PTAB

Search for cases ...

Cheat Sheet
Query Builder
Jurisdiction Selector
Suggestions

Basic Search

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Clear Coverage information Done

All of these words

Any of these words

Exactly this phrase or word

None of these words

This word

Case filed between and

Most recent docket entry filed between and

With deadlines about

Has at least

Party’s Name

Firm

Attorney

Role

Publicly traded

Filter by

Search result types Dockets Documents

Opinions Motions Pleadings Exhibits

Signup
Login
More...
- Signup
- Login
- Features
- Enhance
- Pricing
- News
- About

Information

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Click below for detailed party information:

Petitioner

View, Inc.

Patent Owner

SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.

alt+h	Toggle this page.
alt+u	Toggle Upcoming Events view.
alt+e	Export the docket to Excel.
Filtering / Searching the Docket
ctrl+f	Filter the docket.
ctrl+shift+f	Search docket and documents.
alt+s	Toggle between "Show Only" filtering modes.
alt+d, ctrl+f	System ctrl+f
escape	Clear while in docket filter.
Interactive Timeline
alt+t	Show / re-center case timeline.
alt+↑	Zoom in
alt+↓	Zoom out
alt+←	Pan left
alt+→	Pan right

View, Inc. v. SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.

IPR2015-00244 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.

Filed Nov. 6, 2014

Judges Grace Karaffa Obermann, Jeffrey Abraham, and Jo-Anne Kokoski

Case Type Inter Partes Review

Status Institution Denied

Challenged Patent 08/567,781

Patent No. 5,830,336 assignments

Tech Center 1700

Inventors STEPHEN C. SCHULZ

Last Updated: 3 years, 4 months ago

Filing Date	#	Filing and Exhibits
Entries matching. Show All.
5/17/2021	05-17-2021-Board	Board Refund Approval 11: Notice of Refund
5/12/2021	05-12-2021-Petitioner	Petitioner Refund Request 10: Request for Refund of Post-Institution Fees
6/3/2015	06-03-2015-Board	Event: Motion to Terminate (Granted) Board Termination - Settlement 9: Termination - Settlement
6/2/2015	06-02-2015-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Motion 7: Joint Motion to Terminate Patent Owner Motion 8: Joint Request
3/8/2015	03-08-2015-Patent_Owner	Event: Preliminary Response Patent Owner Preliminary Response 6: Patent Owner's Preliminary Response Patent Owner Exhibit 2001: Exhibit 2001 Patent Owner Exhibit 2002: Exhibit 2002 Patent Owner Exhibit 2003: Exhibit 2003 Patent Owner Exhibit 2004: Exhibit 2004 Patent Owner Exhibit 2005: Exhibit 2005 Patent Owner Exhibit 2006: Exhibit 2006 Patent Owner Exhibit 2007: Exhibit 2007 Patent Owner Exhibit 2008: Exhibit 2008
12/8/2014	12-08-2014-Board	Board Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition 5: Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition
11/26/2014	11-26-2014-Patent_Owner	Potential Patent Owner Power of Attorney 3: Power of Attorney Potential Patent Owner Notice 4: Related Matters
11/6/2014	11-06-2014-Petitioner	Petitioner Power of Attorney 1: Power of Attorney Event: Petition Petitioner Petition 2: Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 5,830,336 Petitioner Exhibit 1001: U.S. Patent No. 5,830,336 Petitioner Exhibit 1002: Declaration of Dr. David Ruzic, Professor of Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Ruzic Decl.) Petitioner Exhibit 1003: Kawade et al., Thick Lithium Metal Target for Fast Neutron Production, 10 J. Nuclear Sci. and Tech 8, 507 (August 1973) (Kawade) Petitioner Exhibit 1004: U.S. Patent No. 5,230,459 to Mueller (Mueller) Petitioner Exhibit 1005: Stein et al., Angular Distributions of Argon Sputtered Lithium, 36 J. Applied Phys., No. 4, 1504 (April 1965) (Stein) Petitioner Exhibit 1006: Dzioba et al., On the Kinetic Energies of Sputtered Excited Particles, I. Atoms Sputtered from Li, LiF, and NaCl, 45 Radiation Effects, 235 (1980) (Dzioba) Petitioner Exhibit 1007: Thin Film Processes, Ed. Vossen - Kern, RCA Laboratories, Princeton NJ (1978) (Thin Film Processes) (excerpted) Petitioner Exhibit 1008: USPN 5,288,381 to Cogan et al. (Cogan 381) Petitioner Exhibit 1009: USPN 4,938,571 to Cogan et al. (Cogan 571) Petitioner Exhibit 1010: USPN 2,549,596 to Hamilton et al. (Hamilton) Petitioner Exhibit 1011: J. Van Esdonk et al., Joining a Sputtering Target and a Backing Plate, Vacuum Technology, Technical Pub. Co. (Jan. 1975) (Esdonk) Petitioner Exhibit 1012: M. Nobes, An Improved Method for Producing Lithium Metal Targets, 72 Nuclear Inst. and Methods 231, N. Holland Pub. Co. (1969) (Nobes) Petitioner Exhibit 1013: Weisser et al., Thin Lithium Targets Sealed in Nickel for Low Oxygen Contamination, 40 The Rev. of Sci. Inst. (1969) (Weisser) Petitioner Exhibit 1014: USPN 3,205,564 to Shaw et al. (Shaw) Petitioner Exhibit 1015: USPN 6,777,699 to Miley et al. (Miley) Petitioner Exhibit 1016: Accelerator Targets Designed from the Production of Neutrons (Rev. English Ed.) Petitioner Exhibit 1017: USPN 4,824,744 to Kuo et al. (Kuo) Petitioner Exhibit 1018: S.N. Abramovich et al., Instruments and Experimental Techniques, Vol. 26, No. 1, Part 2, Jan.-Feb. 1982, at 245-251 (Abramovich) Petitioner Exhibit 1019: USPN 5,507,897 to Campet et al. (Campet) Petitioner Exhibit 1020: Excerpts from the prosecution history of the 336 patent Petitioner Exhibit 1021: Invalidity claim chart in view of Kawade submitted in the pending litigation Petitioner Exhibit 1022: Invalidity claim chart in view of Mueller submitted in the pending litigation Petitioner Exhibit 1023: Invalidity claim chart for Lithium Sputtering Prior Art submitted in the pending litigation

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Unlimited document access
Unlimited case alerts
Unlimited docket tracking
Unlimited search
Search/filter by motion
For-pay state court docs

$99/mo.

Excludes PACER and Gov’t fees

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

$4/document
$3/ docket update
$3/day new case alerts
$2/day for docket tracking
$1/search in Fed Courts
For-pay state court docs

$39.99/mo.

Add-ons include Federal Analytics, Easy Analytics, and the Analytics Workbench.

Add your payment information

Need help? Lets schedule a quick demo.

What is PACER?

PACER is a government system to access US court records.

Why do I need it?

Docket Alarm uses PACER to access Federal Court documents. Under the flat-rate plan, we pass these fees on to your account without markup.

What will I be charged?

If we already have the document in our database, you will not be charged anything. However, if we do not, then we must retrieve it from the court and incur their access fee.

PACER charges $0.10 per page with a 30 page (or $3.00) cap for all documents, except transcripts which have no cap. For example, a five page document is $0.50 and a 50 page document is $3.00. Accessing docket sheets also incurs a fee if we do not already have the full docket sheet (again, max of $3.00). These fees are only incurred for Federal Courts and Bankruptcies.

Do other courts have fees?

Certain state courts, mostly in California, charge for access to some documents. When accessing for-pay state courts, you will always be given an option to accept or decline the payment.

Basic Free Access

We’re committed to keeping the law open. We provide 3 free searches and document/docket views a week for documents already in our system. You have 2 pages left for free viewing.

Note: free views don't apply to documents purchased from government systems, e.g., PACER.

Welcome

Docket Alarm has relationships with many large firms such as yours.

See if your firm has an account

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Petitioner

Patent Owner

Keyboard shortcuts

Filtering / Searching the Docket

Interactive Timeline

View, Inc. v. SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.

IPR2015-00244 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Event:

Event:

Event:

Alert Sharing

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases