`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________
`
`GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01220
`U.S. Patent No. 9,007,420
`_____________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “Patent Board”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01220
`U.S. Patent No. 9,007,420
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s December 16, 2016
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper 9), Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument, which
`
`is currently scheduled for August 9, 2017, on the issues raised in the Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 9,007,420 (“the ’420 patent”), Patent Owner’s
`
`Response, and Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`The issues to be argued are:
`
`• The construction of certain terms of the ’420 patent, such as “actual
`
`face” and “feature detection process”;
`
`• The instituted grounds of unpatentability, namely whether:
`
`o Claims 1-9 and 11-19 of the ’420 patent are unpatentable over
`Torgersrud and Kenoyer; and
`
`o Claims 10, 20, and 21 are unpatentable over Torgersrud, Kenoyer,
`and Zhang;
`
`• Any issues identified in Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument;
`
`• Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters;
`
`• Any other issues raised in papers filed in this proceeding, including
`
`issues raised in papers yet to be filed, such as Motions to Exclude; and
`
`• Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01220
`U.S. Patent No. 9,007,420
`
`
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector,
`
`and screen.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
` /
`
` Joseph E. Mutschelknaus /
`
`
`Joseph E. Mutschelknaus, Reg. No. 63,285
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 22, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01220
`U.S. Patent No. 9,007,420
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served
`
`electronically via e-mail on June 22, 2017, in its entirety on the following:
`
`Justin B. Kimble (Lead Counsel)
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (Back-up Counsel)
`Daniel F. Olejko (Back-up Counsel)
`Terry A. Saad (Back-up Counsel)
`Nicholas c. Kliewer (Back-up Counsel)
`BRAGALONE CONROY PC
`jkimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com
`jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
`dolejko@bcpc-law.com
`tsaad@bcpc-law.com
`nkliewer@bcpc-law.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/ Joseph E. Mutschelknaus /
`
`Joseph E. Mutschelknaus, Reg. No. 63,285
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`Date: June 22, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`5402885_1.docx
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
