throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`Paper No. 9
`
` Entered: November 5, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GAMELOFT, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01771
`Patent 8,784,198
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KERRY BEGLEY, and
`BETH Z. SHAW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SHAW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Termination of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`On October 27, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate the
`instant proceeding. Paper 8. In support of the motion, the parties allege
`that they have agreed to terminate the proceeding because, in the related
`district court litigation, the district court entered a decision finding all
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01771
`Patent 8,784,198
`
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,784,198 (“the ’198 patent”) invalid under 35
`U.S.C. § 101. Id. at 2. Patent Owner agreed that the judgement was final
`and agreed not to appeal the district court judgement. Id. The parties filed
`a copy of a Stipulation filed in the district court, which the parties contend
`is the agreement required under 37 U.S.C. § 317(b). Id. at 3; Ex. 1012.
`The Stipulation states, in part, that “the parties further stipulate that
`Inventor Holdings waives appeal of the Final Judgment.” Ex. 1012 at 3.
`Petitioner filed the Petition in this proceeding on August 19, 2015.
`Patent Owner has not yet filed a Preliminary Response, which is due on or
`before November 29, 2015. No decision whether to institute a trial has
`been made.
`Upon consideration of the joint request before us, terminating the
`instant proceeding promotes efficiency and minimizes unnecessary costs. In
`particular, there is no remaining public interest in another determination of
`patentability of the ’198 patent because Patent Owner has agreed not to
`appeal the ruling of invalidity of all claims of the ’198 patent, as determined
`by the district court. Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter
`judgment.1 See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`
`1 A judgment means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination
`of a proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01771
`Patent 8,784,198
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2015-01771 is
`
`granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the instant proceeding is hereby
`
`terminated as to all parties.
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Eric Buresh
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`
`Mark Lang
`mark.lang@eriseip.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`
`Holly J. Atkinson
`holly.atkinson@ascendalaw.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket