throbber
Paper No. 1
` Entered: August 17, 2017
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`JOHNSON SAFETY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01070
`Patent 7,245,274 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before BRYAN F. MOORE, DANIEL N. FISHMAN, and
`JOHN F. HORVATH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate After Institution Due to Settlement
`35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01070
`Patent 7,245,274 B2
`
`
`The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Terminate Due to Settlement.
`See Paper 15. The Joint Motion states that the parties have settled their
`dispute with respect to the ’274 patent and that the district court litigations
`involving the ’274 patent have been dismissed. Id. at 1. Concurrently with
`the Joint Motion, the parties also filed Exhibit 1020, which the parties
`represent is a true and correct copy of the parties’ Memorandum of
`Understanding settling the dispute. Id. at 1–2.
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), an inter partes review proceeding shall be
`terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the
`petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Patent and Trademark Office has
`decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is
`filed. In this proceeding, trial was instituted on November 23, 2016. Paper
`9. Patent Owner has not yet filed its Response, and the Board has not
`decided the merits of this proceeding. We grant the Joint Motion to
`Terminate and terminate this proceeding as to both Petitioner and Patent
`Owner without rendering a final written decision. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`The Parties also jointly request, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), that
`the Memorandum of Understanding in Exhibit 1020 be treated as business
`confidential information and be kept separate from the files of the involved
`patent. See Paper 15. We grant that request as well.
`Accordingly, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate this proceeding is
`granted and this proceeding is hereby terminated; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ request that Exhibit 1020 be
`treated as business confidential information and kept separate from the files
`of the involved patent is granted, and that Exhibit 1020 be kept separate
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01070
`Patent 7,245,274 B2
`
`from the files of the ’274 patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01070
`Patent 7,245,274 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Gregory Howison
`ipr@dalpat.com
`
`Keith Harden
`ipr@dalpat.com
`
`John Arnott
`ipr@dalpat.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Dean McConnell
`dean@im-iplaw.com
`
`Frank Chau
`chau@chauiplaw.com
`
`Richard Ratchford
`rratchford@chauiplaw.com
`
`F. Chau & Associates, LLC
`130 Woodbury Road
`Woodbury, NY 11797
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket