throbber
Tria1s@uspt0.g0V
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 15
`Entered: July 31, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`KYOCERA CORPORATION, and
`
`KYOCERA COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`ADAPTIX, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2015-00319
`
`Patent 6,947,748 B2
`
`Before GLENN J. PERRY, TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, and
`JUSTIN BUSCH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PERRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`
`Termination ofProceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42. 73
`
`SPRINT 1116
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00319
`
`Patent 6,947,748 B2
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`Kyocera Corporation and Kyocera Communications Inc. (collectively,
`
`“Petitioner”) filed a Petitioner for an interpartes review of claims 8, 9, 21 ,
`
`and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 6,947,748 B2 (Ex. 1003, “the ’748 patent”) under
`
`35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319 (Ex. 1003, “the ’748 patent”) under 35 U.S.C. §§
`
`311-319. See Paper 1 (“Petition” or “Pet.”). The Board instituted review of
`
`claims 8, 9, 21, and 22 (Paper 10, “Dec.”). Patent Owner Adaptix, Inc. now
`
`requests adverse judgment as to the claims subject to this inter partes review.
`
`Paper 14.
`
`We have considered the Request for Adverse Judgment, and hereby
`
`grant Patent Owner’s request for adverse judgment.
`
`II. RELEVANT RULES
`
`The Board may terminate a trial without rendering a final written
`
`decision, where appropriate, including where the trial is consolidated with
`
`another proceeding or pursuant to a joint request under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) or
`
`§ 327(a). 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. A party may request judgment against itself at
`
`any time during a proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b).
`
`III. ANALYSIS
`
`Patent Owner’s Request for Adverse Judgment (Paper 14) requests
`
`adverse judgment and indicates that “the Board cancelled claims 8, 9, 21,
`
`and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 6,947,748 in a Judgment dated July 22, 2015 in
`
`IPR2014-01524.” Paper 14, 2. These are all of the claims for which inter
`
`partes review has been instituted in this case. Paper 10.
`
`No persuasive reason exists on this record to deny this request.
`
`Accordingly, the Request for Adverse Judgment is granted.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00319
`
`Patent 6,947,748 B2
`
`IV. ORDER
`
`For the reasons given, it is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request for adverse judgment under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b) with respect to claims 8, 9, 21, and 22 of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,947,748 B2 is GRANTED; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, at the request of Patent Owner, judgment
`
`is entered herein against Patent Owner with respect to claims 8, 9, 21 , and 22
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 6,947,748 B2.
`
`

`
`IPR20l5-00319
`
`Patent 6,947,748 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Marc Weinstein
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`marcweinstein@quinnemanuel.corn
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Amedeo Ferraro
`
`Wesley Meinerding Martin & Ferraro, LLP
`inerding@martinferraro.com
`Wmeinerding@mar1inferraro.corn

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket