throbber
United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`________________________________________________
`
`Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`________________________________________________
`
`
`
`Juniper Networks, Inc.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`________________________________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01397
`U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838
`________________________________________________
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Exhibit List
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`PATENT OWNER CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC.’S
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`Chrimar
`System, Inc.
`Exhibit No.
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`2019
`
`2020
`
`2021
`
`Exhibit Description
`
`Date Filed
`
`Memorandum Opinion and order denying AMX’s
`motion for summary judgment of non-infringement
`of the ’012 Patent (Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v.
`AMX, LLC, Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-881-JDL,
`Eastern District of Texas, ECF No. 96)
`Memorandum Opinion and order construing certain
`terms of the ’012 Patent (Chrimar Systems, Inc., et
`al. v. AMX, LLC, Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-881-JDL,
`Eastern District of Texas, ECF No. 105)
`Memorandum Opinion and order construing certain
`terms of the ’012 Patent and denying AMX’s
`motion for summary judgment of indefiniteness
`regarding the “distinguishing” terms of the ’012
`Patent (Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. AMX, LLC,
`Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-881-JDL, Eastern District
`of Texas, ECF No. 108)
`Memorandum Opinion and order denying AMX’s
`motion for summary judgment of indefiniteness
`regarding certain claims of the ’012, ’107, and ’760
`Patents (Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. AMX, LLC,
`Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-164-JDL, Eastern District
`of Texas, ECF No. 122)
`Markman order construing certain terms of the ’012,
`’107, ’760, and ’838 Patents (Chrimar Systems, Inc.,
`et al. v. AMX, LLC, Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-164-
`JDL, Eastern District of Texas, ECF No. 123)
`
`10/12/2016
`
`10/12/2016
`
`10/12/2016
`
`10/12/2016
`
`10/12/2016
`
` 
`
`– 1 –
`
`

`
`Chrimar
`System, Inc.
`Exhibit No.
`
`Exhibit Description
`
`Date Filed
`
`Memorandum Opinion and order on ALE’s motion
`to construe certain claim terms of the ’012 and ’760
`Patents (Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. AMX, LLC,
`Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-164-JDL, Eastern District
`of Texas, ECF No. 318)
`Response to Office Action
`Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination
`Certificate
`
`10/12/2016
`
`10/12/2016
`
`10/12/2016
`
`2035
`
`2036
`
`2037
`
` 
`
`– 2 –
`
`  
`
` 
`
`

`
`Dated: October 12, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Justin S. Cohen
`Justin S. Cohen
` Reg. No. 59,964
` Justin.Cohen@tklaw.com
`THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
`One Arts Plaza
`1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`214.969.1700
`214.969.1751 (Fax)
`
`Richard W. Hoffmann
` Reg. No. 33,711
` Hoffmann@Reising.com
`REISING ETHINGTON PC
`755 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1850
`Troy, Michigan 48084
`248.689.3500
`248.689.4071 (Fax)
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
` 
`
`
`
`– 3 –
`
`

`
`Certificate of Service
`
`A copy of this Patent Owner’s Exhibit List under 37 C.F.R. § 42.107(B)(2)
`
`has been served on Petitioner via email at the following correspondence
`
`address:
`
`Nima Hefazi
`Irell & Manella LLP
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Telephone: 949-760-5204
`Fax: 949-760-5200
`email: nhefazi@irell.com
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Justin S. Cohen
`Justin S. Cohen
` Reg. No. 59,964
` Justin.Cohen@tklaw.com
`THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
`One Arts Plaza
`1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`214.969.1700
`214.969.1751 (Fax)
`
`
`
`– 4 –
`
`
`
`October 12, 2016
`
` 
`
` 

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket