throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SECOND DECLARATION BY PETER RYSAVY FOR INTER PARTES
`REVIEW OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 8,135,342 AND 8,879,987
`
`Dated: May 17, 2016
`
`
`
`
` Page 1 of 51
`
`

`
`Table of Contents
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 4
`
`A. EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND........................................... 5
`B. MATERIALS CONSIDERED. ................................................................................ 5
`
`II. THE ‘342 AND ‘987 PATENTS ...................................................................... 6
`
`A. MEANING OF DIFFERENT CLAIM TERMS IN THE ’987 AND ’342 PATENTS ......... 6
`a. “Receiving Said User Information …” ........................................................ 6
`b. “Means For Connecting …” ........................................................................ 8
`c. “Means For Downloading …” ..................................................................11
`d. “Means For Relaying …” ..........................................................................12
`e. “Means For Operating …” ........................................................................16
`f. “User Information”....................................................................................18
`B. SIMILARITY OF CLAIMS AND CLAIM TERMS ....................................................20
`
`III. THE TEE, ACHARYA, AND BENCO PRIOR ART ..............................29
`
`A. SPECIFIC DISCLOSURES OF TEE, ACHARYA, AND BENCO ................................30
`a. Receiving … In A Manner That Uniquely Associates (’987, element 6.3) 30
`b. Wherein Two Users Interconnect To Said Peripheral Device, Said Two
`Users Controlling Said User Information (found, for example in ’987, element
`6.8) 31
`c. Means For Connecting (’987, element 7.2; ’342, elements 11.2, 58.2, and
`68.2) ...................................................................................................................32
`d. Means For Downloading (’987, element 7.3; ’342, elements 11.3, 58.3,
`and 68.3)............................................................................................................35
`e. Means For Relaying (’987, element 7.4; ’342, elements 11.4, 58.4, and
`68.4) ...................................................................................................................35
`f. Means For Operating (’987, element 7.5; ’342, elements 11.5, 58.5, and
`68.5) ...................................................................................................................37
`g. Respective Peripheral Devices Used to Access And Operate Software
`(’987, element 7.8) ............................................................................................38
`
`IV. THE SOIN AND WANG PRIOR ART .....................................................39
`
`A. COMBINING SOIN WITH WANG .......................................................................40
`B. SPECIFIC DISCLOSURES OF SOIN AND WANG ..................................................40
`a. Two Users Interconnect (’987, element 1.7) ..............................................40
`b. Receiving … In A Manner That Uniquely Associates (’987, element 6.3) 40
`c. Means For Connecting (’987, element 7.2; ’342, elements 11.2, 58.2, and
`68.2) ...................................................................................................................42
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 2 of 51
`
`

`
`d. Means For Downloading (’987, element 7.3; ’342, elements 11.3, 58.3,
`68.3) ...................................................................................................................44
`e. Means For Relaying (’987, element 7.4; ’342, elements 11.4, 58.4, and
`68.4) ...................................................................................................................45
`f. Means For Operating (’987, element 7.5; ’342, elements 11.5, 58.5, and
`68.5) ...................................................................................................................47
`g. User Accesses A Respective / Said Peripheral Device (’987, elements 7.7,
`14) 48
`h. Respective Peripheral Devices Used to Access And Operate Software
`(’987, element 7.8) ............................................................................................49
`
`
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 3 of 51
`
`

`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`1. I have been retained as a technical expert by counsel on behalf of
`
`RPX Corporation, to opine on U.S. Patent Nos. 8,135,342 and 8,879,987 (“’342
`
`patent” and “’987 patent,” respectively) and related technologies, in association
`
`with proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`(“USPTO”).
`
`2. I am the same Peter Rysavy who previously submitted a declaration
`
`regarding the ’342 and ’987 patents, which I signed on April 30, 2016 (“April 30
`
`Declaration”).
`
`3. I reserve the right to modify or supplement my opinions, as well as
`
`the basis for my opinions, based on the nature and content of the documentation,
`
`data, proof and other evidence or testimony that Sockeye Licensing TX LLC or
`
`Wildcat Licensing LLC or its experts may present, or based on any additional
`
`information provided to me or found by me in this matter.
`
`4. I am being compensated for my time expended in connection with
`
`this case at the rate of $400 per hour, plus expenses. My compensation is for my
`
`time, and is in no way dependent or based on the content of my opinions or
`
`testimony offered in this matter, the outcome of any issues in this matter, or the
`
`timing of when issues in this matter or this matter as a whole are resolved.
`
`
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 4 of 51
`
`

`
`A. Educational and Professional Background
`
`5. I hereby incorporate the Educational and Professional Background
`
`Section of my April 30 Declaration (paragraphs 3-11). My CV was submitted as
`
`Appendix 1 to my April 30 Declaration.
`
`B. Materials Considered.
`
`6. In connection with my work on this matter, I have reviewed the
`
`following materials and references in forming my opinions:
`
`Michael D. Harold, U.S. Patent No. 8,135,342, System, Method and Apparatus
`For Using a Wireless Cell Phone Device To Create a Desktop Computer and
`Media Center, issued March 13, 2012 (“’342 Patent”)
`
`Michael D. Harold, U.S. Patent No. 8,879,987, System, Method And Apparatus
`For Using A Wireless Device To Control Other Devices, issued November 4,
`2014 (“’987 Patent”)
`
`Lai King Tee et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0203758 A1,
`filed September 27, 2005, published September 14, 2006 (“Tee”)
`
`Shrikant Acharya et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0036509
`A1, filed June 2, 2004, published February 17, 2005 (“Acharya”)
`
`Ravipal Soin et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0091359 A1,
`filed February 25, 2004, published April 28, 2005 (“Soin”)
`
`Tiejun Ronald Wang et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`2006/0077310 A1, filed June 24, 2005, published April 13, 2006 (“Wang”)
`
`David S. Benco et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0135393
`A1, filed December 19, 2003, published June 23, 2005 (“Benco”)
`
`Applicant’s Response to Office Action During Prosecution of ’342 Patent, filed
`May 31, 2011
`Random House Webster’s Computer & Internet Dictionary (2000) (excerpts)
`U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/844,645, filed Sep. 15, 2006.
`U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 11/889,941, filed Aug. 17, 2007.
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 5 of 51
`
`

`
`7. I note that, since signing my April 30 Declaration, I have also
`
`reviewed U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/844,645, filed Sep. 15, 2006
`
`(“’645 Provisional Application”) and U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 11/889,941,
`
`filed Aug. 17, 2007 (“’941 Application”). My opinions expressed in my April 30
`
`Declaration are unchanged after reading the ’645 Provisional Application and ’941
`
`Application.
`
`8. I may also reference other background materials throughout this
`
`declaration.
`
`II. THE ‘342 AND ‘987 PATENTS
`
`9. I hereby incorporate Section II of my April 30 Declaration
`
`(paragraphs 15-49). As noted in paragraph 15 of my April 30 Declaration, in
`
`reviewing the ’342 and ’987 patents I have noted no meaningful differences aside
`
`from the claims. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted, references and citations to
`
`the ’342 patent other than the claims, apply equally to the ’987 patent, and vice
`
`versa.
`
`A. Meaning of Different Claim Terms In the ’987 and ’342 Patents
`
`10. In this and the following paragraphs I discuss the meaning of
`
`additional claim terms that appears in certain claims of the ’342 and ’987 patents.
`
`a. “Receiving Said User Information …”
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 6 of 51
`
`

`
`11. The term “receiving said user information in a manner that
`
`uniquely associates the user information with one or more peripheral devices
`
`and uniquely associates each peripheral device with one or more users” appears
`
`in the ’987 patent claim 6. This term is ambiguous, as the ’987 patent does not
`
`mention either (i) uniquely associating user information with peripheral devices or
`
`(ii) uniquely associating peripheral devices with one or more users, much less
`
`“receiving said user information in a manner that” performs both recited unique
`
`associations. But, as noted in paragraph 43 of my April 30 Declaration, the ’987
`
`patent does use the word “associated” to describe a relationship or association
`
`between two items. ’987 patent 12:29, 13:40, 13:51.
`
`12. The patent also describes a user “specify[ing] the devices to
`
`which the wireless cell phone will connect.” ’987 patent 3:54-60. This specifying
`
`creates an association between the user’s wireless device and the specified
`
`peripheral devices, as well as an association between the user and the specified
`
`peripheral devices. These associations are reflected when the wireless device, upon
`
`receiving user information from a remote server, transmits that user information on
`
`to the specified peripheral devices. ’987 patent, 4:21-39. A skilled artisan would
`
`understand that, in the process of receiving the information, the wireless device
`
`must somehow associate that information, and thus the user, with the peripheral
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 7 of 51
`
`

`
`devices specified by the user, to insure that the information is properly transmitted
`
`to those peripheral devices.
`
`13. Thus, the first part of this term, “receiving … in a manner that
`
`uniquely associates the user information with one or more peripheral devices,”
`
`encompasses receiving the user information in a way that associates the user
`
`information to specific, user-selected peripheral devices, allowing for transmission
`
`to those devices. Similarly, the second part of this term, receiving … in a manner
`
`that … uniquely associates each peripheral device with one or more users,”
`
`encompasses receiving the user information in a way that, by allowing transmission
`
`to the selected peripheral devices, reflects the user association to the specific, user-
`
`selected peripheral devices.
`
`b. “Means For Connecting …”
`
`14. The term “means for connecting a user of said wireless device
`
`to user information stored for the respective wireless device on a server in a
`
`communications network” appears in, e.g., the ’987 patent claim 7. Similar terms
`
`appear in claims 11, 58, and 68 of the ’342 patent and my analysis here also applies
`
`to the overlapping aspects of those claims. I understand that construing this term
`
`requires identifying specific structures in the patent that perform the recited function
`
`of “connecting a user of said wireless device to user information stored for the
`
`respective wireless device on a server in a communications network.”
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 8 of 51
`
`

`
`15. I first note that patent does not discuss user information stored
`
`for a specific wireless device. I also note that the structure for performing the
`
`“connecting” function does not depend on who or what the information is “stored
`
`for.” In other words, the language “stored for the respective wireless device” does
`
`not impact the structure for performing this function, especially given the ’987
`
`patent’s lack of any description in this regard. Thus, I confine my analysis to
`
`locating a structure or structures “for connecting a user of said wireless device to
`
`user information stored … on a server in a communications network.”
`
`16. The ’987 patent describes the following structure that connects a
`
`wireless device to user information stored on a server: the combination of a
`
`“digital baseband” and “TCP/IP services.” E.g., ’987 patent 6:63-68, Figs. 1,
`
`3A-3D.
`
`17. The ’987 patent does not define or explain the term “digital
`
`baseband.” A POSITA would have understood “digital baseband,” as used in the
`
`’342 and ’987 patents, to refer to a combination of hardware and software
`
`configured to down-convert a signal and further process it to extract
`
`information being received (receive path) or process information into a signal
`
`and then up-convert the signal for transmission (transmit path). All practical
`
`wireless systems that I am aware of – including cell phone, Wi-Fi, and other
`
`networks – use an approach of up-conversion and down-conversion when sending
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 9 of 51
`
`

`
`or receiving signals. Thus, as part of transmitting a signal, a device’s wireless
`
`interface first processes the information intended for transmission, including steps
`
`such as coding for error correction and modulation, into a modified signal and then
`
`up-converts the modified signal to a higher frequency for wireless transmission.
`
`Conversely, when receiving a wireless signal, a device’s wireless interface first
`
`down-converts the received signal to a lower frequency for processing to extract the
`
`information being communicated. Typically this information is then handed off to
`
`the device’s operating system or a specific application. The device component that
`
`performs the up-conversion / down-conversion just discussed is often referred to as
`
`a transceiver. The device component that performs the aforementioned processing
`
`is often called a baseband processor. Devices referred to as modems often combines
`
`these two device components, although strictly speaking, modulation/demodulation
`
`is typically a baseband process. Accordingly, within the industry, POSITAs would
`
`have used the terms modem and transceiver interchangeably. They would also have
`
`understood that the term baseband used in isolation to imply the presence of a
`
`transceiver, or to include a transceiver, simply because a baseband processor in
`
`isolation cannot transmit or receive radio signals.
`
`18. A POSITA would understand “TCP/IP services” as referring to
`
`services for carrying out communications using the TCP/IP suite of protocols,
`
`which are the basis of Internet-based communications. The TCP/IP suite of
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 10 of 51
`
`

`
`protocols would have been understood to include Internet Protocol (IP) at the
`
`network layer and both Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram
`
`Protocol (UDP) at the transport layer for transfer of user information. Thus, this
`
`term encompasses interface hardware and/or software configured to carry out
`
`data transfer over a network such as the Internet, or otherwise using portions
`
`of the TCP/IP suite of protocols for data communications across a network.
`
`c. “Means For Downloading …”
`
`19. The term “means for downloading said user information to
`
`said wireless device” appears in the ’987 patent claim 7. The same or similar terms
`
`appear in claims 11, 58, and 68 of the ’342 patent and my analysis here also applies
`
`to the overlapping aspects of those claims. I understand that construing this term
`
`requires identifying structures in the patent that perform the recited function of
`
`“downloading said user information to said wireless device.” The ’987 patent
`
`describes the following structure that downloads user information from a server to
`
`a wireless device: the combination of a “digital baseband,” “TCP/IP services,”
`
`and a “desktop browser.” E.g., ’987 patent 6:63-67 and 7:4-12, Figs. 1, 3A-3D.
`
`“Digital baseband” and “TCP/IP services” would be understood the same as
`
`described above in paragraphs 17. -18.
`
`20. The ’987 patent does not define the term “desktop browser,”
`
`although it appears frequently. It does describe the desktop browser as accessing
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 11 of 51
`
`

`
`“browser-based applications” in a system used “to send messages and data to, and
`
`receive messages and data from the browser-based applications and or services.”
`
`’987 patent 7:5-9. This follows the patent’s statement that the invention provides
`
`access to “browser-based” web sites and applications through the wireless device.
`
`’987 patent, 3:17-19 and Abstract. The term “desktop browser” would have been
`
`understood to refer to a conventional Internet browser, although the “desktop
`
`browser” in the patent is depicted as being part of a “cell phone desktop operating
`
`system” for example in Fig. 3A of the ’987 patent. The patent also states that the
`
`wireless device is not limited to cell phones but could be a “Blackberry, Palm, or
`
`other communicator” device. ’987 patent 14:29-31. Given the lack of a specific
`
`definition and the inconsistent usage of this term, a POSITA would have understood
`
`“desktop browser” to encompass software configured to access any browser-
`
`based web site, e.g., a web browser.
`
`d. “Means For Relaying …”
`
`21. The
`
`term “means for relaying the downloaded user
`
`information, at the control of said user, to a peripheral device” appears in the
`
`’987 patent claim 7. The same or similar terms appear in claims 11, 58, and 68 of
`
`the ’342 patent and my analysis here also applies to the overlapping aspects of those
`
`claims. I understand that construing this term requires identifying structures in the
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 12 of 51
`
`

`
`patent that perform the recited function of “relaying the downloaded user
`
`information, at the control of said user, to a peripheral device.”
`
`22. I first note that the patent does not use the term “relay” or
`
`“relaying.” It does, however, discuss transmitting downloaded user information
`
`from the wireless device to the peripheral device, and I understand this transmitting
`
`as being the claimed relaying. I note that even though the user may control the type
`
`or use of content, the type or use of content streamed (e.g., selecting a specific video
`
`or pausing or fast-forwarding a video) does not impact the “relaying” structure.
`
`23. The ’987 patent describes the following structure that transmits,
`
`under control of a user, the downloaded user information to a peripheral device: a
`
`“desktop browser”; “TCP/IP services”; a “device driver” for peripheral
`
`communications hardware configured to implement at least one of the USB,
`
`IEEE 1394, or IEEE 802.11 protocols; and “peripheral communications
`
`hardware and software” configured to implement at least one of the USB,
`
`IEEE 1394, or IEEE 802.11 protocols. E.g., ’987 patent 7:4-18, 8:60-9:12, 9:59-
`
`67, Figs. 1, 3A-3D. “Digital baseband” and “TCP/IP services” would be understood
`
`the same as described above in paragraphs 17. -18. “Desktop browser” would be
`
`understood the same as described above in paragraph 20.
`
`24. The patent identifies “device drivers” as used to transmit user
`
`information to the peripheral devices, but does not identify specific device drivers,
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 13 of 51
`
`

`
`for example at 7:9-14. The ‘987 patent uses the word “driver” consistently with how
`
`the term would have been used in the industry, namely as software that sits between
`
`the operating system and hardware devices. The context suggests that these device
`
`drivers are drivers for the peripheral communications hardware. This makes sense,
`
`because any device capable of processor-based network communications would
`
`necessarily have device drivers for the network interface. Moreover, the ’987 patent
`
`shows the device drivers as located between the TCP/IP services and the peripheral
`
`communications hardware and software,
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 14 of 51
`
`

`
`Thus, in the context of the ’987 patent the “drivers” that make up in part the
`
`structure for relaying could be any driver for peripheral communications hardware
`
`configured to carry out one of the protocols specified by the ’987 patent, i.e., USB,
`
`
`
`IEEE 1394, or IEEE 802.11.
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 15 of 51
`
`

`
`25. The ’987 patent also mentions “peripheral communications
`
`hardware and software” as part of the transmitting function, for example at 7:9-14.
`
`The phrase “peripheral communications hardware and software” does not connote
`
`a clear structure unless the communications protocols are specified. The ’987 patent
`
`includes several separate disclosures, including specific protocols, as well as
`
`disclosure of (Box 480) the peripheral communications hardware and software.
`
`Together, these disclosures would have informed a POSITA that the “peripheral
`
`communications hardware and software” would be hardware and software
`
`configured to implement at least one of the particular USB, IEEE 1394, or IEEE
`
`802.11 protocols.
`
`e. “Means For Operating …”
`
`26. The term “means for operating said peripheral device from
`
`said wireless device” appears in the ’987 patent claim 7. The same or similar terms
`
`appear in claims 11, 58, and 68 of the ’342 patent and my analysis here also applies
`
`to the overlapping aspects of those claims. I understand that construing this term
`
`requires identifying structures in the patent that perform the recited function of
`
`“operating said peripheral device from said wireless device.” In paragraph 61 of my
`
`April 30 Declaration, I explained how the patent does not discuss “operating” the
`
`peripheral devices, but that a POSITA would have understood it to mean controlling
`
`the peripheral device from the wireless device. I further explained how control
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 16 of 51
`
`

`
`could take two forms: either the wireless device generally operating the peripheral,
`
`as part of a “traditional desktop computing environment” configuration or explicit
`
`control through a (remote) command interface of the peripheral device.
`
`27. For the wireless device as CPU form of operation, the
`
`corresponding structures are essentially the same as for the “means for relaying …”
`
`element discussed above: the TCP/IP services, device drivers for peripheral
`
`hardware communications configured to implement at least one of the USB, IEEE
`
`1394, or IEEE 802.11 protocols, and “peripheral communications hardware and
`
`software” configured to implement at least one of the USB, IEEE 1394, or IEEE
`
`802.11 protocols. These structures allow the wireless device to communicate with,
`
`and thus control, the peripheral devices.
`
`28. For the explicit control form of operation, the ’987 patent
`
`discloses several different structures, each of which could be used to operate a
`
`peripheral device, such as a display, from the wireless device. On the wireless
`
`device itself, the patent describes a “keypad.” ’987 patent 11:59-60. The patent also
`
`describes a keyboard and mouse connected to the wireless device, also allowing
`
`users to operate peripheral devices. ’987 patent 13:58-62. Thus, the structure in the
`
`patent for carrying out this “operating …” function could be either the wireless
`
`device keypad or a keyboard connected to the wireless device or a mouse connected
`
`to the wireless device.
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 17 of 51
`
`

`
`f. “User Information”
`
`29. In paragraph 37 of my April 30 Declaration, I provide examples
`
`of “user information” in the context of the ’342 and ’987 patents. Neither the
`
`claims nor the specification define a particular meaning for “user information.” The
`
`specification, however focuses on Internet- or web-accessible information and data.
`
`Thus, in reading the ’987 and ’342 patents, a POSITA would have understood “user
`
`information” to generally encompass at least any data, documents, or information
`
`accessible to one or more users over a network, e.g., through a web browser via the
`
`Internet. This is consistent with the ’342 and ’987 patents’ discussion of user
`
`information downloaded from the Internet. The only application that the patents
`
`disclose for accessing the user information is a web browser. Even for media
`
`applications, the patents refer to browser-based Internet media applications. For
`
`example, the ’987 patent describes transmitting various types of information to
`
`peripheral devices and then states that “[a]ll of these transmissions may be made
`
`through the wireless cell phone device's browser interface.” ’987 patent, 6:31-50.
`
`30. A POSITA would have understood that the “user information”
`
`downloaded from the Internet would include either users accessing “user
`
`information” uploaded by the user or “user information” uploaded by others. For
`
`example, the ’987 and ’342 patents discus “information … stored on a remote server
`
`700, upon which the user’s (or another’s) data, work space or environment
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 18 of 51
`
`

`
`information resides.” ‘987 patent, 14:23-27. A POSITA reading the patent thus
`
`would have envisioned user information on services such as Hotmail and YouTube.
`
`In the case of Hotmail, the server would store and make available (by web browser)
`
`emails both sent by the user and sent by others. In this vein, the ’987 patent also
`
`describes how songs may be stored in a “user’s personal space on the Internet” or,
`
`alternatively, “attached in an email,” presumably sent by another user. 13:65-14:3.
`
`In the case of YouTube, a user could access videos that he or she uploaded or videos
`
`uploaded by others, in both instances accessing the information from Internet web
`
`servers using a web browser.
`
`31. In any event, the type or source or originator of the “user
`
`information” does not impact the claimed structures or methods in a technologically
`
`meaningful way. In other words, whether the information was originally uploaded
`
`by User A or User B, the claims are carried out in the same way. For example, the
`
`“user information” could be email from a Hotmail or other browser-based email
`
`account, a video previously uploaded by a user or third-party to YouTube (officially
`
`launched in December 2005) or another video-sharing site, or results from a web
`
`search. For all of these information types, the claimed acts and structures would be
`
`the same, and nothing in the ’987 patent suggests otherwise. All of these different
`
`types of “user information” would be downloaded, transmitted, etc. in similar
`
`fashion.
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 19 of 51
`
`

`
`B. Similarity of Claims and Claim Terms
`
`32. I note that the elements recited in ’342 patent claims 11-19, 58-
`
`67, and 68-76 largely overlap, as can be seen in the following side-by-side table:
`
`Claims 11-19
`
`Claims 58-67
`
`Claims 68-76
`
`Claim 11:
`11.1 A wireless device
`for facilitating user
`connectivity, comprising:
`
`Claim 58:
`58.1 A wireless device
`for facilitating user
`connectivity, comprising
`
`Claim 68:
`68.1 A wireless device
`for facilitating user
`connectivity, comprising:
`
`11.2 means for
`connecting a user of said
`wireless device to user
`information stored on a
`server in a
`communications
`network;
`
`58.2 means for
`connecting a user of said
`wireless device to user
`information stored on a
`server in a
`communications
`network;
`
`68.2 means for
`connecting a user of said
`wireless device to user
`information stored on a
`server in a
`communications
`network;
`
`11.3 means for
`downloading said user
`information to said
`wireless device;
`
`58.3 means for
`downloading said user
`information to said
`wireless device;
`
`68.3 means for
`downloading said user
`information to said
`wireless device;
`
`11.4 means for relaying
`the downloaded user
`information, at the
`control of said user, to a
`peripheral device; and
`
`68.4 means for relaying
`the downloaded user
`information, at the
`control of said user, to a
`peripheral device, said
`peripheral device being
`connected to a separate
`system; and
`
`58.4 means for relaying
`the downloaded user
`information, at the
`control of said user, to a
`peripheral device, said
`peripheral device being
`connected to another
`device selected from the
`group consisting of a
`portable PC, tablet
`computer, desktop
`computer and media
`center; and
`
`11.5 means for operating
`said peripheral device
`
`58.5means for operating
`said peripheral device
`
`68.5 means for operating
`said peripheral device
`
`
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 20 of 51
`
`

`
`Claims 11-19
`
`Claims 58-67
`
`Claims 68-76
`
`from said wireless
`device,
`
`from said wireless
`device,
`
`from said wireless
`device,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`68.6 whereby the
`downloaded user
`information on said
`peripheral device creates
`an environment selected
`from the group
`consisting of a desktop
`computing environment,
`a media center
`environment, a portable
`PC computing
`environment, a tablet
`computer computing
`
`
`
`11.6 wherein said
`peripheral device,
`controlled by said user
`from said wireless
`device, is connected to a
`separate system, and
`
`11.7 wherein said
`peripheral device
`comprises a hub,
`
`58.6 whereby said
`peripheral device is
`selected from the group
`consisting of a keyboard,
`a monitor, a mouse,
`speakers, a wireline hub,
`and combinations
`thereof.
`
`
`
`11.8 whereby a plurality
`of components connected
`to said peripheral device
`are accessible
`therethrough.
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 59:
`The wireless device
`according to claim 58,
`wherein the downloaded
`user information on said
`peripheral device creates
`an environment selected
`from the group consisting
`of a desktop computing
`environment, a media
`center environment, a
`portable PC computing
`environment, a tablet
`computer computing
`environment and
`combinations thereof.
`
`SECOND RYSAVY DECLARATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 21 of 51
`
`

`
`Claims 11-19
`
`Claims 58-67
`
`Claims 68-76
`
`Claim 12:
`The wireless device
`according to claim 11,
`further comprising:
`
`Claim 60:
`The wireless device
`according to claim 58,
`further comprising
`
`environment and
`combinations thereof.
`
`Claim 69:
`The wireless device
`according to claim 68,
`further comprising:
`
`means for receiving, at
`said peripheral device, a
`wireless communication
`containing said
`downloaded user
`information transmitted
`from said wireless
`device; and
`
`means for receiving, at
`said peripheral device, a
`wireless communication
`containing said
`downloaded user
`information transmitted
`from said wireless
`device; and
`
`means for receiving, at
`said peripheral device, a
`wireless communication
`containing said
`downloaded user
`information transmitted
`from said wireless
`device; and
`
`means for employing, at
`said peripheral device,
`said downloaded user
`information.
`
`means for employing, at
`said peripheral device,
`said downloaded user
`information.
`
`means for employing, at
`said peripheral device,
`said downloaded user
`information.
`
`Claim 13:
`The wireless device
`according to claim 11,
`further comprising:
`
`Claim 61:
`The wireless device
`according to claim 58,
`further comprising:
`
`Claim 70:
`The wireless device
`according to claim 68,
`further comprising:
`
`means for receiving, at
`said peripheral device, a
`wireline communication
`containing said
`downloaded user
`information transmitted
`from said wireless
`device; and
`
`means for receiving, at
`said peripheral device, a
`wireline communication
`containing said
`downloaded user
`information transmitted
`from said wireless
`device; and
`
`means for receiving, at
`said peripheral device, a
`wireline communication
`containing said
`downloaded user
`informatio

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket