throbber
United States Patent ~ [191
`Baker
`
`[11]
`[45]
`
`Patent Number:
`Date of Patent:
`
`4,874,843
`Oct. 17, 1989
`
`[54] CHROMATOGRAPHIC PURIFICATION
`PROCESS
`
`Patrick J. Baker, Greenwood, Ind.
`[75] Inventor:
`[73] Assignee: Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis,
`Ind.
`
`[21] App]. No.: 128,351
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Dec. 3, 1987 "
`
`[51] Int. Cl.‘ .............................................. .. C07K 1/14
`[52] US. Cl. .................................. .. 530/317; 530/322;
`530/344
`[58] Field of Search ...................... .. 530/317, 322, 344
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,515,717 6/1970 Cha et a1. .......................... .. 260/210
`4,208,403 6/1980 Hamill et al.
`.. 424/115
`4,440,753 4/ 1984 McCormick et al.
`424/ 124
`4,537,717 8/1985 ' Abbott et al. ....... ..
`260/112 5
`4,719,287 l/1988 Login et a1. ....................... .. 530/317
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`0145484 11/1984 European Pat. Off. .
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Lea?et “Isolation of Antibiotics from Fermentation
`Broths by DIAION HP 20, A Synthetic Adsorben ”,
`Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Limited, pp. l-22.
`Grieser et al., “Liquid Chromatography on a Porous
`Polystyrene-Divinylbenzene Support”, Analytical
`Chemistry, vol. 45, No. 8, Jul. 1973, pp. 1348-1353.
`Primary Examiner—Lester L. Lee
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Mary Ann Tucker; Leroy
`Whitaker
`ABSTRACI‘
`[57]
`This invention relates to a new chromatographic pro
`cess for purifying fermentation products, particularly
`the antibiotic LY146032, from fermentation broths by
`use of a reverse phase non-functional resin.
`In the process of this invention the resin is loaded with
`the compound in the aqueous phase, the water then is
`removed from the resin and the resin converted to the
`organic phase for the resolution step. This process is
`applicable to purifying compounds which are adsorbed
`on reverse phase non-functional resins.
`
`11 Claims, No Drawings
`
`
`1 of 4
`
`FRESENIUS-KABI, Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`1
`
`CHROMATOGRAPHIC PURIFICATION PROCESS
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`This invention relates to a new chromatographic
`process for purifying fermentation products, particu
`larly the antibiotic LY146032, from fermentation broths
`by use of a non-functional resin in reverse mode.
`In the process of this invention the resin is loaded
`with the compound in the aqueous phase, the water
`then is physically removed from the resin and the resin
`rewetted with a polar organic solvent for the resolution
`step. This process is applicable to purifying compounds
`which are adsorbed on non-functional resins.
`
`15
`
`4,874,843
`2
`acetate buffer solvent and passed through a column
`containing HP-20ss non-furnnctional macroreticular
`resin. The column is developed with the same solvent
`and the puri?ed fractions containing LY146032 are
`combined, diluted with water and loaded on a column
`containing HP-20 resin. The column is washed with
`water to remove salts, eluted with acetonitrilezwater
`(about 60:40) and the LY146032 fractions collected.
`These steps must be repeated as often as necessary to
`give a product of the desired purity.
`Final resolution and separation of LY146032 from
`structurally similar compounds is impeded by the pres
`ence of impurities which are not identi?able by ultravi
`olet analysis of the fermentation broth. These so-called
`“non-uv” impurities are primarly saponins and other
`fragments. These compounds have solubility character
`istics similar to LY146032 and are dif?cult to separate
`from LY146032. The presence of these compounds
`causes foaming during concentration procedures and
`poor resolution during subsequent chromatographic
`sepration steps.
`Attempts to remove these impurities by various chro
`matographic methods, including reverse-phase chroma
`tography on silica gel/C18 (Quantum LP-l), normal
`phase chromatography over silica gel, and ion-ex
`change chromatography, failed to signi?cantly improve
`the purity of LY146032 over the use of HP-20 as de
`scribed above. All of these methods are plagued by low
`capacity, poor resolution and low recovery of
`LY146032.
`A novel isolation procedure had to be developed to
`overcome these problems. Thus, it was unexpectedly
`found that replacing the ?rst HP-20 step described
`above with a “reverse method” procedure, wherein
`adsorption is carried out with the non-functional resin
`in aqueous phase (polar) and resolution is carried out
`with the resin in organic phase (non-polar), achieves
`substantial improvements in both purity and yield of the
`product. The “reverse method” process of this inven
`tion improves the purity of LY146032 twofold and,
`since it removes impurities that interfere with the subse
`quent puri?cation steps, improves the ?nal purity from
`about 80% to about 93%. In addition, the overall yield
`is increased from about 5% to about 35%.
`An additional bene?t of the “reverse method” pro
`cess is that fewer subsequent separation steps are re
`quired to achieve the increased purity and yield.
`LY146032 is susceptible to transpeptidation degradation
`(U .S. patent application No. 07/060,148, ?led June 10,
`1987). Reducing the number of steps and the time re
`quired to purify the product greatly lessens the forma
`tion of transpeptidation by-products.
`The novel process of the present invention is useful
`for purifying fermentation products that are adsorbed
`onto non-functional resins. These fermentation prod
`ucts include lipopeptides, for example LY146032,
`echinocandin B and the like, and glycopeptides, for
`example vancomycin, actoplanin, teichoplanin, A82846
`and the like.
`The present invention begins with clari?ed, acidic
`aqueous broth containing the fermentation product or
`with partially puri?ed fermentation product in an acidic
`aqueous buffer solution. The process comprises:
`a. contacting an aqueous solution of a fermentation
`product with a non-functional resin in aqueous phase;
`b. physically removing the water from the charged
`resin;
`
`35
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`The antibiotic LY146032 is the N-decanoyl deriva
`tive of the A-21978C antibiotics and has now been iden
`ti?ed as a member of factor A-2l978C0. The A-21978C
`20
`antibiotics are prepared by fermentation methods de
`scribed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,208,403. LY146032 methods
`for its preparation are speci?cally disclosed in U.S. Pat.
`No. 4,537,717. In this method A-2l978C is prepared by
`fermentation techniques. The fatty acid side chain then
`is removed with an enzyme to give the A-2l978C nu
`cleus and the nucleus is reacylated with the desired acyl
`group, for example the n-decanoyl group, to give the
`A-2l978C cyclic peptides as described in US. Pat. No.
`4,527,717.
`An improved method for preparing these cyclic pep
`tides is described by Floyd M. Huber, Richard L.
`Pieper and Anthony J. Tietz in copending US. patent
`application Ser. No. 773,762, ?led Sept. 9, 1985, entitled
`IMPROVED PROCESS FOR A-2l978C DERIVA
`TIVES.
`Because of the interest in LY146032 and other thera
`peutically useful fermentation products and their impor
`tance, new and more effective methods of isolating
`these useful compounds from fermentation mixtures
`continually are sought.
`The novel process of this invention was previously
`disclosed, but not claimed, in US. patent application
`No. 07/060,148, ?led June 10, 1987, for use in purifying
`the B-isomer of LY146032.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`The present process provides a novel method for the
`separation and puri?cation of a wide variety of fermen
`tation products, including the antibiotic LY146032,
`from their fermentation broths or partially puri?ed
`process streams by adsorbing the antibiotic from aque
`ous medium onto a non-functional resin, followed by
`physically removing the water from the resin, rewetting
`the resin with a polar organic solvent and eluting the
`product by increasing the polarity of the solvent.
`Prior to the present inventionfthe partial puri?cation
`of LY146032 was accomplished by ?ltering the whole
`fermentation broth and passing the ?ltrate through a
`column containing HP-20 resin (Diaion High Polymer
`HP-Series, Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Limited,
`Tokyo, Japan). The column is washed with water and
`waterzacetonitrile (about 90:10 to about 80520), and the
`LY146032 eluted with waterzaceonitrile (about 60:40).
`Elution is monitored by paper chromatography or ul
`traviolet monitor and fractions containing LY146032
`65
`are collected, concentrated under vacuum freeze-dried.
`This procedure gives semi-pure LY146032 which
`then is dissolved in an acetonitrile-methanol-sodium
`
`45
`
`55
`
`
`2 of 4
`
`

`
`4,874, 843
`
`30
`
`50
`
`55
`
`3
`c. rewetting the charged resin with a polar organic
`solvent;
`d. washing the resin with a polar organic solvent to
`remove non-uv impurities;
`e. eluting the fermentation product from the non
`functional resin by increasing the polarity of the sol
`vent; and
`f. recovering the ferementation product.
`When the process begins with whole broth, the broth
`is ?ltered and the pH adjusted to about pH 4.0 to about
`pH 5.0, preferably about pH 4.5, using aqueous acetic,
`hydrochloric sulfuric, phosphoric and like acids.
`When the process begins with partially puri?ed fer
`mentation product, the product is dissolved in an aque
`ous buffer solution of about pH 40 to about pH 5.0,
`preferably about pH 4.5. Suitable buffer solutions are
`aqueous solutions of sodium phosphate, ammonium
`phosphate, ammonium acetate, sodium acetate and the
`like. Preferably, the buffer is sodium acetate.
`The fermentation product containing solution is
`passed over a column containing the non-functional
`resin in aqueous phase. Non-functional resins useful in
`the process of this invention can be described generally
`as macroporous copolymers of styrene and divinylben
`zene. Non-functional resins are a known class of resins
`and information concerning these resins, their sources
`and their characteristics appears in J. Chromatography
`201, 287-292 (1980). Typical non-functional resins in
`clude Diaion HP-20, Doulite ES-861, Amberlite XAD
`16, Amberlite XAD-4 and the like. Diaion HP-20 is a
`preferred non-functional resin.
`The resin is removed from the column and ?ltered or
`dried to remove the water. The resin may be dried in a
`vacuum oven or air dried, for example in a Handy
`35
`Dandy Filter (Sharples Filter Co.). The charged resin
`then is rewetted with a polar organic solvent. If the
`resin is substantially dry, rewetting may take place ei
`ther by adding the resin to the polar organic solvent or
`by adding the polar organic solvent to the resin. If ap
`preciable amounts of water remain in the resin, the resin
`must be added slowly to the polar organic solvent to
`avoid stripping the fermentation product from the resin.
`The resin then is repacked into a column and is washed
`with a polar organic solvent to remove non-uv impuri
`45
`ties. The fermentation product is eluted from the resin
`by increasing the polarity of the solvent.
`In the above process, the term “polar organic sol
`vent” includes methanol, ethanol, acetone, n-propyl
`alcohol, isobutyl alcohol, n-butyl alcohol, methyl ethyl
`ketone, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and like solvents
`which have appreciable water solubility or are miscible
`with water. Acetonitrile is a preferred polar organic
`solvent. The polar organic solvent may be acidi?ed
`with from about 1% to about 10% aqueous acid, prefer
`ably about 5% aqueous acid. Aqueous acetic, hydro
`chloric, sulfuric, phosphoric and like acids may be used.
`Acidi?cation to about pH 4.0 to about pH 5.0 improves
`the resolution of the process and, when the fermenta
`tion product is LY146032, reduces the amount of tran
`speptidation by-product formed.
`In the elution step, the polarity of the solvent is in
`creased by diluting the polar organic solvent with a
`more polar solvent, for example water or methanol. For
`example, the fermentation product may be eluted with
`65
`an acetonitrilezwater solvent in the ratio of from about
`95:5 to about 40:60, preferably from about 85:15 to
`about 80:20.
`
`4
`The fermentation product is recovered from the elu
`ate by methods known in the art, for example crystalli
`zation, concentration and lyophilization.
`The invention is illustrated by the following exam
`ples, which are not to be considered as limiting.
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`Puri?cation of LY146032
`Crude LY146032 (137.5 g) was dissolved in 3.5 l of
`1% sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.5. The solution was
`passed through a column containing 3 l of HP-20 resin
`(Diaion High Porous Polymer HP-series, Mitsubishi
`Chemical Industries Limited, Tokyo, Japan). The ef?u
`ent was discarded. The resin was washed with 30 l of
`chilled deionized water and the wash water was dis
`carded.
`The resin, charged with LY146032, was removed
`from the column and ?ltered to remove residual water.
`The charged, semi-dry resin then was added slowly to
`32 l of acetonitrile. The charged resin in acetonitrile was
`repacked into the column.
`The column was washed with 48 l of acetonitrile
`water solution (95:5) to remove the non-uv impurities,
`e.g., the saponins and tripeptide fragments. The column
`was eluted with 17 l acetonitrile-water solution (85:15).
`One liter fractions were collected. The elution was
`monitored by analytical HPLC and fractions containing
`LY146032 were combined.
`The LY146032 containing fractions were diluted
`with ?ve volumes of chilled deionized water and passed
`through a column containing 500 ml of HP-2O resin.
`The column was washed with 500 ml deionized water
`to remove salts. The column was eluted with acetoni
`trile~water solution (60:40). Fractions shown by HPLC
`to contain LY146032 were combined, concentrated and
`lyophilized to provide 53.3 g (60% yield) of 89.3%
`purity LY146032.
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`Puri?cation of LY146032
`Crude concentrate (157 1) containing 1914.2 g of
`LY146032 activity (purity 24.4%) was diluted to 600 l
`with chilled puri?ed water. HP-20 resin (60 l) was
`added to the diluted crude concentrate. The pH was
`adjusted to 4.7 with glacial acetic acid, n-butanol (6 l)
`was added to control foaming, and the mixture was
`stirred for 20 hours. The resin then was washed with
`300 l of water.
`The charged resin was put in a Handy Dandy Filter
`and blown dry. The dried, charged resin was rewetted
`with acetonitrile (6001) and loaded into a column. The
`column was washed with acetonitrile (60 l).
`The resin was washed with a mixture of acetonitrile:
`methanol:0.25% phosphoric acid (80:l5:5) to remove
`non-uv impurities. The column was eluted with 1201 of
`acetonitrilezwater solution (80:20). Fractions (25 l) were
`collected and the fractions containing LY146032 were
`combined. The combined fractions were concentrated
`and freeze-dried to provide 993.1 g (51.9% yield) of
`LY146032 (purity 50.5%).
`EXAMPLE 3
`Puri?cation of Echinocandin B
`Fermentation whole broth (200 L ml) containing 22.75
`mg of Echinocandin B was diluted with two volumes
`(400 ml) of methanol. The insoluble mycelial solids
`
`
`3 of 4
`
`

`
`5
`
`15
`
`4,874,843
`6
`5
`e. eluting the fermentation product from the non
`were removed by ?ltration. The pH was adjusted to 5.0
`functional resin by increasing the polarity of the
`with 5N hydrochloric acid and the ?ltrate was added to
`solvent; and
`HP-20 resin (10 ml). The mixture was diluted with an
`f. recovering the fermentation product.
`equal volume of water and stirred for 60 minutes to
`2. The process of claim 1 wherein the fermentation
`effect adsorption of the Echinocandin B onto the resin.
`product is a lipopeptide.
`The charged resin was separated by ?ltration and dried
`3. The process of claim 2 wherein the fermentation
`for 16 hours at 25° C. in a vacuum oven. The dry,
`product is LY146032.
`charged resin was rewetted with acetonitrile and
`4. The process of claim 2 wherein the fermentation
`packed into a column. The column was washed with
`product is Echinocandin B.
`three column volumes of acetonitrile. Elution with
`5. The process of claim 1 wherein the fermentation
`three column volumes of 90% acetonitrile/10% water
`product is a glycopeptide.
`resulted in recovery of 26% yield with a purity equiva
`-6. The process of claim 4 wherein the fermentation
`lent to the reference sample. Further elution with three
`product is vancomycin.
`column volumes of 80% acetonitrile/20% water re
`7. The process of claim 1 wherein the resin is Diaion
`sulted in the ‘additional recovery of 38% yield with a
`purity of 41.2% of the reference sample.
`HP-20.
`"
`8. The process of claim 1 wherein the resin is amber
`I claim:
`1. A process for purifying fermentation products
`lite XAD-4.
`which comprises:
`9. The process of claim 1 wherein the polar organic
`solvent is acetonitrile.
`a. contacting an aqueous solution of a fermentation
`20
`10. The process of claim 1 wherein the fermentation
`product with a non-functionalized macroporous
`copolymer of styrene and divinylbenzene in aque
`product is eluted from the non functionalized macropo
`rous copolymer of styrene and divinylbenzene with
`ous phase;
`b. physically removing the water from the charged
`acetonitrile containing from about 5% to about 60%
`water.
`resin;
`11. The process of claim 9 wherein the fermentation
`0. rewetting the charged resin with a polar organic
`product is eluted from the non-functionalized macropo
`solvent;
`rous copolymer of styrene and divinylbenzene with
`d. washing the resin with a polar organic solvent that
`acetonitrile containing fromabout 10% to about 20%
`is the same as or different than the polar organic
`solvent used in step (C) to remove non-uv impuri
`water.
`ties; '
`
`a:
`
`1:
`
`* =1:
`
`*
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`
`4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket