`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`William E. Solander, Esq.
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No.: _____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jason A. Leonard, Esq.
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC,
`AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. and SANOFI
`
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC,
`AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. and
`SANOFI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Electronically Filed
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ACTAVIS LLC and
`ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC (hereinafter “Sanofi U.S.”), Aventis Pharma S.A.
`
`(hereinafter “Aventis”) and Sanofi (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) for their Complaint against
`
`defendants Actavis LLC and Actavis Elizabeth LLC (collectively “Defendants”), hereby allege
`
`as follows:
`
`AVENTIS EXHIBIT 2051
`Mylan v. Aventis
`IPR2016-00627
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 2 of 18 PageID: 2
`
`
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Sanofi U.S. is a U.S. subsidiary of Sanofi and is a company
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having commercial headquarters
`
`at 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Aventis is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`
`France, having its principal place of business at 20 avenue Raymond Aron, 92160 Antony,
`
`France.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff Sanofi is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`
`France, having its principal place of business at 54 rue La Boétie, 75008 Paris, France.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff Sanofi is a global research-driven pharmaceutical company that
`
`discovers, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of innovative products to improve
`
`human and animal health.
`
`5.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having principal places of business at 60
`
`Columbia Road, Building B, Morristown, New Jersey 07960 and Morris Corporate Center III,
`
`400 Interspace Parkway, Parsipanny, New Jersey 07054. On information and belief, Actavis
`
`LLC was formerly known as Actavis Inc., a Delaware corporation.
`
`6.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC is a corporation
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of
`
`business at 200 Elmora Avenue, Elizabeth, New Jersey 07202.
`
`7.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC is a wholly-owned
`
`subsidiary of Actavis LLC.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 3 of 18 PageID: 3
`
`
`
`8.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
`
`Actavis, Inc. On information and belief, Actavis, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Nevada, having its principal place of business at Morris Corporate
`
`Center III, 400 Interspace Parkway, Parsipanny, New Jersey 07054.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC assembled and caused to be filed
`
`with the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(b)(2) (Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act), New Drug
`
`Application (“NDA”) No. 207970 (hereinafter “the Actavis 505(b)(2) application”) concerning a
`
`proposed drug product, Cabazitaxel Injection, 10 mg/mL (“Actavis’s Proposed Generic
`
`Product”).
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`10.
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States of America.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1338(a).
`
`11.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Actavis LLC. On information
`
`and belief, Actavis LLC regularly conducts and/or solicits business in the State of New Jersey,
`
`engages in other persistent courses of conduct in the State of New Jersey, and/or derives
`
`substantial revenue from services or things used or consumed in the State of New Jersey. On
`
`information and belief, Actavis LLC, formerly as Actavis Inc., a Delaware corporation,
`
`maintains principal places of business at 60 Columbia Road, Building B, Morristown, New
`
`Jersey 07960 and Morris Corporate Center III, 400 Interspace Parkway, Parsipanny, New Jersey
`
`07054. On information and belief, Actavis LLC, formerly as Actavis Inc., a Delaware
`
`corporation, is registered with the New Jersey Department of Treasury under the business entity
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 4 of 18 PageID: 4
`
`
`
`identification number 0101005391. On information and belief, Actavis LLC, formerly as
`
`Actavis Inc., a Delaware corporation, maintains a corporate agent for service of process at 80
`
`Main Street, 5th Floor, West Orange, New Jersey 07052.
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC has affiliations with the State of
`
`New Jersey that are pervasive, continuous, and systematic. On information and belief, Actavis
`
`LLC engages in direct marketing, distribution, and/or sale of generic pharmaceutical drugs
`
`within the State of New Jersey and to the residents of the State of New Jersey. On information
`
`and belief, Actavis LLC is in the business of manufacturing, marketing, importing and selling
`
`pharmaceutical drug products, including generic drug products. On information and belief,
`
`Actavis LLC directly or through its subsidiaries, affiliates and agents develops, formulates,
`
`manufactures, markets, imports and sells pharmaceutical products, including generic drug
`
`products, which are copies of products invented and developed by innovator pharmaceutical
`
`companies, throughout the United States, including in this Judicial District. On information and
`
`belief, Actavis, Inc. as the parent company and Actavis LLC as the trade name holds an active
`
`wholesale drug license for the State of New Jersey under License No. 5003899.
`
`13.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC has previously submitted to the
`
`jurisdiction of this Court and have availed themselves of the legal protections of the State of New
`
`Jersey, having asserted counterclaims in this jurisdiction, including in the matters of Novartis
`
`Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Actavis LLC. et al., Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-03967
`
`(SDW)(SCM), D.I. 354 at 8, 15-19 (D.N.J. May 16, 2014); and Novartis Pharmaceuticals
`
`Corporation v. Actavis LLC. et al., Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-01028 (SDW)(MCA), D.I. 119 at 9,
`
`15-18 (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2013).
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 5 of 18 PageID: 5
`
`
`
`14.
`
`Actavis LLC is also subject to personal jurisdiction in the State of New
`
`Jersey because, inter alia, Actavis LLC has committed, aided, abetted, contributed to, and/or
`
`participated in the commission of a tortious act of patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(e)(2) that has led and/or will lead to foreseeable harm and injury to Plaintiff Sanofi U.S.,
`
`having commercial headquarters in the State of New Jersey. Actavis LLC sent its December 22,
`
`2014 Paragraph IV Notice Letter to Sanofi U.S.’s commercial headquarters at 55 Corporate
`
`Drive, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807. Plaintiffs’s cause of action arose from Actavis LLC’s
`
`contact with Sanofi U.S. in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Actavis LLC states that it intends to
`
`engage in the commercial manufacture, use, and/or sale of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product
`
`before the expiration of U.S Patent Nos. 5,847,170 (“’170 patent”) and 7,241,907 (“’907 patent”)
`
`throughout the United States, including in this Judicial District.
`
`15.
`
`On information and belief, upon approval of the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application, Actavis LLC and/or its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents will market, sell and/or
`
`distribute Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product throughout the United States, including in this
`
`Judicial District, and will derive substantial revenue therefrom.
`
`16.
`
`On information and belief, upon approval of the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application, Actavis LLC and/or its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents will place Actavis’s
`
`Proposed Generic Product into the stream of commerce with the reasonable expectation or
`
`knowledge and the intent that such product will ultimately be purchased and used by consumers
`
`in this judicial district.
`
`17.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Actavis Elizabeth LLC. On
`
`information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC regularly conducts and/or solicits business in the
`
`State of New Jersey, engages in other persistent courses of conduct in the State of New Jersey,
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 6 of 18 PageID: 6
`
`
`
`and/or derives substantial revenue from services or things used or consumed in the State of New
`
`Jersey. On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC maintains a principal place of
`
`business at 200 Elmora Avenue, Elizabeth, New Jersey 07202. On information and belief,
`
`Actavis Elizabeth LLC is registered with the New Jersey Department of Treasury under the
`
`business entity identification number 0600272818. On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth
`
`LLC, formerly as Actavis Inc., a Delaware corporation, maintains a corporate agent for service
`
`of process at 80 Main Street, 5th Floor, West Orange, New Jersey 07052.
`
`18.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC has affiliations with the
`
`State of New Jersey that are pervasive, continuous, and systematic. On information and belief,
`
`Actavis Elizabeth LLC engages in direct marketing, distribution, and/or sale of generic
`
`pharmaceutical drugs within the State of New Jersey and to the residents of the State of New
`
`Jersey. On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC is in the business of manufacturing,
`
`marketing, importing and selling pharmaceutical drug products, including generic drug products.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC directly or through its subsidiaries, affiliates
`
`and agents develops, formulates, manufactures, markets, imports and sells pharmaceutical
`
`products, including generic drug products, which are copies of products invented and developed
`
`by innovator pharmaceutical companies, throughout the United States, including in this Judicial
`
`District. On information and belief, Actavis, Inc. as the parent company and Actavis Elizabeth
`
`LLC as the trade name holds an active wholesale drug license for the State of New Jersey under
`
`License No. 5003329.
`
`19.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC has previously
`
`submitted to the jurisdiction of this Court and have availed themselves of the legal protections of
`
`the State of New Jersey, having asserted counterclaims in this jurisdiction, including in the
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 7 of 18 PageID: 7
`
`
`
`matters of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC. et al., Civil Action No.
`
`2:13-cv-04507 (CCC)(MF), D.I. 150 at 10, 23-38 (D.N.J. Sep. 3, 2014); Shire LLC et al. v.
`
`Actavis Elizabeth LLC. et al., Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-03781 (SRC)(CLW), D.I. 231 at 5, 40-47
`
`(D.N.J. Jan. 17, 2013); and Depomed, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC. et al., Civil Action No.
`
`3:12-cv-01358 (JAP)(TJB), D.I. 40 at 3, 23-27 (D.N.J. Apr. 13, 2012).
`
`20.
`
`On information and belief, upon approval of the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and/or its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents will market, sell
`
`and/or distribute Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product throughout the United States, including in
`
`this Judicial District, and will derive substantial revenue therefrom.
`
`21.
`
`On information and belief, upon approval of the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and/or its subsidiaries, affiliates or agents will place
`
`Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product into the stream of commerce with the reasonable
`
`expectation or knowledge and the intent that such product will ultimately be purchased and used
`
`by consumers in this judicial district.
`
`22.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court at least pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b),
`
`(c), and/or (d), and 1400(b).
`
`THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`23.
`
`Sanofi U.S. holds approved New Drug Application (“NDA”) No. 201023
`
`for cabazitaxel injection, 60 mg/ 1.5 mL (40 mg/mL), which is prescribed and sold in the United
`
`States under the trademark JEVTANA® KIT (hereinafter “JEVTANA®”). The U.S. Food and
`
`Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved NDA No. 201023 on June 17, 2010. JEVTANA® is
`
`approved for use in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with hormone-
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 8 of 18 PageID: 8
`
`
`
`refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-containing treatment
`
`regimen.
`
`24.
`
`United States Patent No. 5,847,170 (the “’170 patent,” copy attached as
`
`Exhibit A) is entitled “Taxoids, Their Preparation And Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing
`
`Them” and was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`(“USPTO”) on December 8, 1998. The ’170 patent claims, inter alia, cabazitaxel and
`
`pharmaceutical compositions containing cabazitaxel. The ’170 patent is listed in the FDA’s
`
`Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”) for
`
`JEVTANA® (NDA No. 201023).
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`The ’170 patent is owned by Aventis.
`
`United States Patent No. 7,241,907 (the “’907 patent,” copy attached as
`
`Exhibit B) is entitled “Acetone Solvate of Dimethoxy Docetaxel and its Process of Preparation”
`
`and was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)
`
`on July 10, 2007. The ’907 patent claims, inter alia, an acetone solvate of cabazitaxel. The ’907
`
`patent is listed in the FDA’s Orange Book for JEVTANA® (NDA No. 201023).
`
`27.
`
`The ’907 patent is owned by Aventis.
`
`CLAIMS FOR RELIEF -
`
` PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`28.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC submitted the Actavis 505(b)(2)
`
`application to the FDA seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for
`
`sale, sale, and/or importation of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product.
`
`29.
`
`On information and belief, the Actavis 505(b)(2) application seeks FDA
`
`approval of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product for use in combination with prednisone for the
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 9 of 18 PageID: 9
`
`
`
`treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with
`
`a docetaxel-containing treatment regimen.
`
`30.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis LLC actively collaborated with
`
`Actavis Elizabeth LLC participated in and/or directed activities related to the submission of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application and the development of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product, was
`
`actively involved in preparing the NDA, and/or intends to directly benefit from and has a
`
`financial stake in the approval of the NDA. On information and belief, upon approval of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application, Actavis LLC will be involved in the manufacture, distribution,
`
`and/or marketing of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product.
`
`31.
`
`On information and belief, Actavis Elizabeth LLC actively collaborated
`
`with Actavis LLC participated in and/or directed activities related to the submission of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application and the development of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product, was
`
`actively involved in preparing the NDA, and/or intends to directly benefit from and has a
`
`financial stake in the approval of the NDA. On information and belief, upon approval of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application, Actavis Elizabeth LLC will be involved in the manufacture,
`
`distribution, and/or marketing of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product.
`
`32.
`
`By letter dated December 22, 2014 (the “December 22 Letter”), and
`
`pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §355(b)(3)(B) and 21 C.F.R. §314.52(c), Actavis LLC notified Plaintiffs
`
`that it had submitted to the FDA the Actavis 505(b)(2) application, seeking approval to engage in
`
`the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product before the
`
`expiration of the ’170 patent and the ’907 patent. The December 22 Letter was received by
`
`Plaintiffs on December 23, 2014.
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 10 of 18 PageID: 10
`
`
`
`33.
`
`In its December 22 Letter, Actavis LLC notified Plaintiffs, as part of the
`
`Actavis 505(b)(2) application, it had filed certification of the type described in 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(b)(2)(A)(iv) (a “Paragraph IV Certification”) with respect to the ’170 patent and the ’907
`
`patent. On information and belief, Actavis LLC certified that, the ’170 patent and the ’907
`
`patent are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the manufacture, use or sale of
`
`Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product.
`
`34.
`
`The Actavis 505(b)(2) application refers to and relies upon the Sanofi
`
`U.S.’s NDA No. 201023 for JEVTANA®.
`
`35.
`
`In the December 22 Letter, Actavis LLC offered confidential access to
`
`portions of the Actavis 505(b)(2) application on terms and conditions set forth in paragraph VIII
`
`of the December 22 Letter (“Actavis Offer”). Actavis LLC requested that Plaintiffs accept the
`
`Actavis Offer before receiving access to any portion of the Actavis 505(b)(2) application. The
`
`Actavis Offer contained unreasonable restrictions that would apply under a protective order.
`
`36.
`
`Under 21 U.S.C. § 355(c)(3)(D)(i)(III), an “offer of confidential access
`
`shall contain such restrictions . . . on the use and disposition of any information accessed, as
`
`would apply had a protective order been entered for the purpose of protecting trade secrets and
`
`other confidential business information.”
`
`37.
`
`Despite further negotiations, the parties were unable to arrive at
`
`reasonable terms.
`
`38.
`
`Plaintiffs are not aware of any other means of obtaining information
`
`regarding Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product within the 45-day statutory period. Without such
`
`information, Plaintiffs will use the judicial process and the aid of discovery to obtain, under
`
`appropriate judicial safeguards such information as is required to confirm its allegations of
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 11 of 18 PageID: 11
`
`
`
`infringement and to present to the Court evidence that Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product falls
`
`within the scope of one or more claims of the ’170 and ’907 patents.
`
`COUNT I
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,847,170
`
`39.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 38 above as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`40.
`
`By submitting the Actavis 505(b)(2) application under 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(b)(2) for the purpose of obtaining approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use or
`
`sale of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product throughout the United States prior to the expiration
`
`of the ’170 patent, Defendants committed an act of infringement of the ’170 patent under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(e)(2). On information and belief, Defendants were aware of the ’170 patent at the
`
`time the Actavis 505(b)(2) application was submitted.
`
`41.
`
`If Defendants commercially make, use, offer to sell, or sell Actavis’s
`
`Proposed Generic Product within the United States, or import Actavis’s Proposed Generic
`
`Product into the United States, or induces or contributes to any such conduct during the term of
`
`the ’170 patent, they would further infringe the ’170 patent under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a), (b),
`
`and/or (c).
`
`42.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed if Defendants are not enjoined from
`
`infringing the ’170 patent. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`43.
`
`Actavis LLC’s certification under 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)(A)(iv) against the
`
`’170 patent was wholly unjustified, and thus this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 12 of 18 PageID: 12
`
`
`
`forth herein.
`
`COUNT II
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,241,907
`
`44.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 43 above as if fully set
`
`45.
`
`By submitting the Actavis 505(b)(2) application under 21 U.S.C. §
`
`355(b)(2) for the purpose of obtaining approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use or
`
`sale of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product throughout the United States prior to the expiration
`
`of the ’907 patent, Defendants committed an act of infringement of the ’907 patent under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(e)(2). On information and belief, Defendants were aware of the ’907 patent at the
`
`time the Actavis 505(b)(2) application was submitted.
`
`46.
`
`If Defendants commercially make, use, offer to sell, or sell Actavis’s
`
`Proposed Generic Product within the United States, or import Actavis’s Proposed Generic
`
`Product into the United States, or induces or contributes to any such conduct during the term of
`
`the ’907 patent, they would further infringe the ’907 patent under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a), (b),
`
`and/or (c).
`
`47.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed if Defendants are not enjoined from
`
`infringing the ’907 patent. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`48.
`
`Actavis LLC’s certification under 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)(A)(iv) against the
`
`’907 patent was wholly unjustified, and thus this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request the following relief:
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 13 of 18 PageID: 13
`
`
`
`A.
`
`A judgment that Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the ’170
`
`patent by filing NDA No. 207970 relating to Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product before the
`
`expiration of the ’170 patent;
`
`B.
`
`A judgment that the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale and/or
`
`importation of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product will infringe the ’170 patent;
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`A judgment declaring that the ’170 patent remains valid and enforceable;
`
`A permanent injunction restraining and enjoining Defendants, and their
`
`officers, agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from
`
`engaging in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, or sale within the United States, or
`
`importation into the United States, of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product until the expiration of
`
`the ’170 patent or any later date of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs and/or the ’170 patent are or
`
`become entitled to;
`
`E.
`
`An order that the effective date of any approval of Actavis LLC’s NDA
`
`No. 207970 relating to Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product under Section 505(b)(2) of the
`
`Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)) shall be a date that is not earlier
`
`than the expiration date of the ’170 patent or any later date of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs
`
`and/or the ’170 patent are or become entitled;
`
`F.
`
`A judgment that Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the ’907
`
`patent by filing NDA No. 207970 relating to Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product before the
`
`expiration of the ’907 patent;
`
`G.
`
`A judgment that the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale and/or
`
`importation of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product will infringe the ’907 patent;
`
`H.
`
`A judgment declaring that the ’907 patent remains valid and enforceable;
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 14 of 18 PageID: 14
`
`
`
`I.
`
`A permanent injunction restraining and enjoining Defendants, and their
`
`officers, agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from
`
`engaging in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, or sale within the United States, or
`
`importation into the United States, of Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product until the expiration of
`
`the ’907 patent or any later date of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs and/or the ’907 patent are or
`
`become entitled to;
`
`J.
`
`An order that the effective date of any approval of Actavis LLC’s NDA
`
`No. 207970 relating to Actavis’s Proposed Generic Product under Section 505(b)(2) of the
`
`Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)) shall be a date that is not earlier
`
`than the expiration date of the ’907 patent or any later date of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs
`
`and/or the ’907 patent are or become entitled;
`
`K.
`
`A declaration that this case is “exceptional” within the meaning of 35
`
`U.S.C. § 285 and an award of reasonable attorney fees, costs, expenses, and disbursements of
`
`this action; and
`
`L.
`
`Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-00776-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 02/02/15 Page 15 of 18 PageID: 15
`
`
`
`
`
`February 2, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: s/ Jason A. Leonard
`
`
`
`Jason A. Leonard, Esq.
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
`SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, AVENTIS
`PHARMA S.A. and SANOFI
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`William E. Solander, Esq.
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`(212) 218-2100
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15