`
`
`
`
`For the Petitioner
`Lead counsel: James T. Carmichael, Reg. No. 45,306
`Backup counsel: Carol A. Spiegel, Reg. No. 68,033
`Carmichael IP, PLLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. __
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS V LLC;
`HAYMAN CREDES MASTER FUND, L.P.;
`HAYMAN ORANGE FUND SPC – PORTFOLIO A;
`HAYMAN CAPITAL MASTER FUND, L.P.;
`HAYMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT FUND, L.P.;
`HAYMAN OFFSHORE MANAGEMENT, INC.;
`HAYMAN INVESTMENTS, LLC;
`NXN PARTNERS, LLC;
`IP NAVIGATION GROUP, LLC;
`J KYLE BASS, and ERICH SPANGENBERG,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`BIOGEN MA INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01993
`Patent 8,399,514 B2
`____________________
`
`PETITIONER REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01993
`Patent 8,399,514
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper 34), the Notice of Joint
`
`Stipulation to Modify Due Dates 2-4 (Paper 44), and the Board’s Oral Arguments
`
`Order (Paper 56), Petitioner respectfully requests 20 minutes for oral argument in
`
`the trial currently scheduled on 30 November 2016. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.70,
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues, without intent to waive consideration of
`
`any issue not requested, to be argued for this proceeding:
`
`1. Whether provisional application 60/888,921 (Ex. 1012)
`
`provides written descriptive support and enablement for the claims of U.S.
`
`Patent 8,399,514 (“the ‘514 patent”) as required by 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶1.
`
`2. Whether claims 1-6, 8-16 and 20 of the ‘514 patent are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) over Kappos 2006 (Ex. 1003A),
`
`ClinicalTrials (Ex. 1022), Joshi ‘999 (Ex. 1030) and/or ICH Guidelines (Ex.
`
`1004).
`
`3. Whether claim 7 of the ‘514 patent is unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. §103(a) over Kappos 2006 (Ex. 1003A), ClinicalTrials (Ex. 1022),
`
`Joshi ‘999 (Ex. 1030), ICH Guidelines (Ex. 1004) and/or Joshi ‘992 (Ex.
`
`1036).
`
`4. Whether claims 17-19 of the ‘514 patent are unpatentable 35
`
`U.S.C. §103(a) over Kappos 2006 (Ex. 1003A), ClinicalTrials (Ex. 1022),
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01993
`Patent 8,399,514
`
`Joshi ‘999 (Ex. 1030), ICH Guidelines (Ex. 1004) and/or Begleiter (Ex.
`
`1027).
`
`5. Whether Biogen’s proffered secondary considerations show
`
`non-obviousness.
`
`6. Whether Biogen has established diligence throughout the
`
`critical period.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: _/James T. Carmichael/____________
`James T. Carmichael, Reg. No. 45,306
`Carol A. Spiegel, Reg. No. 68,033
`Carmichael IP, PLLC
`8000 Towers Crescent Drive, Ste. 1350
`Tysons Corner, VA 22182
`(703) 646-9255
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`IPR2015-01993
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: 26 October 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01993
`Patent 8,399,514
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.6(e) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing PETITIONER
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served on 26 October 2016, via
`
`electronic mail directed to counsel of record for the Patent Owner at the following:
`
`Michael J. Flibbert
`Maureen D. Queler
`Erin M. Sommers
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`michael.flibbert@finnegan.com
`maureen.queler@finnegan.com
`erin.sommers@finnegan.com
`
`Patent Owner has agreed to electronic service.
`
`
`
`Dated: 26 October 2016
`
`
`
`By: __/James T. Carmichael/__________
`James T. Carmichael, Reg. No. 45,306
`CARMICHAEL IP, PLLC
`8000 Towers Crescent Drive, Ste. 1350
`Tysons Corner, VA 22182
`(703) 646-9255
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
