`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 60
`Entered: August, 29 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.,
`BROCADE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC., and NETGEAR, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2016-01389 (Patent 8,155,012 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01391 (Patent 8,942,107 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01397 (Patent 9,019,838 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01399 (Patent 8,902,760 B2)1
`_______________
`
`Before KARL D. EASTHOM, GREGG I. ANDERSON, and
`ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WEINSCHENK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER2
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`1 Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Brocade Communication Systems, Inc., and
`Netgear, Inc. filed petitions in (now terminated) IPR2017-00718, IPR2017-
`00719, IPR2017-00720, and IPR2017-00790, and were joined to the above-
`listed proceedings.
`2 This Order will be entered in each of the above-listed proceedings as the
`caption indicates. The parties are not permitted to use this caption style.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01389 (Patent 8,155,012 B2)
`IPR2016-01391 (Patent 8,942,107 B2)
`IPR2016-01397 (Patent 9,019,838 B2)
`IPR2016-01399 (Patent 8,902,760 B2)
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`On August 16, 2017, Judges Easthom, Anderson, and Weinschenk
`held a telephone conference call with counsel for Juniper Networks, Inc.,
`Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Brocade Communication Systems, Inc., and Netgear,
`Inc. (“Petitioner”) and counsel for Chrimar Systems, Inc. (“Patent Owner”).
`A court reporter transcribed the call. This Order summarizes the call, but the
`court reporter’s transcript (Paper 62)3 contains a more complete record.
`II. ANALYSIS
`Patent Owner filed a request (Paper 54) for authorization to file
`Exhibits 2052–2054 with its Opposition (Paper 53) to Petitioner’s Motion to
`Exclude (Paper 49). During the call, Petitioner agreed that Patent Owner
`could file Exhibit 2054. Paper 62, 14:14–21. Also, during the call, Patent
`Owner withdrew its request to file Exhibits 2052 and 2053. Paper 62,
`12:11–15:1. Therefore, we grant Patent Owner’s unopposed request to file
`Exhibit 2054, and we dismiss as moot Patent Owner’s withdrawn request to
`file Exhibits 2052 and 2053.
`
`III. ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request (Paper 54) for authorization
`to file Exhibits 2052–2054 is granted for Exhibit 2054, and dismissed as
`moot for Exhibits 2052 and 2053.
`
`
`
`3 We cite to the record in IPR2016-01389.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01389 (Patent 8,155,012 B2)
`IPR2016-01391 (Patent 8,942,107 B2)
`IPR2016-01397 (Patent 9,019,838 B2)
`IPR2016-01399 (Patent 8,902,760 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Nima Hefazi
`Michael Fleming
`Jonathan Kagan
`Talin Gordnia
`IRELL & MANELLA, LLP
`nhefazi@irell.com
`mfleming@irell.com
`jkagan@irell.com
`tgordnia@irell.com
`
`Joseph A. Powers
`Christopher J. Tyson
`Matthew S. Yungwirth
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`cjtyson@duanemorris.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Frank A. Angileri
`Thomas A. Lewry
`Marc Lorelli
`Christopher C. Smith
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`fangileri@brookskushman.com
`tlewry@brookskushman.com
`csmith@brookskushman.com
`
`Richard W. Hoffmann
`REISING ETHINGTON P.C.
`hoffmann@reising.com
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
