throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper No. 13
`
`571-272-7822
`Date Entered: November 15, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON
`WIRELESS, and AT&T MOBILITY LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ADAPTIX, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00824
`Patent 8,934,375 B2
`____________
`
`Before KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, and
`J. JOHN LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`DESHPANDE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
` Termination of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00824
`Patent 8,934,375 B2
`
`
`
`I. DISCUSSION
`On November 2, 2016, Sprint Spectrum L.P. (“Sprint”), Cellco Partnership
`D/B/A Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”), and AT&T Mobility LLC (“AT&T”)
`(collectively, “Petitioner”) and Adaptix, Inc. (“Adaptix” or “Patent Owner’) filed
`an authorized Joint Motion to Terminate the above-captioned proceeding pursuant
`to 35 U.S.C. § 317. Paper 11 (“Mot”). Petitioner and Patent Owner also filed a
`copy of a license agreement between AT&T and Adaptix, and a copy of a release
`agreement between Verizon and Adaptix Exs. 2103, 2104. Petitioner and Patent
`Owner represent that the filed agreements are true and correct copies. Mot. 2–3.
`Sprint and Adaptix represent that the instant Joint Motion to Terminate along with
`the Joint Motion to Terminate IPR2016-00823 “constitute[] Sprint Spectrum L.P.’s
`and Adaptix’s written agreement to terminate this proceeding.” Id. at 3. Petitioner
`and Patent Owner further represent that there are no collateral agreements or
`understandings made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of
`this proceeding. Id. at 2–4.
`“An inter partes review instituted under this chapter shall be terminated with
`respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent
`owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the
`request for termination is filed.” 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). We have not yet decided the
`merits of this proceeding, and a final written decision has not yet been entered.
`Petitioner and Patent Owner represent that they have settled their dispute with
`respect to U.S. Patent Number 8,934,375 B2, and that there are no current or
`contemplated pending litigation proceedings involving U.S. Patent Number
`8,934,375 B2. Mot. 2, 4. Accordingly, we determine that good cause exists to
`terminate this proceeding.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00824
`Patent 8,934,375 B2
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner also filed a Joint Motion to File Agreements as
`Business Confidential Information, requesting that the agreement between AT&T
`and Adaptix and the agreement between Verizon and Adaptix be kept separate
`from the file of the challenged patent. Paper 12.
`“At the request of a party to the proceeding, the agreement or understanding
`shall be treated as business confidential information, shall be kept separate from
`the file of the involved patents, and shall be made available only to Federal
`Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good
`cause.” 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). After reviewing the agreement between AT&T and
`Adaptix, and the agreement between Verizon and Adaptix, we find that the
`agreements contain confidential business information regarding the terms of
`settlement. We determine that good cause exists to treat the agreement between
`AT&T and Adaptix, and the agreement between Verizon and Adaptix as business
`confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b).
`
`
`II. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate (Paper 11) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that this proceeding is hereby terminated; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to File Settlement Agreement
`as Business Confidential Information (Paper 12) is granted, and the Agreement
`between AT&T and Adaptix, and the Agreement between Verizon and Adaptix
`will be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) and be kept separate from the publicly available file of the
`challenged patent.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00824
`Patent 8,934,375 B2
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`David Cavanaugh
`Larissa Park
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`larissa.park@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`Robert Hilton
`George Davis
`MCGUIREWOODS LLP
`RHilton@mcguirewoods.com
`GDavis@mcguirewoods.com
`
`
`
`Douglas Kubehl
`Kurt Pankratz
`Jennifer Tempesta
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`doug.kubehl@bakerbotts.com
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`jennifer.tempesta@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Amedeo Ferraro
`Wesley Meinerding
`MARTIN & FERRARO, LLP
`aferraro@martinferraro.com
`wmeinerding@martinferraro.com
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket