Filed on behalf of Securus Technologies, Inc.
`By:
`Justin B. Kimble (JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Daniel F. Olejko (dolejko@bcpc-law.com)
`Nicholas C. Kliewer (nkliewer@bcpc-law.com)
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01220
`U.S. Patent No. 9,007,420 B1
`
`
`
`PRO HAC VICE MOTION TO ADMIT ATTORNEY
`DANIEL F. OLEJKO PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`By:
`Justin B. Kimble (JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Daniel F. Olejko (dolejko@bcpc-law.com)
`Nicholas C. Kliewer (nkliewer@bcpc-law.com)
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01220
`U.S. Patent No. 9,007,420 B1
`
`
`
`PRO HAC VICE MOTION TO ADMIT ATTORNEY
`DANIEL F. OLEJKO PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01220
`Patent 9,007,420
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Securus Technologies, Inc. (“Securus”) hereby files this
`
`motion pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) for Daniel F. Olejko to appear pro hac
`
`vice on its behalf before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in IPR2016-001220.
`
`This Motion follows the guidelines set forth in IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, entered
`
`October 15, 2013.
`
`I. Factual Background
`
`Securus has already designated a registered practitioner, Justin B. Kimble (Reg.
`
`No. 58,591) as lead counsel, and Securus intends to designate Mr. Olejko as one of
`
`its back-up counsel in the event this motion is granted. The following statement of
`
`facts shows that there is good cause for the Board to recognize Mr. Olejko pro hac
`
`vice during this proceeding.
`
`Mr. Olejko is a patent litigator with over nine years’ experience, including
`
`significant experience in the area of patent validity and invalidity. In the many
`
`patent litigations in which he has been counsel, he has worked extensively on
`
`issues relating to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, 103, and 112, including by reviewing and
`
`analyzing numerous prosecution histories and prior art references, developing
`
`arguments for contentions and briefing for motions to dismiss, summary judgment
`
`motions, post-trial motions, and appeals, working closely with experts on their
`
`reports, conducting discovery and expert depositions, and preparing arguments for
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01220
`Patent 9,007,420
`
`trial. Mr. Olejko has also spent significant time learning the procedure of inter
`
`partes review proceedings.
`
`Mr. Olejko currently represents Securus in a number of pending appeals before
`
`the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which are all appeals from final
`
`written decisions in inter partes review proceedings before the Board. See, e.g.,
`
`Securus Techs., Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corp., Nos. 2016-1992, -1993 (Fed. Cir.
`
`docketed May 4, 2016) (appealing from IPR2014-01278 and IPR2014-01282,
`
`involving U.S. Patent No. 7,860,222); Global Tel*Link Corp. v. Securus Techs.,
`
`Inc., No. 16-2573 (Fed. Cir. docketed May 26, 2016) (appealing from IPR2015-
`
`00156, involving U.S. Patent No. 7,551,732); Securus Techs., Inc. v. Global
`
`Tel*Link Corp., No. 16-2573 (Fed. Cir. docketed Aug. 29, 2016) (appealing from
`
`IPR2015-00155, involving U.S. Patent No. 7,853,243). As counsel for Securus,
`
`Mr. Olejko has become very familiar with patents that cover technology that is
`
`similar to the technology at issue in this proceeding (e.g., prison telephone
`
`systems). Further, Mr. Olejko spent significant time assisting in the development
`
`of arguments in support of the responses in this matter, as well as considerable
`
`time preparing and reviewing the Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response itself.
`
`Given Mr. Olejko’s familiarity with the underlying technology, patent at issue,
`
`and prior art, Securus asks that the Board grant this Motion to afford Securus the
`
`benefit of having an additional attorney authorized on this matter.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01220
`Patent 9,007,420
`
`II. Attestation of Facts by Mr. Olejko
`
`Mr. Olejko has submitted a declaration herewith attesting to the following facts:
`
` Mr. Olejko is a member in good standing of the Pennsylvania State
`
`Bar.
`
` Mr. Olejko has never been subject to any suspensions or disbarments
`
`from practice before any court or administrative body.
`
` None of Mr. Olejko’s applications for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body has ever been denied.
`
` Mr. Olejko has never been sanctioned nor had contempt citations
`
`imposed by any court or administrative body.
`
` Mr. Olejko has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in
`
`37 C.F.R. pt. 42.
`
` Mr. Olejko will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 11.101, et seq., and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
` This is Mr. Olejko’s second application to appear pro hac vice in a
`
`proceeding before the Board. The first application in IPR2016-01123
`
`is currently pending.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01220
`Patent 9,007,420
`
` Mr. Olejko has familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding as set forth in Section I above.
`
`
` Dated: January 13, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 58,591
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4500W
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Phone: (214) 785-6670
`Email: JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01220
`Patent 9,007,420
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that this document has been served via
`
`electronic mail on January 13, 2017, to Petitioner via counsel, Michael D. Specht,
`
`and Joseph E. Mutschelknaus at the email addresses: mspecht-PTAB@skgf.com,
`
`jmutsche-PTAB@skgf.com, and PTAB@SKGF.com, pursuant to Petitioner’s
`
`consent in its Petition at page 60.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 58,591
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4500W
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Phone: (214) 785-6670
`Email: JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
