HeleneC.Carlson
`
`Michael R.
`
`alek‘
`
`
`
`4
`9
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`JorqeaGold-stein
`
`Ruben Greene sienna
`David K5. Cnrlmall
`Robe’! W. Esnmnd _
`Tra Gene 6. Durhn
`Mk
`IeA.C'm1baIa
`Michael 8. Ray
`mm E. Sakuhl
`En: I<.5teP?e
`titties
`linbert C. Miflurlig
`Donald J. reazrurmne
`‘fimolhy-J.Si1ea,lr
`Midiaeltt Messirlger
`Jeffrey T. Helm
`Judith 0. KM‘!
`Hdcn L Etilson
`
`Piterkladcman
`
`Donald it Bancwit
`Brian J. Del Bunnu
`Mari: for Evan:
`V1rIcen'tL Ea nann
`Elizabeth I.
`aanes
`Michael 0. Spedn
`Kevin W. Mtflbe
`Glenn 1. Pen
`ti.“:a‘.‘t.:i°
`VI
`fl Lselieaston
`mngmms. Wand
`loseah St Dstrotf
`Jason D. Elsenherg
`Jan .Wri ht
`lfal¥L Muller
`Lumne
`. Defiarms
`
`October 29, 2007
`
`LEI
`Mark was
`Ann L snnunerfiera
`Carla li-Eur: Kim
`Cynthia M.Buu:11et
`Doyle A. Siever‘
`1':m0lh-{A.Doy|e
`Ulrikewinklev Ienks
`Gain L. Lem swonh
`Paul A. calm
`Lon‘ A Go
`an
`Robert A. Schwarnrnar:
`Laura kVogE|-
`m-Lgflm
`C. Matthew Frazier‘
`Bryan 1 Wade
`Edward J. Km!”
`shameek Ghuse I
`BashIrM.S. AI:
`§;n~;i«n=-Cc.Ggg;sn_r»I
`:=.::L:'L*,;§.1i3;""
`?h.“.'."”r."..'i.‘.""°"
`.
`Mirheila It. I-Ioioubllt
`Malshan. Res: - ‘MMPW “WWI
`Scutl A. Sthaiier
`Karen R. Marlmwia
`‘_
`_
`_
`Lei Zhou
`Matthew J, Dnwd
`Admrned only In Malyianrl
`lamesl Pohl
`Soon M_INtaudha1.:5e
`-Ptaonce timed to
`W. Blake Coblontz
`Mlta Mtlkherjee
`'MrII|_t'Ied only in Virginia
`min ‘I. Haran
`Peter A. Saunas
`Federal Agencies
`
`Dani:InL.Leillng
`
`K. Mills
`Jeff:
`Inn" Iinndei
`Eleven C. 0
`Aarnn it as
`Gaumgsfl-,3";
`
`heirner
`
`mwrm ’s DIRECT NUMBER.-
`izozmzssso
`INTERNET A DDRESS:
`EKESS1.E.R.@S-KGF.(2DM
`
`Ara‘ Unit 3992
`
`Arm: Mail Stop Ex Parts Reexam
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`PO Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Re:
`
`Reexamination ofU.S. Patent No. 6,233,389
`Control No. 90/007,750; Filed: October 17, 2005
`
`For: Multimedia Time Warping System
`Inventor: BARTON et 3.1.
`Our Ref:
`25 13 .0O1REXO
`
`Transmitted herewith for appropriate action are the following documents:
`
`1. Reply to the Final Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination and Statement of
`Substance of Interview Under 37 C.F.R. §1.560;
`
`Certification of Service on Third Party Requester of Reply to Final Office Action and
`Statement of Substance of Interview; and
`
`Petition for Extension of Time Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.S50(c);
`
`Online payment authorization in the amount of 52 00.00 to cover:
`
`$200.00
`
`Payment for Petition for Extension of Time.
`
`The above-listed documents arefiled electronically through EFS- Web.
`
`In the event that extensions of time are necessary to prevent abanclonment of this patent
`application, then such extensions of time are hereby petitioned.
`
`Sterne, Kesslet, Goicistein 8.. Fox P1 L 1:
`
`; 1100 New York Avenue, NW ' Washington, DC 20005 : 202.321.2600 f 202.371.2540 1 www skgftnm
`
`1451
`
`

`
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`October 29, 2007
`
`Page 2
`
`The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby authorized to charge any fee deficiency,
`or credit any overpayment, to our Deposit Account No. 19-0036.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STEIN & Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`w d J. Ke
`
`Attorney for Applicant
`Registration No. 25,688
`
`EJK/jdp
`Enclosures
`
`7402994 DOC
`
`'
`
`.
`
`'
`
`-1
`
`.
`
`‘I100 New York Avenue, NW 2 Washington. DC 20005 2 202.371.2600 '' 202.371.2540 1
`
`‘s’v“-"'«".-"'3l*£_'i.C"!T~l
`
`1452
`
`

`
`OCT-29-EBEY? 1: 34
`
`P" 31
`
`®;;SierneKesslel
`n
`
`/'i":‘T(JRNEY': AT LAW
`
`”""“E°E'”E”
`i3ENTHAl.HEEXAMINLTIUNUNIT
`
`OCT 2 9 2007
`
`F
`
`Urgent
`
`I:IRetum reply requested I:lOn'ginal will be sent as confirmation
`
`To: U.5. Patent 8. Trademark Office
`
`Date: October 29, 2007
`
`Attention: Special Program Examiner
`Mark J. Re-inhart
`From: Edward J. Kessler
`
`Re: Petition for Extension of Time
`' Under 37 C.F.R. 'i.550(c)
`
`Pages (including cover sheet): 4
`
`Our Reference: 2513.001RE)(0
`
`Fax Number: (571) 273-9900
`
`Your Reference: Re-exam control No.
`9Dl’0D7,750', flied: October 17, 2005
`
`Message
`The original ‘of this Petition and Reply to Final Office Action was elecironicailyfiled with
`the appropriate fee.
`
`if any pCll'Ii0l'I of this transmission is not received clearly or in full. contact us at the numbers below.
`
`please sign and reium ihls siege as acknowledgment of receipt
`
`This message is inienriad me me exclusive use oi the individual or enlily in wi-Ildl ii is addressed. The message may cnniain il1£lJr1'natk'il1 ihal I5 pmnegoa.
`ecnfnienfial, urn-inerwise eiempi imm disciuaure under appfitable In iilha reader of mil: massage is net the intended recipient. you are hereby naiiiied via:
`any diesamlnaliul. uishiuutbn, copying or use all me cemmunilalion ii any way is slricliy pmiubiiad,
`ii‘ )‘Du have received this oummuniatien in amt, please
`call us ceilenl immediately. and return Ina original ri-mirage in us urine above address via ms US. Postal‘ Sanka.
`
`Sterne. Messier, Gaidinsin fli Fol P.LLt'.'.
`
`: 1100 NewYoI'll Avenue, ilifl
`
`: Washington. DQ200115 : 202.371.2800 l201.3T1.2540
`
`PRGE ill ’ RCVD AT 1Dl29l20fli 10:30:10 AM [Eastern Dallligii Time]" SVR‘.U3PTO-EFXRF-3i'I2* DN|S'.2?.'i999D ‘ CSlD‘. " DURATION (mm-ss]:il1-12
`
`1453
`
`

`
`OCT-29-EB’? 1: 34
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICEFAX RECEIVED
`
`In re reexam of: us. Patent 6,233,289
`(Barton)
`
`_
`Re-exam Control No; 9010075750
`
`Confinnation No - 4653
`"
`
`'_
`Art Unit: 3992
`
`OCT 2 90 2007
`
`GEMTFAL neemmiwuou um
`0
`
`Filed: October 17, 2005
`
`Exarniner: David 13- Harvey
`
`For: Multimedia Time Warping Syste
`
`Atty. Docket No.: 2513.00lREXO
`
`Petition for Extension of Time Under 3'?’ C.F.R. § 1.55I](c)
`
`Atm: Central Reexainination Unit
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`0
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`Mail Stop: ExParre Reeram
`
`Pursuant to 37 C,F,R_ § 1.550(5), the patent owner, TiVo Inc. ("TiVo"), hereby
`
`requests an extension of time to respond to the Final Office Action mailed July 30, 2007.
`
`A first extension of time was requested and granted. The currently extended due date is
`
`set to expire on October 30, 2007. An additional extension of time of one week, until
`November 5, 2007 is hereby requested. The extension of time is sought for the following
`reason.
`
`On October 25, 2007,
`
`‘I‘iVo's representatives conducted an interview with
`
`Primary Examiner Oviclio Escalante, Primary Examiner Minh T. Nguyen, and Special
`
`Pmgram Eatatniner Mark J. Reinhart. During that interview 'I‘iVo's representatives
`
`‘ exp-lained the differences between the invention, as recited in claim 1 and 32, and the
`-cited reference, U.S. Patent No. 6,788,382. to Cool‘, et a1 (Gear). Subsequently, on
`
`October 26, 2007, a further telephone interview was conducted. Based on the results of
`
`these interviews. TiVo believes it is able to answer the questions raised by Primary
`
`Examiner Bscalante and to clearly explain the differences between the present invention
`
`PAGE 201 ‘ RCVD AT 10fl0l200? 10:30:10 Mil [Eastern Daylight Time] *SVR:USPTO-EFXRF-3!12 " DH|S12i39900 ‘ C910‘. ‘ DURATION (mm-ss}:ll1-12
`
`1454
`
`

`
`UCT-29-2EIE|'?
`
`13 3 34
`
`- 2 —
`
`Barton, at of.
`Control No. 90!007.7S0
`
`and the Geer disclosure. A response to the outstanding Offiee Action is being
`
`concurrently filed with this Petition.
`
`This Petition is requested to enable the Examiner to review the response and set
`
`on it before the Patent Owner must take alternative action.
`
`It is hoped that the granting
`
`of this Petition and the Exa.mine:r‘s actions upon review of the Patent Owner's response
`
`will in fact expedite the disposition of this re-exsrninstion proceeding.
`
`For the above reason, TiVo specifically requests that the extension of time to
`
`respond to the Office Action be granted for a period of one week to allow sufficient time
`
`for Examiner Escalante to review and act on the Patent Owner's response.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`1‘ a LDSTEIN 8.: Fox ‘P.L.L.C.
`
`Attorny for Ptent Owner
`Regjstratiotl No. 25,688
`
`Date: October 29, 2007
`
`1 100 New York Avenue. N‘,'W.
`Washington, DC. 20005-3934
`(202) 371 -2600
`
`1aour__I .ooc
`
`PAGE ill ' RCVD AT 10120200? 10:30:10 Ml [Eastern Daylight Time] ' Sl'R:USPTD-EFXEF-3:'12' 0ll|S:2T39000 ‘ C8051‘ DURATION (mm-ss]:01-12
`
`Atty. Docket No. 454030000041
`
`1455
`
`

`
`UCT-29'2BB7
`
`15 : 34
`
`Patent Under Reexamination: 6,233.3 B9
`Reexamination Control No.: 90!0l'J7,‘?50
`Examiner: Esca1ante,0vidio
`Art Unlt: 3992
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`_-
`I
`F/~‘-X REQENED
`
`mfizgmm
`CENTRAL nr£xAM;r'ir-'.T1o~ mm
`
`Sir:
`C
`
`TITION
`TIFICA IO OF ERVICE
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. §1.§5D§c[
`
`XTENSION O TINIE
`
`in compliance with 37 C.F.R_ § 1.550(1), the undersigned, on behalf of the
`
`patent owner, hereby certifies that a eopy of this paper has been served on the third-
`
`party requester by firs! class mail on October 29, 2.007. The name and address of the
`
`party served is as follows:
`
`David L. Felirman
`Morrison & I-‘oerster, LLP
`555 W. Fifth Street, Suite 3500
`Los Angeles, CA 90013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`SLBR GOLDSTEIN 3: Fox 9.]. LC.
`
`E ward J. Kessler
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 25,688
`
`Date: .21’ a
`[100 New York Avenue, NIW.
`Washington. D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`'MI.I:Ie?_l.D0€
`
`PAGE-H4‘ tcvon 1nrzsmnr1u:3u:1oAm [EaslemDayflghtTnne]'s'u‘R:UsPTo-EFXRF-3112'DHl5'2?399M'cS!D' 'DURhTl0H[mm-ss)'01 12
`
`rrmru "in. an
`
`1456
`
`

`
`Litigation Search Report CRU 3999
`
`Reexam Control No. 90l007,750
`
`T0: Ovidio Escalante
`
`From: James R. Matthews
`
`Location: CRU
`
`Art Unit : 3992
`
`Date: 10l'31:‘07
`
`Location: CRU 3999
`
`MDW TC71
`
`Phone: (571) 272-4233
`
`Case Serial Number: 90I007,750 JamesR.Matthews@uspto.gov
`
`Search Notes
`
`U'.s. Patent No6,233,389
`
`I) I performed a KeyCite Search in Westlaw, which retrieves all history on the patent including any
`litigation.
`
`2) I performed a search on the patent in Lexis CourlLink for any open dockets or closed cases.
`
`3) I performed a Search in Lexis in the Federal Couns and Administrative Materials databases for any cases
`found.
`
`4) I performed a search in Lexis in the IP Journal and Periodicals database for any articles on the patent.
`
`S) I performed a search in Lexis in the news databases for any articles about the patent or any articles about
`litigation on this patent.
`
`Litigation was found and not stayed.
`
`1457
`
`

`
`Date of Printing: OCT 31,2007
`
`KEYCITE
`
`HUS PAT 6233389 MULTIMEDIA TIME WARPING SYSTEM, Assignee: TiVo, Inc. (May 15, 200])
`
`History
`Direct History
`
`I MULTIMEDIA TIME WARPING SYSTEM, US PAT 6233339, 2001 WL 5l09l3 (U.S. PTO
`Utility May IS, 2001) (NO. 09/126071)
`Ruied Irfringed by
`TlVO Inc. v. Echostar Communications Corp., 446 F.Supp.2d 664 (E.D.Tex. Aug 17, 2006) (NO.
`2:04 CV l DF)
`
`Related References (U.S.A.)
`'l'iVo, Inc. v. Eehostar Comm. Corp., 2005 WL All 31649 (E.D.Tex. Scp 26, 2005) (NO. CIVA
`2:04CVl (DF))
`
`Court Documents
`
`Verdict and Settlement Summaries (U.S.A.)
`
`EchoStar Pauses After Jury Awards TiVo $74M for Patent Infringement, 2006 WL I458-143
`(Verdict and Settlement Summary) (E.D.Tex. Apr. I3, 2006) (NO. 204CV0000l)
`TiVo inc. v. Echostar Communications Corporation, Inc., Echostar DBS Corporation, Echostar
`Technologies Corporation and Echosphere Limited Liability Company, 2006 WL M93710 (Verdict
`and Settlement Summary) (E.D.Tex. Apr. I3, 2006) (NO. 2-04CV0l DF)
`
`Trial Court Documents (U.S.A.)
`
`E.D.Tex. Trial Pleadin gs
`6 TWO lNC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. EC}-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, and 2. Echostar Dbs Corporation, a Colorado corporation,
`Defendant, 2004 WL 3357025 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.Tex. Jan. 5, 2004) Complaint for Patent
`Infringement (NO. 2-04CV-OIDF)
`TWO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. EchoStar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Delendants., 2004 WL 3357040 (Trial Pleading)
`(E.D.Tex. Jan. IS, 2004) Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (N0. 2-04CV0l DF)
`TWO INC., :1 Delaware corporation, Plaintiffi v. 1. EC}-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Ecltostar DB5 Corporation,'a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants., 2004 WI. 3357063 (Trial Pleading)
`(E.D.Tex. Mar. 1, 2004) Defendants Echoslar Technologies Corporation and Echosphere
`Limited Liability Company‘: Answer to Am (NO. 2-04CV0l DF)
`
`© Copyright 2007 West, Carswell, Sweet & Maxwell Asia and Thomson Legal 8: Regulatory Limited, ABN 64
`058 9l4 663, or their Licensors. All rights reserved.
`
`1458
`
`

`
`9 TWO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, V. I. EC}-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. and Related Counterclaims, 2005 WL
`1365521 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 21, 2005) Defendants Echostar Communications
`Corporation and Echostar DB5 Corporation’: Answer to Amended Comp (NO. 2-04CV01 DF)
`TIVO tNC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. EchoStar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`EchoStar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. And Related Counterclaims, 2005
`WL 3966191 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 21, 2005) Defendants Echostar Communications
`Corporation and Echostar DBS Corporation's Answer to Amended Comp (NO. 2—04CVOI DF)
`TIVO INC.. a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DES Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2005 WL. 3966192 (Trial Pleading)
`(E.D.Tex. Apr. II, 2005) Two lnc.'s Opening Brief on Claim Construction (NO. 2-04CV—0I)
`TIVO INC, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, V. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. EchoStar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`EchoStar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2005 WL 3966190 (Trial Pleading)
`(E.D.Tex. May I8, 2005) Echostar's Opening Claim Construction Brief (NO. 2-IMCVDIDF)
`TIVO INC, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, V. 1. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostr DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company; and 5. Echostar Satellite LLC, a Colorado limited
`liability company, Defendants, 2006 WL 3l4l67 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.Tex. Feb. 9, 2006)
`Defendants Echostar Technologies Corporation, Echosphere Limited Liability Company, and
`Echostar Sat (NO. 2-[l4CV0lDF)
`.
`14 TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATION
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company; and 5. Echostar Satellite LLC, a Colorado limited
`liability company, Defendants, 2006 WL 8I4I95 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.Te:t. Feb. 9, 2006)
`Defendants Echostar Communications Corporation and I-Zehostar DBS Corporation's Second
`Amended Answer (NO. 2-04CV0l DF)
`
`E.D.Tex. Trial Motions, Mernoranda and Affidavits
`I5 TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I.ECl-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echoliitar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2004 WL 376800] (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 1, 2004} Defendants‘ Motion to Dismiss and
`Transfer (NO. 2—04CVOI DF)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, 21 Nevada corporation; 2. Ecbostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`E.choStar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2004 WL 3768004 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E‘..D.Tex. Mar. I, 2004) Defendants‘ Motion to Dismiss and
`Transfer (NO. 2-O4CVOl DF)
`
`O Copyright 2097 West, Carswell, Sweet & Maxwell Asia and Thomson Legal & Regulatory Limited, ABN 64
`058 914 668, or their Licensors. All rights reserved.
`
`1459
`
`

`
`1? TIVO INC, :1 Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DES Corporation. a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant, 2004 WL 3357067 (Trial Motion.
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 26, 2004) Tivo's Opposition to Motion to Ttransfer
`(NO. 204—CV-0]-DF)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHO STAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar Dbs Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defenda.nt., 2004 WL 335707! (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Afiidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 26, 2004) 'l'ivo's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
`(NO. 204—CV—0t —DF)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. EC}-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company. a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant, 2004 WL 3768002 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 26, 2004) TiVo's Opposition to Motion to Transfer
`(NO. 204-CV-Ul -DF)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHO STAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`' Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant, 2004 WL 3768003 (‘Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 26, 2004) TiVo's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
`(NO. 204-CV-01-DF)
`TIVO lNC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevad corporation; 2. Echostar DB5 Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Ecl-iosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant.-L, 2004 WL 3357075 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Apr. 5, 2004) Defendants‘ Reply Brief in Support of
`Motion to Transfer (NO. 2-04CVOI DF)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffi V. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION. a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostar DES Corporation. a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2004 WL 3357078 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Apr. 5, 2004) Defendants’ Reply Briefin Support of
`Motion to Dismiss (NO. 2-04CV0l DF)
`TIVO INC., 21 Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Ecliosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants.. 2004 WL 3768005 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Apr. 5, 2004) Defendants’ Reply Briefin Support of
`Motion to Transfer (NO. 2-04CV0lDF)
`TWO INC, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHO STAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. EchoStar OBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2004 WL 3768006 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Af‘l‘1davit)(E.D.Tex. Apr. 5, 2004) Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of
`Motion to Dismiss (NO. 2-04CVOIDF)
`
`C1 Copyright 2007 West, Carswell, Sweet £5 Maxwell Asia and Thomson Legal & Regulatory Limited, ABN 64
`058 914 668, or their Licensors. All rights reserved.
`
`1460
`
`

`
`TWO tNC.. a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar Dbs Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendann, 2004 WL 3357080 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tcit. Apr. 12, 2004) Tivo's Sur-Reply in Support of
`Opposition to Motion to Transfer (N0. 204-CV-01-DF)
`TIVO (NC, a Delaware corporation, PIaintifi', v. 1. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, 21 Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3..
`Eohostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant, 2004 WL 3768007 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Apr. I2, 2004) TiVo‘s Sur-Reply in Support of
`Opposition to Motion to Transfer (NO. 204-CV-01-DF)
`TIVO lNC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. 1. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar Dbs Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant, 2004 WL 3357083 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Apr. I6, 2004) Tivo's Sur-Reply in Support ofits
`Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 204-CV-01-DF)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant, 2004 WL 3768008 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) {B.D.Tex. Apr. I6, 2004) TiVo's Sur-Reply in Support ol’ its
`Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 204-CV-01-DP)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation. a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Ecliosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defenda_nts., 2005 WL 3966209 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) {E.D.Tex. Feb. 7, 2005) Stipulated Protective Order (NO.
`2-o4Cv-01oF)
`TIVO INC., 2: Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ESCHOSTAR COMMUNICATION
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2005 WL l3655l7 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 2, 2005) Echostar Technologies Corporation and
`Echosphere Limited Liability Company's Motion to Cornpel lnterr (NO. 2-04C\v’0I DF)
`TWO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostar DB5 Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echo-Star Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company. Defendants, 2005 WL 3966208 {Trial Motion.
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 2, 2005) Er.-hostar Technologies Corporation and
`Ecllosphere Limited Liability Company-"s Motion to Compel Interr (NO. 2-04CVOIDF)
`TiVo INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. BCHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar Dbs Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company. Defendants, And Related Counterclaims, 2005
`W1. 4 I 70'?0l (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. I6, 2005) Tivo's
`Opposition to Ei:IioStar's Motion to Conipel a More Detailed lnterrogatory Response (NO.
`2-04CV-01)
`
`O Copyright 2007 West, Carswell, Sweet 62'. Maxwell Asia and Thomson Legal & Regulatory Limited, ABN 64
`058 914 668, or their Licensors. Allrights reserved.
`
`1461
`
`

`
`TIVO lNC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintifi‘, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Echostar Dbs Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. and Related Counterclaima, 2005 WL
`l3655l9 {Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.TeJt. Mar. 17, 2005} Tivo's Motion to
`Compel EclIostar's Production of Documents, lnterogatory Responses, and Attendance a
`(NO. 2-04CV-01)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation. Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. And Related Counterclaims., 2005
`WL 3966211 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 17, 2005) TiVo's
`Motion to Cornpel Echostar's Production of Documents, Interrogatory Responses, and
`Attendance (N0. 2-IMCV-01)
`TWO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; EchoStar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation;
`Echostar Technologies Corporation. a Texas corporation; and Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2005 WL 3966212 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. I7, 2005) Defendants‘ Responses and Objections to
`""First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to all D (NO. 204CV0lDF)
`TWO INCL, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`EchoStar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company. Defendants, 2005 WL 1365523 [Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit} (‘i..D.Tex. Mar. 21, 2005) Defendants’ Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Opposition to Plainttt‘l"I‘ivo lnc.'s Motion to Am (NO. 2-04CV0l DF)
`TWO l'NC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. EchoStar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2005 WL 1365526 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 23,2005) Reply Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Support of Ecltostar Technologies Corporation's and Ech (NO. 2-04CV0l DF)
`TIVO lNC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I . ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. E.choStar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants., 2005 WL 3966214 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Teit. Mar. 23, 2005) Reply Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Support of Echostar Technologies Corporation's and Ech (NO. 2-04CV0l DF)
`TIVO INC., :1 Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3
`Ecliostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2005 WL 1365529 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Aftidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 24, 2005) Ti\"o's Reply in Support of its Motion to
`Amend the Scheduling Order (N0. 2-04CV-DI)
`TWO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, And Related Counterclaims., 2005
`WL B65532 {Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 29, 2005) Defendants‘
`Opposition to TiVo's Motion to Compel Echostar's Production of Documents, Interrogatory
`(NO. 2-04CVOIDF)
`
`© Copyright 2007 West, Carswell, Sweet & Maxwell Asia and Thomson Legal & Regulatory Limited, ABN 64
`053 914 668, or their Licensors. All rights reserved.
`
`1462
`
`

`
`41 TWO lNC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; Echostar DB5 Corporation, a Colorado corporation;
`Ecliostar Technologies Corporation. a Texas corporation; and Echosphcre Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants., 2005 WL 3966215 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Altidavit) (E..D_Tex_ Mar. 29, 2005) Defendants‘ Responses and Objections to
`""First Set of Requests for Admissions to all Defendants (No (NO. 204CV0l DF)
`TWO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echo-star Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2005 WL B65534 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Mar. 30, 2005) TiVo's Sur-Reply in Opposition to
`Echostar's Motion to Compel A More Detailed interrogalory Response (NO. 2-04CV-01)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. ECI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, aNevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. And Related Counterclaims, 2005
`WI. 3966216 (Trial Motion. Memorandum and Afiidavit) (E.D.'I‘ex. Mar. 30, 2005) TiVo's
`Sur-Reply in Opposition to EeI1ostar‘s Motion to Com pel it More Detailed lnterrogatory
`Response (NO. 2-04CV-0])
`. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`I
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v.
`CORPORATION, 21 Nevada corporation. 2. Echostar Dbs Corporation, a Coloado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. and Related Counterclaims, 2005 WL
`1365536 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Apr. 5, 2005) Tivo's Reply to
`Defendants’ Opposition to 'l'ivo's Motion to Com pel EcI1ostar's Production of Documents
`(N0. 2—04CV—0I)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff’, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, aNcvada corporation; 2. EchoStar Dbs Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation; and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants, 2005 WL 1365538 (Trial Motion,
`Memorandum and Aflidavit) (E.D.Tex, Apr. I I, 2005) E.chostar's Opening Claim Construction
`Brief (NO. 2-IMCVDI DF)
`TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation. Plaintiff, v. I. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar Dbs Corporation, a Coloradorcorporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. and Related Counterolaims, 2005 WL
`1365540 ("Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex, Apr. 27, 2005) Tivo's Opposition
`to Defendants‘ Second Motion to Compel (NO. 2-04CV-01)
`.
`TWO INC, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. 1. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, 2. Echostar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, 3.
`Echostar Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation, and 4. Echosphere Limited Liability
`Company. a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. And Related Cou_nterclaims., 2005
`WI. 3966217 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Apr. 27, 2005) Tivo's
`Opposition to Defendants‘ Second Motion to Compel (N0. 2—04CV-01)
`TWO INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. I. SCI-IOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
`CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; 2 Echostar DES Corporation, a Colorado corporation; 3.
`Echostar Te