PTAB

Search for cases ...

Cheat Sheet
Query Builder
Jurisdiction Selector
Suggestions

Basic Search

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Clear Coverage information Done

All of these words

Any of these words

Exactly this phrase or word

None of these words

This word

Case filed between and

Most recent docket entry filed between and

With deadlines about

Has at least

Party’s Name

Firm

Attorney

Role

Publicly traded

Filter by

Search result types Dockets Documents

Opinions Motions Pleadings Exhibits

Signup
Login
More...
- Signup
- Login
- Features
- Enhance
- Pricing
- News
- About

Information

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Click below for detailed party information:

Petitioner

View, Inc.

Patent Owner

SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.

alt+h	Toggle this page.
alt+u	Toggle Upcoming Events view.
alt+e	Export the docket to Excel.
Filtering / Searching the Docket
ctrl+f	Filter the docket.
ctrl+shift+f	Search docket and documents.
alt+s	Toggle between "Show Only" filtering modes.
alt+d, ctrl+f	System ctrl+f
escape	Clear while in docket filter.
Interactive Timeline
alt+t	Show / re-center case timeline.
alt+↑	Zoom in
alt+↓	Zoom out
alt+←	Pan left
alt+→	Pan right

View, Inc. v. SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.

IPR2015-00245 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.

Filed Nov. 7, 2014

Judges David McKone, James Arpin, and Jo-Anne Kokoski

Case Type Inter Partes Review

Status Terminated

Challenged Patent 10/495,758

Patent No. 7,193,763 assignments

Tech Center 2800

Last Updated: 3 years, 8 months ago

Filing Date	#	Filing and Exhibits
Entries matching. Show All.
6/3/2015	06-03-2015-Board	Event: Motion to Terminate (Granted) Board Termination 11: Judgment - Termination of the Proceeding 37 C.F.R. 42.73
6/2/2015	06-02-2015-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Motion 9: Joint Motion to Terminate Patent Owner Motion 10: Joint Request
5/12/2015	05-12-2015-Board	Event: Petition Institution (Granted and Denied) Board Institution Decision 7: Decision - Institution of Inter Partes Review 37 C.F.R. 42.108 Board Notice 8: Scheduling Order
3/11/2015	03-11-2015-Patent_Owner	Event: Preliminary Response Patent Owner Preliminary Response 6: Patent Owner's Preliminary Response Patent Owner Exhibit 2001: Exhibit 2001 Patent Owner Exhibit 2002: Exhibi 2002 Patent Owner Exhibit 2003: Exhibit 2003 Patent Owner Exhibit 2004: Exhibit 2004 Patent Owner Exhibit 2005: Exhibit 2005
12/11/2014	12-11-2014-Board	Board Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition 5: Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition
11/26/2014	11-26-2014-Patent_Owner	Potential Patent Owner Power of Attorney 3: Power of Attorney Potential Patent Owner Notice 4: Related Matters
11/7/2014	11-07-2014-Petitioner	Petitioner Power of Attorney 1: Power of Attorney Event: Petition Petitioner Petition 2: Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,193,763 Petitioner Exhibit 1001: U.S. Patent No. 7,193,763 Petitioner Exhibit 1002: Declaration of Dr. Colin Wolden (Wolden Decl.) Petitioner Exhibit 1003: Japan Patent App. Pub. Tokkai 63-231318 (certified translation into English and Japanese language original) (Tokkai 318) Petitioner Exhibit 1004: U.S. Patent No. 5,919,571 (Badding) Petitioner Exhibit 1005: Kulkarni, et al., Dependence of the Sheet Resistance of Indium-Tin-Oxide Thin Films on Grain Size and Grain orientation Determined from X-ray Diffraction Techniques, Thin Solid Films 345- 273-277 (1999) (Kulkarni 1999) Petitioner Exhibit 1006: Kulkarni, et al., Electrical, Optical, and Structural Properties of Indium-Tin-Oxide Thin Films Deposited on Polyethylene Terephthalate Substrates by rf Sputtering, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16(3), 1636 (1998) (Kulkarni 1998) Petitioner Exhibit 1007: European Patent App. EP 1011040 A1 (EP 040) Petitioner Exhibit 1008: Hiroshi Morikawa and Miya Fujita, Crystallization and Decrease in Resistivity on Heat Treatment of Amorphous Indium Tin Oxide Thin Films Prepared by d.c. Magnetron Sputtering, Thin Solid Films 339- 309-313 (1999) (Morikawa) Petitioner Exhibit 1009: Choi, et al., Effect of Film Density on Electrical Properties of Indium Tin Oxide Films Deposited by DC Magnetron Reactive Sputtering, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 19(5) (Sept./Oct./ 2001) (Choi) Petitioner Exhibit 1010: Japan Patent App. Pub. Tokkai 9-305313 (certified translation into English and Japanese language original) (Tokkai 313) Petitioner Exhibit 1011: February 8, 2006 Office Action in App. Ser. No. 10/495,758 Petitioner Exhibit 1012: Chopra, et al., Transparent Conductors - A Status Review, Thin Solid Films 102-1-46 (1983) (Chopra) Petitioner Exhibit 1013: March 13, 2006 Response in App. Ser. No. 10/495,758 Petitioner Exhibit 1014: Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement in Sage Electrochromics, Inc. v. View, Inc., No. 3-12-CV-6441 (JST) (N.D. Cal.), dated 9/24/2014 Petitioner Exhibit 1015: Invalidity Chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,193,763 in View of Japanese Tokkai Patent No. 63-231318 from Sage Electrochromics, Inc. v. View, Inc., No. 3-12-CV-6441 (JST) (N.D. Cal.), served on 7/25/2014 Petitioner Exhibit 1016: Invalidity Chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,193,763 in View of USPN. 5,919,571 to Badding et al. from Sage Electrochromics, Inc. v. View, Inc., No. 3-12-CV-6441 (JST) (N.D. Cal.), served on 7/25/2014 Petitioner Exhibit 1017: Random House Webster_s Unabridged Dictionary, Second Edition (2001) at cover pages, 1401 Petitioner Exhibit 1018: Thorton, et al., Transparent Conductive Sn-doped Indium Oxide Coatings Deposited by Reactive Sputtering with a Post Cathode, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 13(1) (Jan./Feb. 1976) (Thorton)

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Unlimited document access
Unlimited case alerts
Unlimited docket tracking
Unlimited search
Search/filter by motion
For-pay state court docs

$99/mo.

Excludes PACER and Gov’t fees

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

$4/document
$3/ docket update
$3/day new case alerts
$2/day for docket tracking
$1/search in Fed Courts
For-pay state court docs

$39.99/mo.

Add-ons include Federal Analytics, Easy Analytics, and the Analytics Workbench.

Add your payment information

Need help? Lets schedule a quick demo.

What is PACER?

PACER is a government system to access US court records.

Why do I need it?

Docket Alarm uses PACER to access Federal Court documents. Under the flat-rate plan, we pass these fees on to your account without markup.

What will I be charged?

If we already have the document in our database, you will not be charged anything. However, if we do not, then we must retrieve it from the court and incur their access fee.

PACER charges $0.10 per page with a 30 page (or $3.00) cap for all documents, except transcripts which have no cap. For example, a five page document is $0.50 and a 50 page document is $3.00. Accessing docket sheets also incurs a fee if we do not already have the full docket sheet (again, max of $3.00). These fees are only incurred for Federal Courts and Bankruptcies.

Do other courts have fees?

Certain state courts, mostly in California, charge for access to some documents. When accessing for-pay state courts, you will always be given an option to accept or decline the payment.

Basic Free Access

We’re committed to keeping the law open. We provide free searches and document/docket views a week for documents already in our system. You have pages left for free viewing.

Note: free views don't apply to documents purchased from government systems, e.g., PACER.

Welcome

Docket Alarm has relationships with many large firms such as yours.

See if your firm has an account

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Petitioner

Patent Owner

Keyboard shortcuts

Filtering / Searching the Docket

Interactive Timeline

View, Inc. v. SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.

IPR2015-00245 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Event:

Event:

Event:

Event:

Alert Sharing

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases