throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`PROTEIN
`
`METABOLISM
`BLOOD
`AND
`
`FROM
`TISSUE
`
`THE STANDPOINT
`ANALYSIS.
`
`OF
`
`THIRD
`
`PAPER.
`
`FURTHER
`ENCE
`
`ABSORPTION
`TO
`THE
`BEHAVIOR
`AND
`TO
`THE
`
`EXPERIMENTS
`OF
`CREATINE
`FORMATION
`
`WITH
`
`ESPECIAL
`AND
`CREATININE
`OF UREA.
`
`REFER-
`
`BY OTTO
`
`FOLIN
`
`AND W. DENIS.
`
`(From
`
`the Biochemical
`
`Laboratory
`
`of Harvard
`
`Medical
`
`School,
`
`Boston.)
`
`(Received
`
`for
`
`publication,
`
`June
`
`1, 1912.)
`
`are
`products
`digestion
`the nitrogenous
`that
`The hypothesis
`the
`resynthesized
`into albuminous materials while passing
`through
`mucous membrane of the intestine and therefore
`cannot be detected
`in the blood was originally
`advanced
`to explain
`the absence of
`peptones
`in the blood during digestion.
`The subsequent
`discovery
`that protein digestion normally
`proceeds
`further
`than
`to the pep-
`tone stage and results
`in the formation
`of amino-acids
`suggested
`another explanationof
`the earlier negative
`results.
`Asthe attempts
`to find the amino-acids
`in the blood were no more successful
`than
`had been the earlier attempts
`to find the peptones,
`the hypothesis
`of the immediate
`resynthesis
`of the digestion products
`into albumin-
`ous substances
`was
`revived.
`Kutscher
`adopted
`it? and Abder-
`halden has become more and more positive
`that
`it represents
`the
`only adequate explanation
`of the negative
`results obtained by him
`and his coworkers
`in their search
`for peptones and amino-acids
`in the blood.
`Since the resynthesis
`hypothesis
`is based on nega-
`tive
`findings alone it has no value after
`the presence
`in the blood
`of amino-acids
`absorbed
`from
`the
`intestine
`has been positively
`demonstrated.
`In our
`first paper2 we showed
`that
`it is possible
`by means of our new analytical method9
`to trace urea, glycocoll
`and pancreatic
`amino-acid mixtures
`not only
`into
`the blood, but
`
`f. physiol.
`xxxiv,
`Chem.,
`1 Zeitschr.
`p. 87, 1912.
`* This
`Journal,
`xi,
`xi, pp. 493-536,
`1912.
`3 Ibid.,
`
`p. 529,
`
`1902.
`
`141
`
`001
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`142
`
`.
`
`Urea
`
`Formation
`
`the increases
`tissues of the body. Moreover,
`also into the general
`nit’rogen of the blood and muscles which we
`in the non-protein
`have obtained
`in absorption
`experiments
`are large enough
`to
`account
`for practically
`all the nitrogenous material absorbed
`from
`the
`intestine.
`We do not claim
`to account
`exactly
`or quanti-
`tatively
`for all that has been absorbed.
`It
`is entirely
`possible
`that different
`tissues absorb different amounts
`from
`the blood, and
`we have
`therefore
`omitted
`all calculations
`tending
`to show
`that
`all the absorbed mat,erial
`is present
`in the animal
`in non-protein
`form.
`The result’s obtained
`indicate,
`however,
`that practically
`all the absorbed nitrogen
`can be accounted
`for, so that
`for
`the
`present at least
`the hypothesis
`of immediate
`protein
`synthesis
`in
`the walls of the
`intestine must be regarded
`as superfluousand
`untenable.
`of
`idea served only as an explanation
`regeneration
`The protein
`the failure
`to find the absorbed amino-acids;
`it was anything but an
`explanation
`of the formation
`of those amino-acids
`in the intestine;
`it was
`inconsistent
`with
`t’he rapid urea elimination
`after protein
`feeding, and it necessarily
`presupposed
`that
`in chemical
`composi-
`tion the serum proteins are veryvariable,
`whereas, on the contrary,
`they appear
`to remain decidedly uniform
`in composition.
`As an explanation
`of the failure
`to find peptones or amino-acids
`in the blood when
`they should be there
`in unusual amount,s,
`the
`immediate deaminization
`hypothesis
`therefore
`seemed more plausi-
`ble than the protein
`regenerat,ion doctrine, and was usually accepted
`as a working
`hypothesis
`by t,hose who could not accept
`the older
`t’heory of protein synthesis.
`content of the portal blood, and
`The supposedly
`high ammonia
`the results
`report’ed by Cohnheim4 on the production
`of ammonia
`and volatile bases accompanying
`the disappearance
`of peptone
`and amino-acids
`from
`the digestive
`tract of fishes (when
`isolated
`and suspended
`in blood or salt solutions)
`pointed certainly
`in the
`direction
`of deaminizat.ion.
`The experiments
`of Jacobi5 and of
`Lang6 on
`the deaminization
`of amino-acids
`by
`tissue extracts
`
`lix,
`Chem.,
`paper
`Cohnheim
`
`lxi,
`1909;
`p. 239,
`reports
`only
`
`lxxvi,
`p. 181, 1909;
`the
`finding
`of ammonia
`
`p.
`
`physiol.
`f.
`4 Zeitschr.
`In his
`last
`293, 1912.
`and
`no amino-acids.
`5 Zeitschl.
`j. physiol.
`6 Ho.jmeister’s
`Hritrtige,
`
`p. 149,
`xxx.
`Chem.,
`v, p. 321, 1904.
`
`1900.
`
`002
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`Otto
`
`Folin
`
`and W. Denis
`
`143
`
`direct evidence of t,he presence of deaminizing
`to furnish
`seemed
`in the intestine
`and
`liver, a,nd helped
`therefore mat,e-
`ferments
`rially
`to strengthen
`the theory of immediate deaminization
`as the
`characteristic
`feature of intermediary
`protein
`cat!abolism.
`Folin’s
`theory of protein metabolism
`is based on
`the same conception.
`Folin did not commit himself
`to the localiza,t,ion of the deamini-
`zation process
`in the intestine and liver.
`though he believed
`that
`those organs were
`chiefly
`responsible
`for
`the ammonia and urea
`formations.
`to explain
`failed of course
`theory
`The immediate deaminization
`why
`the non-prot,ein
`nitrogen did not increase
`in the blood during
`active absorption.
`The adherents
`of that
`theory had to content
`themselves with
`the “calculations”
`of Bergma.nn and Langstein’
`and others
`that
`the speed of the blood was so grea.t as to remove
`the urea practically
`as fast as it was
`formed.
`In such an appli-
`cation of these calculations
`it is tacit,ly a.ssumed tha.t the excretory
`capacity
`of
`the k’dneys
`is quite as efficient as
`the absorptive
`capacity of the intestine,
`for if such were not, t,he case, the volume
`and speed of the blood stream
`in the mesenteric
`and portal circu-
`lation could not prevent a temporary
`accumdlat,ion
`of t,he absorbed
`digestion products
`in the blood.
`t,hat the deami-
`indicated
`The results
`reported
`in our first paper
`is by no means
`nizing power ascribed
`to the int.estine and liver
`adequate
`to prevent
`the accumulation
`of amino-acids
`in the blood;
`and in our second papers we showed
`that no specialized deamini-
`zation process
`is located
`in the intestine, and that
`t,he ammonia
`in
`the portal blood is very small in amount and represents
`the absorp-
`tion of ammonia produced
`in the
`intestinal
`lumen,
`chiefly by
`putrefactive
`bacteria.
`in so
`two pa,pers are surprising
`in our first
`The results
`reported
`far as they
`failed
`to reveal any urea formation
`at all except when
`ammonia was present
`in the material used
`for absorption.
`This
`result might be regarded as inconsistent
`with
`the fact shown
`by
`ordinary
`feeding experiments
`that
`the urea elimination
`is rapidly
`increased when protein or amino-acids
`are fed to men or to animals.
`The
`inconsistency
`is, however, more a,pparent
`than
`real.
`The
`“rapid
`urea elimination”
`after
`the intake of nit.rogenous
`food
`is
`
`7 Hofmeistey’s
`6 This
`Jownal,
`
`p. 27, 1904.
`vi,
`Beitriige,
`xi, p. 161, 1912.
`
`003
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`I44
`
`Urea
`
`Formation
`
`we
`experiments
`in our absorption
`by hours, whereas
`measured
`the experiments
`and did not carry
`were dealing with minutes,
`for the urea dur-
`beyond one hour.
`The negative
`results obtained
`ing the first stages of absorption
`prove
`that
`the urea
`formation
`is not
`localized
`in the
`intestine
`and
`liver
`for
`the purpose
`of
`holding back all amino-acids which are not needed for the rebuild-
`ing of body
`tissues, because
`if such were
`the case the increase
`in
`the urea contents
`of the blood should begin practically
`at once,
`and should be much greater
`than
`the accumulation
`of amino-acid
`nitrogen.
`On the other hand, unless we could show
`that
`the urea
`formation
`does take place later
`there would
`remain a discrepancy
`between our findings and the facts established by ordinary
`feeding
`experiments.
`In this paper we wish
`to report
`results which
`seem
`to clear up in a measure
`the formation
`of urea from amino-acids.
`Before
`taking
`up the consideration
`of experiments
`specifically
`planned
`to throw
`light on the urea formation we wish
`to record a
`few additional
`absorption
`experiments with
`substances which are
`not adapted
`for the study of the urea production.
`
`repre-
`which
`details
`certain
`here
`to state
`we wish
`of brevity
`sake
`the
`For
`paper
`in
`this
`recorded
`the
`experiments
`in all
`followed
`sent
`the
`procedure
`alone,
`ether
`we have
`used
`(1) F or anesthetics
`described.
`unless
`otherwise
`sulphate,
`or
`of morphine
`with
`a subcutaneous
`injection
`or ether
`together
`with
`the substance
`inves-
`(the
`latter
`injected,
`together
`ether
`with
`chloretone
`tigated,
`into
`the
`intestine).
`After
`the
`first
`few minutes
`the ether was admin-
`istered
`by means
`of a tracheal
`cannula.
`(2) As soon
`as
`the
`animals
`were
`unconscious
`we
`laid
`bare
`the
`common
`carotids
`to have
`them
`ready
`when
`wanted
`and
`inserted
`a tracheal
`cannula
`in
`the usual manner.
`(3) The
`first
`sample
`of blood
`was
`then
`taken
`from
`one of
`the
`femoral
`arteries
`by means
`of a 2 or 5 cc. pipette,
`as described
`in
`this
`journal,9
`the
`gracilis
`muscle
`of
`the
`opened
`leg was dissected
`out,
`and
`5 grams
`of
`it was
`immediately
`cut
`fine with
`scissors
`and
`immersed
`in pure methyl
`alcohol.
`(4) The abdomen
`of
`the animal
`was
`then
`opened
`and
`ligatures
`applied
`to
`the
`small
`intestine,
`one
`just
`below
`the
`stomach,
`the
`other
`just
`above
`caecum.
`(6) Unless
`the
`otherwise
`stated
`the
`kidneys
`were
`not
`ligatured
`disturbed.
`(6) The
`or
`50
`substance
`under
`investigation,
`dissolved
`in
`from
`to 100 grams
`of water,
`was
`then
`injected
`into
`the
`intestine
`by means
`of a large
`syringe
`and
`small
`a hypodermic
`needle
`and
`the abdomen
`promptly
`closed
`by means
`of artery
`clips.
`(7) The
`animal
`was
`kept
`warm
`by means
`of an electric
`stove
`below
`the
`holding
`frame.
`(8) The
`alcoholic
`blood
`and
`tissue
`extracts
`were
`pre-
`pared
`as described.lO
`(9)
`The
`analytical
`results
`are
`calculated
`in
`terms
`of
`
`9 This
`lo Ibid.,
`
`xi, p. 527,
`Journal,
`xi, p. 528, 1912.
`
`1912.
`
`004
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Otto
`
`Folin
`
`and W. Denis
`
`145
`
`(10)
`out
`
`The difference
`tissue.
`or
`of blood
`per 100 grams
`of nitrogen
`milligrams
`at
`the
`intestine
`by washing
`of nitrogen
`obtained
`the
`amount
`between
`the
`contained
`in
`of nitrogen
`of
`the
`experiment
`and
`the
`amount
`the
`end
`absorbed.
`A small
`product
`is given
`as
`the
`amount
`of substance
`injected
`the
`to keep
`animals
`be
`involved
`in
`this
`procedure,
`but
`in order
`may
`error
`the
`intestine
`before
`as possible
`we did
`not
`want
`to wash
`out
`as normal
`the experiment.
`We have washed
`out
`the
`intestine
`at
`the
`begin-
`beginning
`ning and have
`found
`only
`a few
`(30
`to 40) milligrams
`of nitrogen,
`so the error
`is certainly
`of
`very
`little
`significance.
`(11) Unless
`otherwise
`stated,
`no
`account
`has been
`taken
`of
`the
`absorption
`of water
`from
`the
`intestine
`or of
`urine
`elimination.
`In nearly
`all of our
`experiments
`there
`was
`practically
`no elimination
`of urine
`as the bladder
`remained
`collapsed,
`also
`there
`was very
`little
`water
`absorption,
`for
`the
`intestine
`remained
`full.
`
`ABSORPTION
`
`OF
`
`ASPARAGINE.
`
`feeding,
`Last
`3163 grams).
`(weight,
`1. Cat 41
`EXPERIMENT
`hours before
`the operation.
`Anesthetic,
`ether and
`twenty-four
`After
`ligaturing
`the blood supply of both kidneys
`10
`morphine.
`grams of Kahlbaum’s
`asparagine
`dissolved
`in about 100 cc. of
`water were
`injected
`into the ligatured
`intestine.
`Asparagine
`is not
`very soluble and the absorption was allowed
`to continue
`for
`two
`hours.
`The following
`analytical
`results were obtained.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`2154
`. 1054
`43
`
`49
`
`69
`
`52
`
`62
`
`70
`
`83
`
`62
`200
`
`235
`
`.
`
`.
`
`I.
`II.
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`VI.
`
`VII.
`
`VIII.
`
`. . . . .
`.
`.
`blood..
`vein,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. .
`. . . . . . _
`twenty-two
`
`vein,
`
`twenty-four
`
`.
`min-
`
`min-
`
`injected..
`nitrogen
`Asparagine
`absorbed..
`nitrogen
`Asparagine
`control
`nitrogen,
`Non-protein
`jugular
`nitrogen,
`Non-protein
`utes
`afterinjection...............................
`Non-protein
`nit.rogen,
`portal
`utesaftertheinjection...........................
`artery,
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`carotid
`.
`minutes
`after
`the
`injection..
`artery,
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`carotid
`injection..
`the
`and
`twenty
`minutes
`after
`vein,
`one
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`portal
`.
`the
`injection..
`twenty-three
`minutes
`after
`one hundred
`Non-prot,ein
`nitrogen,
`mesenteric
`vein,
`injection.
`.
`and
`twenty-nine
`minutes
`after
`the
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`inferior
`vena
`cava,
`one hundred
`and
`thirty-two
`minutes
`after
`the
`injection..
`injection
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in muscle
`before
`the
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in muscle
`one
`hundred
`and
`thirty-seven
`minutes
`after
`the
`injection..
`
`forty-seven
`
`one
`
`hundred
`
`hundred
`
`and
`
`005
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`146
`
`Urea
`
`Formation
`
`to make urea
`it is useless
`injections
`the case of asparagine
`In
`determinations
`because
`the imide group
`is not sufficiently
`stable
`to resist
`the treat*ment employed
`for decomposing
`urea.
`The figures
`recorded
`in the above experiments
`are not entirely
`satisfactory.
`There is an unmistakable
`increase
`in the non-protein
`nitrogen of the blood and in the muscle extract.
`Quantitatively
`the figures are perhaps
`rather
`smaller
`than
`they should be on the
`basis of the asparagine absorption.
`The explanationof
`thenitrogen
`deficit
`is the fact
`that asparagine
`is precipitated
`together with
`the
`albuminous materials by the methyl alcohol used as a precipitant.
`The same difficulty
`is met with even with
`such a soluble product
`as urea, unless
`the precipitated
`protein materials
`are washed with
`alcohol.
`The loss of non-protein
`ment recorded below.
`EXPERIMENT
`30 mgm.
`blood containing
`2. To slaughter-house
`of non-protein
`nitrogen per 100 cc. was added (1) urea, (2) glyco-
`~011, (3) asparagine,
`in the proportion
`of (a) 100, (b) 50 mgm. of
`nitrogen
`per 100 cc. of blood.
`After precipitating
`the blood
`in
`the usual manner
`(but without
`washing
`the coagulum) with nine
`volumes of pure methyl alcohol and a little zinc chloride,
`the fol-
`lowing
`figures were obtained
`from
`the filtrates:
`
`is shown
`
`in the experi-
`
`nitrogen
`
`involved
`
`.
`nitrogen..
`1 a Urea
`nitrogen...............................
`1 b Urea
`2 a Glycocoll
`nitrogen.
`2 b Glycocoll
`nitrogen.
`3 a Asparagine
`nitrogen..
`3 b Asparagine
`nitrogen.
`_____
`
`_.
`
`. .
`
`ADDED
`w7.
`100
`50
`100
`50
`100
`50
`
`RECOVERED
`mg.
`82
`36
`82
`36
`44
`36
`
`to the extent of washing
`procedure
`the analytical
`Ry varying
`fresh portions of methyl
`albuminous material with
`the precipitated
`alcohol
`the urea and glycocoll added to the blood can be recovered
`almost quantitatively,
`but with
`asparagine
`as with
`creatine
`or
`creatinine
`the loss remains
`large.
`Thus when adding 100 mgm. of
`asparagine nitrogen we
`recovered
`only 33, and when adding 50
`we recovered 21.
`
`006
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`Otto Folin
`
`and W. Denis
`
`147
`
`the values
`in the case of asparagine,
`In all cases, but particularly
`therefore
`nitrogen of the blood must
`obtained
`for the non-protein
`be regarded as minimum
`values so far as the increase due to the
`absorbed
`substance
`is concerned.
`
`ABSORPTION
`
`OF TYROSINE.
`
`In view of the insolubility and low nitrogen content of tyrosine
`it seemed practically hopeless to try
`to trace its transportation
`from the digestive tract to the blood and tissues by means of nitro-
`gen determinations. The negative results which have heretofore
`been obtained by means of Millon’s reagent’1 also indicate that
`tyrosine is absorbed very slowly indeed. Millon’s reaction is how-
`ever not a particularly delicate one for the detection of tyrosine.
`One part in 10,000 seems to be about the limit for an unmistakable
`test on the basis of that reaction. Afar more delicate color reaction
`for tyrosine is one recently discovered by Folin and Macallum on
`the basis of a certain phosphotungstic phosphomolybdic compound,
`the exact composition of which we do not know, but the practical
`preparation of which is described elsewhere.12 By means of this
`reagent we obtain an unmistakable blue color with solutions con-
`taining 1 part of tyrosine in 1 million parts of water. Here we
`had, therefore, a method by means of which it should be an easy
`matter to trace tyrosine in the body.
`3. Cat 48 (weight, 2530 grams). Last feeding,
`EXPERIMENT
`twenty-four hours before the operation. Anesthetic, ether and
`morphine. Two grams of tyrosine dissolved in about 125 cc. of
`warm 1 per cent sodium carbonate solution was used for the injec-
`tion. More
`tyrosine could not be used for want of a suitable
`solvent. The usual nitrogen determinations were made on the
`blood and on muscle extracts only to determine whether any
`increase in the non-protein nitrogen occurs in the absence of active
`absorption.
`
`in control blood..
`nitrogen
`I. Non-protein
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`II. Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`carotid
`artery,
`minutes after the injection.
`. . .
`Urea nitrogen....................................
`
`This Journal,
`I1 H. C. Bradley:
`xi, p. 10, 1912.
`12 See the next number of this Journal.
`
`.
`
`Milligrams.
`39
`20
`
`eighty-four
`. .
`
`. .
`
`40
`20
`
`007
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`148
`
`Urea Formation
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`20 cc. of
`tyrosine we evaporated
`for
`test
`the calorimetric
`For
`first about
`in the usual manner, and added
`the alcoholic
`filtrates
`1 cc. of the phosphotungstic-molybdenum
`reagent, 2 or 3 cc. of
`water, and then solid sodium carbonate
`in excess (as much as would
`dissolve).
`The control
`extracts
`of blood and muscle gave an
`extremely
`faint
`reaction, while all the other
`tests both in the blood
`and in the second muscle extract were so strong as to uny istak-
`ably prove
`the presence of the tyrosine.
`It seemed hardly worth
`while
`to make
`the test quantitative
`because of the small amounts
`involved,
`but
`the reaction
`is decided enough
`to be available
`for
`quantitative
`purposes.
`
`ABSORPTION
`
`OF CREATININE.
`
`to the albumi-
`like asparagine adheres so tenaciously
`Creatinine
`nous precipitate
`produced
`on adding alcohol
`to blood
`that all of
`it cannot be recovered.
`The absorption
`and general distribution
`of creatinine
`is however
`easily demonstrated
`by means of the non-
`protein nitrogen determinations.
`The calorimetric
`estimation
`of
`creatinine
`in the alcoholic blood and tissue extracts proved at first
`rather
`puzzling.
`Although
`our nitrogen
`determinations
`showed
`that our extracts
`contained enough of the absorbed
`creatinine
`to
`make a calorimetric
`determination
`feasible, we failed to get even a
`sure qualitative
`test with
`the alkaline pierate
`reagent.
`The nega-
`tive results could have been due to the transformation
`of creatinine
`into creatine, although
`this seemed unlikely
`from what we know
`concerning
`the metabolism
`of these
`two products.
`Roiling
`the
`
`Milligrams.
`and
`
`one hundred
`.
`
`one
`vein,
`the
`injection..
`
`hundred
`
`and
`
`artery,
`carotid
`nitrogen,
`Non-protein
`the
`injection.
`minutes
`after
`eighty
`nitrogen.....................................
`Urea
`nitrogen,
`portal
`Non-protein
`minutes
`after
`eighty-three
`Ureanitrogen.....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`mesenteric
`and
`eighty-six
`minutes
`after
`Urea
`nitrogen.....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in muscle
`Ureanitrogen.....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in muscle
`minutes
`after
`the
`injection..
`Urea
`nitrogen.....................................
`
`one
`vein,
`injection..
`
`hundred
`
`the
`
`before
`
`the
`
`injection
`
`one hundred
`
`and ninety
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`39
`19
`
`39
`20
`
`39
`19
`180
`26
`
`180
`26
`
`008
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`Otto Folin and W. Denis
`
`‘49
`
`failed
`residues
`the dry
`acid or heating
`extracts with hydrochloric
`The
`true explanation
`however
`to yield
`the creatinine
`reaction.
`was
`found on adding creatinine directly
`to alcoholic blood extracts.
`The negative
`results obtained are due to the presence
`insuch extracts
`of some inhibiting
`substance.
`Fortunately
`that substance
`is solu-
`ble in ether and in chloroform.
`The fact
`that muscle and blood
`contain substances which
`interfere with
`the calorimetric
`determina-
`tion of creatinine doubtless
`invalidates
`at least some of the creatine
`and creatinine
`determinations
`recorded
`in
`the
`literature.
`The
`creatinine determinations
`of Noel PatonI
`in goose flesh, for exam-
`ple, were made under conditions which precluded his finding any
`creatinine which might have been present
`in his muscle extracts.
`To test
`for creatinine or to determine
`it we have therefore worked
`out
`the
`following
`procedure:
`To
`the alcoholic
`blood or
`tissue
`extract
`in an evaporating
`dish add 0.1 or 0.2 gram of picric acid
`Wash
`the
`(in methyl alcohol solution)
`and evaporate
`to dryness.
`residue several
`times with
`chloroform
`saturated with
`picric acid
`Then add a little water
`and,
`finally, once with pure chloroform.
`and alkali
`in the usual manner and make up to a suitable volume
`(usually 25 or 50 cc.).
`
`creatinine
`pure
`determinations
`As a standard
`potassium
`the
`half-normal
`rather
`more
`are
`by Folin.
`Creatinine
`keeps
`solutions
`originally
`solutions,
`and
`since
`creatinine
`acid
`in
`tenth-normal
`the
`chief
`reason
`for
`using
`condition,
`easily
`be prepared
`One
`gram
`of
`creatinine
`longer
`holds.
`mate
`as a standard
`acid
`can be used
`for
`several
`hundred
`in a liter
`of
`tenth-normal
`tions
`by
`taking
`1 cc. and making
`the
`reaction
`in a 50 cc. volumetric
`
`for such creatinine
`satisfactory
`than
`recommended
`hydrochloric
`in pure
`no
`
`solutions
`bichromate
`indefinitely
`can now
`bichro-
`the
`dissolved
`determina
`flask.
`
`4. Cat 42 (weight, 2353 grams). Three days after
`EXPERIMENT
`the last feeding the animal was anesthetized (ether and morphine),
`the right kidney was removed, the ureter of the left kidney was
`ligatured, and 6 grams of creatinine together with about 100 of
`water were introduced into the ligatured intestine.
`
`Creatinine
`Creatinine
`Non-protein
`Urea
`
`injected..
`nitrogen
`absorbed
`nitrogen
`in control
`nitrogen
`nitrogen.......................................l$
`
`I.
`
`in eighty
`blood
`
`minutes.
`
`Milligrams.
`2172
`822
`31
`
`I3 Joum.
`
`of Physiol.
`
`xxxix.
`
`p. 488, 1010.
`
`009
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`150
`
`Urea
`
`Formation
`
`artery,
`
`nine minutes
`
`Milligranzs.
`
`II
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`VI.
`
`VII.
`
`this
`The calorimetric creatinine determinations shattered in
`experiment
`for reasons which we have already described. We
`had kept some of the samples of blood, however, and later made
`calorimetric determinations on blood samples IV, V, and VI.
`The calorimetric values obtained gave us 51, 44 and 70 mgm.,
`respectively, per 100 cc. of blood for the creatinine nitrogen. The
`corresponding direct nitrogen determinations, after subtracting the
`normal value 31, are 65, 47 and 73.
`5. Cat 44 (weight, 2743 grams). For two weeks
`EXPERIMENT
`prior to the experiment this animal had been kept on a low nitrogen
`diet consisting of rice (25 grams) and cream (50 cc., 15 per cent
`fat). For anesthetic we used ether and morphine. Before inject-
`ing the creatinine solution the bladder was emptied by means of
`a syringe.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`t3l
`18
`
`79
`18
`
`91
`17
`
`78
`17
`
`104
`17
`
`91
`18
`216
`26
`
`250
`26
`147
`19
`
`181
`16
`
`carotid
`nitrogen,
`Non-protein
`aftertheinjection................................
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`portal
`aftertheinjection................................
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`portal
`aftertheinjection................................
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`carotid
`utes
`after
`the
`injection..
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`vein,
`Non-protein,
`mesenteric
`after
`the
`injection................................
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`carotid
`.
`after
`the
`injection.
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in muscle
`Urea
`nitrogen..
`.
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in muscle
`theinjection.....................................
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in kidney
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in kidney
`theinjection.....................................
`Ureanitrogen....................................
`
`vein,
`
`fourteen
`
`minutes
`
`vein,
`
`fifty-one
`
`minutes
`
`.
`
`artery,
`
`fifty-four
`
`min-
`
`sixty-seven
`
`minutes
`
`artery,
`
`eighty
`
`minutes
`.
`
`before
`
`the
`
`injection.
`
`eighty
`
`minutes
`
`after
`
`before
`
`the
`
`injection.
`
`eighty
`
`minutes
`
`after
`
`.
`
`010
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`Otto Folin and W. Denis
`
`151
`
`Milligrams.
`.
`2172
`and
`
`922
`30
`20
`
`45
`21
`
`.
`
`12
`
`(15)
`
`blood.
`.
`one hundred
`vein,
`the
`injection.
`
`determina-
`
`vein,
`mesenteric
`minutes
`
`one hun-
`after
`the
`
`56
`21
`
`.
`
`.
`
`colosimetric
`
`determina-
`
`vein,
`after
`
`hundred
`one
`the
`injection.
`
`calorimetric
`
`determina-
`
`artery,
`iliac
`after
`minutes
`calorimetric
`
`one hundred
`the
`injeCtion.
`determina-
`
`before
`
`the
`
`injec-
`
`25
`
`(26)
`
`(22)
`
`42
`21
`
`9
`
`45
`
`12
`
`(15)
`
`.
`iniected..
`nitrogen
`Creatinine
`in one hundred
`absorbed
`nitrogen
`Creatinine
`minutes..
`. . . .
`twenty-three
`nitrogen
`in control
`Non-protein
`Urea
`nitrogen..
`portal
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`after
`and
`twenty
`minutes
`Urea
`nitrogen...............................
`Creatinine
`nitrogen,
`calorimetric
`tion.........................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`and
`dred
`twenty-three
`injection....................................
`Urea
`nitrogen..
`Creatinine
`nitrogen,
`tion.......................................
`iliac
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`and
`twenty-five
`minutes
`Ureanitrogen...............................
`Creatinine
`nitrogen,
`tion.......................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen,
`and
`twenty-seven
`Creatinine
`nitrogen,
`tion.......................................
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in muscle
`tion.......................................
`Urea
`nitrogen...............................
`test.
`Creatinine
`nitrogen,
`calorimetric
`Non-protein
`nitrogen
`in muscle
`one hundred
`twenty-seven
`minutes
`after
`the
`injection.
`Ureanitrogen...............................
`Creatinine
`nitrogen,
`tion.......................................
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`130
`16
`trace
`
`180
`16
`
`and
`
`.
`
`54
`
`(50)
`
`calorimetric
`
`determina-
`
`in Experi-
`recorded
`in the results
`difference
`The most striking
`ments 4 and 5 is the different distribution
`of the absorbed
`creat-
`inine.
`In
`the former
`there
`is a greater accumulation
`in the blood,
`and in the latter
`the muscles have taken up a greater proportion.
`It
`is not possible at
`the present
`time
`to definitely
`explainthis
`variation.
`The
`two experiments
`are not strictly
`similar.
`The
`absorption
`periods are
`longer
`in Experiment
`5, and it
`is quite
`likely
`that
`the speed of the absorption
`diminishes
`as the absorbed
`product accumulates
`in the blood, and that
`the muscles
`therefore
`
`011
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`I.52
`
`Urea
`
`Formation
`
`Cat 42 had been fed on a
`Further,
`absorb a larger proportion.
`to the fasting, while Cat 44 (Experi-
`protein-rich
`diet preliminary
`ment 5) had been kept on a low nitrogen
`diet which,
`especially
`in a naturally
`high protein
`animal
`like
`the cat, might
`leave the
`muscles unusually
`low
`in non-protein
`nitrogen
`and
`thereby
`lead
`to a greater avidity
`for
`the absorbed products.
`The non-protein
`nitrogen per 100 grams of control muscle
`in Cat 42 is 214 mgm.,
`as against only 130 mgm.
`in Cat 44.
`In Cat 42 the elimination
`of urine had been prevented,
`but
`this has
`little
`to do with
`the
`result,
`for in the bladder of Cat 44 we obtained only a small quan-
`tity of urine secreted during
`the experiment and it contained only
`a few milligrams of creatinine.
`During
`the last few years numerous
`interesting
`and suggestive
`papers have appeared on creatine and
`creatinine,
`on the transformation
`of the one into
`the other, and
`vice versa, as well as on their complete destruction within
`the body.
`The results of our absorption
`experiments
`seem to throw
`some new
`light
`from a different
`angle on the problems
`thus
`raised.
`The
`hypothetical
`transformation
`of creatinine
`into creatine
`in the mus-
`cles, as suggested
`by Mellanby,14 or by means of ferments,
`as
`claimed by Gottlieb andStangassinger,15
`isnot
`founded on convinc-
`ing experiments
`and is certainly
`not supported
`by the determjna-
`tions
`recorded above.
`Considering
`the nature of our experiments
`and the somewhat
`preliminary
`character
`of the analytical
`tech-
`nique,
`the calorimetric
`values obtained
`for
`the creatinine
`in the
`blood as well as in the muscle correspond
`surprisingly
`well with
`the
`total
`increase
`in the non-protein
`nitrogen.
`opposite
`in brackets
`To make
`this point clear we have
`inserted
`the creatinine
`nitrogen
`figures
`the corresponding
`figures derived
`from
`the total non-protein
`nitrogen determinations.
`the
`According
`to the experiments
`of Gottlieb and Stangassinger
`tissues of the animal body contain not only
`ferments
`capable of
`transforming
`creatinine
`into creatine but also ferments
`capable of
`decomposing
`creatine and creatinine.
`The figures which we have
`obtained
`for the urea in the above experiments
`are however entirely
`negative
`so far as the
`‘Ldestruction”
`of creatinine
`is concerned.
`And since our results were obtained
`from experiments with
`living
`animals we are inclined
`to insist
`that
`the results obtained by Gott-
`
`14 Journ. of Physiol.,
`I5 Zeitschr.
`f. physiol.
`
`1908.
`p. 447,
`xli,
`Iii, p. 1, 1908;
`Chem.,
`
`lvii, p. 131, 1908.
`
`012
`
`Harvest Trading Group - Ex. 1120
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 19, 2015
`
`Otto
`
`Folin
`
`and W. Denis
`
`I53
`
`in their autolysis and perfusion experiments
`lieb and Stangassinger
`have no bearing on the processes of animal metabolism.
`More-
`over,
`the analytical
`results of Gottlieb and Stangassinger
`are more
`or less open to suspicion
`in view of the circumstance
`that
`they did
`not discover and did not take
`into account
`the fact that blood and
`tissues
`contain
`substances
`which
`interfere with
`the calorimetric
`creatinine determinations.
`Their conclusion
`that
`the figures
`they
`obtained
`represented maximum
`values because of other substances
`giving
`the same reaction
`is certainly
`untenable.
`To be sure Van
`Hoogenhuyze
`and Verploegh have verified
`their
`result@
`but Mel-
`lanby on the other hand was unable
`to do so. At all events our
`results
`lend no support
`to the theory
`that
`the animal body contains
`special
`ferments
`for
`the destruction
`of creatinine.
`
`ABSORPTION
`
`OF CREATINE.
`
`In the study of the creatine we have made use of the following
`method:
`
`in a
`contained
`extract
`tissue
`or
`blood
`alcoholic
`the
`To 10 to 20 cc. of
`acid
`dissolved
`in me

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket