throbber
Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`William E. Solander, Esq.
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No.: _____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jason A. Leonard, Esq.
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC,
`AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. and SANOFI
`
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC,
`AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. and
`SANOFI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Electronically Filed
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ACTAVIS LLC and
`ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC (hereinafter “Sanofi U.S.”), Aventis Pharma S.A.
`
`(hereinafter “Aventis”) and Sanofi (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) for their Complaint against
`
`defendants Actavis LLC and Actavis Elizabeth LLC (collectively “Defendants”), hereby allege
`
`as follows:
`
`AVENTIS EXHIBIT 2051
`Mylan v. Aventis
`IPR2016-00627
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 2 of 18 PageID: 2
`
`
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Sanofi U.S. is a U.S. subsidiary of Sanofi and is a company
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having commercial headquarters
`
`at 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Aventis is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`
`France, having its principal place of business at 20 avenue Raymond Aron, 92160 Antony,
`
`France.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff Sanofi is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`
`France, having its principal place of business at 54 rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff Sanofi is a global research-driven pharmaceutical company that
`
`discovers, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of innovative products to improve
`
`human and animal health.
`
`5.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having principal places of business at 60
`
`Columbia Road, Building B, Morristown, New Jersey 07960 and Morris Corporate Center III,
`
`400 Interspace Parkway, Parsipanny, New Jersey 07054. On information and belief, Actavis
`
`LLC was formerly known as Actavis Inc., a Delaware corporation.
`
`6.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC is a corporation
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of
`
`business at 200 Elmora Avenue, Elizabeth, New Jersey 07202.
`
`7.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC is a wholly-owned
`
`subsidiary of Actavis LLC.
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 3 of 18 PageID: 3
`
`
`
`8.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
`
`Actavis, Inc. On information and belief, Actavis, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Nevada, having its principal place of business at Morris Corporate
`
`Center III, 400 Interspace Parkway, Parsipanny, New Jersey 07054.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC assembled and caused to be filed
`
`with the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(b)(2) (Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act), New Drug
`
`Application (“NDA”) No. 207970 (hereinafter “the Actavis 505(b)(2) application”) concerning a
`
`proposed drug product, Cabazitaxel Injection, 10 mg/mL (“Actavis’s Proposed Generic
`
`Product”).
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`10.
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States of America.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1338(a).
`
`11.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Actavis LLC. On information
`
`and belief, Actavis LLC regularly conducts and/or solicits business in the State of New Jersey,
`
`engages in other persistent courses of conduct in the State of New Jersey, and/or derives
`
`substantial revenue from services or things used or consumed in the State of New Jersey. On
`
`information and belief, Actavis LLC, formerly as Actavis Inc., a Delaware corporation,
`
`maintains principal places of business at 60 Columbia Road, Building B, Morristown, New
`
`Jersey 07960 and Morris Corporate Center III, 400 Interspace Parkway, Parsipanny, New Jersey
`
`07054. On information and belief, Actavis LLC, formerly as Actavis Inc., a Delaware
`
`corporation, is registered with the New Jersey Department of Treasury under the business entity
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 4 of 18 PageID: 4
`
`
`
`identification number 0101005391. On information and belief, Actavis LLC, formerly as
`
`Actavis Inc., a Delaware corporation, maintains a corporate agent for service of process at 80
`
`Main Street, 5th Floor, West Orange, New Jersey 07052.
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC has affiliations with the State of
`
`New Jersey that are pervasive, continuous, and systematic. On information and belief, Actavis
`
`LLC engages in direct marketing, distribution, and/or sale of generic pharmaceutical drugs
`
`within the State of New Jersey and to the residents of the State of New Jersey. On information
`
`and belief, Actavis LLC is in the business of manufacturing, marketing, importing and selling
`
`pharmaceutical drug products, including generic drug products. On information and belief,
`
`Actavis LLC directly or through its subsidiaries, affiliates and agents develops, formulates,
`
`manufactures, markets, imports and sells pharmaceutical products, including generic drug
`
`products, which are copies of products invented and developed by innovator pharmaceutical
`
`companies, throughout the United States, including in this Judicial District. On information and
`
`belief, Actavis, Inc. as the parent company and Actavis LLC as the trade name holds an active
`
`wholesale drug license for the State of New Jersey under License No. 5003899.
`
`13.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC has previously submitted to the
`
`jurisdiction of this Court and have availed themselves of the legal protections of the State of New
`
`Jersey, having asserted counterclaims in this jurisdiction, including in the matters of Novartis
`
`Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Actavis LLC. et al., Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-03967
`
`(SDW)(SCM), D.I. 354 at 8, 15-19 (D.N.J. May 16, 2014); and Novartis Pharmaceuticals
`
`Corporation v. Actavis LLC. et al., Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-01028 (SDW)(MCA), D.I. 119 at 9,
`
`15-18 (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2013).
`
`4
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 5 of 18 PageID: 5
`
`
`
`14.
`
`Actavis LLC is also subject to personal jurisdiction in the State of New
`
`Jersey because, inter alia, Actavis LLC has committed, aided, abetted, contributed to, and/or
`
`participated in the commission of a tortious act of patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(e)(2) that has led and/or will lead to foreseeable harm and injury to Plaintiff Sanofi U.S.,
`
`having commercial headquarters in the State of New Jersey. Actavis LLC sent its December 22,
`
`2014 Paragraph IV Notice Letter to Sanofi U.S.’s commercial headquarters at 55 Corporate
`
`Drive, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807. Plaintiffs’s cause of action arose from Actavis LLC’s
`
`contact with Sanofi U.S. in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Actavis LLC states that it intends to
`
`engage in the commercial manufacture, use, and/or sale of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product
`
`before the expiration of U.S Patent Nos. 5,847,170 (“’170 patent”) and 7,241,907 (“’907 patent”)
`
`throughout the United States, including in this Judicial District.
`
`15.
`
`On information and belief, upon approval of the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application, Actavis LLC and/or its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents will market, sell and/or
`
`distribute Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product throughout the United States, including in this
`
`Judicial District, and will derive substantial revenue therefrom.
`
`16.
`
`On information and belief, upon approval of the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application, Actavis LLC and/or its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents will place Actavis’s
`
`Proposed Generic Product into the stream of commerce with the reasonable expectation or
`
`knowledge and the intent that such product will ultimately be purchased and used by consumers
`
`in this judicial district.
`
`17.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Actavis Elizabeth LLC. On
`
`information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC regularly conducts and/or solicits business in the
`
`State of New Jersey, engages in other persistent courses of conduct in the State of New Jersey,
`
`5
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 6 of 18 PageID: 6
`
`
`
`and/or derives substantial revenue from services or things used or consumed in the State of New
`
`Jersey. On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC maintains a principal place of
`
`business at 200 Elmora Avenue, Elizabeth, New Jersey 07202. On information and belief,
`
`Actavis Elizabeth LLC is registered with the New Jersey Department of Treasury under the
`
`business entity identification number 0600272818. On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth
`
`LLC, formerly as Actavis Inc., a Delaware corporation, maintains a corporate agent for service
`
`of process at 80 Main Street, 5th Floor, West Orange, New Jersey 07052.
`
`18.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC has affiliations with the
`
`State of New Jersey that are pervasive, continuous, and systematic. On information and belief,
`
`Actavis Elizabeth LLC engages in direct marketing, distribution, and/or sale of generic
`
`pharmaceutical drugs within the State of New Jersey and to the residents of the State of New
`
`Jersey. On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC is in the business of manufacturing,
`
`marketing, importing and selling pharmaceutical drug products, including generic drug products.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC directly or through its subsidiaries, affiliates
`
`and agents develops, formulates, manufactures, markets, imports and sells pharmaceutical
`
`products, including generic drug products, which are copies of products invented and developed
`
`by innovator pharmaceutical companies, throughout the United States, including in this Judicial
`
`District. On information and belief, Actavis, Inc. as the parent company and Actavis Elizabeth
`
`LLC as the trade name holds an active wholesale drug license for the State of New Jersey under
`
`License No. 5003329.
`
`19.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC has previously
`
`submitted to the jurisdiction of this Court and have availed themselves of the legal protections of
`
`the State of New Jersey, having asserted counterclaims in this jurisdiction, including in the
`
`6
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 7 of 18 PageID: 7
`
`
`
`matters of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC. et al., Civil Action No.
`
`2:13-cv-04507 (CCC)(MF), D.I. 150 at 10, 23-38 (D.N.J. Sep. 3, 2014); Shire LLC et al. v.
`
`Actavis Elizabeth LLC. et al., Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-03781 (SRC)(CLW), D.I. 231 at 5, 40-47
`
`(D.N.J. Jan. 17, 2013); and Depomed, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC. et al., Civil Action No.
`
`3:12-cv-01358 (JAP)(TJB), D.I. 40 at 3, 23-27 (D.N.J. Apr. 13, 2012).
`
`20.
`
`On information and belief, upon approval of the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and/or its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents will market, sell
`
`and/or distribute Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product throughout the United States, including in
`
`this Judicial District, and will derive substantial revenue therefrom.
`
`21.
`
`On information and belief, upon approval of the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and/or its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents will place
`
`Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product into the stream of commerce with the reasonable
`
`expectation or knowledge and the intent that such product will ultimately be purchased and used
`
`by consumers in this judicial district.
`
`22.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court at least pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b),
`
`(c), and/or (d), and 1400(b).
`
`THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`23.
`
`Sanofi U.S. holds approved New Drug Application (“NDA”) No. 201023
`
`for cabazitaxel injection, 60 mg/ 1.5 mL (40 mg/mL), which is prescribed and sold in the United
`
`States under the trademark JEVTANA® KIT (hereinafter “JEVTANA®”). The U.S. Food and
`
`Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved NDA No. 201023 on June 17, 2010. JEVTANA® is
`
`approved for use in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with hormone-
`
`7
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 8 of 18 PageID: 8
`
`
`
`refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-containing treatment
`
`regimen.
`
`24.
`
`United States Patent No. 5,847,170 (the “’170 patent,” copy attached as
`
`Exhibit A) is entitled “Taxoids, Their Preparation And Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing
`
`Them” and was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`(“USPTO”) on December 8, 1998. The ’170 patent claims, inter alia, cabazitaxel and
`
`pharmaceutical compositions containing cabazitaxel. The ’170 patent is listed in the FDA’s
`
`Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”) for
`
`JEVTANA® (NDA No. 201023).
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`The ’170 patent is owned by Aventis.
`
`United States Patent No. 7,241,907 (the “’907 patent,” copy attached as
`
`Exhibit B) is entitled “Acetone Solvate of Dimethoxy Docetaxel and its Process of Preparation”
`
`and was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)
`
`on July 10, 2007. The ’907 patent claims, inter alia, an acetone solvate of cabazitaxel. The ’907
`
`patent is listed in the FDA’s Orange Book for JEVTANA® (NDA No. 201023).
`
`27.
`
`The ’907 patent is owned by Aventis.
`
`CLAIMS FOR RELIEF -
`
` PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`28.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC submitted the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application to the FDA seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for
`
`sale, sale, and/or importation of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product.
`
`29.
`
`On information and belief, the Actavis 505(b)(2) application seeks FDA
`
`approval of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product for use in combination with prednisone for the
`
`8
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 9 of 18 PageID: 9
`
`
`
`treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with
`
`a docetaxel-containing treatment regimen.
`
`30.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC actively collaborated with
`
`Actavis Elizabeth LLC participated in and/or directed activities related to the submission of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application and the development of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product, was
`
`actively involved in preparing the NDA, and/or intends to directly benefit from and has a
`
`financial stake in the approval of the NDA. On information and belief, upon approval of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application, Actavis LLC will be involved in the manufacture, distribution,
`
`and/or marketing of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product.
`
`31.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC actively collaborated
`
`with Actavis LLC participated in and/or directed activities related to the submission of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application and the development of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product, was
`
`actively involved in preparing the NDA, and/or intends to directly benefit from and has a
`
`financial stake in the approval of the NDA. On information and belief, upon approval of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application, Actavis Elizabeth LLC will be involved in the manufacture,
`
`distribution, and/or marketing of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product.
`
`32.
`
`By letter dated December 22, 2014 (the “December 22 Letter”), and
`
`pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §355(b)(3)(B) and 21 C.F.R. §314.52(c), Actavis LLC notified Plaintiffs
`
`that it had submitted to the FDA the Actavis 505(b)(2) application, seeking approval to engage in
`
`the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product before the
`
`expiration of the ’170 patent and the ’907 patent. The December 22 Letter was received by
`
`Plaintiffs on December 23, 2014.
`
`9
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 10 of 18 PageID: 10
`
`
`
`33.
`
`In its December 22 Letter, Actavis LLC notified Plaintiffs, as part of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application, it had filed certification of the type described in 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(b)(2)(A)(iv) (a “Paragraph IV Certification”) with respect to the ’170 patent and the ’907
`
`patent. On information and belief, Actavis LLC certified that, the ’170 patent and the ’907
`
`patent are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the manufacture, use or sale of
`
`Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product.
`
`34.
`
`The Actavis 505(b)(2) application refers to and relies upon the Sanofi
`
`U.S.’s NDA No. 201023 for JEVTANA®.
`
`35.
`
`In the December 22 Letter, Actavis LLC offered confidential access to
`
`portions of the Actavis 505(b)(2) application on terms and conditions set forth in paragraph VIII
`
`of the December 22 Letter (“Actavis Offer”). Actavis LLC requested that Plaintiffs accept the
`
`Actavis Offer before receiving access to any portion of the Actavis 505(b)(2) application. The
`
`Actavis Offer contained unreasonable restrictions that would apply under a protective order.
`
`36.
`
`Under 21 U.S.C. § 355(c)(3)(D)(i)(III), an “offer of confidential access
`
`shall contain such restrictions . . . on the use and disposition of any information accessed, as
`
`would apply had a protective order been entered for the purpose of protecting trade secrets and
`
`other confidential business information.”
`
`37.
`
`Despite further negotiations, the parties were unable to arrive at
`
`reasonable terms.
`
`38.
`
`Plaintiffs are not aware of any other means of obtaining information
`
`regarding Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product within the 45-day statutory period. Without such
`
`information, Plaintiffs will use the judicial process and the aid of discovery to obtain, under
`
`appropriate judicial safeguards such information as is required to confirm its allegations of
`
`10
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 11 of 18 PageID: 11
`
`
`
`infringement and to present to the Court evidence that Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product falls
`
`within the scope of one or more claims of the ’170 and ’907 patents.
`
`COUNT I
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,847,170
`
`39.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 38 above as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`40.
`
`By submitting the Actavis 505(b)(2) application under 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(b)(2) for the purpose of obtaining approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use or
`
`sale of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product throughout the United States prior to the expiration
`
`of the ’170 patent, Defendants committed an act of infringement of the ’170 patent under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(e)(2). On information and belief, Defendants were aware of the ’170 patent at the
`
`time the Actavis 505(b)(2) application was submitted.
`
`41.
`
`If Defendants commercially make, use, offer to sell, or sell Actavis’s
`
`Proposed Generic Product within the United States, or import Actavis’s Proposed Generic
`
`Product into the United States, or induces or contributes to any such conduct during the term of
`
`the ’170 patent, they would further infringe the ’170 patent under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a), (b),
`
`and/or (c).
`
`42.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed if Defendants are not enjoined from
`
`infringing the ’170 patent. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`43.
`
`Actavis LLC’s certification under 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)(A)(iv) against the
`
`’170 patent was wholly unjustified, and thus this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`11
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 12 of 18 PageID: 12
`
`
`
`forth herein.
`
`COUNT II
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,241,907
`
`44.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 43 above as if fully set
`
`45.
`
`By submitting the Actavis 505(b)(2) application under 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(b)(2) for the purpose of obtaining approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use or
`
`sale of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product throughout the United States prior to the expiration
`
`of the ’907 patent, Defendants committed an act of infringement of the ’907 patent under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(e)(2). On information and belief, Defendants were aware of the ’907 patent at the
`
`time the Actavis 505(b)(2) application was submitted.
`
`46.
`
`If Defendants commercially make, use, offer to sell, or sell Actavis’s
`
`Proposed Generic Product within the United States, or import Actavis’s Proposed Generic
`
`Product into the United States, or induces or contributes to any such conduct during the term of
`
`the ’907 patent, they would further infringe the ’907 patent under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a), (b),
`
`and/or (c).
`
`47.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed if Defendants are not enjoined from
`
`infringing the ’907 patent. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`48.
`
`Actavis LLC’s certification under 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)(A)(iv) against the
`
`’907 patent was wholly unjustified, and thus this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request the following relief:
`
`12
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 13 of 18 PageID: 13
`
`
`
`A.
`
`A judgment that Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the ’170
`
`patent by filing NDA No. 207970 relating to Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product before the
`
`expiration of the ’170 patent;
`
`B.
`
`A judgment that the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale and/or
`
`importation of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product will infringe the ’170 patent;
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`A judgment declaring that the ’170 patent remains valid and enforceable;
`
`A permanent injunction restraining and enjoining Defendants, and their
`
`officers, agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from
`
`engaging in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, or sale within the United States, or
`
`importation into the United States, of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product until the expiration of
`
`the ’170 patent or any later date of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs and/or the ’170 patent are or
`
`become entitled to;
`
`E.
`
`An order that the effective date of any approval of Actavis LLC’s NDA
`
`No. 207970 relating to Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product under Section 505(b)(2) of the
`
`Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)) shall be a date that is not earlier
`
`than the expiration date of the ’170 patent or any later date of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs
`
`and/or the ’170 patent are or become entitled;
`
`F.
`
`A judgment that Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the ’907
`
`patent by filing NDA No. 207970 relating to Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product before the
`
`expiration of the ’907 patent;
`
`G.
`
`A judgment that the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale and/or
`
`importation of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product will infringe the ’907 patent;
`
`H.
`
`A judgment declaring that the ’907 patent remains valid and enforceable;
`
`13
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 14 of 18 PageID: 14
`
`
`
`I.
`
`A permanent injunction restraining and enjoining Defendants, and their
`
`officers, agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from
`
`engaging in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, or sale within the United States, or
`
`importation into the United States, of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product until the expiration of
`
`the ’907 patent or any later date of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs and/or the ’907 patent are or
`
`become entitled to;
`
`J.
`
`An order that the effective date of any approval of Actavis LLC’s NDA
`
`No. 207970 relating to Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product under Section 505(b)(2) of the
`
`Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)) shall be a date that is not earlier
`
`than the expiration date of the ’907 patent or any later date of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs
`
`and/or the ’907 patent are or become entitled;
`
`K.
`
`A declaration that this case is “exceptional” within the meaning of 35
`
`U.S.C. § 285 and an award of reasonable attorney fees, costs, expenses, and disbursements of
`
`this action; and
`
`L.
`
`Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 15 of 18 PageID: 15
`
`
`
`
`
`February 2, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: s/ Jason A. Leonard
`
`
`
`Jason A. Leonard, Esq.
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
`SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, AVENTIS
`PHARMA S.A. and SANOFI
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`William E. Solander, Esq.
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket