`0
`~.()
`~
`"'~'( l ' 1.\\\'
`'° -v~
`s~ 111898,912
`~~
`"-.'1?'.
`~7'RAO
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`PATENT
`
`Applicant:
`
`Serial No.:
`
`Filed:
`
`Title:
`
`Michael D. Harold
`
`Examiner:
`
`PHU, SANHD
`
`11/898,912
`
`Group Art Unit:
`
`2618
`
`September 1 7, 2007
`
`Docket No.:
`
`Harold - 200
`
`SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR USING A WIRELESS CELL
`PHONE DEVICE TO CREA TE A DESKTOP COMPUTER AND MEDIA
`CENTER
`
`AMENDMENT
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 223 13-14 5 0
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`In response to the Office Action mailed November 30, 2010, please amend the above(cid:173)
`
`identified application as follows:
`
`Amendments to the Specification are set forth on page 2 of this paper.
`
`Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of claims that begins on page 3 of this
`
`paper.
`
`Remarks begin on page 9 of this paper.
`
`Page 1 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 111898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 31, 2011
`
`Reply to Office Action ofNovember 30, 2010
`
`Amendments to the Claims:
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions and listings of claims in the application.
`
`Listing of Claims:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Canceled)
`
`(Amended) A method for facilitating user connectivity, comprising:
`
`downloading, by a user on a wireless device in a communications network from a
`
`server in said communications network, user information to said wireless device; afHl
`
`transmitting, under user control on said wireless device, the downloaded user
`
`information from said wireless device to a peripheral device; and
`
`operating said peripheral device from said wireless device,
`
`wherein said peripheral device, controlled by said user from said wireless device,
`
`is connected to a separate system.
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 3 1, 2011
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 2010
`
`10.
`
`(Amended)
`
`A wireless device
`
`for
`
`facilitating user connectivity,
`
`comprising:
`
`means for connecting a user of said wireless device to user information stored on a
`
`server in a communications network;
`
`means for downloading said user information to said wireless device; arul
`
`means for relaying the downloaded user information, at the control of said user, to
`
`a peripheral device; and
`
`means for operating said peripheral device from said wireless device,
`
`wherein said peripheral device, controlled by said user from said wireless device,
`
`is connected to a separate system.
`
`11.
`
`(Original) The wireless device according to claim 10, further comprising:
`
`means for receiving, at said peripheral device, a wireless communication
`
`containing said downloaded user information transmitted from said wireless device; and
`
`means for employing, at said peripheral device, said downloaded user information.
`
`12.
`
`(Original) The wireless device according to claim 10, further comprising:
`
`means for receiving, at said peripheral device, a wireline communication
`
`containing said downloaded user information transmitted from said wireless device; and
`
`means for employing, at said peripheral device, said downloaded user information.
`
`13.
`
`(Original) The wireless device according to claim 10, wherein said
`
`peripheral device comprises personal equipment of said user.
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 3 1, 2011
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 2010
`
`14.
`
`(Original) The wireless ·device according to claim 10, wherein said
`
`peripheral device comprises personal equipment of a third party being used by said user.
`
`15.
`
`(Original) The wireless device according to claim 10, wherein said means
`
`for relaying comprises a wireline connection between said wireless device and said
`
`peripheral device.
`
`16.
`
`(Original) The wireless device according to claim 10, wherein said means
`
`for relaying comprises a wireless connection between said wireless device and said
`
`peripheral device.
`
`17.
`
`(Original) The wireless device according to claim 10, wherein said
`
`peripheral device compromises an input device, and
`
`wherein said user inputs commands into said input device,
`
`said commands being relayed through said wireless device.
`
`18.
`
`(Original) The wireless device according to claim 10, wherein said
`
`peripheral device is controlled by said user at a wireless input device.
`
`19.
`
`(Amended) The wireless device according to claim 10, wherein said
`
`peripheral device comprises a hub,
`
`whereby a plurality of components · eonstituting connected to said peripheral
`
`device are accessible therethrough.
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 31, 2011
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 2010
`
`20.
`
`(Amended) A peripheral device control system, comprising:
`
`a peripheral device;
`
`an interconnector, said interconnector connecting, at the control of a user, a
`
`wireless device to said peripheral device, and downloading user information to said
`
`peripheral device, said user information being stored on a server in a communications
`
`network; and
`
`said peripheral device, upon receipt of the downloaded user information,
`
`employing said user information at the control of said user_,_
`
`wherein said peripheral device, controlled by said user from said wireless device,
`
`is part of a separate system.
`
`21.
`
`(Original) The peripheral device control system according to claim 20,
`
`wherein said downloaded user information employed by said peripheral device creates a
`
`desktop computing environment.
`
`22.
`
`(Original) The peripheral device control system according to claim 20,
`
`wherein said downloaded user information employed by said peripheral device creates a
`
`media center.
`
`23.
`
`(New) The method according to claim 9, further compromising:
`
`transmitting, under user control on said wireless device, the downloaded user
`
`information from said wireless device to a display screen; and
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`Amendment dated May 3 I, 20 I I
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 20 I 0
`
`responding to said display screen output by using at least one input peripheral
`
`device, thereby enabling interactive and real time communications between the peripheral
`
`device and the server.
`
`24.
`
`(New) The method according to claim 9, further compromising:
`
`transmitting, under user control on said wireless device, the downloaded user
`
`information from said wireless device to an interactive multi-touch display screen; and
`
`responding to said interactive multi-touch display screen output by using at least
`
`one input capability of said multi-touch display screen, thereby enabling interactive and
`
`real time communications between the peripheral device and the server.
`
`25.
`
`(New) The method according to Claim 9, further compromising:
`
`transmitting, under user control on said wireless device, the downloaded user
`
`information from said wireless device to an output peripheral device in the form of a
`
`display screen; and
`
`responding to said display screen output by using input devices available on the
`
`wireless device to communicate with the server.
`
`26.
`
`(New) The method according to claim 9, further compromising:
`
`downloading, by a plurality of users, onto a respective plurality of wireless
`
`devices in a communications network from a server in said communications network;
`
`transmitting, under respective user control on respective wireless devices, the
`
`downloaded user information from said wireless device to at least one display screen; and
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 111898,912
`Amendment dated May 3 I, 20 I I
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 20 I 0
`
`responding to output on said at least one display screen output via input devices
`
`connected to the respective wireless devices, thereby communicating with the server.
`
`27.
`
`(New) The method according to claim 9, further compromising:
`
`downloading, by a plurality of users, onto a respective plurality of wireless
`
`devices in a communications network from a server in said communications network;
`
`transmitting, under respective user control on respective wireless devices, the
`
`downloaded user information from said wireless device to at least one display screen and
`
`at least one speaker system; and
`
`responding to output on said at least one display screen or said at least one speaker
`
`system via input devices connected to the respective wireless devices, thereby
`
`communicating with the server.
`
`28.
`
`(New) The wireless device according to claim 10, wherein said peripheral
`
`device is connected to a portable PC, said peripheral device being selected from the
`
`group consisting of a keyboard, a monitor, a mouse, speakers, a wireline hub, and
`
`combinations thereof.
`
`29.
`
`(New) The wireless device according to claim 10, wherein said peripheral
`
`device is connected to a tablet computer, said peripheral device being selected from the
`
`group consisting of a keyboard, a monitor, a mouse, speakers, a wireline hub, and
`
`combinations thereof.
`
`7
`
`Page 7 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 31, 2011
`
`Reply to Office Action ofNovember 30, 2010
`
`30.
`
`(New) The peripheral device control system according to claim 20,
`
`wherein said downloaded user information employed by said peripheral device creates a
`
`portable PC computing environment.
`
`31.
`
`(New) The peripheral device control system according to claim 20 wherein
`
`said downloaded user information employed by said peripheral device creates a tablet
`
`computer computing environment.
`
`8
`
`Page 8 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 31, 20 I I
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 20 I 0
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 9-31 are pending, claims 1-8 canceled, claims 9, 10, 19 and 20 are amended, and
`
`new claims 23-31 are added. Support for new claims 23-31 is found throughout the Specification
`
`and the Figures. Applicant respectfully submits that no new matter has been added.
`
`Applicant was requested to make an election, and claims 9-22 (Group II) were selected
`
`for consideration. Claims 1-8 (Group I), accordingly, were withdrawn, subject to a restriction
`
`requirement, and are canceled herein. Applicant respectfully submits that withdrawn claims 1-8
`
`will be filed in a subsequent divisional or continuation application.
`
`Claims 9, 10 and 20 are amended for clarity, i.e., to better indicate that the peripheral
`
`devices are controlled by the wireless device user through the cell phone or PDA without the
`
`host computer involvement (apart from connectivity). Pending claim 19 is amended to correct a
`
`typographical error.
`
`Turning to the instant Office Action rejections, claims 9-15, 17 and 19-22 stand rejected
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`
`US2009/0197652 to Lundstrom et al. (hereinafter "Lundstrom"). Applicant respectfully
`
`traverses this rejection.
`
`The present invention is directed to an innovative approach to employ a cell phone or like
`
`PDA, through connectivity to the peripheral components of a desktop computer or electronic
`
`system, to create a media center controlled by the user through the cell phone without the usage
`
`of the computing power of the peripherals' PC. With the cell phone as a connectivity conduit to
`
`remote user information, such as a song or movie, a cell phone or PDA user can control various
`
`constituent or peripheral parts of a PC (or other system such as a stereo or display) remotely.
`
`9
`
`Page 9 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 111898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 31, 2011
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 2010
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that Lundstrom is directed to a different technology and
`
`technological paradigm than that of the instant invention, as claimed.
`
`Fist, Applicant objects to the equivalency drawn by the Examiner between the connection
`
`between the VO devices in a portable PC and the 1/0 devices in a desktop PC of Lundstrom with
`
`the connection between the cell phone or PDA and various "peripheral" devices of the instant
`
`invention. There is a significant difference between the two approaches. Indeed, there is a
`
`significant difference between connection to a PC (and all of its constituent parts) and a
`
`connection to a "peripheral" device. By definition, a "peripheral is a device attached to a host
`
`computer, but not part of it, and is more or less dependent on the host. It expands the host's
`
`capabilities. But does not form part of the core computer architecture." See, Wikipedia definition
`
`of "Peripheral." Furthermore, the common definition of a computer is a CPU and the core
`
`components, such as the motherboard and memory, i.e., the "computer itself --and not the
`
`monitor, keyboard and mouse." See, Wikipedia definition of "Computer."
`
`Further, the peripheral components of the claimed invention, following this definition,
`
`constitute "dumb" devices, such as speakers, monitors, displays, keyboards, a computer mouse,
`
`and other separate and peripheral devices, all of which are directly controlled by the cell phone
`
`or PDA, which acts as the "CPU." The host PC is not controlling. Thus, by definition the instant
`
`claims differ markedly from the disclosure of Lundstrom. Furthermore, Lundstrom does not
`
`define peripheral devices, and also fails to disclose or suggest the direct connectivity of
`
`peripheral devices to the cell phone.
`
`10
`
`Page 10 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 31, 2011
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 20 I 0
`
`Second, Lundstrom merely describes a conventional tethering operation of a cell phone to
`
`a computer, and not the peripheral cell phone control of the claimed invention. Indeed, in
`
`Lundstrom, the connectivity is actually between two computers, where a PC or laptop connects
`
`to the Internet via another PC's or a cell phone's wireless Internet connection, providing a bridge
`
`connection but not ceding control. The instant invention, as claimed, does not use a cell phone to
`
`connect a "computer" to the Internet, as with Lundstrom. Quite the reverse, the instant invention
`
`connects peripheral devices (connected to the computer) to the cell phone to create a desktop
`
`computing environment on the cell phone. Indeed, the instant invention combines a cell phone or
`
`like PDA with peripheral devices to create a desktop PC, a portable PC, a digital tablet and/or
`
`media center that relies on the processor, memory and computational capabilities of the cell
`
`phone in combination with various peripheral devices, such as monitors, keyboards, mice,
`
`speaker systems, and various combinations thereof.
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that the paradigms of operation are radically different. So
`
`different, that Applicant respectfully submits that one skilled in the art would not implement the
`
`present invention using Lundstrom alone. Lundstrom fails as an anticipatory reference, and the
`
`paradigm of Lundstrom in no way suggests the teachings of the present invention.
`
`Nonetheless, in an effort to better clarify the instant invention and distinguish it from the
`
`prior art, such as Lundstrom, Applicants herein amend claims 9, 10 and 20 to better reflect the
`
`differences between the two paradigms. Applicant respectfully submits that the above argument
`
`and this clarification readily distinguish the instant invention from that of the likes of Lundstrom.
`
`In view of the aforementioned amendments, arguments and remarks, Applicants
`
`respectfully submit that the rejection has been overcome. Reconsideration and withdrawal of the
`
`§ 102( e) rejection of claims 9-15, 17 and 19-22 are respectfully requested. Applicants further
`
`respectfully submit that the instant invention, as claimed, is not rendered obvious in view of
`
`Lundstrom and its ilk at least for the reasons set forth above.
`
`11
`
`Page 11 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`Amendment dated May 3 I, 201 I
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 20 I 0
`
`Turning again to the instant Office Action rejections, claims 16 and 18 stand rejected
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable for obviousness over Lundstrom in view of U.S.
`
`Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0192806 to Wyper et al. (hereinafter "Wyper").
`
`Applicants respectfully traverse this rejection also.
`
`The many and serious deficiencies of Lundstrom have been discussed, the least of which
`
`are the paradigmical differences. Wyper adds little and fails to cure the aforementioned
`
`deficiencies. As with Lundstrom, Wyper is directed to Bluetooth capabilities, and fails to correct
`
`the aforementioned different paradigm of Lundstrom or provide an elaboration on mechanisms to
`
`change it to one nearer that of the claimed invention.
`
`Accordingly, Applicant respectfully submits that Wyper not only fails to cure the
`
`aforementioned deficiencies of Lundstrom, but leads one of skill in the art in the opposite
`
`direction as the present invention, as claimed.
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that Wyper utterly fails to cure the aforementioned
`
`deficiencies of Lundstrom as a primary reference against the instant invention. The proposed
`
`combination Wyper to Lundstrom fails to suggest the present invention, and does not render the
`
`instant invention.obvious. One of skill in the art of Lundstrom would not look to Wyper for
`
`inspiration for the instant invention, as claimed.
`
`Applicant, therefore, respectfully submits that the proposed combination of Lundstrom
`
`and Wyper is deficient on numerous grounds and fails to suggest the present invention, as
`
`claimed. Reconsideration and withdrawal of the § 103(a) rejection of claims 16 and 18 are,
`
`accordingly, respectfully requested.
`
`Reconsideration and withdrawal of all of the aforementioned §§102(b) and 103(a)
`
`rejections are respectfully requested in view of the arguments and amendments presented herein.
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that new claims 23-31 are also novel and nonobvious at least in
`
`view of the references cited herein and distinguishing arguments cited hereinabove.
`
`12
`
`Page 12 of 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/898,912
`
`Amendment dated May 3 l, 2011
`
`Reply to Office Action of November 30, 20 l 0
`
`In view of the above amendments and remarks, Applicant respectfully requests a Notice
`, of Allowance. If the Examiner believes a telephone conference or personal Interview would
`
`advance the prosecution of this application, the Examiner is invited to telephone the undersigned
`
`at the below-listed telephone number for an Interview, whether telephonic or personal.
`
`Applicant's representative prefers to personally interview, at least initially.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Raymond Van Dyke
`Van Dyke Law
`Washington Square
`P.O. Box 65302
`l 050 Connecticut A venue NW
`Washington, DC 20035
`(202) 378-3903
`
`!V~
`
`,Ray~d vanDYke ~
`Registration No. 34,746
`
`Date: May 31, 2011
`
`97110
`
`PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`13
`
`Page 13 of 18
`
`
`
`,
`
`1:
`~~
`
`_:;..---
`
`O~AP
`~.
`tg,
`PTO/SB/22 (07--09)
`'l 1 1~\\ w
`Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651--0031
`"
`~
`\>1~1 J
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARMENT OF COMMERCE
`Und~e paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`""-':oN FOR EXTENSION OF TIME UNDER 37CFR1.136(a)
`FY 2009
`(Fees oursuant to the Consolidated Aaaroorlations Act, 2005 lH.R. 4818).)
`
`of,- 01-11 ~
`I
`- ' } /
`
`Docket Number (Optional)
`
`Harold- 200
`
`Application Number 11/898,912
`
`Filed September 17, 2007
`
`For
`
`. System, method and apparatus for using a wireless cell phone device to create a desktop computer
`
`Art Unit 2618
`
`Examiner PHU, SANH D
`
`This is a request under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a) to extend the period for filing a reply in the above identified
`application.
`
`The requested extension and fee are as follows (check time period desired and enter the appropriate fee below):
`
`D One month (37 CFR 1.17(a)(1))
`D Two months (37 CFR 1.17(a)(2))
`0 Three months (37 CFR 1.17(a)(3))
`D Four months (37 CFR 1.17(a)(4))
`D Five months (37 CFR 1.17(a)(5))
`Applicant claims small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27.
`
`Fee
`
`$130
`
`$490
`
`$1110
`
`$1730
`
`$2350
`
`Small Entity Fee
`
`$65
`
`$245
`
`$555
`
`$865
`
`$1175
`
`555
`
`$
`
`$
`
`$
`
`$
`
`$
`
`A check in the amount of the fee is enclosed.
`
`0
`D
`0
`Payment by credit card. Form PT0-2038 is attached.
`D The Director has already been authorized to charge fees in this application to a Deposit Account.
`[Z] The Director is hereby authorized to charge any fees which may be required, or credit any overpayment, to
`Deposit Account Number _5 .... o ... --.54 .... 1 ... 6..._ ____ _
`WARNING: Information on this form may become public. Credit card information should not be included on this form.
`Provide credit card information and authorization on PT0-2038.
`
`I am the D applicant/inventor.
`D assignee of record of the entire interest. See 37 CFR 3. 71.
`
`Statement under 37 CFR 3.73(b) is enclosed (Form PTO/SB/96).
`[{] attorney or agent of record. Registration Number_3_4...;.,_74_6 ______ _
`D attorney or agent under 37 CFR 1.34.
`
`:(22:;z;::zz~i37CFR 1.34
`
`~ Signature :;;)
`Raymond Van Dyke
`
`Typed or printed name
`
`May 31, 2011
`
`Date
`
`202.378.3903
`
`Telephone Number
`
`NOTE: Signatures of all the inventors or assignees of record of the entire interest or their representative(s) are required. Submit multiple forms if more than one
`signature is required, see below.
`
`D Totalof
`forms are submitted.
`This collection of information 1s required by 37 CFR 1.136(a). The information 1s required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which 1s to file (and by the
`USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11and1.14. This collection is estimated to take 6 minutes to
`complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed apprrcation form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any
`comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer,
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED
`FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`0~/02/2011 HVUONG1 00000002 11898912"' you need assistance in completing the form, ca/11-800-PT0-9199 and select option 2.
`
`01 FC:2253
`
`555.00 OP
`
`Page 14 of 18
`
`
`
`PTO/SB/21 (07-09)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031
`U S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`-" nf 1 aoi::. nn nor~nn1 ""'""" ,. .... ,..., ,;,. .... r1 tn roc-nnnrC tn !':l rnll •rtinn nf.
`1nloeo.c it l'iic:-nl.::nrc ::I u~lirl r..• U'"I
`·--"'-
`ru1mher.
`Application Number
`
`Doc Code: TRAN.l,ET
`Document Description: Transmittal Letter
`
`1 lnno•thn
`
`-
`r
`;o
`-v AP TRANSMITTAL
`FORM
`
`I
`
`-<I
`
`'
`
`(to be useilJ• r all correspondence after initial filina)
`
`\
`~ ~ '1\\\\ ~
`Total ~of Pages in This Submission I 17
`:1'~
`~/RAU~
`
`11/898,912
`
`Filing Date
`
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`September 17, 2007
`
`Michael D. Harold
`
`2618
`
`PHU, SANH D
`
`Harold· 200
`
`""
`
`~
`
`ENCLOSURES
`
`(Check all that apply)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Fee Transmittal Form
`
`Drawing(s)
`
`0
`
`Fee Attached
`
`Amendment/Reply
`
`D
`D
`
`After Final
`
`Provisional Application
`
`Affidavits/declaration(s)
`
`Change of Correspondence Address
`
`D
`D Licensing-related Papers
`D Petition
`D Petition to Convert to a
`D Power of Attorney, Revocation
`D Terminal Disclaimer
`0
`D Express Abandonment Request D Request for Refund
`D Information Disclosure Statement D CD, Number of CD(s)
`D Landscape Table on CD
`
`D After Allowance Communication to TC
`D Appeal Communication to Board
`D Appeal Communication to TC
`D
`D Status Letter
`D Other Enclosure(s} (please Identify
`
`of Appeals and Interferences
`
`(Appeal Notice, Brief, Reply Brief)
`
`Proprietary Information
`
`below):
`
`Credit card authorization
`
`Extension of Time Request
`
`D Certified Copy of Priority
`D Reply to Missing Parts/
`D Reply to Missing Parts
`
`Document(s)
`
`Incomplete Application
`
`under 37 CFR 1.52 or 1.53
`
`I Remarks
`
`I
`
`Firm Name
`
`Raymond Van Dyke
`
`SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT, ATTORNEY, OR AGENT
`
`~\
`
`--
`Signature /~-<"~~/
`,
`
`Printed name
`
`Raymond Van Dyke
`
`Date
`
`r
`
`May 31, 2011
`
`,v·
`
`I Reg. No. 1 34,746
`
`CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION/MAILING
`
`~
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence is being facsimile transmitted to the USPTO or deposited with the United States Postal Service with
`sufficient postage as first class mail in an envelope addressed to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on
`the date shown below:
`Signature
`
`Typed or printed name
`
`Raymond Van Dyke
`
`I Date I May 31, 2011
`
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.5. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to
`process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and1.14. This collection is estimated to 2 hours to complete, including
`gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the
`amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS
`ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`
`If you need assistance in completing the form, ca/11-800-PT0-9199 and select option 2.
`
`Page 15 of 18
`
`
`
`•'
`
`.._ &
`
`Effective on 12/0812004.
`rsuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818).
`
`PTO/SB/17 (10-08)
`1£1
`1.\)\\ W.
`Approved for use through 09/30/2010. OMB 0651-0032
`::I, ~ '\
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Offiee; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`~
`Under t
`1aoerwork Reduction Act of 1995 no oersons are required to resoond to a collection of information unless it disotavs a valid OMB control number
`' "'....£...
`"II
`Complete if Known
`11/898,912
`=~FEE TRANSMITTAL Application Number
`September 17, 2007
`For FY 2009
`First Named Inventor Michael D. Harold
`lZJ Applicant claims small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27
`PHU, SANH D
`Examiner Name
`'"TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAYMENT I ($)
`2618
`555
`Harold -200
`
`Filing Date
`
`Art Unit
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`
`..
`
`METHOD OF PAYMENT (check all that aoolv)
`
`D Check [lJ Credit Card D Money Order D None D Other (please identify):
`0 Deposit Account DepositAccountNumber: 50-5416
`
`Deposit Account Name: Ra~mond Van D~ke
`For the above-identified deposit account, the Director is hereby authorized to: (check all that apply)
`
`Ocharge fee(s) indicated below
`
`D Charge fee(s) indicated below, except for the filing fee
`
`[{]Charge any additional fee(s) or underpayments offee(s)
`under 37 CFR 1.16 and 1.17
`WARNING: Information on this form may become public. Credit card Information should not be included on this form. Provide crecfd card
`Information and authorization on PT0-2038.
`·
`FEE CALCULATION
`
`[{] Credit any overpayments
`
`1. BASIC FILING, SEARCH, ANO EXAMINATION FEES
`FILING FEES
`SEARCH FEES
`Small Entity
`Small En!!!x
`.EiUll
`165
`110
`110
`165
`I IO
`
`f!!.W
`330
`220
`220
`330
`220
`
`EXAMINATION FEES
`Small g!!titv
`
`Fees Pi!id (I)
`
`Small Entity
`
`mm ~ mm Fee($)
`540
`220
`270
`110
`50
`100
`140
`70
`330
`170
`85
`165
`540
`650
`270
`325
`0
`0
`0
`0
`mm m..w
`52
`26
`220
`110
`390
`195
`Multigle Del:?!nde!!t Claims
`mm
`Feefaid II)
`
`&!elication TJa!e
`Utility
`Design
`Plant
`Reissue
`Provisional
`2. EXCESS CLAIM FEES
`Fee Descrietion
`Each claim over 20 (including Reissues)
`Each independent claim over 3 (including Reissues)
`Multiple dependent claims
`Total Claims
`Extra Claim!!
`22
`- 20 or HP=
`0
`x
`HP = highest number of total claims paid for, if greater than 20.
`Extra Cli!ims mm
`lndee. Claims
`a
`=
`- 3 or HP =
`0
`x
`HP = highest number of independent claims paid for, if greater than 3.
`3. APPLICATION SIZE FEE
`If the specification and drawings exceed I 00 sheets of paper (excluding electronically filed sequence or computer
`listings under 37 CFR 1.52(e)), the application size fee due is $270 ($135 for small entity) for each additional 50
`sheets or fraction thereof. See 35 U.S.C. 4l(a)(l)(G) and 37 CFR l.16(s).
`Total Sheets
`Extra Sheets
`Number of each additional 50 or fractlo!! thereof
`/50 =
`-100 =
`(round up to a whole number) x
`4. OTHER FEE(S)
`Non-English Specification, $130 fee (no small entity discount)
`Other (e.g., late filing surcharge): Three Month extension time 1!5!mll ent~ 1555
`-
`/._/ ~/Y _;r l.,~_J
`
`E!!.w
`
`=
`
`Fee Paid (I)
`
`Fee Paid lll
`
`fg.111
`
`=
`
`Fee Paid (I)
`
`Fees Paid (I)
`
`SUBMITTED RV
`
`Signature
`
`Name {Print/Type) Raynrcroo van Dyke
`
`t'.'
`
`Registration No.
`/Attornev/Anent)
`
`34,746
`
`Telephone 202.378.3903
`
`Date May 31, 2011
`
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.136. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the
`USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 30 minutes to complete,
`including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. nme will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments
`on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden. should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent
`and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS
`ADDRESS: SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PT0-9199 and select option 2.
`
`Page 16 of 18
`
`
`
`PTO/SB/06 (07-06)
`Approved for use through 1/31/2007. OMB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`PATENT APPLICATION FEE DETERMINATION RECORD
`Application or Docket Number
`Filing Date
`11/898,912
`Substitute for Form PT0-875
`
`09/17/2007 D To be Mailed
`
`APPLICATION AS FILED- PART I
`(Column 1)
`
`(Column 2)
`
`SMALL ENTITY [8J
`RATE($)
`FEE($)
`
`OR
`
`OTHER THAN
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`RATE($)
`
`FEE($)
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`x $
`
`x $
`
`=
`
`=
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`OR
`
`x $
`
`x $
`
`=
`
`=
`
`TOTAL
`
`TOTAL
`
`FOR
`D BASIC FEE
`(37 CFR 1.16(a), (b), or (c))
`D SEARCH FEE
`(37 CFR 1.16(k), (i), or (m))
`D EXAMINATION FEE
`(37 CFR 1.16(0), (p), or (q))
`TOTAL CLAIMS
`(37 CFR 1.16(i))
`INDEPENDENT CLAIMS
`(37 CFR 1.16(h))
`
`0APPLICATION SIZE FEE
`(37 CFR 1.16(s))
`
`NUMBER FILED
`
`NUMBER EXTRA
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`minus 20 =
`
`*
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`minus 3 =
`
`*
`If the specification and drawings exceed 100
`sheets of paper, the application size fee due
`is $250 ($125 for small entity) for each
`additional 50 sheets or fraction thereof. See
`35 U.S.C. 41(a)(1)(G) and 37 CFR 1.16(s).
`D MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM PRESENT (37 CFR 1.16(j))
`* If the difference in column 1 is less than zero, enter "O" in column 2.
`
`APPLICATION AS AMENDED- PART II
`
`(Column 1)
`
`(Column 2)
`
`(Column 3)
`
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`OR
`
`OTHER THAN
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`05/31/2011
`
`RATE($)
`
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`RATE($)
`
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`CLAIMS
`REMAINING
`f--
`AFTER
`z
`AMENDMENT
`w
`Total (37 CFR
`* 23
`~ 1.16(i))
`0
`z
`Independent
`* 4
`w
`f37CFR 1.16fh\\
`~ D Application Size Fee (37 CFR 1.16(s))
`D FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM (37 CFR 1.16(j))
`
`HIGHEST
`NUMBER
`PREVIOUSLY
`PAID FOR
`** 22
`***4
`
`PRESENT
`EXTRA
`
`= 1
`= 0
`
`Minus
`
`Minus
`
`<(
`
`(Column 1)
`
`(Column 2)
`
`(Column 3)
`
`CLAIMS
`REMAINING
`AFTER
`AMENDMENT
`f--
`z
`Total (37 CFR
`*
`w
`1.16(i\\
`~ Independent
`*
`0
`(37CFR 1.16(hll
`z D Application Size Fee (37 CFR 1.16(s))
`w
`~ D FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM (37 CFR 1.1