throbber
weed my
`
`[E-‘J
`Ijffi/\lE§ Yo QJEDSIHJUEE
`
`FRE SENIUS-KABI, Exh. 1012
`
`
`1 of 8
`
`FRESENIUS-KABI, Exh. 1012
`
`

`
`§lOTECHNOLOGYPRO€ESSES:
`Scale-up and Mixing
`
`Eolited by
`
`CHESTER 5. HO
`State University of New York at Buffalo
`Buffalo, N.Y.
`
`JAMES Y. OLDSHUE
`Mixing Equipment Company
`Rochester, New York
`
`American Institute of Chemical Engineers
`New York, New York
`
`
`2 of 8
`
`

`
`Copyright 1987
`American Institute. of Chemical Engineers
`;_j?34‘5‘§E_as’t\ 47tiij.S'tre_E2t'
`'
`'
`l
`-
`New Ylork, New York 10017
`
`AiChE shall not be responsible for statements or opinions advanced in papers
`or printed in its publications.
`
`Library 0? Cengress Cataloging-in—Publication Data
`
`Biolechnology processes.
`Includes index.
`2. Bio-
`1. Biochemical enginee1‘ing—-Congresses.
`technoI0gy—Meth0d0l0gy—-—Congresses.
`I. Ho, Chester 5.,
`1950-
`.
`ll. Oldshue, James Y.
`-Ill. American
`institute of Chemical -Engineers.
`TP24-8.3.-B'62
`19-87
`‘E 6'O’.'6
`ISBN 0-'8169—04i‘0—3
`
`874 4393
`
`’
`
`MANU-FACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES ‘OF AMERICA
`
`
`3 of 8
`
`

`
`Dispersal of insouble Fatty Acid Precursors
`in Stirred Reactors as a Mechanism
`
`to Control Antibiotic Factor Distribution
`
`FLOYD M. HUBER
`RICHARD L. PIEPER
`
`ANTHONY J. TIETZ
`fermentation Technology Department
`Eli Lilly and Company
`Indianapolis, lndiana 46285
`
`I
`
`_
`
`Biosynthesis of factors in the A—21973C antibiotic complex was controlled by
`addition of appropriate fatty acid precursors. Toxicity associated with higher fatty
`acids was avoided by continuous addition of the fatty acid at a rate nearly equal to
`the uptake by the producing organism. Inability of the producing organism to assimilate
`a solid, insoluble long-chain fatty acid was overcome bydissolution of the acid in
`another substrate.
`
`Substance A2l978C is a complex of antibiotics
`produced by Streptomyces roseosporus, having
`a common cyclic polypeptide nucleus and dif-
`ferent fatty acid side chains-(L)
`(Q)
`(Figure 1). Separation of the major factors
`C1. C2, and C3 revealed differences in both
`in vitro antibiotic activity and toxicology
`E6i the different naturally occurring com-
`pounds. Deacylation of the alkanoyl side
`chain,
`followed by reacylatiqn with a series
`of fatty acids indicated the nrdecanoyl‘sub—
`stitution at position R, resulted in the best
`therapeutic potential (§)
`(5)
`(E).
`
`permit isolation ,in sufficient quantity
`directly from fermentation broth {Table 1).
`
`_In an attempt to produce LYl46032 by
`fermentation,
`the addition of decanoic acid
`during the antibiotic production phase of
`the fermentation mas proposed.
`Initial
`efforts in shaken cultures were unsuccessful
`due to either the toxicity-or insolubility
`of the fatty acid; 'In‘this paper we will
`describe'efforts to'direct'the biosynthésis
`of AZ1978C factors in continuously stirred
`reactors operating in a fedebatch mode.
`
`The natural occurrence of the n—decanoyl
`factor, designated LY146032, was too low to
`
`MATERIALS 7' AND METHODS
`
`TABLE 1
`Distribution of Naturally Occurring Factors in A21978C_
`Fermentation
`
`A21978C
`Factor
`
`C1
`C2
`C3
`C5
`LY146032
`
`_
`
`I Concentration
`’ Halml
`
`Z of ‘Total
`
`A?.l978C_
`Complex -
`
`'
`
`77
`113
`72
`trace
`trace
`282
`
`'
`
`'
`
`27 . 3
`40. 1
`25 .5
`-
`—
`
`Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis,
`Indiana.
`'
`
`BIOTECHNOLOGY PROCESSES
`
`A mutant strain of Streptomyces
`roseosporus NRRL 11379 was used to inoculate
`50 ml of vegetative ‘medium of the following
`composition: Trypticase soy broth
`_ (Baltimore __lu3io,lo_gical Laboratories ,
`Baltimore-,
`i1aryland),- 30 .mg/'mll;;,potato '
`. dextrin,' 25_ mglml. _.
`'_]:he inoculated medium was
`incubated for 48 hours, at 30°C in a 250 ml
`Erlenmeyer -flask on -a ‘shaker rotating. through
`- an arc of two, inches in diameter at -250 ‘RPM.
`0ne—half- ml of the mature ,v_e.get:_ative culture
`was dispensed into multip1_e_ containers and
`stored in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen.
`One ml of the stored culture was used to
`inoculate 800 ml _of the vegetative medium
`described above.
`-The inoculated Lvegetative
`medium was incubated in a 2000 ml Erlenmeyer
`‘I
`flask‘ at 32°C for 120 hours on a shaker
`
`--——- 249
`
`
`4 of 8
`
`

`
`Dispersal of Insoluble Fatty Acid Precursors
`
`rotating through an arc of two inches in 1-
`diameter at 250 RPM.
`The entire content§_of
`the two flasks (approximately 1400 ml after
`incubation) were used to inoculate.l900 liters
`of a secondary vegetative stage having the
`following composition (mgfml):
`soybean flour,
`5.0; yeast extract
`(Difeo Laboratories,
`Detroit, Michigan), 5.0; calcium gluconate,
`10.0; KCl, 0.2; MgS0n'7H20, 0.2; FeS0n'7Hz0,
`0.004; Sag 471 antifoam (Union Carbide,
`Danbury, Connecticut).
`The potassium,
`magnesium, and ferrous salts were prepared ’
`separately as follows:
`7.6 g FeS0n-7H20 was
`dissolved in 76 ml of concentrated H61.
`380 g
`of Mgsot-7HgD and 380 g of K01 and deionized
`water were added to bring the total volume to
`3800 ml.
`The inoculated medium was incubated
`2% hours in a stainless steel vessel at 30°C.
`The vessel was aerated at 0L85'vfw/m and
`stirred with conventional agitators.
`
`compound has very low solubility in water.
`In order to avoid the obvious problems aris-
`ing in supplying a limiting nutrient as a
`solid phase,
`the substrate was dispensed to
`the stirred reactor as a five percent solu-
`tion dissolved in a fifty percent ethanol!
`water mixture. There was an imediate
`
`response in oxygen uptake to the onset of
`the decanoic acid feed, as-illustrated in
`Figure 2. Also, a significant improvement
`in LY146032 concentration was immediately
`realized (Table 2).
`
`TABLE 2
`
`Distribution of A_21978C Factors with Decanoic Acid Feed’
`
`A21978C
`Factor‘
`
`Concentration
`Us /1111
`
`2 of Total
`A21978C
`Complex
`
`19.8
`29.9
`11.5
`5.2
`33.5
`
`The mature secondary seed (8.332 V/v)
`was used to inoculate a production medium of
`the following composition (mg/ml):
`soybean
`flour, 22.0; Fe(NHn)2SOn'6H2U, 0.66; glucose
`monohydrate, 8.25; Sag 471, 0.22; potato
`dextrin, 33.0; and molasses (blackstrap),
`2.75.
`'
`-
`
`c1
`oz
`c3
`c5
`
`LY146032
`
`72
`109
`42
`19
`
`Egg
`364
`
`Two types of stirred reactors were used.
`The smaller vessel, operated at 120 liters,
`- was agitated with two conventional flat
`Rushton type impellers at.relatively high
`power input.
`The larger vessel, operated at
`4550 liters, was equipped with impellers
`having curved paddles and was operated at
`relatively low power input. Air flow in both
`reactors was supplied at 0.5 v/v/m by_large
`open tubes which were estimated to contribute
`very little to the overall mixing. Respira-
`tion rates were estimated by difference in
`inlet and exhaust gas concentration via a
`Perkin—Elmer mass spectrometer. Distribution
`of A21978C factors was estimated by high
`performance liquid chromatography as
`described previously (2);
`
`I..
`
`Examination of the batch fermentation
`medium suggested that the-growth limiting
`nutrient was carbon in the form of carbohy-
`drate.
`It was then hypothesized that in a
`fed-batch operation a moderately toxic sub-
`strate, such as decanoic acid,’could‘be fed
`continuously to the fermentation if the
`metabolic consumption rate exceeded the
`addition rate.
`
`Delivery of decanoic acid to the
`culture presented a problem. With a melting
`point of 34°C the compound is a solid at the
`fermentation temperature of 30°C, and the
`
`(3) N-decanoic acid/ethanol/water 122:2 fed
`'50‘ml'per hour to 120 L'op§rating volume.
`
`Material balances suggested that only
`a small portion of the decanoic acid that
`was fed could be accounted for by incorpora-
`tion into the product. Thus; most of the
`fatty acid was apparently catabolized,
`presumably by the beta—oxidation pathway.
`In an attempt to increase the amount of
`deeanoic acid available for-the incorpora-
`tion,
`the concentration of fatty acid in the
`
`TABLE 3
`Distribution of A21978C Factors with Increased Decanoic Acid
`Feed“
`'
`
`Z of Total
`A2l978C
`Complex
`
`A21978C
`Factor
`
`C1
`C2
`C3
`C5
`LY146032
`
`Concentration
`
`pg/ml
`
`131
`189
`107
`52
`784
`
`1263
`
`(a)
`
`N—decanoic acid/ethanol/water 1:2:2 fed
`50 ml per hour to 120 L operating volume.
`
`B1OTECHNOLOGY PROCESSES
`
`
`5 of 8
`
`

`
`Floyd M. Huber, Richard L. Pieper, and Anthony J, Tietz
`
`TABLE 5
`
`Distribution of A21978C Factors with Decanoic Acid/Methyl
`Oleate Fed-to a Larger Reactori
`
`A21978C
`Factor
`
`C1
`C2
`C3
`C5
`,‘LY146032
`
`Concentration
`'
`us/ml
`
`260
`337
`270
`170
`489
`
`1527
`
`Z of Total
`A2l973C
`Complex
`
`17.0
`22.1
`17.7
`11.1
`32.0
`
`(3) N-decanoic acidfmethyl oleate 1:1 fed
`490 ml per hour to 4550 L operating
`' V0 lllthé
`
`the uptake of the fatty agid
`large vessel,
`was not equivalent throughout the population
`in the reactor (Table 6).
`'
`
`TABLE6
`
`,
`
`Mixing Time and Power input in Pilot-Scale Equipment Used in
`A2197BC Fermentation
`
`Vessel Size Mixing Time
`(1)
`(seconds) ’
`
`(a)
`
`Power Input
`(Hp/100 Gal.)
`
`150
`
`soon
`
`7
`
`43
`
`1.36
`0.82
`
`(a) Time required for pH to reach equilib-
`rium after addition of a sufficient
`quantity of 6M NaOH to increase pH by
`0.3 ‘
`'
`
`The first approach to achieve better
`incorporation of the fatty acid precursor in
`the poorly mixed larger vessel was to
`increase the feed rate of the decanoic acid]
`methyl oleate mixture.
`The percentage of
`LY146032 increased to nearly that achieved
`in the smaller equipment, but the total yield
`of A21978C was reduced to about two-thirds of
`the amount achieved at the lower feed rate
`(Table 7).
`
`feed was increased to twenty percent——the
`solubility limit of decanoic acid in aqueous
`ethanol.
`A significant increase in both the
`LY145032 and total yield was observed
`(Table 3);
`
`Although the fed-batch fermentation
`employing the fatty acid/ethanol/water addi—
`tion proved an effective method of directing
`the synthesis of the A21978C complex,
`the
`presence of the volatile alcohol presented
`both safety problems and uncertainties in
`quantitating the carbon balance.
`It was not
`known to what extent the producing organism
`could metabolize ethanol, since it was likely
`that much of the alcohol was escaping in the
`exit gases. Methyl oleate_was identified in
`batch shaken cultures-as a metabolizable,
`non—toxic and low volatile solvent. A mix-
`ture of equal volumes of methyl oleate and
`decanoic acid remained liquid at 30°C.
`The
`results of feeding the mixture of decanoic
`acid dissolved in methyl oleate on an equiva-
`lent basis to the previously used aqueous
`ethanol feed resulted in a slightly higher
`total yield with a similar concentration of
`the desited LY146032 (Table 4).
`
`"TABLE 4
`Distribution of A21 978C Factors in a Decanoic Acidr‘M¢thyi
`Oleate Fed Fermentation‘
`
`% of Total“
`A21978C
`Complex
`
`H.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`1
`_1
`
`A21978C
`Factor
`
`Concentration
`
`c1
`c2
`c3
`cs
`LY146032
`
`?-
`
`no .
`'
`.
`
`,
`
`,
`
`'
`
`pg/ml
`
`154
`191
`127-
`68
`913
`
`1453
`
`(3) N—decanoic acid/methyl 151 oleate fed
`13 ml per hour to 120 L'operating volume
`
`SCALEQUP CONSIDiE2RATIONS
`
`The initial scale—up of thetprocess to
`a larger 6000 L pilotescale stirred reactor
`did not produce-equivalent LY146032 factor
`distribution (Table §).
`
`The percentage'of LY146032 was approxi-
`mately one—half of that obtained in the
`smaller equipment.‘ It was hypothesized that
`the microbial population was oxidizing the
`decanoic acid preferentially over the methyl
`oleate, and due to the poorer mixing in the
`
`The reduction in overall yield associ«
`ated with the increased feed of the decanoic
`acid precursor was believed to be a result of
`"the feed rate of the fatty acid approaching
`the metabolic rate of consumption. The con-
`sequences of introducing the toxic fatty acid
`
`- BIOTECHNOLOGY PROCESSES
`
`p
`
`251
`
`
`6 of 8
`
`

`
`(A)(3
`
`ix:0
`
`
`
`
`
`OxygegjUptakeMmo|fL/Min 3.
`
`LID?
`
`GU
`
`D-ser
`
`\.
`3‘-Me_G|u (L-tI1lre9)
`L-K’3{n
`
`-- " ‘ O/II
`L-Thr/
`C’
`T
`L-Asp
`f
`
`FIOCOF
`

`
`’
`
`A2197BCa
`A2197ac,
`A21978
`A2197B(c2:
`A2197ac4
`A21978C5
`‘- mix|ufg of mg isomers
`
`v
`
`-
`_ C1oalkanpyl"f _
`,
`ma-mgi}1h3lrI dr:ica_noYl_ I
`-m0
`If H“ 903F103‘
`10-methyldodecanoyl -
`C12 alkanuyl t
`C13 alkanoyl t
`1 structure uncertain
`
`FIGURE 1. Naturally occurring A21978C factors.
`
`Decanolc Acid
`I ‘ Overted
`
`
`
`DXYUptakel|IIml|.IlJIIn
`
`Dispersal of Insoluble Eattyficid Precursors-._.
`
`,
`
`.50
`
`J:O
`
`" 3; .s_t=.xr.t-..
`Déc'a‘ndic .-\‘cid__
`‘
`Feed
`
`L
`
`.
`'
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`'
`
`A
`
`'
`
`.
`
`15
`'
`
`""30
`'
`
`-' "45""
`' Hours
`’
`"
`
`‘
`
`..
`
`‘
`
`|.
`
`FIGURE 3. The toxic effect of_Q_ve‘n-‘eeding _d-ec..:noic_ acid.
`
`15.00"
`
`45.09
`30.00
`Hours
`‘
`FIGURE 2. The effect of n-decanoic acid feed upon oxygen uptake.
`
`60.00‘
`
`75.00
`
`_
`FIGURE 4. Feeding of mdecanoac acidfmethyl oleate to a large reactor
`Via [W0 em;-y poim5_
`
`‘ 252
`
`-
`
`BIOTECHNOLOGY PROCESSES
`
`
`7 of 8
`
`

`
`TABLE?
`Distribution of A2197BC Factors with Increased Decanoic Acid!
`Methyl Oleate Feda to a Larger Reactor
`
`A21978C
`Factor
`
`c1
`c2
`(:3
`C5
`LY146032
`
`Concentration
`ug/m1
`
`% of Total
`A21978C
`Complex
`
`.
`
`.
`
`1
`1
`
`122
`117
`33
`93 I
`607
`
`1022 '
`
`(a) N—decanoic acid/methyl oleate lzl fed 590
`ml per hour to.4550 L operating volume‘
`
`at a_rate greater than the microbial consump—'
`tion rate are illustrated in Figure 3;
`In
`this reactor the feeding system failed,
`resulting in significant overfeeding of the
`fatty acid; The resfilting accumulation of
`the fatty acid caused rapid*lysis of the
`culture as evidenced by-the rapid cessation-
`of respiration.
`‘
`'
`
`‘A second approach to solve the mixing
`problem in the large fermenter was.to-intro-
`duce the fatty acid/ester mixture at'two
`widely separated‘entry—points.
`One entry
`point was at the-top of the vessel and=au
`second was in between the two impellers -
`(Figure 4)- The.subsequent LYl460I2 concen-
`tration obtained (Table 8)
`indicated that7at
`greater incorporation of the n—decanoyl side
`
`-
`‘
`"
`:1'='
`vfi‘
`TABLE8
`Distribution of A21978C‘Factors-withDecanoic Acid/Methyl V.
`Oleate Fed to -a Larger Reactor via Two Entry Points“
`
`A2l9I8C K
`Factor-
`
`-; Concentration
`’V U3/ml
`
`-
`
`Z of Total-
`A21978C
`"C0mfilEXu
`--1..
`
`'
`
`3
`
`C1
`G2 .
`I C3.
`V
`C5
`LY146032
`
`,
`._.‘,,
`
`I
`
`._
`
`,:
`
`-
`':
`
`'
`
`7-5
`_/" U 119 ..
`._
`V
`103
`15
`'l090
`
`.
`
`q-1&4,”-:8’; t
`
`(é?”flfdecanoiciacid/methjl 5iEate‘Ia1;£éd'212
`V mlfpe Whour'to'eaph“9fltwo entry points;
`455otL“wbfk1ng-vo1hne:’*
`
`'
`
`-BIOTECHNOLOGY PRbCE5SE5
`
`chain had occurred as a result of the dual
`introduction.
`
`the following scaledup prob— _
`In summary,
`lems associated with the production of
`LYl46032 have been addressed and solved:
`
`A sound strategy was provided to
`1.
`feed the microbial culture a very toxic
`substance.
`9
`
`A mechanism was devised to supply
`2.
`the normally solid substrate to the reactor
`in a convenient Iiquid form.
`
`’
`
`Preferential substrate utilization
`'3.
`was‘identified_and the necessary feeding
`hardware was‘construEted to promote homogen-
`eous utilization‘of"lipoidal materials when
`the fermentation was scaled up to larger
`reactors.
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`
`Hamill, R.L. and M.M.1Hoehn, U.S, Patent
`'4,208,403.to Eli Lilly and Company
`(June 17,_l980).
`
`‘_Debono; Mandel, U.S. Patent 4,39fi,067 to
`_ Eli Lilly and_Company (August 16, 1983).
`
`_
`
`'
`
`'v;M.
`,B._.I. Abbott,
`Debono, Mgmué1;
`Krupinski, R.M{'Molloy, D.J. Berry, E.T.
`‘Counter, L.C._floward,_J,L. Ott and RLH.
`__ liamill, T'Sy_n't11e's:"s;|,and 'Stru'ct11:r_e Activity
`Relationships ofWflew_Analogs of the New
`Gram-Positiveflipopeptide Antibiotic
`A2l978C,W.Abstract 1077) Interscience
`Conference on antimicrobial Agents and
`H_Chemctherapj
`(ICAAC)
`(Qctober I984).
`
`. Eukuda, 1_3_.S.:',.__B_._J.'Abb_ott,, D._J. Berry,
`L.D,,Boeok, Manuel Debonog R.I._Hamill,
`V.M§ Krupinski and R.L, Holloy;_VDeacy-
`‘H;latiQn_and,Reacylation'of_A21978C,
`’ Acidic fiipopepfide Antibiotic:_Prepara—
`.tion of New,Analogs,H Abstract 1076,
`ulntersciepce Conference on Antimicrobial
`Agents _and 'Chemotherapy_ Crcgmc)
`. I0ctober 1QS§)3f_
`
`—
`
`Counter, F.T., P.J. Baker; L.D. Boecfi,
`Manuel Debono, P.W. Ensminger, R.L.
`'
`Hamill, V.M. Kruginski,.R.H. Molloy and
`_J}Lg__tr, “LYl46032>[N¥(n¥decanoy1)
`'A2lQ]8CwNucl”'
`],;a_Néw Acidic Lipopep—
`tide Antibiot;c::Synthesis and Biological
`h_
`' —, Evaluation,“ Abstract 1078, Interscience
`_ Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and
`Chemotherapy (ICAAG)
`(October 1984).
`
`
`8 of 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket