throbber
Paper No. ___
`Filed: June 5, 2015
`
`Filed on behalf of: Askeladden LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`Askeladden LLC
`Petitioner
`v.
`Sean McGhie and Brian Buchheit
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00125
`U.S. Patent No. 8,540,152
`
`_____________
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`PETITIONER’S OPPOSITION TO
`PATENT OWNERS’ MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AUTHORIZATION
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.54, Petitioner Askeladden LLC (“Askeladden”)
`
`hereby moves to seal portions of Petitioner’s Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion
`
`for Discovery Authorization (“the Opposition”), filed concurrently herewith. The
`
`Opposition discusses evidence that has already been sealed, as a result of
`
`Petitioner’s previous discussions with Patent Owners and Patent Owners’
`
`acquiescence to sealing such evidence. See Paper 19 at 1; Paper 22 at 1.
`
`Consequently, the Board’s Default Protective Order (“Protective Order”) was
`
`entered in this case. Paper 20; Paper 24; Paper 25. Thus, Petitioner seeks to seal the
`
`Opposition inasmuch as it contains information already deemed confidential and
`
`related information. Pursuant to Section 4(A)(ii) of the Protective Order, Petitioner
`
`is also filing partially redacted public versions of its Opposition.
`
`I.
`
`
`
`Good cause exists for sealing Petitioner’s confidential information.
`
`The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide provides that “the rules aim to strike
`
`a balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`
`information.” 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012). Under the Board’s
`
`rules, “confidential information [is identified] in a manner consistent with Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade
`
`secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information.”
`
`Id. (citing 37 C.F.R. § 42.54).
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Patent Owners seek discovery in connection with their speculation that
`
`“Alleged RPI,” i.e., “owning banks” of The Clearing House Payments Company
`
`LLC (“PayCo”) and the Clearing House Association, are real parties-in-interest in
`
`this proceeding. See Paper 39. The Opposition discusses evidence showing that
`
`Askeladden alone controls the prosecution, direction, and funding of this IPR. The
`
`narrowly-tailored excerpts of the Opposition that Askeladden seeks to seal discuss
`
`details of Askeladden’s organizational structure, business processes, financing, and
`
`operational guidelines, which are confidential.
`
`
`
`Askeladden has a strong interest in maintaining the confidentiality of its
`
`internal business structure and strategy. Further, there is no countervailing interest
`
`that would counsel against grant of the present motion. The confidential
`
`information relates to evidence already sealed in this case, which Patent Owners
`
`did not oppose. And, the sealed information has nothing to do with the underlying
`
`substantive matters and questions at issue in this IPR proceeding. Therefore, grant
`
`of the present motion will have no effect on the public’s interest in “maintaining a
`
`complete and understandable file history.”
`
`
`
`Moreover, the Opposition relates only to a non-dispositive request for
`
`discovery about third-parties such that sealing it will not inhibit public access to a
`
`complete and understandable file history.
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Additionally, the Board previously accepted Askeladden’s motions to seal
`
`papers and exhibits containing the same or substantively similar information. See
`
`Papers 17-19; Paper 22; Paper 36; Ex. 1031; Ex. 1033.
`
`II.
`
`Certification of Non-Publication
`
`
`
`On behalf of Petitioner, undersigned counsel certifies that the information
`
`identified as confidential and sought to be sealed has not, to their knowledge, been
`
`published or otherwise made public.
`
`III. Certification of Conference with Opposing Party
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.54 and Proposed Protective Order
`
`Petitioner previously conferred with Patent Owners regarding sealing
`
`
`
`documents and portions thereof containing the same, or substantively similar,
`
`confidential information that Petitioner requests to seal in the Opposition. Patent
`
`Owners did not oppose. The Board’s Default Protective Order has already been
`
`entered. Further, Petitioner notified Patent Owners of its intent to file the present
`
`motion, and Patent Owners did not object.
`
`IV. Conclusion
`
`
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board seal
`
`the Opposition, which Petitioner files concurrently herewith.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, New York 10104-3800
`Facsimile: (212) 218-2200
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Frank A. DeLucia/
`Frank A. DeLucia, Jr.
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Registration No. 42,476
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.105, the undersigned certifies
`
`that on this date, a true and correct copy of this Petitioner’s Motion to Seal
`
`Petitioner’s Opposition to Patent Owners’ Motion for Discovery Authorization
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.54 was served via email on the Patent Owner’s counsel
`
`at the following address indicated in the Patent Owner’s Mandatory Notices.
`
`
`
`bbuchheit@gmail.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Frank A. DeLucia/
`Frank A. DeLucia, Jr.
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Registration No. 42,476
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket