throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
` Paper No. 20
`
` Entered: January 21, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SHARP CORPORATION, SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, and
`SHARP ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF AMERICA,
`INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SURPASS TECH INNOVATION LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00913
`Patent 7,420,550 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, BRYAN F. MOORE, and
`BETH Z. SHAW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SHAW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Granting Motion to Terminate Proceeding and Treat Exhibit 2004
`as Business Confidential Information
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`On January 20, 2016, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate the
`instant proceeding. Paper 19. In support of the motion, the parties allege
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01771
`Patent 7,420,550 B2
`
`
`that they have agreed in writing to terminate the proceeding. Id. at 1. The
`parties filed a copy of a Settlement Agreement, which the parties contend is
`the agreement required under 37 U.S.C. § 317(b). Id. at 2; Ex. 2004. The
`parties request that this Settlement Agreement (Ex. 2004) be treated as
`business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37
`C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Id.
`The Board issued a Decision to Institute on September 9, 2015.
`Paper 9. At this juncture of the proceeding, the Board does not have before
`it full briefing on the trial issues; the case has not been heard; and the
`Board has not entered a final decision.
`Upon consideration of the joint request before us, terminating the
`instant proceeding promotes efficiency and minimizes unnecessary costs.
`Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to enter judgment1 and to
`treat Exhibit 2004 as business confidential information. See 35 U.S.C. §§
`317(a)-(b); 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72 and 42.74(c).
`
`
`1 A judgment means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination
`of a proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.2.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00913
`Patent 7,420,550 B2
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2015-00913 is
`
`granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request to treat Exhibit
`2004 as business confidential information, to be kept separate from the patent
`file as specified in 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the instant proceeding is hereby
`
`terminated as to all parties.
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Anthony F. Lo Cicero
`Brian A. Comack
`Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP
`alocicero@arelaw.com
`sharp-550IPR@qarelaw.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Wayne M. Helge
`Michael R. Casey
`Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP
`whelge@dbjg.com
`mcasey@dbjg.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket