United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`________________________________________________
`
`Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`________________________________________________
`
`
`
`D-Link Systems, Inc.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`________________________________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01426
`U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838
`________________________________________________
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Current Exhibit List
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________________________
`
`Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`________________________________________________
`
`
`
`D-Link Systems, Inc.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`________________________________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01426
`U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838
`________________________________________________
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Current Exhibit List
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC.’S
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`Chrimar
`System, Inc.
`Exhibit No.
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`2019
`
`2020
`
`2032
`
`2033
`
`Exhibit Description
`
`Date Filed
`
`Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 96,
`filed in Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. AMX, LLC,
`Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-881-JDL, Eastern District
`of Texas
`
`Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 105,
`filed in Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. AMX, LLC,
`Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-881-JDL, Eastern District
`of Texas
`
`Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 108,
`filed in Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. AMX, LLC,
`Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-881-JDL, Eastern District
`of Texas
`
`Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 122,
`filed in Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. Alcatel-
`Lucent, et al., Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-163-JDL,
`Eastern District of Texas
`Defendants’ Combined Motion for Summary
`Judgment and Claim Construction (selected
`portions), Dkt. No. 73, filed in Chrimar Systems,
`Inc., et al. v. AMX, LLC, Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-
`881-JDL, Eastern District of Texas
`Defendants’ Responsive Claim Construction Brief
`(selected portions), Dkt. No. 432, filed in Chrimar
`Sys., Inc., et al. v. ADTRAN, Inc., et al., Civil
`Action No. 6:15-cv-618-JRG-JDL, Eastern District
`of Texas
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`– 1 –
`
`
`
`
`Chrimar
`System, Inc.
`Exhibit No.
`
`2034
`
`2035
`
`2036
`
`2037
`
`2038
`
`2039
`
`2040
`
`2041
`
`2042
`
`2043
`
`2044
`
`Exhibit Description
`
`Date Filed
`
`Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 223,
`filed in Chrimar Sys., Inc., et al. v. Alcatel-Lucent, et
`al., Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-163-JDL, Eastern
`District of Texas
`
`Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 318,
`filed in Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. AMX, LLC,
`Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-881-JDL, Eastern District
`of Texas
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`Response to Office Action (Reexam Control No.
`90/009,513) (June 15, 2010)
`
`10/20/2016
`
`Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination
`Certificate (Reexam Control No. 90/009,513)
`(Nov. 22, 2010)
`D-Link Annual Report, 2014
`
`D-Link Corporate Presentation, August 2013
`
`D-Link Annual Report, 2013
`Docket Sheet, Quad Powerline Tech. v. Actiontec
`Elec., Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-01166-JRG-RSP,
`Eastern District of Texas
`Docket Sheet, Via Vadis, et al. v. D-Link Sys., Inc.,
`Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00812-LY, Western
`District of Texas
`Docket Sheet, Ericsson Inc. v. D-Link Corp., et al.,
`Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-00473-RWS, Eastern
`District of Texas
`Docket Sheet, Concinnitas, LLC, et al. v. D-Link
`Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-01043-JRG-
`RSP, Eastern District of Texas
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`10/20/2016
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`– 2 –
`
`
`
`
`Chrimar
`System, Inc.
`Exhibit No.
`
`2045
`
`2046
`
`2047
`
`2048
`
`2049
`
`2088
`
`Exhibit Description
`
`Date Filed
`
`Docket Sheet, NorthPeak Wireless, LLC v. 3Com
`Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 5:08-cv-01813-IPJ,
`Northern District of Alabama
`Docket Sheet, Network-1 Sec. Sol., Inc. v. D-Link
`Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 6:05-cv-00291-LED,
`Eastern District of Texas
`Notice of Appearance of Counsel for Defendant D-
`Link Systems, Inc., Dkt. No. 64, Chrimar Sys.,
`Inc., et al. v. D-Link Sys., Inc., Civil Action No.
`6:15-cv-618-JRG-JDL, Eastern District of Texas
`Docket Sheet, Garnet Digital, LLC v. D-Link
`Systems, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-
`00648-LED, Eastern District of Texas
`Docket Sheet, Innovative Wireless Solutions, LLC v.
`K-Link Systems, Inc., Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-
`01814-CJC-AN, Central District of California
`Transcript of Telephone Proceedings, November
`1, 2016, IPR2016-01425, IPR2016-01426
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`10/20/2016
`
`11/30/2016
`
`
`
`
`
`– 3 –
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Justin S. Cohen
`Justin S. Cohen
` Reg. No. 59,964
` Justin.Cohen@tklaw.com
`THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
`One Arts Plaza
`1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`214.969.1700
`214.969.1751 (Fax)
`
`Richard W. Hoffmann
` Reg. No. 33,711
` Hoffmann@Reising.com
`REISING ETHINGTON PC
`755 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1850
`Troy, Michigan 48084
`248.689.3500
`248.689.4071 (Fax)
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 30, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`– 4 –
`
`
`
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`A copy of this Patent Owner’s Exhibit List under 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(B)(2)
`
`has been served on Petitioner via email at the following correspondence
`
`address:
`
`Victoria Hao
` vhao@sjclawpc.com
`Martha Hopkins
` mhopkins@sjclawpc.com
`Law Offices of S.J. Christine Yang
`17220 Newhope Street
`Suites 101 & 102
`Fountain Valley, California 92708
`Telephone: 714.641.4022
`Fax: 714.641.2082
`
`
`
` /s/ Justin S. Cohen
`Justin S. Cohen
` Reg. No. 59,964
` Justin.Cohen@tklaw.com
`THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
`One Arts Plaza
`1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`214.969.1700
`214.969.1751 (Fax)
`
`
`
`– 5 –
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`November 30, 2016
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
