throbber
MAbs.
`v. 2, no. 1 (Jan—Feb 2010)
`General Collection
`W1 MA144C
`2010-06-16 07:05:54
`
`V°'Ume 2 ° |ssue1 - JanuaryIFebruary 2010
`w<w~«w-
`‘«Vw4v1'r|\'1|‘|l'vl um .-... ..—..- . .1.........
`"*"-~«~-s~wm.«..»m.».¢...‘..........».,..-wa-«»»»~...w..1 ....a..m..—..mW--1;. mm.~1V"‘1‘\
`
`Editor in-Chief
`_
`.
`Janice M. Relchert
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`§_ A_:;_
`§ NATIONAL
`LIBRARY or
`umouu lvtnlnllu or uvutl
`E MEDICINE
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 1/11
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 1/11
`
`

`

`
`
`About the cover. The cover illustra-
`arrangt'e<'>:eSrl‘1tow:a sketch of possible
`Single Ch .5 o oligomeric forms of
`forms 3”‘ '95. Higher molecular
`are found in size exclusion
`chromatograms of an |gG variant
`thVe"':e‘;l/lelifiht chain connected to
`linker It car): beam by a 34 amino acid
`~
`speculated that these
`forms result from a crossover
`assembll’ Process similar to diabody
`Or diFabody formation. For
`additional information see
`
`Schirrmann et al., pp. 73-6,
`
`VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1
`JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2010
`
`Eniioit-iN—Ciiiiai:
`JANICE M. RE|CllliR'I‘
`
`
`
`L”1'_"“_"] EDITORIAL
`1
`mAb therapeutic products and risk management
`Janice M Ri’:‘lCl’l£‘-ll.
`
`O MINI-REVIEW
`3
`Canakinumab
`Eugen Dliimolea
`
`14
`
`REVIEW
`Evolution of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapeut
`E‘/o§}s>lii'i C)i'la;/oglu and l auruii P Aiidoly
`
`ics in oncology
`
`1 REPORTS
`20
`A dua|—targeting PDGFRB/VEGF-A molecule assembled from stable antibody fragments
`demonstrates anti-angiogenic activity in vitro and in vivo
`Rol.‘i€=iT l/iabry, Debra Ci Gilbrsitsoii, /xniaiida liaiik, 'li,iyeii ‘/ii, Dai'i Ardourel, (_ wig ()5i,;md¢.,'
`Brenda Siei/ei"i_<., Siisari Jiilieri, Secil lrarike, Bieiit Mi’;‘(‘| i-gin, lei ll lll:'3l Brody, Scoii Prcgngill‘
`l’i()l)c‘=r1 llcsl-.’)r, ( iiidy Yigii,
`l"lamarjl iei, lvlegaiil aniry, Aiiitia Wolf, Tom lfii_il<.<>wr~,l<i,
`Nels ll
`Monica /\i ldi:>r<.oii»l~la|ey, Keiiiicili lligiscl, Oi l’ai‘i, llaiik l iiiiikliri, l’<‘-iiiiy ll’iorn,r;i<,oii, Mike D(_)(_ld','
`Sara Ui'ideiw::iod, S<oii Pei-erson, Pallavui V 3|‘/£)l’\lJlIltil zll id Marl. ‘,,i‘iav:>ly
`
`35
`
`42
`
`53
`
`n of the CD4*CD25*Foxp3‘ T regulatory cells
`Differential effects of IL-2 and IL-21 on expansioted antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity
`with redundant roles in natural killer cell media
`in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
`l>i_iili:>i‘ie llr)./z;iwi,l«i, ‘fi/z‘Iyii.rj= Kii ii:l‘.vr>ili‘l
`l‘yi‘i (,lie=ii-73/,
`/iiiiria Ciovvda, /‘islia Ramai iui iiii, Caro
`Jolin ( Byrd illifl l\li"1l_0lE}l£'Il”I l\/llJIlil.l',<llTiy
`Amy l elirriari,
`David l€jiJOUl£l,
`l~/iicliael i’aligii,iri,
`
`Cold denaturation of monoclonal antibodies
`Kristi L Lazar, Thomas W. Paiapoff and ‘i/ikas K ‘sl’iaini«;i
`
`Neutralizing epitopes of the SARS-CoV S-protein cluster independent of repertoire, antigen
`structure or mAb technology
`,|l"IIiI Waiig, Fiaiicis A Pli_mim.ui,
`Jody D. Berry, Kevin Hay, James M. Rini, li-/leng Yu, l
`Cindi R. Corbett and Anton /\.r'idoi“iov
`
`1 BRIEF REPORTS
`
`Target mediated dispo
`Application in the detection 0
`Slivveta R Uiva and Jo?/;=p|‘i P Balthazar
`
`sition ofT84.66, a monoclonal anti—CEA antibody:
`fcolorectal cancer xenografts
`
`67
`
`73
`
`s of single chain immunoglobulin (sc|gG)
`Oligomeric form
`l\/ienzel, l\/iirilmel l'lLl3l,
`l{?3L|’ a Prilop, 'l l ioinas Jostorl
`Thomas Schirrm.:—ii"in, Cliristian
`and S1&‘I'ai‘i Di.iliel
`
`O POINT OF VIEW
`77
`Antibody fragments: Hope and hype
`/\aroi'iL Nelson
`
`This material was csopiesj
`at the N LM a rid may be
`Subject LIE {in-pyright‘ Laws
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 2/11
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 2/11
`
`

`

`L‘::‘::] EDITOR’S CORNER
`84
`Antibodies to watch in 2010
`Jamie M Rev h-art
`
`Note of appreciation to reviewers
`Jamie M F’.E‘i(i’IE*rl,
`
`Upcoming meetings
`Jarur M R=‘wCrwrr
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 3/11
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 3/11
`
`

`

`Print ISSN: 1942-()862;On|ine ISSN: 19420870
`
`EDITORIAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
`Our Editorial Policies and guidelines for submitting manuscripts may be found here:
`http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/mabs/guidelines
`
`PRESUBMISSION INQUIRIES
`Presubmission inquires should be addressed to Janice M. Reichert, Editor—in-Chief,
`janice.reichert@|andesbioscience.com.
`
`An other inquiries should be directed to Nicole Todd, Managing Editor, nico|e@|andesbioscience.com.
`SUBMISSION OF MANUSCRIPTS
`Manuscripts should be submitted onlinez http://mabs.msubmit.net
`
`COPYRIGHT AND COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE CENTER
`
`The Copyright Revision Act (PL 94553), which became effective January 1, 1978, states that the copyright
`of a work is vested in the author from the moment of creation. Therefore, all authors who wish to publish
`in mAbs must formally transfer copyright to the proprietor of the journal, Landes Bioscience. It is understood
`by this transfer that the authors relinquish all exclusive rights of copyright ownership, including the
`rights of reproduction, derivation, distribution, sale and display.
`
`Authors who prepared their articles as part of their official duties as employees of the US Federal Government
`are not required to transfer copyright to Landes Bioscience, since these articles are considered to
`be in the public domain. However, it is necessary for these authors to sign the appropriate section of the
`transfer form. In the case of articles supported by federal grants or contracts, copyright transfer to Landes
`Bioscience is required. The federal government may retain a nonexclusive license to publish or republish
`such material.
`
`Printed on acid-free paper effective with Volume 1, Issue 1, 2009.
`
`EDITORIAL OFFICE
`I002 West Avenue, 2"‘ Floor
`Austin. Texas 7870l USA
`5l2.637.6050 phone
`5|2.637.6079 fax
`
`Journal Publications Director
`Kimberly Mitchell
`
`Art Direction/Production Director
`Kathryn Sauceda
`kat@|andesbioscience.com
`
`Managing Editor
`Nicole Todd
`
`nicole@|andesbioscience.com
`
`Journal Production Assistant
`Katie Lents
`katie@landesbioscience.com
`
`This material was csnpiecl
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 4/11
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 4/11
`
`

`

`
`./ill’) l.«')l'l{l{"-r i2'l')’,4,l-.’*li(,v'
`riir—-Jr. j’. l.
`r‘'/ 9.1: lriiiii.ri"y'l~lriiiai_v ./l)l’7,'
`L
`
`POINT OF VIEW
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Antibody fragments
`
`Hope and hype
`
`Aaron L. Nelson
`
`Tufts University School ofMedicinc; Boston, MA USA
`
`he antibody molecule is modular and
`separate domains can be extracted
`through biochemical or genetic means.
`It is clear from review of the literature
`
`safety and efficacy of antibody products.
`It is tempting to further speculate that the
`properties of designed antibodies could
`confer additional benefits for bionianufac—
`
`that a wave of novel, antigen—specific
`molecular forms may soon enter clini—
`cal evaluation. This report examines the
`developmental histories of therapeutics
`derived from antigen-specific fragments
`of antibodies produced by recombinant
`processes. Three general
`types of frag-
`ments were observed, antigen—binding
`fragments (Fab), single chain variable
`fragments (scFv) and “third generation”
`(3G), each representing a successive wave
`of antibody fragment
`technology.
`In
`parallel, drug developers have explored
`inulti—specificity and conjugation with
`exogenous
`functional moieties
`in all
`three fragment types. Despite high hopes
`and an active pipeline, enthusiasm for
`differentiating performance of fragments
`should, perhaps, be tempered as there are
`yet few data that suggest these molecules
`have distinct clinical properties due only
`to their size.
`
`Introduction
`
`long
`have
`designers
`drug
`Antibody
`h
`othesized that the modular nature of
`VP
`
`iminunoglobulins could be exploited to
`engineer “customized” therapeutics, with
`pharinacologic properties optimized for
`specific applications. Thus, half—life and
`distribution, valency, affinity and avid-
`ity,
`tissue penetration and bioactivities
`could each be controlled b
`selection of
`Y
`
`appropriate molecular domains or defined
`genetic
`features,
`thereby theoretically
`allowing developers control over both
`
`This material W‘aS—Efl~|3lErd
`at: the N LM a rird may be
`Eu bjecglfifio-py‘right Laws
`
`turing, such as improved purity, quality
`and quantity of goods, and homogene—
`ity of molecular species produced. This
`is a remarkable vision, and one might be
`tempted to see the beginnings ofthis revo-
`lution in antibody fragment products such
`the marketed therapeutic certolizumab
`pegol (Cimzia).
`focuses on therapeutics
`This report
`derived from antigen-specific fragments
`of antibodies produced by recombinant
`processes of any derivation and discusses
`5/i ofthese molecules that entered clinical
`
`study sponsored by a commercial firm, as
`well as candidates in preclinical develop-
`ment. Fusion proteins such as etanerccpt
`(Enbrel), which is composed ofthe ligand
`binding portion of TNFOL receptor fused
`to an antibody Fc domain, were therefore
`excluded. Due to the extensive literature
`
`describing the technologies and specific
`antibody drug candidates, only selected
`references are provided.
`Three technologies——antigen—binding
`fragments (Fab), single chain variable frag-
`ments (scFv), and “third generation" (SG)
`moleciiles——represent
`successive waves
`of antibody fragment
`technologies (Fig.
`1). Fabs are clearly the most thoroughly
`explored; knowledge and experience was
`generated during the development ofthree
`US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
`approved therapeutics (Table 1), six agents
`in active clinical development, and 20 dis-
`continued programs, which collectively
`account for 49% of 54 identified antibody
`fragments that entered the commercial
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 5/11
`
`77
`
`Key words: atitibody fragments, scFv,
`Fab, technology developtneiit, aiitibody—
`drug conjugate
`Submitted: 11/10/09
`
`Accepted: 11/27/09
`
`Previously published online:
`www.landesbioscience.coin /journals/
`mabs/article/10786
`
`Correspondence to: Aaron L. Nelson;
`Email: aaron.lowell.nelson@gmarl.com
`
`www.|andesbioscience.com
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 5/11
`
`

`

`
`
`Fv
`
`-1
`(fd + LC) i_
`
` Fab
`
`1 CH1
`
`CL1
`
`VHl-l/ VH ;
`
`ypes. Depiction of a full size antibody and various antibody fragment
`j types CH constant heavy chain; CL, constant light chain: |gG. immunoglobulin; Fab, antigen bind-
`. mg fragment; SCFV, single chain variable fragment, VH, variable heavy chain; l/L, variablelight chain.
`
`j I University of Braunschweig. Figure used with permission.
`
`bispecific and multimeric molecules will
`expand, creating additional opportunities
`for clinical benefit. Given the coming diver-
`sification of fragment types, it is possible
`that antibody fragments, or modular ther-
`apeutics incorporating antibody domains,
`with efficacy and safety profiles superior
`to full-sized mAbs will be approved in the
`coming decade. Alternatively, fragments,
`as a class, may never empirically out—per—
`form full—si7.ed mAbs generally, but drug
`developers and clinicians might
`identify
`select applications for which fragment-
`derived molecules have unique utility.
`
`Pros and Cons
`
`in
`Fragmentation of antibodies results
`altered physiochemical features of these
`therapeutic molecules. For instance,
`the
`smaller size of fragments permits penetra-
`tion into tissues inaccessible to full-size
`
`mAbs.5"‘ As previously noted, antibody
`fragments may prove easier and less costly
`to manufacture due to the lack ofglycosy—
`lation and relatively small size, which per-
`mits use ofprokaryotic expression systems.
`However, fragments lack the Fc domain
`that serves to both stabilize full—size anti-
`
`bodies and allow FcR—mediated recycling.
`As a consequence, fragments are rapidly
`degraded in humans and have short cir-
`culating half—lives.5 Several strategies have
`been developed to extend the half—life of
`fragments, including conjugation to pro-
`teins such as albumin“ and l’EGylation,7
`which was applied to the FDA approved
`anti-TNFOL Fab,
`certolizumab
`pegol.
`However, biomanufacturing advantages
`of fragment production may be lost
`if
`l’EGylation is required because the pro-
`cess can prove expensive and technically
`challenging.
`Lack ofan Fc domain and the absence
`
`of in vivo processes that select against
`B cell production of unstable antibody
`species can increase the risk of aggrega-
`tion during production or purification of
`antibody fragments, which in turn might
`increase the possibility of iinmunogenic—
`ity in patients. The lack of an Fc domain
`has additional consequences because frag-
`ments can effect therapeutic action only
`by binding either ligand or receptor; they
`do not
`induce Fc—n1ediated
`functions
`
`\
`
`clinical pipeline.‘ scFvs are a less mature,
`but significantly progressed set of tech-
`nologies, with multiple agents in Phase
`3 testing and a growing diversity of mar.
`phologies. The antibody fragment pipeline
`is expanding, with 10 scFvs accounting
`for 40% of the active clinical pipeline,
`and many in preclinical research.‘ Least
`mature are the “3C}” fragment technolo-
`gies, including single domain and “minia-
`turized" antibody therapeutic molecules.
`These classes have few representatives in
`clinical study (6%), but account
`for at
`least lialfofthe identified preclinical pipe-
`line.‘ Moreover, strong interest in explor-
`ing multi-specificity and conjugation with
`exogenous functional moieties continues.
`Therefore, it is clear that a wave of novel,
`antigen-specific molecular forms is now
`entering clinical evaluation; various trends
`in their development are considered here.
`Enthusiasm for differentiating per-
`formance of fragments should, perhaps,
`be tempered as there are yet
`few data
`that suggest
`these molecules have dis-
`tinct clinical properties due only to their
`size. Of the three fragments approved by
`the FDA, only certolizuinab pegol has
`competitors for the same clinical
`indica-
`tions (Crolm disease, rheumatoid arthri-
`tis, ankylosing spondilitis). Although no
`head-to—head comparative trials have yet
`
`78
`
`been conducted, certolizumab pegol offers
`no clear advantages with regard to efficacy
`or safety over infliximab, adalimumab or
`golimumab? Perhaps the most direct, con-
`clusive data regarding comparison of an
`antibody fragment with a full—length form
`will come from trials directly comparing
`ranibizumab (Lucentis) with bevaci7.umab
`
`(Avastin) for the treatment of age-related
`macular
`degeneration. Concern
`over
`the high price of ranibizumab and the
`molecular similarity between the antigen-
`binding domains of both molecules have
`been used to justify several
`trials (clini-
`caltrials.gov identifiers NCT00593450,
`NCT00710229), despite the fact that the
`FDA has not approved bevacizumab for
`this indication. Only in biomanufactui'—
`ing may there be significant differences
`between fragments and full-sized mol-
`ecules, e.g., the smaller size of fragments
`may permit cheaper, faster production in
`microbial systems, although tests of this
`contention have not yet been described in
`the public literature.
`Nonetheless, drug developers continue
`to tinker with an increasingly diverse series
`ofmolecular modules, permitting the cre-
`ation of ever smaller highly—specific bind-
`ing domains and the selection of diverse
`functional modifications.
`In addition,
`it
`
`is likely that clinical evaluation of many
`
`such as antibody-dependent cell-inediated
`
`This i'l'lat‘.E-l'lanl1§§‘g§-°EiEl~|:}lEtd
`at the N LM 5! I'l- may be
`Subject US {lo-piyright Laws
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 6/‘I1
`Volume 2 issue 1
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 6/11
`
`

`

`
`
`Table 1. Monoclonal antibody fragments approved in the US
`Generic (brand) names
`Description
`Anti—GPllb/Illa chimeric Fab
`
`abciximab (Reopro)
`
`ranibizumab (Lucentis)
`
`certolizumab pegol (Cimzia)
`
`Anti-VEGF-A humanized Fab
`
`Anti-TNFalpha pegylated
`humanized Fab
`
`Indication of 1“ approval
`
`Clot prevention in angioplasty
`Macular degeneration
`Moderate to severe Crohn
`disease
`
`Date of 1" approval
`l2/22/94
`
`06/30/06
`
`04/22/08
`
`Sponsor
`Centocor
`
`Genentech
`
`UCB
`
`Fab, antigen binding fragment; GP, glycoprotein; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
`
`complement-dependent
`or
`cytotoxicty
`cytotoxicity unless specifically conjugated
`to an effector moiety.“
`
`Overview of Fragments in
`Development
`
`As part of ongoing studies of therapeutic
`antibody development, Tufts Center for
`the Study of Drug Development recently
`reviewed the progress of 54 fragment
`the1'apeutic candidates in clinical devel-
`opment and 38 molecules in preclinical
`research described in public literature.‘
`Fragments have,
`to date,
`collectively
`performed similarly to their
`full—si7.ed
`brethren in the clinic;
`the two types
`of molecules demonstrate comparable
`cumulative success rates and both must
`
`overcome a primary barrier to progression
`at Phase 2 (Fig. 2). Moreover, most frag-
`ments have been developed with the intent
`to treat neoplastic and immunological
`conditions, matching broader trends also
`observed in full—si7.ed mAbs. A high frac-
`tion of fragments in clinical development
`were conjugated to functional moieties,
`an unsurprising finding given that most
`fragments lack Fc effector domains. That
`said, a subtle, but notable, shift in thera-
`
`peutic indications selected for fragment
`development was
`identified,
`indicating
`that drug developers may be increasingly
`interested in immunomodulation, rather
`
`than antineoplastic activities. Finally,
`successive waves of fragment therapeutics
`that entered clinical development were
`observed, with Fabs followed by second
`generation scFvs, and the initiai represen-
`tatives of a third generation of fragment
`therapeutics,
`including “rniniaturized”
`mAbs and single antigen-binding domain
`molecules.
`
`Although Fabs are discussed, the focus
`ofthis article is on second— and third-gen-
`eration fragment
`technologies,
`including
`scFvs, “miniaturi'/.ed” and single domain
`
`antibodies, as these approaches are the cur-
`rent focus of the industry. Development
`trends that are woven through diverse
`fragment classes, such as the advent of
`multi-specific and functionally conjugated
`molecules, are additionally considered,
`and highlighted molecules therefore may
`be discussed in multiple sections.
`
`Antigen Binding Fragments
`
`Fab agents are the oldest class of motto-
`clonal antibody (tnAb)
`fragment
`thera-
`peutics, demonstrated by the fact that all
`eight fragment therapeutics that entered
`clinical development before 1995 were
`Fabs.‘ This class of fragments is also argu-
`ably the most successful, accounting for
`/19% of fragments to have entered clini-
`cal development and three FDA approved
`clinical applications. Abciximab (ReoPro,
`Centocor/_lohnson 8: Johnson) is a Fab
`fragtnent of a chimeric antibody against
`platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, approved in
`1994 as an adjunct to prevent thrombosis
`during to coronary artery catheteri7.ation
`for ST-elevation myocardial
`infarction.
`Ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech) is a
`humanized Fab directed against vascular
`endothelial growth factor A, approved
`in 2006 as a treatment for neovascular
`
`(wet) age-related macular degeneration.
`Certoliztnnab pegol
`(UCB)
`is a peg)!-
`lated anti-TNFOL Fab approved in 2008
`for treatment of Crohn disease. Beyond
`these monoclonal
`fragments, polyclonal
`Fab agents are also marketed,
`including
`CroFab, DigiFab and Digibind. The cor-
`ollary to successful experiences with Fab
`technology is the large number of failed
`projects. Failure and success alike are
`learning experiences, and provide knowl-
`edge that can be applied in pharmacology,
`regulatory concerns and biomanufactur-
`ing, which may explain why numerous
`companies continue to test Fabs in clinical
`development.
`
`Single-Chain Variable Fragments
`
`Single-chain variable fragments (scFvs)
`are recombinant molecules in which the
`
`variable regions oflighr and heavy imrnu—
`noglobulin chains encoding antigen-bind-
`ing domains are engineered into a single
`polypeptide. Generally,
`the VH and VL
`sequences are joined by a flexible linker
`sequence, and a series of variants are gen-
`erated for optitnizing binding affinity and
`stability." Molecular engineers have con-
`tinued to diversity the fundamental scFv
`molecule, resulting in paired scFvs that
`bind to one another through complemen-
`tary regions to form bivalent
`tnolecules
`(diabodies), complementary scFvs them-
`selves produced as a single chain (tandem
`scFvs or tascFvs), and bispecific tandem
`scFvs (bis—scFvs), among others. Nearly
`as many scFv therapeutics have entered
`clinical development
`(19) as Fabs (23),
`accounting for 40% of clinically evalu-
`ated fragments.‘ These candidates include
`12 active and nine discontinued agents,
`most in early development, with all hav-
`ing entered clinical study after 1995. \X/ith
`at least 11 scFvs publicly described in pre-
`clinical research,‘ interest in this technol-
`
`ogy remains strong. From these data, scFvs
`appear to be a promising technology that,
`while
`yet unproven, will have many
`opportunities to achieve clinical success in
`the future.
`
`Five monovalent, monospecihc scFvs
`were developed, only two ofwhich remain
`active projects
`in
`early development.
`ESBA-105 is an anti—TNFOL scFv in Phase
`
`1 development by ESBATech for ophthal-
`mic indications. Efungumab (Mycograb),
`an scFv that binds to the heat shock pro-
`tein of Crznz/it//1 /z//Iiams,
`is in Phase 2
`
`development by NeuTec, a wholly-owned
`subsidiary of Novartis. Novomab-G2 is
`an anti-cancer scFv discontinued in Phase
`
`2 by Viventia after the company decided
`to pursue a formulation that
`included a
`
`www.|andesbioscience.com
`
`This material wastcsn-pied
`at the Nrlllfilgitcl may be
`in bject LIE {fie-pyright Laws
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 77/911
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 7/11
`
`

`

`
`
`cytoxic conjugate. Pexelizumab is an anti-
`C5 scFv discontinued in 2007 by Alexion
`Pharmaceuticals and Proctor 8C Gamble
`
`after primary outcomes were not met in
`two Phase 3 trials. Aurograb, an scFv that
`binds to a surface protein of metliicilliti-
`resistant Stzzp/1}//ococczts /zurezts, was discori-
`tinued in 2008 after Phase 2 trials failed to
`
`show efficacy.
`Diabodies, composed of iioii—covalent
`dimers ofscFvs, are bivalent aritigen—bind-
`irig molecules. Few, ifaiiy, diabodies have
`entered clinical development, and, to my
`knowledge, none have commercial spon-
`sorship. An iodine-123-labeled diabody
`versioti ofthe anti-CEA chimeric antibody
`cT8/L66 is being evaluated for pre-surgical
`iminunoscintigraphic detection of col-
`orectal cancer in a study sponsored by the
`Beckman Research Institute ofthe City of
`Hope (Clinicaltrials.gov NCTOO647153).
`Using molecular genetics,
`two scFvs
`can be engineered in tandem itito a single
`polypeptide, separated by a linker domain,
`called a “tandem scFv” (tascFv). TascFvs
`
`have been found to be poorly soluble“’
`and require refolding“ when produced in
`bacteria, or they may be manufactured in
`mammalian cell culture systems, which
`avoids refolding requirements but may
`result in poor yields.” Construction of a
`rascFv with genes for two different scFvs
`yields a “bispecific sirigle-chain variable
`fragments” (bis-scFvs). Only two tascFvs
`have been developed clinically by C()II1—
`mercial firms; both are bispecific agents
`in active early phase development by
`Microniet for oncologic indications, and
`are described as “Bispecific T-cell Engagers
`(l3iTE)”." Blinatumomab is
`an ariti-
`CD19/anti-CD3 bispecific
`tascFv that
`poteritiates T-cell responses to B—cell non-
`Hodgkin lyniplioma in Phase 2.” MT110
`is an anti-EP-CAM/anti-CD3 bispecific
`tascFv that poteiitiates T-cell responses to
`solid tumors in Phase 1.” Bispecific, tet-
`ravalent “TandAbs” are being researched
`by Affinied, but none have yet reached
`clinical development.
`
`Third Generation Molecules
`
`Another approach to reducing the size of
`antigen—binding immuiioglobuliii-derived
`recombinant proteins has been to “min-
`iaturize” full—si7.ed mAbs by removing
`
`domains deemed iiori-essential for func-
`tion."’ Miniaturized mAbs were included
`
`in the “3G” fragment category due to the
`relatively recent advent of this approach,
`in contrast to scFvs, which were described
`
`as early as 1988. Only a handful of“min-
`iaturized” antibodies have entered clinical
`
`development.
`Among the best examples ofmAb min-
`iaturization are the small modular immu-
`
`nopharmaceuticals (SMIPS) from Triibioii
`Pharmaceuticals. These molecules, which
`can be motiovaleiit or bivalent, are recom—
`
`binant siiigle-cliain molecules containing
`one VL, one V” antigen-binding domain,
`and one or
`two
`constant
`“effector”
`
`domains, all connected by linker domains.
`Presumably, such a molecule might offer
`the advantages ofincreased tissue or tumor
`penetration claimed by fragments while
`retaining the immune effector functions
`conferred by constant domains. At
`least
`three “miniaturized” SMIPs have entered
`
`clinical development. TRU-015, an anti-
`CD20 SMIP developed in collaboration
`with \X/yeth, is the most advanced project,
`having progressed to Phase 2 for rheurna-
`toid arthritis (RA). Earlier attempts in
`systemic lupus erythrernatosus (SLE) and
`B cell lymphomas were ultimately discon-
`tinued. Trubion and Facet Biotechnology
`are collaborating in the development of
`TRU-016, an anti-CD37 SMIP, for the
`
`treatment ofCLL and other lymphoid neo-
`plasias, a project that has reached Phase 2.
`Wyetli has licensed the anti-CD20 SMIP
`SBI-087 for the treatment ofautoimmuiie
`
`diseases, including RA, SLE and possibly
`multiple sclerosis, although these projects
`remain in the earliest stages of clinical
`testing.
`
`Genmab is researching application of
`their “Unibody" technology,
`in which
`the hinge region has been removed from
`IgG4 molecules.
`\X/hile IgG4 molecules
`are unstable and can exchange light-lieavy
`chain heterodimers with one another,
`
`deletion of the hinge region prevents
`heavy ehaiii—heavy chain pairing entirely,
`leaving highly specific monovalent light/
`heavy heterodimers, while retaining the
`Fc region to ensure stability and half-life
`in vivo. This configuration may minimi7.e
`the risk ofirnmurie activation or oiicogeiiic
`growth, as lgG4 interacts poorly with FcRs
`and monovalent unibodies fail to promote
`
`80
`
`‘.\
`
`This material ijéxabstee-pied
`at: the N Llvl a fill méiy‘ be
`Eu bjeet LIE {lo-pyright Laws
`
`intracellular signaling complex formation.
`These c()titentions are, however,
`largely
`supported by laboratory, rather than clini-
`cal, evidence. Biotecnol is also developing
`a “miniaturized" niAb, CAB051, which is
`
`a “compacted” 100 kDa anti-HER2 anti—
`body in preclinical research.
`Recombinant therapeutics composed of
`single antigen—binding domains have also
`been developed, although they currently
`account for only 4% of the clinical pipe-
`line.‘ These molecules are extremely small,
`with molecular weights approximately
`one-tenth of those observed for full—si7.ed
`
`mAbs. Arana and Domantis engineer
`molecules composed of antigen—binding
`domains of human immuiioglobulin light
`or heavy chains, although only Arana has
`a candidate in clinical testing, ART-621,
`an anti-TNPOL molecule in Phase 2 study
`for the treatment of psoriasis and rheu-
`matoid arthritis. Ablynx produces “nano-
`bodies” derived from the antigen—binding
`variable heavy chain regions (Vmris) of
`heavy chain antibodies found in camels
`and llamas, which lack light chains.“’ Two
`Ablynx anti-von \X/illebraiid Factor nano-
`bodies have advanced to clinical develop-
`ment,
`including ALX-0081,
`in Phase 2
`development as an intravenous therapy to
`prevent thrombosis in patients utidergo-
`ing percutaiieous coronary intervention
`for acute coronary syndrome, and ALX-
`0681, a Phase 1 molecule for subcutaneous
`
`administration intended for both patients
`with acute coronary syndrome and throm-
`botic thrombocytopenic purpura.
`In addition, at
`least 16 domain inol-
`
`ecules are being researched in preclini-
`cal studies, accounting for nearly half of
`the identified preclinical
`research pipe-
`line, with Ablynx responsible for 5 and
`Domantis responsible for the remaining
`11 candidate. Domantis, a wholly—owned
`subsidiary ofGlaxoSmithKline since 2007,
`produces single-doinain molecules based
`on human iriirnunoglobulin sequences,
`which may or may prove advantageous in
`the clitiic.
`These data are consistent with the rela-
`
`tive novelty ofindividual antibody domain
`molecules, and demonstrate how little is
`
`known about the clinical efficacy ofagents
`derived from these binding domains,
`despite encouraging pre-cliiiical research
`and great commercial interest.
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 8/11
`Volume 2 Issue 1
`
`LILLY EX. 1040 - 8/11
`
`

`

`
`
`Multi-Specificity
`
`Although multi-specific molecules were
`described in the previous sections,
`this
`approach is sufficiently important to war-
`rant separate, parallel consideration when
`evaluating trends in the development of
`antibody fragment therapeutics.
`Natural antibodies express two identical
`antigen—binding domains, and are therefore
`mono-specific, but bivalent.
`In contrast,
`bispecific molecules possess two different
`antigen-l)inding domains, each with differ-
`ent target specificity. Bispecific antibodies
`were initially described in the mid 1980s,
`and were generated by the fusion of two
`antibody-producing cells, each with dis-
`tinct specificity.” These “quadromas” pro-
`duced multiple molecular species, as the
`two distinct light chains and two distinct
`heavy chains were free to recombine in
`the quadromas in multiple configurations.
`Since these early efforts, bispecific Fabs,
`scFvs and full—si7.e mAbs have been gener-
`ated and tested using a variety of technolo-
`gies. Six bispecific fragments have entered
`development, including four discontinued
`bispecific Fabs, three of which were from
`Medarex, and two bispecific tascFvs in
`active development by Microtnet. At least
`11
`bispecific fragments
`therapeutics in
`preclinical
`research have been described
`in public documents, including two Fabs
`from Imrnunomedics, five scFvs including
`four from Afhrned and one from Targa, as
`well as four bispecific human “domain”
`antibodies from Domantis. Nine of those
`
`fragments are intended for development
`in oncologic indications, and the remain-
`ing two for immunological disorders. The
`Imtnunomedic compounds are each tri-
`meric, with two arms specific for one tar-
`get, and a third arm specific to a second
`target. These molecules function for the
`most part by potentiating B cell, T cell or
`natural killer cell responses to tumor cells.
`Although not clearly an antibody frag-
`ment, Trion Pharma l1as sought to develop
`“trispecific” molecules by expressing bispe-
`cific antibodies with two distinct Fabs and
`
`an FC demonstrating highly potent mac-
`rophage activation properties. This was
`first described fora mouse lgG2a anti-Ep-
`CAM,
`rat
`lgG2b anti-CD3 quadroma,
`called BiUll.'“ The authors propose that
`BiUll permits the co-localization oftumor
`
`cells expressing Ep-CAM, T cells express-
`ing CD3, and macrophages expressing
`FCYRI, potentiating the costimulatory and
`anti-tumor functions ofthe immune cells.
`
`Trion has three trispecific full-let1gtl1 mAbs
`that have entered clinical development,
`including catumaxomab (Removab), an
`anti-EpCAM rat-human hybrid molecule
`approved in the EU, and in Phase 3 study
`in the US, for malignant ascites.
`
`Conjugation
`
`the conjuga-
`Similar to tnulti-specificity,
`tion ofexogenous effector moieties to anti-
`body ftagtnent molecules is an important
`approach taken by drug designers. For this
`reason, although conjugated molecules
`were described in previous sections, sepa-
`rate consideration is given to this topic.
`Full-length antibodies have biologi-
`cal functions conferred by both antigen
`binding and the complement
`fixation
`and cellular activation capacity of the FC
`domain. The biological function of the
`three approved Fab fragment therapeutics,
`however, is strictly limited to the capacity
`of the single binding domain molecule to
`bind the target. Nearly half of fragments
`ir1 clinical development were conjugated
`to exogenous functional moieties and all
`ofthese were intended for the treatment of
`
`cancer. This constitutes a higher propor-
`tion than that observed for all anti-cancer
`
`mAbs, of which approximately 44% are
`innnunoconjugates.” These data demon-
`strate that drug developers are well aware
`of the functional limitation of fragments
`that
`lack effector domains or see frag-
`ments as an opportunity to more precisely
`control the functional properties of thera-
`peutic candidates.
`A total of 24 conjugated antibody frag-
`ments have entered clinical study, with
`eight active projects and one molecule
`approved
`in China. Metuximab-I131
`(Licartin) is a murine lgG1 anti-CD1/17
`F(ab)2 conjugated to iodine-131 produced
`by Chengdu Hoist I-litech and approved
`by the Chinese State FDA for the treat-
`ment of liver cancer;
`this molecule has
`
`not met regulatory approval in any other
`country. The remaining eight projects in
`active development are well-distributed
`throughout the phases of clinical devel-
`opment, with two in Phase 3 and two in
`
`Phase 2. Ofthe 24 conjugated fragments,
`12 are fragments conjugated to cellular tox-
`ins, seven are conjugated to radioisotopes,
`three to eytolcines and one to an enzyme
`to target
`toxic metabolites;
`the type of
`moiety conjugated to 1
`is unknown.
`Twelve Fab conjugates have entered eliti-
`ical development,
`including metuxin1ab
`I-131 and an active Phase 3 Can

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket