throbber
Case No. IPR2016-000950
`Patent No. 8,166,739
`
`Filed on behalf of Oxbo International Corporation
`
`By: Andrew J. Lagatta, Reg. No. 62,529
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`3200 IDS Center
`80 South 8th Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel:
`(612) 371-5383
`Fax: (612) 332-9081
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`H&S MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OXBO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00950
`Patent 8,166,739
`____________
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S
`
`DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2016-000950
`Patent No. 8,166,739
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, Oxbo International Corporation, hereby submits
`
`this
`
`disclosure of its remaining objections to demonstratives. Patent Owner represents
`
`that demonstratives were timely exchanged and that counsel conferred regarding
`
`these demonstratives on July 26-27, 2017. These objections represent Patent
`
`Owner’s remaining objections following discussion with counsel for Petitioner.
`
`1. Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide No. 5 because the
`
`title of the demonstrative incorrectly argues that Patent Owner argued
`
`against there being any claim construction issues, and as such, it is also a
`
`new argument not previously made in Petitioner’s Petition or Reply.
`
`2. Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide No. 8 because it
`
`improperly raises a new claim construction argument for the term “material”
`
`and is not responsive to Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`3. Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide No. 11 because it
`
`improperly takes Patent Owner’s expert witness’s statement out of context,
`
`as prohibited in IPR015-00780, Paper 48, p. 4.
`
`4. Patent Owner objects to Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slide No. 17 because it
`
`is a new argument alleging Patent Owner’s arguments rely on “bodily
`
`incorporation,” which was not made in the Petitioner’s Petition or Reply;
`
`Petitioner’s Reply merely quotes a legal statement from the Board’s
`
`preliminary decision, but makes no argument about it.
`
`1
`
`

`

`5. Patent Owner reserves further objections pursuant to its pending Motion to
`
`Case No. IPR2016-000950
`Patent No. 8,166,739
`
`Exclude.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.
`
`
`/Andrew J. Lagatta/
`Andrew J. Lagatta, Reg. No. 62,529
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`80 South 8th St., Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 332-5300
`Fax: (612) 332-9081
`alagatta@merchantgould.com
`OxboIPR@merchantgould.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER
`
`Date: July 27, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Trial No. IPR2016-00950)
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2016-000950
`Patent No. 8,166,739
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that “PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS
`TO PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES” for the above-captioned matter was
`served in its entirety on July 27, 2017, upon the following parties via e-mail:
`
`
`Brad D. Pederson (Reg. No. 32,432)
`Eric H. Chadwick (Reg. No. 42,664)
`PATTERSON THUENTE PEDERSEN, P.A.
`80 South Eighth Street, Suite 4800
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 349-5740
`Facsimile: (612) 349-9266
`chadwick@ptslaw.com
`pedersen@ptslaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 27, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(IPR2016-00950)
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.
`
`/Andrew J. Lagatta/
`
`
`
`
`
`Andrew J. Lagatta, Reg. No. 62,529
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`80 South 8th St., Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 332-5300
`Fax: (612) 332-9081
`alagatta@merchantgould.com
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket