`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571.272.7822
`
`Paper 29
`Entered: August 16, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CANON INC., CANON U.S.A., INC.,
`CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., FUJIFILM CORPORATION,
`FUJIFILM HOLDINGS AMERICA CORPORATION,
`FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, JVC KENWOOD
`CORPORATION, JVCKENWOOD USA CORPORATION,
`NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON INC., OLYMPUS CORPORATION,
`OLYMPUS AMERICA INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION,
`PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Cases IPR2016-01199, IPR2016-01212, IPR2016-01214, IPR2016-01216,
`and IPR2016-01225 (Patent 8,966,144),
`IPR2016-01200, IPR2016-01211, and IPR2016-01213 (Patent 8,504,746)1
`____________
`
`Before JONI Y. CHANG, JENNIFER S. BISK, and
`MIRIAM L. QUINN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CHANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This Order addresses the same issues for the above-identified cases. We,
`therefore, exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01199, IPR2016-01212, IPR2016-01214, IPR2016-01216, and
`IPR2016-01225 (Patent 8,966,144),
`IPR2016-01200, IPR2016-01211, and IPR2016-01213 (Patent 8,504,746)
`
`
`In each of the above-identified proceedings, we instituted inter partes
`review (Paper 82) and issued a Scheduling Order (Paper 9), which sets an
`oral hearing date, if oral hearing is requested by either party and granted by
`the Board. In particular, the oral hearing date for cases involving U.S.
`Patent No. 8,966,144 is September 13, 2017, and the oral hearing date for
`cases involving U.S. Patent No. 8,504,746 is September 14, 2017. Pursuant
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, the parties jointly requested an oral hearing in each
`case. Paper 15. The requests are granted.
`In addition to requesting an oral hearing, the parties jointly propose to
`group the cases by the same primary prior art references, for efficiency. Id.
`at 3. Specifically, as to the oral hearing on September 13, 2017, the parties
`propose: (1) arugment on IPR2016-01211, IPR2016-01212, and
`IPR2016-01216, involving Kawaguchi (Ex. 1206, filed in IPR2016-01211),
`for one hour per party; and (2) argument on IPR2016-01225 involving
`McNeill (Ex. 1301, filed in IPR2016-01225), for 30 minutes per party. Id.
`With respect to the oral hearing on September 14, 2017, the parties propose:
`(1) argument on IPR2016-01199 and IPR2016-01200, involving Aytac
`(Ex. 1004, filed in IPR2016-01199), for 45 minutes per party; and (2)
`argument on IPR2016-01213 and IPR2016-01214, involving Yamamoto
`(Ex. 1401, filed in IPR2016-01214), for 45 minutes per party. Id.
`In view of the circumstances before us, we agree with the parties, and
`accept their proposal.
`
`
`2 Citations refer to IPR2016-01199, as representative, unless otherwise
`noted.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01199, IPR2016-01212, IPR2016-01214, IPR2016-01216, and
`IPR2016-01225 (Patent 8,966,144),
`IPR2016-01200, IPR2016-01211, and IPR2016-01213 (Patent 8,504,746)
`
`
`The consolidated hearing for IPR IPR2016-01211, IPR2016-01212,
`IPR2016-01216, and IPR2016-01225 will commence at 10:00 AM Eastern
`Time, on September 13, 2017. Each party will have ninety (90) minutes of
`total time to present arguments for these proceedings.
`The consolidated hearing for IPR2016-01199, IPR2016-01200,
`IPR2016-01213, and IPR2016-01214 will commence at 10:00 AM Eastern
`Time, on September 14, 2017. Each party will have ninety (90) minutes of
`total time to present arguments for these proceedings.
`Both hearings will be conducted at the USPTO Headquarters, Ninth
`Floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia, 22314.3 The hearings will be open to the public for in-person
`attendance that will be accommodated on a first-come first-serve basis.
`For each oral hearing, because Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of
`proof that the challenged claims are unpatentable, Petitioner will proceed
`first to present its case as to the challenged claims and instituted grounds of
`unpatentability in the proceedings, and may reserve a small portion of its
`time for rebuttal. Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s case.
`After that, Petitioner may use the rest of its time for its rebuttal, responding
`to Patent Owner’s specific arguments presented at the oral hearing. No live
`testimony from any witness will be taken at the oral argument.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at
`least seven business days prior to the hearing. The parties shall confer with
`each other regarding any objections to demonstrative exhibits, and file
`
`
`3 See https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/uspto-locations/alexandria-virginia-
`headquarters for additional information.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01199, IPR2016-01212, IPR2016-01214, IPR2016-01216, and
`IPR2016-01225 (Patent 8,966,144),
`IPR2016-01200, IPR2016-01211, and IPR2016-01213 (Patent 8,504,746)
`
`demonstrative exhibits with the Board, as a separate exhibit in accordance
`with 37 C.F.R. § 42.63, at least five business days prior to the hearing.
`Demonstrative exhibits are not evidence, but merely a visual aid at the
`oral hearing. For any issue that cannot be resolved after conferring with the
`opposing party, the parties may file jointly a one-page list of objections at
`least five business days prior to the hearing. The list should identify with
`particularity which demonstrative exhibits are subject to objection and
`include a short statement (no more than one sentence) of the reason for each
`objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted.
`We will consider the objections and schedule a conference call if
`necessary. Otherwise, we will reserve ruling on the objections until the
`hearing or after the hearing. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is
`not presented timely will be considered waived. Each party also shall
`provide a hard copy of its demonstrative exhibits to the court reporter at the
`hearing.
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`referenced during each hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`reporter’s transcript. The parties also should note that Judge Miriam Quinn
`will be attending each hearing electronically and will only have access to the
`courtesy copy of the demonstratives provided in advance, as referenced
`above. If a demonstrative is not made available to the Board in the manner
`indicated above, that demonstrative may not be available to each of the
`judges during the hearing and may not be considered. Further, images
`projected, using audio visual equipment in Alexandria, will not be visible to
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01199, IPR2016-01212, IPR2016-01214, IPR2016-01216, and
`IPR2016-01225 (Patent 8,966,144),
`IPR2016-01200, IPR2016-01211, and IPR2016-01213 (Patent 8,504,746)
`
`Judge Quinn. Because of limitations on the audio transmission systems in
`our hearing rooms, the presenter may speak only when standing at the
`hearing room podium. If the parties have questions as to whether
`demonstrative exhibits would be sufficiently visible and available to all of
`the judges, the parties are invited to contact the Board at (571) 272-9797.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at oral
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`whole or in part. If lead counsel for either party is unable to attend the oral
`argument, the Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference call
`no later than five business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the
`matter.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for each hearing, and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`hearing transcript will be entered in the record of the proceedings.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment at the hearing are to be made
`five days in advance of the hearing date. The requests must be sent to
`Trials@uspto.gov. If the requests are not received timely, equipment may
`not be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01199, IPR2016-01212, IPR2016-01214, IPR2016-01216, and
`IPR2016-01225 (Patent 8,966,144),
`IPR2016-01200, IPR2016-01211, and IPR2016-01213 (Patent 8,504,746)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`T. Vann Pearce
`Christopher Higgins
`Christopher Siebens
`John Inge
`TVPPTABDocket@orrick.com
`0CHPTABDocket@orrick.com
`29CPTABDocket@orrick.com
`JRIPTABDocket@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`David Maiorana
`F. Drexel Feeling
`Matthew Johnson
`David Witcoff
`Marc Blackman
`dmaiorana@JonesDay.com
`f.dfeeling@jonesday.com
`mwjohnson@jonesday.com
`dlwitcoff@jonesday.com
`msblackman@jonesday.com
`JONES DAY
`
`Ahren Hsu-Hoffman
`Dion Bregman
`Chris Mizumoto
`Ahren.hsu-hoffman@morganlewis.com
`dion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`chris.mizumoto@morganlewis.com
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`
`Gregory Cordrey
`gcordrey@jmbm.com
`JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01199, IPR2016-01212, IPR2016-01214, IPR2016-01216, and
`IPR2016-01225 (Patent 8,966,144),
`IPR2016-01200, IPR2016-01211, and IPR2016-01213 (Patent 8,504,746)
`
`Brian Rupp
`Carrie Beyer
`Nikola Colic
`Brian.Rupp@dbr.com
`Carrie.Beyer@dbr.com
`Nick.Colic@dbr.com
`DRINKR BIDDLE & REATH LLP
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Nicholas T. Peters
`Paul Henkelmann
`Joseph Marinelli
`ntpete@fitcheven.com
`phenkelmann@fitcheven.com
`jmarinelli@fitcheven.com
`FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP
`
`Anthony Meola
`info@themeolafirm.com
`THE MEOLA FIRM, PLLC
`
`
`7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
