throbber
STUDIES
`
`AND CREATININE
`IN CREATINE
`METABOLISM.
`
`V. THE
`
`METABOLISM
`
`OF CREATlNE.
`
`BY STANLEY
`
`R. BENEDICT
`
`AND EMIL
`
`OSTERBERG.
`
`(From
`
`the Department
`
`of Chemistry,
`New
`
`York
`
`Cornell
`City.)
`
`University
`
`Medical
`
`College,
`
`(Received
`
`for
`
`publication,
`
`March
`
`17, 1923.)
`
`to the
`In 1906 Folin (1) published a memorable contribution
`subject of creatine metabolism in which, as a result of experiments
`upon human subjects, he concluded that
`the animal organism
`cannot convert creatine into creatinine. The conclusion was also
`reached that while creatininc is a waste product, creatine is a food
`and that
`there is no biological relationship between these com-
`pounds. Klercker
`(2) reached quite similar conclusions inde-
`pendently of Folin’s observations.
`In view of the very recent admirable summary of the literature on
`creatine and creatinine given by Hunter (3), it is quite unnecessary
`for us to present an account of the mass of data which has accu-
`mulated since Folin’s
`first contribution.
`A number of in-
`vestigators have reported
`that
`traces of extra creatinine may
`appear in the urine following creatine administration and that
`with very large doses of creatine (Rose and Dimmitt, 4) appreciable
`quantities of extra creatinine may be eliminated. Such findings,
`together with the very excellent and suggestive work of Myers and
`Fine upon the relationship between muscle creatine and urinary
`creatinine elimination, have led many to question seriously Folin’s
`original conclusions. Yet all the evidence presented on the origin
`of urinary creatinine from creatine during the 16 years which have
`elapsed since Folin’s paper, has not been very convincing. Folin
`himself has never abandoned his original position, and there are
`many who would agree with him that practically no positive
`evidence has been offered that creatine is the normal biological
`source of creatinine. Even those most strongly favoring the view
`229
`
`001
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`230
`
`Creatine Metabolism
`
`the
`that
`from creatine would have to admit
`that crcatinine arises
`evidence
`for this view must be selected piecemeal here and there,
`wherever
`it can be found.
`Direct,
`clear-cut
`evidence has been
`wholly
`lacking.
`The
`failure
`to
`find conversion
`of appreciable
`amounts
`of creatine
`into creatinine,
`together with
`the fact
`that
`“creatinuria”
`is a definite entity which
`is usually unrelated
`to
`changes
`in the creatinine
`elimination,
`are facts which have made
`Folin’s
`position
`almost
`unassailable
`for
`those who
`forget
`the
`chemical
`relationship
`of the compounds
`involved.
`The work
`reported
`in the present paper was a result of the con-
`clusions
`reached by Behre and Benedict
`(5) that creatinine
`does
`not exist
`in appreciable amounts,
`if at all, in blood, while creatine
`(or some combination
`of it) can be demonstrated
`in this
`fluid, and
`accumulates
`in large amounts after ablation of the kidney
`func-
`tion.
`Prior
`to these
`findings we had held the position
`taken by
`Folin, but
`the work
`on creatine and creatinine
`in blood forced us
`to a different
`view-point.
`We concluded
`that creatine, or some
`simple derivative
`of it, must be the precursor
`of creatinine,
`and
`therefore
`sought
`for
`loopholes
`in previous
`investigations
`which
`might open a way
`to attack
`the problem,
`so that some direct
`answer might be obtained
`to the fundamental
`questions
`involved.
`A careful consideration
`of all the facts available
`led us to conclude
`that there was one basic defect in the strongest argument advanced
`by Folin and his followers
`against
`the origin of urinary
`creatinine
`from creatine.
`Creatine was administered
`and did not
`increase
`the urinary
`creatinine.
`But
`the creatine administered was never
`accounted
`for
`in any way whatever.
`Here
`lay
`the weakness
`in
`Folin’s argument.
`It is true that,
`reasoning
`from
`the known
`facts
`of metabolism,
`it seemed safe to assume
`that a nitrogenous
`com-
`pound would surely give rise to its end-products
`in the body during
`the period
`covered by Folin’s
`experiments.
`Yet Folin himself
`demonstrated
`that
`creatine was
`practically
`or wholly
`unique
`among nitrogen
`compounds
`in that
`it failed
`to reappear
`in any
`form-even
`undetermined
`nitrogen-during
`the period
`of his
`observation.
`Obviously,
`if metabolized at all,
`the creatine must
`ultimately give rise to something.
`Then so long as it remains wholly
`unaccounted for, there is no justification
`for the conclusion
`that it may
`not give rise to creatinine.
`
`002
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`S. R. Benedict and E. Osterberg
`
`231
`
`the
`
`led to undertake
`
`we were
`As a result of these considerations
`experiments
`reported
`in the present paper.
`The general plan of the work was to bring dogs into approximate
`nitrogenous
`equilibrium
`upon a constant
`diet, and then
`to ad-
`minister
`a small amount
`of creatine daily until an appreciable
`quant,ity of the administered
`creatine was accounted
`for
`in some
`form in the urine.
`The results obtained are, we believe, of definite
`interest
`in connection with
`the basic questions
`of creatine and
`creatinine metabolism.
`of
`the spring and summer
`The work was
`carried out during
`1922. The experimental
`animals were
`healthy
`female
`dogs.
`Each was kept
`in a metabolism
`cage and fed upon a constant diet
`throughout
`the experiment.
`The animals were catheterized
`and
`weighed once daily before
`feeding.
`Periods were marked
`for the
`feces by administration
`of bone-black.
`Total nitrogen was deter-
`mined by the macro Kjeldahl method, using potassium and copper
`sulfates as catalyzers.
`Crcatinine was determined by the original
`Folin m&hod,
`using bichromate
`as standard.
`With
`very
`few
`exceptions
`the urines were diluted
`to the same volume each day
`and the reaction and calorimetric
`reading were
`thus carried out
`Creatine
`in the urine was con-
`under
`rigidly
`fixed conditions.
`verted
`to creatinine
`and determined
`as such by
`the procedure
`commonly
`employed
`in this
`laboratory
`(6).
`The creatine em-
`ployed was prepared
`in the
`laboratory
`from creatinine
`obtained
`from urine (7) and was
`recrystallized
`until
`free from any detectable
`trace of creatinine.
`of the creatine was carefully con-
`The method
`for administration
`sidered. We
`finally adopted oral administration
`by mixing
`the
`creatine with
`the food as the method
`to be tried
`first.
`It seemed
`probable
`that
`the experimental
`period would be long, and the oral
`administration
`was
`far preferable
`from
`the practical
`standpoint
`to
`any
`injection procedure.
`It
`is time-saving,
`and avoids
`infection
`and chance of conversion
`of creatine
`to creatinine
`during sterili-
`zation of the solutions.
`We soon found
`that we could check up the
`question of conversion
`of creatine
`to creatinine
`in the gastro-
`intestinal
`tract, as well as that of absorption
`of the creatine as
`such.
`As we shall show
`later
`in this paper,
`the oral method of
`administration
`is ideal from every standpoint
`for the experiments
`which we carried out upon dogs.
`
`003
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`232
`
`Creatine Metabolism
`
`the weighed
`the animal was placed upon
`In each experiment
`diet, and became accustomed
`to
`the cage and
`routine
`of the
`experiments many days before
`the
`first periods which we have
`reported
`in the present paper.
`I to III.
`in Tables
`The results of the experiment’s are recorded
`Table
`I presents a detailed
`report of our
`first experiment.
`In-
`cluding
`the preliminary
`period of 9 days,
`this experiment
`lasted
`128 days.
`There were
`ten periods of 7 days each, during which
`the
`dog received 0.620 gm. of creatine daily
`(containing
`1 molecule of
`water
`of crystallization).
`This was equivalent
`to 0.470 gm.
`expressed
`as creatinine.
`The
`ten periods
`of creatine adminis-
`tration were
`followed by seven after periods of 7 days each.
`We believe
`that a detailed study of Table
`I will be found of
`interest.
`We may
`summarize
`the main
`facts brought
`out as
`:
`follows
`The dog had been on the diet for 24 days before the preliminary
`period reported.
`The nitrogen balance was + 1.3 gm. for a period
`of 7 days preceding
`the
`first period
`recorded
`in the table.
`The
`preliminary
`period
`reported
`shows a plus nitrogen balance of 0.7
`gm. for 7 days.
`The creatinine output
`is quite constant
`for this
`(and the preceding unreported
`periods) and averages 405 mg. per
`day. During
`the 1st week of the creatine administration
`there is no
`apparent effect on the creatinine elimination,
`except
`that on the
`last day of
`the period an increase of about 20 mg. above
`the
`average
`level is to be noted.
`Such a slight
`increase
`is typical of
`The
`results
`previously
`reported
`after
`creatine
`administration.
`nitrogen balance of
`the
`first creatine period
`is +2.7 gm.
`This
`represents
`a retention
`of nitrogen equal to more
`than
`twice
`that
`contained
`in the creatine.
`None of the creatine given appears as
`such
`in the urine.
`Since the urinary
`nitrogen
`is definitely below
`that of the preliminary
`period we may
`infer
`that
`the creatine
`is
`practically
`wholly
`retained
`in some form during
`this period.
`The
`second period of creatine administration
`develops several points
`of real
`interest.
`The creatinine
`in the urine
`is definitely above
`that of the preceding period, but shows
`its maximal height during
`the 1st day.
`The creatinine
`for this second period averages about
`40 mg. higher per day than
`is found during
`the control periods.
`This increase appears
`to us as still too small to warrant
`concluding
`that
`there
`is conversion
`of creatine
`into creatinine, but
`it begins
`to be very suggest,ive.
`
`004
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`S. R. Benedict and E. Osterberg
`
`233
`
`Nitrogen,
`
`Creatinine,
`
`The
`
`dog
`
`received
`
`daily
`
`Eliminalion
`
`I.
`
`TABLE
`and Creatine
`Administration.
`Dog
`1.
`Female.
`the
`following
`diet:
`
`Crackermeal...............................................
`Evaporated
`milk.
`. .
`Cascin....................................................
`(6.65
`
`gm.
`
`nitrogen)
`
`.
`
`. .
`
`Daily
`
`output
`
`in
`
`the urine.
`
`after Creutine
`
`am.
`150
`. . . . . 100
`24
`
`Remarks.
`
`B
`2 6.
`yj
`.;
`.$
`. .
`a
`T=i
`8
`E
`___-
`Pm. m!7.
`5.711
`412
`5.571
`40:
`6.000
`41:
`5.600
`40:
`5.934
`40:
`5.700
`39;
`5.460
`40:
`5.350
`39i
`5.360
`401
`-~
`5.631
`
`40:
`
`5.746
`5.124
`5.418
`
`5.600
`5.500
`5.644
`5.600
`
`40:
`39:
`39;
`
`40:
`381
`40!
`42f
`
`k/.
`14.4
`
`14.4
`
`14.3
`
`14.4
`
`14.3
`
`--
`k3.626
`5.518
`
`14.4
`
`m!J.
`
`“Vk.
`
`0 Urine
`Feces
`Hair
`Total
`
`=
`=
`=
`=
`
`50.686
`8.282
`0.115
`
`59.083
`
`Food
`0 Balance
`
`N
`
`59.850
`=
`= +0.767
`
`0
`
`0 Urine
`0 Feces
`0 Hair
`
`0 Total
`Food
`
`N
`
`0 Creatine
`
`Total
`Balance
`
`=
`=
`=
`
`=
`=
`
`38.626
`6.316
`0.992
`
`---
`45.034
`46.55
`
`N =
`
`1.215
`
`---
`47.765
`=
`= S2.731
`
`Preliminary
`days
`creatine
`
`period
`duration.
`given.
`
`9
`of
`No
`
`Average
`
`daily
`
`output.
`
`of
`
`creatine
`0.620
`
`period
`First
`administration.
`gm. of creatine(GHsNs-
`with
`Oz. H20)
`was mixed
`This
`the
`food
`each
`day.
`quantity
`of
`crcatine
`would
`represent
`0.470
`gm.
`of creatininc.
`
`2,81!
`40
`
`2
`1
`-
`
`0
`0
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for 7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`005
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`234
`
`Creatine Metabolism
`
`TABLE
`
`I--Continued.
`
`Daily
`
`output
`
`in
`
`the
`
`urine
`
`2 P
`2
`2 .eo
`B
`kg.
`14.4
`
`14.5
`
`14.4
`
`14.6
`
`15.0
`
`14.7
`
`14.8
`
`14.9
`
`14.8
`
`-
`
`-
`
`RCXIXWkS.
`
`period
`Second
`administration.
`of
`w.
`given
`daily
`
`of creatine
`0.620
`was
`food.
`
`creatine
`in
`the
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for
`
`7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`of continued
`period
`Third
`creatine
`administration.
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for 7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`Fourth
`tinued
`istration.
`
`period
`creatine
`
`con-
`of
`admin-
`
`0m.
`5.74(
`5.57:
`5.38t
`5.03(
`5.21t
`5.27(
`5.23!
`
`mu.
`45c
`44:
`45(
`44E
`45(
`44:
`44
`
`nw.
`
`um.
`
`Intake
`
`0
`0
`32 Output
`83
`113 Balance
`130
`147
`
`7.431
`5.341
`
`I, 121
`44f
`
`505
`101
`
`5.12‘
`5.04
`5.20
`5.15
`5.04(
`5.12‘
`5.00(
`
`442 1
`44: 5
`45( 1
`46I 1
`45( 1
`45; i
`46( 1
`
`Intake
`
`139
`169
`164 Output
`163
`203 Balance
`209
`204
`
`5.681
`5.09:
`
`I, 161
`45:
`
`1,251
`178
`
`5.26,
`5.05’
`5.23,
`5.29
`5.04
`5.01’
`5.09
`
`46t
`47;
`47:
`47:
`46(
`48:
`48:
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`209
`221
`239
`253
`245 Balance
`254
`254
`
`=
`
`=
`
`47.765
`
`44.036
`
`=
`
`f3.729
`
`=
`
`=
`
`47.765
`
`42.049
`
`= $5.716
`
`=
`
`=
`
`47.765
`
`42.252
`
`= $5.513
`
`3
`15.99
`5.14
`
`3, 32
`47‘
`
`1,675
`239
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for 7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`006
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`S. R. Benedict and E. Osterberg
`
`235
`
`TABLE
`
`I-Continued.
`
`Daily
`
`output
`
`in
`
`the urine.
`
`i
`
`Remarks
`
`WJ.
`494
`
`T7.
`242
`
`Intake
`
`gm.
`=
`
`47.765
`
`period
`Fifth
`creatine
`
`of continued
`administration.
`
`kg.
`15.0
`
`15.3
`
`15.1
`
`15.3
`
`15.4
`
`15.3
`
`15.4
`
`15.:
`
`i
`
`15.E
`
`i
`
`gm.
`5.151
`
`5.067
`4.800
`4.700
`4.760
`4.550
`4.760
`
`4.900
`4.927
`4.970
`4.956
`5.166
`5.151
`5.040
`-_
`35.110
`5.015
`
`=
`
`39.875
`
`= +7.890
`
`=
`
`=
`
`47.765
`
`40.054
`
`= +7.711
`
`=
`
`=
`
`47.76:
`
`41.Oli
`
`= +6.74E
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for
`
`7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`period
`Sixth
`creatine
`
`of continued
`administration.
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for 7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`Seventh
`tinued
`istration.
`
`period
`creatine
`
`con-
`of
`admin-
`
`481
`494
`494
`50(
`491
`5Ot
`
`248
`230 Output
`217
`223 Balance
`204
`198
`
`3 3.788
`
`4.826
`
`3,47(
`49!
`
`1,562
`223
`
`5.040
`5.040
`4.760
`4.731
`4.788
`4.861
`4.760
`
`50t
`52f
`51:
`49z
`5ot
`481
`5Ot
`
`Intake
`
`224
`230
`258 Output
`242
`218 Balance
`229
`204
`
`2 13.980 3, 53: 1,605
`
`4.854
`50‘
`229
`
`51!
`501
`501
`501
`521
`51,
`52
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`198
`192
`186
`211
`210 Balance
`237
`245
`
`3,59
`51
`
`1,479
`211
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for 7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`007
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`236
`
`Creatine Metabolism
`
`TABLE
`
`I-continued.
`
`Daily
`
`output
`
`in
`
`the urine.
`
`kg.
`15.8
`
`,
`
`15.0
`
`I
`
`15.5
`
`15.5
`
`15.7
`
`15.7
`
`.-
`
`15.7
`
`15.7
`
`15.6
`
`15.i
`
`om.
`5.012
`5.026
`5.375
`5.823
`5.754
`5.684
`5.544
`
`mo.
`5oi
`50(
`54(
`56C
`55:
`53:
`54c
`
`mo.
`205
`187
`203
`192
`224
`285
`286
`
`8.218
`3
`5.459
`
`,734
`53:
`
`1,582
`226
`
`5.375
`5.081
`5.124
`5.070
`5.320
`5.067
`4.760
`
`5.797
`3,
`5.113
`
`5.012
`4.927
`1
`5.110
`/
`5.067
`I
`5.460
`5.290
`!
`I
`5.194
`
`-
`3t
`5.060
`5.151
`
`52E
`51s
`533
`52E
`52E
`533
`51s
`
`6%
`52E
`
`526
`526
`540
`570
`555
`54a
`533
`
`790
`54:
`
`284
`253
`238
`224
`253
`231
`205
`
`,688
`241
`
`210
`210
`224
`201
`294
`270
`238
`
`,647
`23F
`
`Intake
`
`om.
`=
`
`47.765
`
`output
`
`= 44.296
`
`Balance
`
`= +3.469
`
`Eighth
`tinued
`istration.
`
`period
`creatine
`
`of con-
`admin-
`
`Intake
`
`=
`
`47.765
`
`output
`
`= 41.771
`
`Balance
`
`= $5.994
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`=
`
`47.765
`
`= 42.310
`
`Balance
`
`= +5.455
`
`for 7 days.
`Total
`Average
`for 1 day.
`
`Ninth period of continued
`creatine administration.
`
`for 7 days.
`Total
`Average
`for 1 day.
`
`Tenth period of continued
`creatine administration.
`
`-
`for 7 days.
`Total
`Average
`for 1 day.
`
`008
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`S. R. Benedict and E. Osterberg
`
`237
`
`-
`
`Daily
`
`d
`m
`‘6
`a’
`.60
`;
`
`ko.
`15.7
`
`15.6
`
`15.7
`
`15.6
`
`*m.
`5.25C
`5.012
`5.29a
`5.375
`5.32C
`5.110
`5.46C
`-
`6.817
`3
`5.259
`
`5.264
`4.703
`4.941
`4.816
`4.563
`5.466
`5.193
`
`4.940
`3
`4.991
`
`5.04C
`5.‘123
`4.983
`4.900
`5.096
`5.488
`5.18C
`_
`3
`m5.81C
`5.116
`
`15.6
`
`15.7
`
`15.7
`
`15.7
`
`d
`2
`.$
`m
`6
`_-
`m.0.
`519
`513
`570
`555
`540
`506
`506
`--
`,709
`529
`--
`494
`482
`488
`500
`488
`494
`506
`--
`,452
`493
`
`500
`506
`494
`488
`482
`500
`494
`
`,464
`494
`
`TABLE
`
`I-continued.
`
`in
`
`the urine.
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`0m.
`
`=
`
`46.550
`
`=
`
`42.745
`
`Balance
`
`= +3.805
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`=
`
`46.550
`
`=
`
`41.370
`
`Balance
`
`= +5.1a
`
`output
`-
`
`a
`I
`8
`&T
`HI
`a!‘; ., 4
`2;
`‘2 I
`zc
`6’
`
`mo
`
`: 36
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`-_
`36
`:
`
`-.
`0
`0
`0
`
`--
`
`Intake
`
`0
`
`output
`
`=
`
`=
`
`46.550
`
`42.375
`
`0
`
`Balance
`
`= +4.175
`
`0
`-.
`0
`
`Remarks.
`
`after
`First
`creatine
`
`period.
`given.
`
`No
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for
`
`7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`Second
`creatine
`
`period.
`after
`given.
`
`No
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for
`
`7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`after
`Third
`creatine
`
`period.
`given.
`
`No
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for 7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`009
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`238
`
`Creatine Metabolism
`
`TABLE
`
`I-Ccncluded.
`
`Daily
`
`output
`
`in
`
`the urine.
`
`T
`
`Remarks.
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`Qm.
`=
`
`46.550
`
`=
`
`44.340
`
`Balance
`
`=
`
`f2.210
`
`Fourth
`creatine
`
`period.
`after
`given.
`
`No
`
`a
`3
`3
`g
`3
`3
`
`w
`
`I.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`--
`
`--
`
`ww.
`506
`466
`486
`455
`463
`450
`440
`
`ti -3
`“0
`c’ .$
`s
`kg.
`15.7
`
`15.7
`
`15.7
`
`15.7
`
`gm.
`5.29(
`5.47:
`5.57(
`5.334
`5.41(
`5.32(
`5.221
`
`17.62~
`5.37i
`
`5.10(
`5.04(
`5.20;
`5.32(
`4.9s:
`5.07(
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for
`
`7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`after
`Fifth
`creatine
`
`period.
`given.
`
`No
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`=
`
`=
`
`39.900
`
`37.196
`
`0
`
`Balance
`
`= $2.704
`
`,266
`466
`_-
`441
`455
`468
`463
`440
`455
`~-
`:, 722
`453
`__-
`440
`450
`440
`440
`445
`445
`440
`
`10.72(
`5.12(
`
`5.04(
`5.40(
`5.37:
`5.49(
`5.51;
`5.29
`5.39(
`
`17.50
`5.35
`
`I, 100
`442
`
`5.23!
`5.26‘
`5.12‘
`5.321
`5.24:
`5.29
`5.34;
`
`435
`440
`435
`435
`442
`426
`426
`
`36.82‘
`5.261
`
`1,039
`434
`
`15.8
`
`15.7
`
`15.8
`
`15.8
`
`15.8
`
`15.5
`
`15.8
`
`-.
`
`--
`
`0
`
`-.
`
`-I-
`
`O
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`=
`
`=
`
`46.550
`
`43.965
`
`Balance
`
`= +2.585
`
`Intake
`
`output
`
`=
`
`=
`
`46.550
`
`43.910
`
`Dalance
`
`= +2.640
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for
`
`6 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`after
`Sixth
`creatine
`
`period.
`given.
`
`No
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for
`
`7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`Seventh
`creatine
`
`period.
`after
`given.
`
`No
`
`Total
`Average
`
`for 7 days.
`for
`1 day.
`
`010
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`S. R. Benedict and E. Osterberg
`
`239
`
`On the 3rd day of this period, or the 10th day of creatine ad-
`ministration,
`a scarcely detectable quantity
`of creatine
`(32 mg.)’
`appears
`in the urine.
`The creatine
`in the urine rapidly
`increases,
`and within
`5 days has reached 147 mg. for 1 day. Here
`is direct
`evidence that creatine given even in small amounts, and apparently
`completely
`utilized,
`is retained, at least partially,
`as such
`in the
`organism
`for a considerable period.
`Furthermore, many days are
`required
`to fill the creatine
`reservoir,
`indicating
`a very slow
`rate
`of metabolism
`for creatine.
`The nitrogen balance
`for the second
`period of creatine
`feeding
`is +3.7 gm.,
`representing
`a storage of
`nitrogen of more
`than
`three
`times
`the quantity
`contained
`in the
`creatine
`retained.
`This
`result
`begins
`to suggest
`that
`creatine
`may cause nitrogen storage
`in the body
`far beyond
`that contained
`in the crcatine
`itself.
`Further
`data show
`t.hat there can be little
`question of the correctness
`of this view.
`throws
`I)
`(Table
`The
`third period of creatine administration
`output
`further
`light upon
`the questions
`raised.
`The creatinine
`frequent
`rises.
`True,
`it
`rises grudgingly
`and unwillingly,
`with
`minor drops.
`This picture
`is typical of all our experiments
`in this
`connection.
`But
`the period as a whole shows a definite
`increase
`in creatinine excretion.
`The figure
`is now about 50 mg. per day
`(12 per cent) above
`the control period,. and we should almost
`feel
`justified
`in concluding
`definitely
`that
`creatine
`gives
`rise
`to
`creatinine
`in
`the organism,
`but with
`the proviso
`that
`this
`is
`apparently
`not a simple direct conversion.
`Definite settlement of
`this question will come
`later.
`The creatine output
`in the urine
`continues
`to rise, reaching about 200 mg. per day toward
`the end
`of
`the
`third
`period of creatine administration.
`Evidently
`the
`creatinc
`reservoir
`can retain
`less and less of the ingested creatine,
`but more
`than 50 per cent of that given
`is st’ill retained.
`The
`nitrogen balance
`for
`this period
`is + 5.7 gm., and the weight of
`the dog is definitely
`increasing.
`We arc
`inclined
`to believe
`that
`the nitrogen
`retention
`and
`increase
`in weight
`arc due
`to
`the
`creatine administered,
`since during
`the 33 days before creatine
`administration
`this animal did not change in weight a total of more
`than 100 gm., and the fluctuations
`were both sides of 14.4 kilos.
`
`* Throughout
`its equivalent
`
`paper
`this
`in creatinine.
`
`the
`
`creatine
`
`found
`
`in
`
`the urine
`
`is expressed
`
`as
`
`011
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`240
`
`Creatine Metabolism
`
`feeding
`finding
`
`the weight of the
`is at
`least
`very
`
`the first 21 days of the creatine
`During
`animal has increased
`600 gm. The
`suggestive.
`the
`,administration
`creatine
`period of
`fourth
`the
`During
`in the urine shows
`the same continued
`increase as for
`creatinine
`The average
`for the period shows a
`the two preceding periods.
`daily elimination
`of 70 mg. of creatinine
`(17 per cent) above
`the
`The urinary
`creatine
`con-
`daily average
`for
`the control periods.
`This
`figure
`tinues
`to rise, and shows a daily average of 239 mg.
`is nearly maximal
`for
`the entire
`ten periods of creatine adminis-
`tration, and is maintained
`approximately
`constant as long as the
`creatine
`feeding
`is continued.
`The creatine
`eliminated
`during
`these periods amounts
`to 50 per cent of that given.
`In spite of the increased
`creatinine and creatine
`in the urine, the
`total urinary
`nitrogen
`continues
`low and the nitrogen balance
`for
`the period
`is +5.5 gm.
`The weight
`of the dog shows a slight
`increase
`(100 gm.) over
`the preceding period.
`is
`feeding
`The picture
`for the fifth and sixth periods of creatine
`similar
`to that of the preceding period.
`Creatinine
`in the urine
`continues
`to increase
`slowly,
`so that
`the sixth period shows
`100
`mg. of creatinine
`per day
`in the urine
`in excess of that
`for
`the
`control
`periods.
`The daily
`output
`of creatine
`is somewhat
`irregular,
`but the average
`for the fifth and sixth periods
`is close to
`the average
`for the fourth period.
`Retention
`of nitrogen
`is over
`1 gm. per day for
`the two periods, and the weight of the animal
`increases by about 400 gm.
`further
`feeding shows a slight
`The seventh period of creatine
`rise in creatinine output, while
`the creatine output
`is slightly
`lower
`than
`for the preceding period.
`Nitrogen
`retention
`for the 7 days
`is 6.7 gm.
`The average weight
`of the animal
`for
`this period
`is 1,100 gm. greater
`than
`at
`the beginning
`of
`the creatine
`administration.
`feeding show continued
`The eighth and ninth periods of creatine
`increase
`in the creatinine
`elimination,
`reaching a daily average of
`121 mg. (29 per cent)
`in excess of the control period.
`The creatine
`output
`is practically
`constant.
`Nitrogen
`retention
`for
`the
`two
`periods
`is 9.3 gm. and the weight
`of the dog reaches 1,300 gm.
`above that of the control period.
`
`012
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`S. R. Benedict and E. Osterberg
`
`241
`
`shows wider
`The tenth and last period of creatine administration
`fluctuations
`in the creatinine
`elimination
`than do the preceding
`periods.
`The maximal
`figure
`for creatinine elimination
`is reached
`during
`this period,
`the avcragc daily output being 541 mg., which
`is 136 mg. or 33 per cent above the daily output
`(405 mg.) during
`the control period.
`The highest
`figure
`for a single day (570 mg.)
`occurs once during
`this and the following
`period.
`The relatively
`wide variations which
`seem to occur at the height of the curve of
`crcatinine
`elimination
`(Period 10 and the
`first after period)
`are
`not apparent during
`the subsequent periods.
`The creatine output
`for the tenth period
`is similar
`to that
`for the ninth.
`the
`At
`the end of the tenth period of creatine administration
`for
`feeding of creatine was discontinued.
`We watched
`the figures
`the following
`period with exceptional
`interest.
`If
`the increased
`crcatinine, which we had found
`in the urine,
`represented
`creatinine
`formed
`in the
`intestinal
`tract
`through
`bacterial
`or other action,
`then the excess creatinine
`in the urine should vanish as promptly,
`or even more promptly,
`than
`the creatine,
`after
`the
`latter was
`discontinued.
`If, on the contrary,
`the extra creatinine
`in the urine
`represented
`the result of a slow, definite metabolism
`of the pre-
`viously
`administered
`creatine,
`the withdrawal
`of
`the creatine
`should have an effect which
`should show
`itself only slowly over a
`considerable period of time.
`are
`after periods
`and subsequent
`The
`results
`for
`the
`first
`beautiful
`and clear-cut.
`The
`first day after withdrawal
`of the
`creatine
`from
`the food
`the creatine of the urine
`fell to a scarcely
`detectable quantity
`(36 mg.) and at no subsequent
`time during
`the
`seven after periods could we detect any creatine
`in the urine.
`The
`creatinine of the urine, on the contrary,
`appears at first
`to have no
`real relationship
`to the administered
`creatine.
`The independence
`of creatine and creatinine
`is again apparent.
`But
`this
`indepen-
`dence is only apparent;
`it is not real.
`Beginning with
`the first
`after period, and continuing
`through
`the six
`following
`periods,
`there
`is a drop
`in the creatinine
`excretion which
`becomes per-
`fectly plain and definite when we consider
`the figures
`for any 7
`day period.
`The drop
`is just as unwilling,
`slow, and slightly
`irregular
`(from day to day) as was
`the rise.
`But it is just as definite
`and clear-cut
`for a number of days considered
`together.
`For
`the
`fifth after period
`the creatinine
`coefficient
`(28) is the same as for
`
`013
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`Creatine Metabolism
`
`to store nitrogen, but
`The dog continues
`period.
`the preliminary
`this falls to 2.2 and 2.7 gm. for the last two periods of observation.
`After discontinuing
`the creatine
`the weight of the animal remains
`practically
`constant
`at an average of 15.75 kilos
`for
`the seven
`after periods as against 15.7 kilos
`for
`the first after period.
`to that
`Tables
`II and III
`record
`two
`further experiments
`similar
`recorded
`in Table
`I.
`In order
`to save space the figures are given
`for 7 day periods, and for the daily average of each period,
`instead
`of in full detail as for the experiment
`recorded
`in Table
`I.
`The
`The experiment with Dog 2 is summarized
`in Table
`II.
`entire experimental
`period covered
`twelve periods of 7 days each.
`These
`included
`two preliminary
`control periods,
`five periods
`of
`creatine administration,
`and five after periods.
`0.5 gm. of crea-
`tine was given daily with
`the
`food during
`the creatine periods,
`equivalent
`to 379 mg. per day expressed
`as creatinine.
`This
`represented
`43 mg. per kilo of body weight, which
`is the same per
`kilo dose as that given to Dog 1. There
`is a slight but detectable
`rise
`in crentinine
`elimination
`for
`the
`first
`creatine period, while
`the maximal
`figure
`for creatinine
`in the urine was
`reached
`for
`the
`third creatine period.
`For
`this period
`the creatinine output per
`day was 387 mg.
`This was 92 mg., or 31 per cent, above
`the
`preliminary
`period
`level of 295 mg. of creatinine
`per day.
`This
`high creatinine elimination was approximately maintained
`through
`the last
`two periods of the creatine administration.
`After with-
`drawal of the creatine
`from
`the food the creatinine shows
`the same
`type of very
`slow
`fall observed
`in the experiment with Dog 1
`(Table
`I).
`in the
`(40 mg.) appeared
`In the experiment with Dog 2 creatine
`urine
`first on the 22nd day of creatine administration,
`or 11 days
`later
`than
`in the case of Dog 1, though both
`received
`the same
`quantity
`of creatine per kilo of body weight.
`The quantity
`of
`creatine
`in the urine
`increased
`rapidly
`just as in the preceding
`experiment,
`and during
`the
`fifth
`(and
`last) period of creatine
`administration
`represented
`about 50 per cent of that given,
`just
`as in the preceding experiment.
`Creatine
`(25 mg.) appeared
`for
`the last time
`in the urine on the 1st day of the first after period.
`Nitrogen
`retention
`and
`increase
`in weight of the animal occurs,
`but these are not so great as in the case of Dog 1. Nevertheless,
`there
`is a considerable
`excess of nitrogen
`(above
`that contained
`
`in
`
`014
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`S. R. Benedict and E. Osterberg
`
`243
`
`increase
`is a slight
`in this animal, and there
`retained
`the creatine)
`The period of creatine administration
`was only one-
`in weight.
`half as long as in the preceding experiment.
`
`Nitrogen,
`
`Creatinine,
`
`II.
`
`TABLE
`and Creatine
`Administration.
`
`Elimination
`
`after
`
`Creatine
`
`The dog
`
`received
`
`daily
`
`the
`
`2.
`Dog
`following
`
`Female.
`diet:
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. . . .
`
`. . . . . .
`
`l7m.
`150
`. 100
`15
`40
`
`meal...............................................
`Cracker
`milk.
`. .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Evaporated
`Casein....................................................
`Bone
`ash..................................................
`(5.45
`for 7 day periods
`
`The
`
`figures
`
`are
`
`T
`
`am.
`31.774
`$1.916
`il. 650
`
`ma.
`295
`295
`314
`
`am.
`to.24
`to.49
`i-l.24
`
`il.938
`
`2,507
`
`0
`
`358
`
`t1.29
`
`11.8
`11.8
`11.9
`12.1
`12.2
`12.2
`12.3
`12.3
`
`il.777
`S2.222
`S1.833
`31.398
`30.752
`30.981
`31.743
`32.056
`
`2,725
`2,623
`2,610
`2,545
`2,487
`2,403
`2,234
`2,209
`
`0
`837
`1,025
`25’
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`387
`374
`374
`363
`355
`343
`319
`315
`
`t1.23
`to.90
`to.84
`to. 62
`Il.33
`Il.14
`to.23
`-0.02
`
`-
`
`* Eliminated
`
`1st day
`
`of period.
`
`nitrogen)
`gm.
`unless
`otherwise
`
`indicated.
`
`Remarks.
`
`preliminary
`First
`preliminary
`Second
`Dog
`received
`0.5
`(C4HgN302.H20)
`food.
`Clreatine
`period.
`“
`“
`‘I
`
`given
`
`as
`
`“
`“
`“
`
`period.
`period.
`gm.
`creatine
`daily with
`the
`
`in preceding
`
`“
`‘I
`“
`
`X0 creatine
`I‘
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`
`“I
`
`given.
`“
`“
`“
`‘I
`
`third experiment,
`of our
`is recorded a summary
`III
`In Table
`carried out upon Dog 3. The experiment
`covers a period of 92
`days.
`450 mg. of creat,ine, equivalent
`to 341 mg. expressed
`as
`
`015
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`244
`
`Creatine Metabolism
`
`feeding,
`the period of creatine
`creatinine, were given daily during
`which
`lasted 66 days.
`There was an after period of 20 days.
`The
`
`Nitrogen,
`
`Creatinine,
`
`The
`
`dog
`
`received
`
`daily
`
`the
`
`Elimination
`
`III.
`
`TABLE
`and Creatine
`Administration.
`Dog
`3.
`Female.
`following
`diet:
`
`ajter
`
`Creatine
`
`Crackermeal...............................................
`Evaporated
`milk.
`. . . . . .
`Casein....................................................
`(4.45
`1 )eriods
`
`The
`
`figures
`
`are
`
`for 7 day
`
`.
`
`9m.
`90
`. . . . . . . 100
`15
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`nitrogen)
`gm.
`unless
`otherwise
`
`indicated.
`
`kg.
`9.1
`9.1
`
`9m.
`22.188
`24.052
`
`m9.
`1,662
`2,039
`
`m*.
`
`0
`27*
`
`m9.
`277
`291
`
`9m.
`f0.300
`f2.092
`
`9.1
`
`25.646
`
`2,2241,092
`
`317
`
`f1.650
`
`9.2
`9.2
`9.1
`9.2
`9.2
`9.2
`9.3
`9.2
`
`24.881
`24.602
`23.739
`23.630
`23.731
`24.121
`23.283
`9.980
`
`1,288
`2,277
`1,189
`2,298
`2,3441,371
`2,301
`1,324
`2,347
`1,270
`2,367
`I, 204
`2,364
`1,150
`1,001
`510
`
`325
`328
`335
`328
`335
`338
`337
`333
`
`+2.361
`+2.723
`f3.667
`f3.689
`f3.520
`+3.145
`f3.574
`+1.584
`
`9.2
`
`19.517
`
`1,984
`
`201
`
`330
`
`t2.745
`
`9.1
`9.0
`
`24.266
`25.474
`
`2,181
`2,058
`
`0
`0
`
`311
`294
`
`f2.058
`j-O.281
`
`* Eliminated
`t Eliminated
`
`day
`last
`1st day
`
`of period.
`of period.
`
`0.450
`
`period.
`gm.
`daily
`
`creatine
`with
`
`as
`
`in preceding
`
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`Creatine
`period.
`No
`
`given
`
`creatine
`
`given
`
`preliminary
`6 day
`received
`Dog
`(CaHpNaOz.HsO)
`the
`food.
`Creatine
`period.
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`
`6
`
`period.
`3 day
`as in preceding
`day
`period.
`given.
`No
`creatine
`“
`“
`
`given.
`“
`
`016
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1121
`
`

`
`S. R. Benedict and E. Osterberg
`
`245
`
`to those of the prc-
`are quite similar
`of the experiment
`results
`shows
`a slight
`rise
`ceding experiments.
`The creatinine
`output
`during
`the
`first
`creatine period.
`The rise continues, with
`slight
`fluctuations,
`and the creatinine output
`reaches a maximal
`figure of
`338 mg. per day for
`the eighth period of creatine administration.
`This
`figure
`is 61 mg., or 22 per cent, above
`the control period.
`Creatine
`first appeared
`in the urine on the 7th day of creatine
`feed-
`ing, and increased
`rapidly as in the preceding experiments.
`When
`the creatine output was at its height, about 54 per cent of the
`creatine
`given was excreted
`in the urine as such. When
`the
`creatine
`feeding
`is s

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket