throbber

`Auvuai'i
`
`
`NT SUPPLY SERVICES
`
`Your order details
`Our Order Ref: 01006131-001
`Your Ref: 439520US
`
`Despatched on: 10/10/2014
`
`Your item details
`
`Your shipping address
`
`UIN:
`Title:
`Publisher:
`Year:
`Issue:
`
`Pages:
`
`ETOCENO15628327
`World oil.
`GULF PUBLISHING CO
`1994
`Volume:
`4
`
`215
`
`Author name(s): Risch, D. L. Chowdhury, A. N. Hannan, A.
`
`Comments
`
`Thank you for using Document Supply Services!
`
`large:
`Eifi
`
`Copyright Statement
`Unless out of copyright, the contents of the document(s) attached to or accompanying this page are protected by copyright, They are supplied on condition that, except to
`enable a single paper copy to be printed out by or for the individual who originally requested the document(s), you may not copy (even for Internal purposes), store or retain
`any electronic medium, retransmit, resell. or hire the contents (including the single paper copy referred to above), However these rules do not apply where:
`1 you have written permission of the copyright owner to do otherwise;
`
`2. you have the permission of The Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd. or similar licensing body;
`
`3. the document benefits from a free and open licence issued with the consent of the copyright owner;
`4. the intended usage is covered by statute.
`
`Breach of the terms of this notice is enforceable against you by the copyright owner or their representative.
`
`This document has been supplied under our Copyright Fee Paid service. You are therefore agreeing to the terms of supply for our Copyright Fee Paid service, available at:
`http:llwww.bl.uklreshelp/atyourdesk/docsupplylhelpltermslindex.html
`
`The British Library Document Supply Service, Boston Spa, Wetherby, United Kingdom, L823 780
`bldss.bl.uk
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 1
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 1
`
`

`

`new modern techniques
`improve seismic interpretation
`
`Part 1—Seismic interpretation has evolved from
`basic 2-D structural mapping of vague anticlines
`observed on single seismic trace paper records
`in the 19205 to sophisticated stratigraphic mapping
`with lateral resolution from 3-0 data
`
`David L. Hisch, Abu N.
`Chowdhury, Andrew E. Harman,
`Project Geophysicists, and George
`A. mm. Senior Geophysicist,
`Geco-Prakla. Houston. Texas
`
`Reflection seismology was first
`applied to hydrocarbon exploration
`in the 19208 and today is an integral
`part of oil and gas business. As tech-
`nology evolves, more information is
`derived from seismic and used in
`many interpretation modes. Inter-
`preter demands are also becoming
`greater as more data of higher quality
`is available for incorporation into
`integrated interpretation.
`Part 1 of this article describes the
`planning involved for seismic surveys,
`along with current methods and equip-
`ment used for acquisition, processing,
`display and interpretation of seismic
`data. Major points covered include:
`0 Interpretation objectives
`0 Seismic acquisition, processing
`and display
`0 Structural interpretation organi-
`zation and procedure.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`Acquiring continuous datasets
`along traverses provides a vast
`amount of data compared to single
`data points given by well control. It
`has been used for years in exploration
`and, with the advent of 3-D seismic,
`field development use has increased.
`Seismic data was first used to map
`subsurface geologic features.
`Seismic signatures visible as direct
`hydrocarbon indicators (DHI), such
`
`ing closely-spaced, high—quality/fre—
`quency (resolving power) 3-D seis-
`mic lines, data from many wells,
`petrophysical measurements, pro-
`duction histories and extensive mod-
`eling. Geological models are essen-
`tial to begin interpretation and are
`based on literature and personal
`experience. Models are used initially
`but interpretation comes from work-
`ing with data.
`
`SEISMIC METHOD
`
`Exploration reflection seismology
`uses induced acoustic reflections of
`rock layers. Vibrations are generated
`in the earth with acoustic sources, and
`reflections are recorded with receivers.
`Reflection intensity depends on veloc-
`ity and density contrasts of rock lay-
`ers and contained pore fluids.
`
`Acquisition. Data acquisition begins
`by laying out seismic programs with
`parameters designed for geologic objec~
`tives based on study—area under-
`standing. Parameters include: seismic
`frequency for vertical and horizontal
`resolution (horizontal resoulution also
`depends on source, receiver and line
`spacing); depth to target (distance
`between source and farthest receiver,
`i.e.. far offset); rock layer dip; and envi-
`
`as bright spots and AVO (amplitude
`variation with offset), are important
`tools. Seismic sequence stratigraphy
`adds another dimension to explo-
`ration with an understanding of geo-
`logic depositional process.
`
`INTERPRETATION OBJECTIVE
`
`Geological interpretation begins
`by defining problem scope and area.
`Studies range from large to small
`scale, i.e., from regional to reservoir.
`Techniques and data types vary
`depending on the problem size. For
`example, basin and regional studies
`involve interpreting large scale fea—
`tures from a few widely spaced seis-
`mic lines, and from gravity and mag-
`netic data, often with little or no well
`control. Objectives are to obtain
`regional overviews and identify
`anomalies that warrant further study.
`In contrast, detailed reservoir
`characterization requires integrat—
`
`
`
`Fla. 1. Simplified diagram of seismic princrple used in exploration,
`
`WORLD OIL ! APRIL 1994 B5
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 2
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 2
`
`

`

`L
`
`It
`
`lllllllllllll'i
`'
`““‘lll
`
`in
`
`3.5
`
`4...;
`
`
`
`Two-waytime.sec 5 U!
`
`5.0
`
`l”
`
`E.5
`
`ronmental, cultural and geo-
`logical conditions.
`Most marine acquisition
`sound sources are air guns
`that repeatedly displace
`water volumes. On land,
`sources are explosives or
`truck mounted vibrators.
`It is common to use syn-
`chronized source arrays to
`increase, or focus, energy
`at each shot. Vibrators can
`generate more high-fre-
`quency energy, compensat-
`ing for the earth‘s natural
`attenuating frequencies.
`Geophones are land receiv-
`ers that detect slight ground
`movements. Marine receiv-
`ers are pressure sensitive
`devices called hydrophones.
`Each receiver converts pres-
`sure or ground disturbances
`to electrical impulses. The
`digitally recorded electrical
`pulses of an array or group
`of receivers are summed for
`each station and transmit-
`ted, via cable or telemetry,
`to recording computers.
`Electric response am-
`plitude is directly propor-
`tional to reflection strength.
`Increases or decreases in
`acoustic impedance (veloc-
`ity X density) across reflec-
`tors are displayed as peaks
`or troughs on seismic wave-
`form displays. Receivers
`record reflections every 2
`msec for a chosen time
`
`
`
`PLAN TO ATTEND
`
`Make plans now to be a port at the
`world's largest exhih‘fl'on ot inland
`oiltield products and services.
`The Permian Basin Oil Show
`promises to be the biggest, most
`exciting show In history, with over
`l,l00 exhibits on display. Spend
`three days showcasing the latest
`developments in oil and gas
`technolo y and equipment, as
`thousanci of industry decision
`makers will be on hand to see your
`products or service. Nowhere will
`you tind a more enlightenin and
`profitable event dedicated exc usively
`to the oil and gas industry.
`
`The Permian than 0i! Show
`
`Circle 102
`
`
`
`Hg. 2. CMP gathers with hyperbolic move out (a), and velocity cor—
`rected to horizontal alignment tor stacking. (II).
`
`(commonly 4—10 sec) resulting in a
`well sampled vertical seismic record
`called a trace.
`
`In the seismic principle example,
`Fig. l. the Horizon 1 reflection
`results from an impedance contrast
`between Layers 1 and 2; likewise for
`Reflection 2 emanating from Hori-
`zon 2. Ray paths are described by
`Snell’s Law and bend at each layer
`interface (horizon). Subsurface hori-
`zons are imaged at midpoints
`between source and receiver. These
`points are imaged repeatedly by
`source-receiver pairs as shooting pro-
`gresses to each consecutive line loca-
`tion. A common midpoint (CMP)
`gather is a collection of all combina-
`tions of source-receiver pairs which
`records energy from the same mid-
`point location. therefore containing
`travel paths from near to far offset
`traces. This redundancy increases
`
`the signal to noise ratio when traces
`are processed and summed.
`
`Prue-calm. Stored reflection elec-
`trical pulses are sorted and merged
`with geographic location data to cre-
`ate CMP gathers. Reflection travel
`time increases with receiver offset
`distance and shows a hyperbolic
`geometry called move-out, Fig. 2a.
`Move-out is corrected by selecting a
`velocity that aligns reflectors hori-
`zontally so they can be summed to
`one average output trace. Layer veloc—
`ities are picked by computer algo-
`rithms and human evaluation. Veloc.
`ity analysis is critical to processing
`and may be done more than once to
`fine-tune seismic images.
`Land data frequently requires an
`additional static adjustment which
`accounts for varying travel times
`through near-surface layers. Fig. 2b
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 3
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 3
`
`

`

`shows corrected traces of a CMP
`gather ready for summing. Trace
`summing process is called stacking
`and final output is a seismic section
`or line. A final process, migration, is
`used to reposition misplaced events
`associated with dipping interfaces
`and collapse diffractions caused by
`discontinuities (faults).
`
`Display. Horizontal scale of seismic
`sections is measured in shot-point
`number. corresponding to seismic
`basemaps. The vertical scale is 2-way
`seismic travel time in sec. A typical
`seismic section has a grid of vertical
`lines every 20th shot-point and hori-
`zontal lines every 0.01 sec. A sidelabel
`provides line number and informa-
`tion about acquisition, processing,
`and display parameters. Data is dis-
`played at various scales and trace
`gains depending on the exploration
`objective.
`Reflections recorded as electrical
`
`pulses are small and must be ampli-
`fied to be seen. The processor has a
`variety of gain functions to compen-
`sate for energy loss with depth. One
`gain function identifying amplitude
`or reflection anomalies preserves rel—
`ative amplitudes of all trace reflec-
`tions so largest reflections are eas-
`ily visible. Data can also be used with
`an interactive workstation. Coffeen
`(1986) offers a review of the seismic
`exploration method.1
`
`
`
`STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION
`Structural interpretations have
`been the foundation for prospect
`development and usually precede
`stratigraphic analyses. Structural
`interpretation of seismic data involves
`organization of data, selecting hori-
`zons to map, integration of well and
`seismic data, loop-tieing seismic sec-
`tions, transferring interpretation to
`basemaps and contouring time val-
`ues. A final step sometimes involves
`depth-converting seismic time maps
`to remove false structures caused by
`abrupt lateral velocity changes.
`
`The database. First steps in seismic
`interpretation, after exploration objec—
`tives are defined, are to collect and
`organize required data. A seismic base
`map is generated and inspected for
`locations and orientations of seismic
`lines and well locations.
`Well data consists of checkshot sur-
`vey and sonic log velocity data; rock
`cores and well logs to predict litholo-
`
`
`
`
`
` S.|..P.'
`
`THREAD
`SOLID lUBIlICATING PLATE
`PATENT 4.291.073
`PROTECTOR
`
`Chemicals and
`Physical
`
`Characteristics
`SLP IS
`a dry lllm
`
`lubricant containing
`
`lhe highly slippery
`
`refined Molybdenum
`
`Drsulvroe
`(MOS?)
`
`dispersed m a resrn
`
`carefully mixed lor
`
`quick drying and
`
`controlled wear
`When sprayed onto
`
`any obyecl lhe resm
`Desrgned by KLAMPON to save time
`
`hardens hxing the
`and cost on the rig floor. Made ol an
`
`dispersed granules
`all resrslant elastomer. with a high
`ol M052 in his resin
`
`strength alloy steel band molded in—
`hlm which is rubbed
`
`side. make this thread proleclor lruly
`
`oil by human or
`heavy duty. Featuring a simple last-
`
`It is
`posing me lixeo M052 granules.
`achng cam latch. which provides an
`
`these exposed granules that form lhe
`adequate squeeze inlo Long or Short
`
`slippery contacl surlace.
`API and Hydrll 2.Step Threads. Easy
`
`The SLP coating. once dry. will survive
`adjustment by T-wrench and quick-
`
`lensron nut. Also available
`cold
`temperature ranges 01 «330°F 10
`
`+ 750°F and may be applled by spray
`weather protectors for temperatures
`
`lrom —65° lo +250F
`rng almost anywhere
`
`1461 Cole Ave. Long Beach. CA 90813
`Telex 650415 ' (310) 4355326
`FAX: (310) “5-3452
`“Son/mg mo Orr lnausrry smce I955
`
`Circle 105
`
`We’ve Been On The
`Cutting Edge Since 1928.
`
`-'
`
`f ireatedandpredsionnrofl '
`
`184 Northwest 10‘]! Street 0 Meridian, Idaho 83642
`
`In that Iolmncl. is Ilnd II In! cutting bladeslhcy cut cleanly
`and nun-r lam ll'l'duann in; but none (an duplimte our US.
`Made qlullly. finally. MorseS‘lirlett is a cut above the,
`ml For m inn caning dun-ling 3 sizes of
`Impm tuners ln l-1a'2' Maud 7 sizes
`or manual and pawn mated hydraulic
`curler: In J.-1.l2' tumours-1|
`
`Dealer Inquiries
`Invited!
`
`STFIRRETT
`208/888-7571
`
`Circle 106
`
`WORLD OIL / APRIL 1994 89
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 4
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 4
`
`

`

`Shot lOCJIIUDS
`
`uu aim-miniminminiiliimflfiilfll
`I. mu
`
`iii Mimi; .
`
`-
`
`i. L
`
`'
`
`'
`'111'
`M]: in.
`4
`
`'
`
`Flg. 3. Tieing well and seismic data example using a synthetic seismogram Shifting the synthetic is com-
`mon to obtain optimum character match With the seismic data. Microtossiis for dating are in italics.
`
`
`
`1 ,680
`
`ups...
`
`
`imaging, structural complexities, and
`frequency content (determines thick-
`ness of beds).
`
`Procedure. Mapping horizons are
`selected in correspondence with known
`productive reservoir rocks observed on
`well logs. Seismic characteristics
`(reflection amplitude and continuity)
`and depositional environments asso-
`ciated with reservoir rocks are noted
`for future reference as analogs.
`Well data constrains seismic inter-
`pretation, so well trajectories are pro—
`jected onto the nearest seismic line.
`Well data in depth is converted to
`seismic 2-way time and plotted along
`the seismic-line well trace using syn-
`thetic seismograms or checkshot
`velocities. Microfossil datums or
`extinctions are plotted on the seismic
`data for age dating and correlating
`from one well, or area, to another, Fig.
`3. This is important where complexi-
`ties exist. Correlated well logs pro
`vide more information to aid seismic
`interpretation where fossil data is
`lacking.
`Interpretation begins at well con—
`trol-data, and well information is
`extended by following selected seis—
`mic reflections. Horizons are distin-
`guished by color-coding chosen reflec-
`tions. The least complex structural
`path is chosen to establish a frame-
`work of interpreted lines incorpo-
`rating all available well data. The
`seismic grid of intersecting lines pro-
`vides numerous pathways minimiz-
`ing ambiguous correlations across
`faults and other features.
`Each line intersection is a tie point
`with common reflections on both
`lines. When paper sections are used,
`one seismic line is folded with a ver-
`tical crease at the intersection and
`placed on the intersecting line so sur-
`face datums match (sea level or a pre-
`determined elevation common to the
`seismic data grid). Reflections should
`match if structural dip is nearly flat,
`or compensation is made. Interpreted
`horizons are identified on the new
`line and tracked to the next inter-
`section. If done properly, a loop of
`interpretation results in horizons
`linking back to the first tied inter-
`section. Workstations (see Part 2) dis-
`play loops as a single image.
`Fault cuts are interpreted at off-
`sets in reflections and tied at grid
`intersections. Fault points are con-
`nected in a trend honoring reflec-
`tion offsets observed on the tie line,
`
`Fla. 4. Seismic lines iieing at an intersection. Seismic reflectors, horizons and faults match at the tie.
`
`gies and fluids; and rock samples with
`microscopic fossils for age dating. Well
`data, in depth, is converted to 2-way
`time using synthetic seismograms,
`checkshots or vertical seismic pro-
`files, (VSPs).
`A synthetic seismogram is a con-
`tinuous vertical record that looks like
`a seismic trace but is derived from
`sonic and density logs, Fig. 3. Check-
`shot surveys are collections of several
`
`90 WORLD OIL/APRIL 1994
`
`pairs of travel-times and known depths
`within wells. A VSP is similar to sur-
`face seismic sections but has receivers
`in the well instead of along the sur—
`face; it is the best way to convert
`between seismic and well data.
`Seismic data is sorted into dip
`lines (acquired in structural dip
`direction) and strike lines (perpen—
`dicular to dip lines). Lines are exam—
`ined for quality, depth of reliable
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 5
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 5
`
`

`

`locations
`
`Seismic shot
`
`Fig. 5. Seismic structure map 0! interpreted horizon. Three faulted anticlines (highs) are potential
`hydrocarbon traps.
`
`Fig. 4. Loop-tieing is done repeat-
`edly until the seismic grid is inter-
`preted, working from least to the
`most complex areas.
`Mapping follows completion of
`horizon interpretation on the seis-
`mic grid of data. Seismic 2-way
`times measured from surface, or ref-
`erence datum, to interpreted hori-
`zons are transferred to seismic base
`maps by hand, or computer if digi~
`tized. Fault cuts are also posted and
`mapped according to their trends
`determined from interpretation.
`Structural highs (anticlines) and
`lows (synclines) are marked on maps
`to guide contouring. Equal seismic
`time values are connected with a
`curved line (isotime contour) to
`depict subsurface structural config-
`uration, Fig. 5. Contour lines ter~
`minate at faults but contour trends
`continue on the other side of faults.
`Workstations post data to maps
`automatically.
`Seismic time-structure maps are
`
`92 wow on. I APRIL 1994
`
`usually depth converted because
`abrupt lateral velocity variations
`will give false time structures that
`may look like promising traps.
`Depth conversion is performed using
`velocity control (preferably grids)
`from surface down to horizons being
`converted. If structural closures,
`highs against faults or anticlines,
`remain after depth conversion, then
`prospects are high graded; particu-
`larly if they have seismic attributes
`similar to those observed at a pro-
`ductive well.
`
`COMING NEXT
`The second half of this seismic
`
`interpretation overview will discuss
`and illustrate additional modern
`methods used in seismic data inter-
`
`pretation, including direct hydro-
`carbon indicators; sequence strati-
`graphic interpretation models,
`techniques and maps; and interac-
`tive workstation techniques, aids
`and data access.
`no
`
`
`
`
`The authors
`David L. Risch, a project
`geophysicisr with Good
`Prakla's Exploration Ser-
`vices Group in Houston,
`has a BS in geology and
`physics from University of
`Wisconsin at Eau Claire
`and an MS in geophysical
`oceanography from Texas A&M University.
`He worked for Phillips for six years in data
`processing and interpretation of dalasels
`from the GOM, South China Sea and Nor-
`wegian See. Since joining Geco~PraI<Ia In
`1988. he has worked offshore Chile and
`GOM as a structural interpreter and
`sequence stratigrapher on 2-D and 3-D seis-
`mic datasers.
`
`Abu N. Chowdhury joined
`Geco-Prak/a, Houston, as
`a project geophysicist in
`1991, He has BS and MS
`degrees in geology from
`I.I.'lZ (India) and an MS in
`geophysics from the Uni-
`versity of Houston. He has
`15 years of worldwide
`industry experience with
`The Analysts, Fairfield. Sohio and T63. He is
`currently doing regional sequence strati-
`graphic interpretations on non-exclusive seis-
`mic grids ln the GOM.
`
`
`
`
`
`Andrew E. Harman, pro-
`ject geophysicisl. Geco-
`Prakla, Houston, has 85
`and MS degrees in geoI.
`agy from the University of
`Cincinnati. He has 20
`years in the petroleum
`industry in the GOM hav-
`ing worked With Cities Ser~
`vice. Kerr-McGee and
`Mark Producing. Hannan joined Geco-
`Prakla, Houston.
`in 1989 and works pri-
`marily on GOM structural and sequence
`stratigraphic interpretations.
`George A. Jamieson,
`senior geophysicist, Geco-
`Prakla. has a BS in geol—
`ogy from Sheffield Unl-
`vorslty, England, and an _
`MS In petroleum geology g
`from Imperial College.
`London. He was a wellsite
`geologist In the North Sea
`and Persian Gulf, and per-
`formed geophysical studies in Angola,
`Ghana and Gabon. Joining Geco-Prskle in
`London in 1986, he worked with 2.0 and 3-
`D seismic data in the North Sea, Egypt.
`Cameroon and, since 1991, has been
`assigned to GOM and Venezuelan projects
`in Houston.
`
`
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`The authors thank Geco-Prakla for per—
`mission to show seismic data, and Karen El-
`T‘awil and Jerry Watson for their support and
`review of the paper. We also thank Jack Cald»
`well and Mark Chang for the paper review,
`Kathy Lee for figure drafting and Sandy
`Abrams for typing.
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`' (‘ofl‘wnnl A..S-Imniu Explumlum Fundunwnlnls. l‘mlnwvll
`l’uhlishinu Cu. “iii-a. Okla, l986, p. 347.
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 6
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 6
`
`

`

`DOCUMENT SUPPLY
`
`Boston Spa, Wetherby
`West Yorkshire L523 780
`www.b|.uk
`
`Please note the following:
`
`This is the best copy available
`
`This article has a very tight binding
`
`Some pages within the original article are
`advertisements and have therefore not
`
`been sent
`
`Advertisement pages: m'ggm q l
`
`Some pages within the original are blank
`and have therefore not been sent
`
`Blank pages: ...................
`
`The article you require is on different pages
`to those that you quoted
`
`AEB-11Version2 | 04/14
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 7
`
`Cm:
`
`0
`
`:1;-< I
`
`‘2
`
`tc
`
`:
`an
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 7
`
`

`

`Preview
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 8
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 8
`
`

`

`DEPARTMENTS
`22 Meetings
`117 People in industry
`123 Companies
`127 New equipment
`138 New literature
`145 Classified advertising
`146 Advertisers' index
`
`About the cover: HZ-26 oil field
`in the South China Sea, dis(cid:173)
`covered by the ACT Group
`(Agip, Chevron, Texaco), cur(cid:173)
`rently produces 40,000 bopd
`from 15 wel/s. The platform,
`shown here on a hazy day, is
`located in 395 ft of water. Photo
`courtesy Agip.
`
`WORW OIL (ISSN 0043-8790) is published
`monthly by Gulf Publishing Co., 3301 Allen
`Parkway. Houston, Texas 77019. Second
`class postage paid at Houston, Texas, and
`at additional mailing offices.
`
`POSTMASTER: Send address changes to
`WORW OIL, P.O. Box 2608, Houston, Texas
`77252-2608.
`Copyright © 1994 by Gulf Publishing Co. All
`rights reserved.
`World on was established in 1916 as The Oil
`Weekly. World Oil and The Oil Weekly are
`registered trademarl<s of Gulf Publishing Co.
`Pennission is granted by the copyright owner
`to libraries and others registered with the
`Copyright Clearence Center (CCC) to pho(cid:173)
`tocopy any articles hemin for the base fee of
`$2 per page per copy of the article. Payment
`should be sent directly to the CCC, 21
`Congress St., Salem, Mass. 01970. Copying
`for other than personal or intemal reference
`use without express permission is prohibited.
`Requests for special permission or bulk
`orders should be addressed to the Editor.
`ISSN 0043-8790194
`Address subscriptions and change notices
`to World Oil, Circulation Dept., PO Box
`2608, Houston, Texas 77252-2608.'
`World 011 is available on a complimentary
`Request Subscription basis to persons
`actively engaged in the exploration-drilling(cid:173)
`producing phese of the gasloil industry pro(cid:173)
`vided that they are in a position to recom(cid:173)
`mend, specify or approve the purchase or
`use of equipment or services used in their
`operations. (When requesting subscription,
`state title, company name and nature of
`business as initial qualifications.) Persons in
`the gasloil industry who do not recommend,
`specify or approve the purchase or use of
`equipment or services, and persons in a
`field which has a definite related-interest
`(such as equipment manufacturers, service
`and supply companies, governmental agen(cid:173)
`cies, banks, etc.) can purchase subSCrip(cid:173)
`tions at the following rates. Subscriptions in
`United States, Canada and Latin Amerlca,
`one year $24; a/l other countries, one year
`$30. AIRMAIL: North America $70 one year:
`Outside North America $125 one year. Sin(cid:173)
`gle copies $10, prepaid. PAYMENT MUST
`ACCOMPANY ORDER. Make check payable
`to World Oil,
`
`i
`
`WOfl/dOi/®
`
`__ r;;n1
`
`APRIL 1994 • VOL. 215 NO.4
`
`SPECIAL FEATURE
`39 OlC '94
`A preview of the technical program for the 26th Annual Offshore Technology
`Conference, to be held in Houston, May 2-5 .
`
`\
`
`.
`
`FEATURES
`45 Gullfaks development provides challenges
`S. Tollefsen, E. Graue and S. Svinddai
`.... ,,~ft~~ Iftl!li-' • ifI-' -mi.,n
`Part 1-History, future perspective and proposed fie
`of 570,OOO-bopd field with complicated reservoir geolog
`H
`57 Advanced composites enhance coiled tubing capabilities
`A. Sas-Jaworsky and J. G. Williams
`How Conoco's development of continuous pipe made from high-performance
`fibers improves on performance of steels under certain load conditions
`71 Subsea intervention modules offer diverless solutions
`D. Langrock
`New diverless ROV intervention system operating on the farm-tractor
`and implement concept performs wellhead/tree work in 3,OOO-ft water
`75 Blowout control: Response, intervention and management
`P. Smestad, O. B. Rygg and J. W. Wright
`Part 5-Hydraulic modeling. Matching known downhole well information
`with blowout surface flow helps select most efficient kill method
`85 How modern techniques improve seismic interpretation
`D. L. Risch, A. N. Chowdhury, A. E. Hannan and G. A. Jamieson
`Part 1-Planning for seismic surveys, plus overview of current methods
`for acquisition, processing, display and data interpretation
`95 Colombia prospects still hot
`J. Roeiofsen
`Status of petroleum activity and exploration opportunities, including
`areas that hold potential for discovering another giant field
`107 What's new in artificial lift
`J. F. Lea and H. W. Winkler
`Part 2-Twenty-two new surface and downhole developments for beam
`pumping systems, progressive cavity pumping and a joint industry study
`
`INDUSTRY IN FOCUS
`9 Editorial comment
`Global what (?) and cold winters; Billy Jeff, wheat and the Alamo
`11 011 country hotline
`Four big new fields off Brazil; IPAA petitions for oil import relief
`15 Looking ahead
`Modest U,S, demand growth seen; Drillers cautious during first half
`19 Industry at a glance
`Twelve-month U,S. gas price steady; March rig count up from '93
`25 What's happening in exploration
`Re-exploration in developed areas; Oryx's 3-D seismic applications
`27 What's happening in drilling
`Extended reach drilling applications from the IADC/SPE Conference
`29 What's happening in production
`Some key meetings coming up; New Sundowner rig for the Caspian Sea
`31 What's happening offshore
`Shell selects FPSOs in North Sea; U.S. Gulf 1994 hurricane prospects
`33 A world of oil
`,Comments and thoughts on Viet Nam; New study on subsea/multiphase flow
`35 Oil and gas in Washington
`How plans to upgrade EPA to a more oppressive agency were waylaid
`37 Management issues
`Advice on managing investment risk while protecting cash flow
`
`WORLD OIL 1 APRIL 1994 3
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 9
`
`

`

`How modern techniques
`improve· seismic interpretation
`
`. Part 1-Seismic interpretation has evolved from
`basic 2-D structural mapping of vague anticlines
`observed on single seismic trace paper records
`in the 1920s to sophisticated stratigraphic mapping
`with lateral resolution from 3-~ data
`
`David L. Risch, Abu N.
`Chowdhury, Andrew E. Hannan,
`Project Geophysicists, and George
`A. Jamieson, Senior Geophysicist,
`Geco-Prakla, Houston, Texas
`
`Reflection seismology was first
`applied to hydrocarbon exploration
`in the 1920s and today is an integral
`part of oil and gas business. As tech(cid:173)
`nology evolves, more information is
`derived from seismic and used in
`many interpretation modes. Inter(cid:173)
`preter demands are also becoming
`greater as more data of higher quality
`is available for incorporation into
`integrated interpretation.
`Part 1 of this article describes the
`planning involved for seismic surveys,
`along with current methods and equip(cid:173)
`ment used for acquisition, processing,
`display and interpretation of seismic
`data. Major points covered include:
`• Interpretation objectives
`• Seismic acquisition, processing
`and display
`• Structural interpretation organi(cid:173)
`zation and procedure.
`
`as bright spots and AVO (amplitude
`variation with offset), are important
`tools. Seismic sequence stratigraphy
`adds another dimension to explo(cid:173)
`ration with an understanding of geo(cid:173)
`logic depositional process.
`
`INTERPRETATION OBJECTIVE
`Geological interpretation begins
`by defining problem scope and area.
`Studies range from large to small
`scale, i.e., from regional to reservoir.
`Techniques and data types vary
`depending on the problem size. For
`example, basin and regional studies
`involve interpreting large scale fea(cid:173)
`tures from a few widely spaced seis(cid:173)
`mic lines, and from gravity and mag(cid:173)
`netic data, often with little or no well
`control. Objectives are to obtain
`regional overviews and identify
`anomalies that warrant further study.
`In contrast, detailed reservoir
`characterization requires integrat-
`
`ing closely-spaced, high-quality/fre(cid:173)
`quency (resolving power) 3-D seis(cid:173)
`mic lines, data from many wells,
`petrophysical measurements, pro(cid:173)
`duction histories and extensive mod(cid:173)
`eling. Geological models are essen(cid:173)
`tial to begin interpretation and are
`based on literature and personal
`experience. Models are used initially
`but interpretation comes from work(cid:173)
`ing with data.
`
`SEISMIC METHOD
`Exploration reflection seismology
`uses induced acoustic reflections of
`rock layers. Vibrations are generated
`in the earth with acoustic sources, and
`reflections are recorded with receivers.
`Reflection intensity depends on veloc(cid:173)
`ity and density contrasts of rock lay(cid:173)
`ers and contained pore fluids.
`
`Acquisition. Data acquisition begins
`by laying out seismic programs with
`parameters designed for geologic objec(cid:173)
`tives based on study-area under(cid:173)
`standing. Parameters include: seismic
`frequency for vertical and horizontal
`resolution (horizontal resoulution also
`depends on source, receiver and line
`spacing); depth to target (distance
`between source and farthest receiver,
`i.e., far offset); rock layer dip; and envi-
`
`Layer 1
`
`BACKGROUND
`Acquiring continuous datasets
`along traverses provides a vast
`amount of data compared to single
`data points given by well control. It
`has been used for years in exploration
`and, with the advent of 3-D seismic,
`field development use has increased.
`Seismic data was first used to map
`subsurface geologic features.
`Seismic signatures visible as direct
`hydrocarbon indicators (DHI), such Fig. 1. Simplified diagram of seismic principle used in exploration.
`
`Layer 2
`
`Layer a
`
`WORLD OIL I APRIL 1994 85
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 1008, pg. 10
`
`

`

`Near
`offset
`
`3.0
`
`Near
`Far
`offset offset
`
`Far
`offset
`
`3.5
`
`4.0
`
`~4.5 i
`
`5.0
`
`5.5
`
`6.0
`
`ronmental, cultural and geo(cid:173)
`logical conditions.
`Most marine acquisition
`sound sources are air guns
`that repeatedly displace
`water volumes. On land,
`sources are explosives or
`truck mounted vibrators.
`It is common to use syn(cid:173)
`chronized source arrays to
`increase, or focus, energy
`at each shot. Vibrators can
`generate more high-fre(cid:173)
`quency energy, compensat(cid:173)
`ing for the earth's natural
`attenuating frequencies.
`Geophones are land receiv(cid:173)
`ers that detect slight ground
`movements. Marine receiv(cid:173)
`ers are pressure sensitive
`devices called hydrophones.
`Each receiver converts pres(cid:173)
`sure or ground disturbances
`to electrical impulses. The
`digitally recorded electrical
`pulses of an array or group
`of receivers are summed for
`each station and transmit(cid:173)
`ted, via cable or telemetry,
`to recording computers.
`Electric response am(cid:173)
`plitude is directly propor(cid:173)
`tional to reflection strength.
`Increases or decreases in
`acoustic impedance (veloc(cid:173)
`ity x density) across reflec(cid:173)
`tors are displayed as peaks
`or troughs on seismic wave(cid:173)
`form displays. Receivers Fig. 2. CMP gathers with hyperbolic move-out, (a), and velocity cor(cid:173)
`record reflections every 2
`rected to horizontal alignment for stacking. (b).
`msec for a chosen time
`(commonly 4-10 sec) resulting in a
`the signal to noise ratio when traces
`well sampled vertical seismic record are processed and summed.
`called a trace.
`In the seismic principle example,
`Fig. 1, the Horizon 1 reflection
`results from an impedance contrast
`between Layers 1 and 2; likewise for
`Reflection 2 emanating from Hori(cid:173)
`zon 2. Ray paths are described by
`Snell's Law and bend at each layer
`interface (horizon). Subsurface hori(cid:173)
`zo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket