface 45 of the flange 44 of the post 40. lg. 110029.
`
`AS is evident from the above—quoted portions of Purdy, the continuity member 70 freely
`
`moves with respect to the post 40 and, instead of fastening, is kept in place by being squeezed
`
`between a surface of the nut 30 and a surface of the post 40.
`
`It, therefore, is not fastened to the
`
`post 40, and certainly is not welded to the post 40. Moreover, the Office Action completely
`
`disregarded the term “monolithic” in claim 8. Since Purdy’s continuity member is a completely
`
`separate component from the post 40, the continuity member 70 is not and cannot be monolithic
`
`with the post 40.
`
`Therefore, Purdy does not teach every element of the claim 8. Accordingly, for at least
`
`these additional reasons, claim 8 is allowable and Applicant respectfully requests withdrawal of
`
`the rejection of claim 8.
`
`Rejection of Claims 2-3, 10-11, 15-16, 21-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) - Purdy
`
`Claims 2-3, 10-11, 15-16, 21-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Purdy.
`
`Applicant respectfully traverses.
`
`In order to establish prz'mafacz'e obviousness, “[a]ll words in a
`
`claim must be considered” and all limitations must be taught or suggested by the prior art. MPEP
`
`§ 2143.03, In re Royka, 490 F.2d 981, 180 USPQ 580 (CCPA 1974). Additionally, “there must
`
`be some articulated reasoning with some rational underpinning to support the legal conclusion of
`
`obviousness” to establish obviousness. KSR Int’l v. Teleflex, Inc., 550 US. 398, 418, 82
`
`USPQ.2d 1385, 1396 (2007).
`
`As discussed above, Purdy does not teach or suggest all features of amended independent
`
`claims 1, 13 and 21. Accordingly, all of the limitations of claims 1, 13 and 21 are not taught or
`
`suggested by Purdy. A such, the Office Action has failed to establish prima facie obviousness of
`
`claims 1, 13 and 21 based on Purdy. Additionally, claims 2-3, 10-11, 15-16, 22-23 depend,
`
`either directly or indirectly, from one of claims 1, 13 and 21. Due to these dependencies, the
`
`Office Action has failed to establish prima facie obviousness of claims 2-3, 10-11, 15-16, 22-23
`
`9of10
`
`

`
`Application Serial No. 13/653,095
`Response to Office Action mailed February 28, 2014
`
`based on Purdy. Thus, it is not necessary to address the additional features in claims 2~3, 10-11,
`
`15~l6, 22-23 to overcome this rejection. However, Applicant reserves the right to do so in the
`
`future .
`
`Conclusion
`
`In view of the foregoing remarks, Applicant respectfully submits that claims 1-23 of the
`
`present application are in condition for allowance.
`
`It is respectfully requested that a Notice of
`
`Allowance be issued in due course. Examiner Jean F. Duverne is encouraged to Contact
`
`Applicant’s undersigned attorney to resolve any remaining issues
`
`in order
`
`to expedite
`
`examination of the present application.
`
`A fee of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) is believed due in connection with this Reply
`
`for a one-month extension of time. The Office is authorized to charge the one—month extension
`
`fee and any additional fees that may be necessitated by this Reply to Deposit Account No. 03-
`
`3325.
`
`Date:
`
`6/27/2014
`
`Customer No. 21495
`
`Corning Optical Communications LLC
`P.O. Box 489
`
`800 17th Street NW
`
`Hickory, NC 28603
`Tel Office (828) 901-5032
`Fax Office (828) 901-5206
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ohn H. Vynalé
`
`Registration No. 37,254
`
`10 ofl0
`
`

`
`Electronic Patent Application Fee Transmittal
`
`Filing Date:
`
`16-Oct-2012
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTOR WITH INTEGRAL RFI PROTECTION
`
`;
`
`Utility under 35 USC111(a) Filing Fees
`
`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Sub-Total in
`
`USD($)
`
`Basic Filing:
`
`Miscellaneous Filing
`
`Patent Appeals and Interference:
`
`Post-Allowance-and-Post Issuance
`
`Extension-of-Time:
`
`Extension -1 rnonth
`
`

`
`Miscellaneous:
`
` S“:-S1-;(t$a)| in
`
`Total in USD (S)
`
`

`
`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`m—
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTOR WITH INTEGRAL RFI PROTECTION
`
`I
`
`Payment information:
`
`yes—
`Submitted with Payment
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 1.21 (Miscellaneous fees and charges)
`
`—Auth°“zedUser
`The Director of the USPTO is hereby authorized to charge indicated fees and credit any overpayment as follows:
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 1.19 (Document supply fees)
`
`

`
`File Listing:
`
`Document
`
`.
`
`.
`
`File Size(Bytes)/
`
`Multi
`
`Pages
`
`Amend ment/Req. Reconsideration-After
`Non-Final Reject
`
`20140627_H|12-117_US_Respo
`nse.pdf
`
`452643
`
`3c7fed44744dCfeeI f787b4I4c2ee9cf6dc6
`78
`
`Information:
`
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`
`fee-info.pdf
`
`a82If5df0I76bd9ae952d753cI2141(e63:
`ef99
`
`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO ofthe indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`lfa new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`lfa timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/E0/903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`lfa new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and ofthe International Filing Date (Form PCT/R0/105) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`

`
`PTO/SB/O6 (09-11)
`Approved for use through 1/31/2014. OMB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`PATENT APPLICATION FEE DETERMINATION RECORD
`Substitute for Form PTO-875
`
`FI““9 Date
`APP“°a“°“ OI Docket Number
`1 1 2 D TO be Mailed
`
`APPLICATION AS FILED — PART I
`
`(Column 2)
`
`FOR
`
`NUMBER FILED
`
`ENTITY:
`
`IXI LARGE I:| sMALL El MICRO
`
`I:| BASIC FEE
`37CFR1.16a, b,or c
`
`I:I SEARCH FEE
`37CFR1.16k,
`
`i,or m
`
`D EXAMINATION FEE
`(37 CFR1.16( ), (p), or (q))
`TOTAL CLAIMS
`37 CFR1.16i
`INDEPENDENT CLAIMS
`37 CFR 1.16 h
`
`U/;:PCL;g§T'gNS'ZE
`I
`'
`IS”
`
`WA
`
`WA
`
`N/A
`
`.
`”"”“5 2°=
`
`If the specification and drawings exceed 100 sheets
`I
`th
`I"
`t'
`'
`f
`d
`'
`310
`155
`;°..*°:.::I.l..‘:I:I°I°.'::;::It
`fraction thereof. See 35 u.s.C. 41(a)(1)(G) and 37
`
`I:I MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM PRESENT (37 CFR1.16(j))
`* If the difference in column 1
`is less than zero, enter “0“ in column 2.
`
`APPLICATION AS AMENDED — PART II
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TEILWG
`
`AMENDMENT
`
`(Column 2)
`
`HIGHEST
`
`sstiaafw
`
`PAID FOR
`
`(Column 3)
`
`I:I Application Size Fee (37 CFR 1.16(s))
`
`D FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM (37 CFR1.16(j))
`
`(Column 3)
`
`AMENDMENT
`
`CLAIMS
`REMAINING
`AFTER
`AMENDMENT
`H
`-
`*
`cI=R
`Total(
`-2;
`
`HIGHEST
`NUMBER
`PREVIOUSLY
`PAID FOR
`
`PRESENT EXTRA
`
`AMENDMENT D FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM (37 CFR1.16(j))
`
`I:I Application Size Fee (37 CFR 1.16(s))
`
`* If the entry in column 1 is less than the entry in column 2, write “0“ in column 3.
`** If the “Highest Number Previously Paid For“ IN THIS SPACE is less than 20, enter “20“.
`*** If the “Highest Number Previously Paid For" IN THIS SPACE is less than 3, enter
`The “Highest Number Previously Paid For“ (Total or Independent) is the highest number found in the appropriate box in column 1.
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.16. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to
`process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete, including gathering,
`preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you
`require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.
`Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS
`ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1—800—PTO—9199 and select option 2.
`
`LIE
`/ERNEST MARFO/