`Trials@uspto.gov Paper No. 19
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`Entered: August 18, 2017
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01289
`Patent 7,060,360 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER,
`and MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`OBERMANN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01289
`Patent 7,060,360 B2
`
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioner request an oral hearing pursuant to
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 17, 18. The requests are granted to the extent set
`forth below and subject to the following conditions.
`Oral argument shall commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on
`September 18, 2017, on the 9th floor of the Madison Building East, 600
`Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`Each party is allotted forty-five (45) minutes to present argument.
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the challenged patent
`claims are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will open the hearing by
`presenting its case regarding the challenged claims for which we instituted
`trial. Petitioner may reserve some of its argument time for rebuttal.
`Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s presentation.
`
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`reporter’s transcript shall constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. If the parties have any
`concern about disclosing confidential information, they are requested to
`contact the Board at least five (5) days in advance of the hearing to discuss
`the matter.
`
`The parties are directed to serve demonstrative exhibits on opposing
`counsel at least five (5) business days before the hearing date. Please also
`provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least
`five (5) business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to
`Trials@uspto.gov. The parties are directed to refrain from filing
`demonstrative exhibits in the record of this proceeding.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01289
`Patent 7,060,360 B2
`
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if such objections
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file any objections to demonstrative
`exhibits with the Board at least two (2) business days before the hearing.
`Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be
`considered waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`reserve ruling on the objections until the oral argument. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27,
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits.
`At least one member of the panel may be attending the hearing
`electronically from a remote location and may not be able to view the
`projection screen in the hearing room. Thus, if a demonstrative exhibit is
`not made available or visible to the judge(s) presiding over the hearing
`remotely, that demonstrative will not be considered. Each presenter must
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`screen number) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and
`accuracy of the reporter’s transcript and for the benefit of the judge(s)
`presiding over the hearing remotely.
`
`No live testimony from any witness will be taken at the oral argument.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person at the
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01289
`Patent 7,060,360 B2
`
`oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument. If either party expects that its lead counsel will not attend the oral
`hearing, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference with the
`Board no later than two (2) business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss
`the matter.
`
`Petitioner “requests permission to use a computer, projector and
`screen to display possible demonstratives and exhibits.” Paper 18, 3. That
`request, and any other special requests for audiovisual equipment, should be
`directed to Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be
`honored unless presented in a separate communication not less than five
`days before the hearing, directed to the above email address.
`
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that the parties’ requests for oral hearing are granted
`subject to the conditions set forth in this Order; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that oral hearing, conducted pursuant to the
`procedures outlined above, shall commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on
`September 18, 2017.
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01289
`Patent 7,060,360 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Anish Desai
`GE.WGM.Service@weil.com
`
`Megan Wantland
`megan.wantland@weil.com
`
`Brian Ferguson
`brian.ferguson@weil.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`
`Timothy Riffe
`riffe@fr.com
`
`Lauren Degnan
`degnan@fr.com
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
