throbber
Filed on behalf of: Askeladden LLC
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`Askeladden LLC
`Petitioner
`v.
`Loyalty Conversion Systems Corporation
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case _____________
`U.S. Patent No. 8,540,152
`
`_____________
`
`DECLARATION OF MATTHEW CALMAN
`
`ASKELADDEN 1502
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`Introduction ..................................................................................................1
`
`Professional Background ..............................................................................1
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Education............................................................................................2
`
`Professional Career .............................................................................2
`
`Honors, Awards, Publications, and Speeches......................................6
`
`Basis for Opinion..........................................................................................7
`
`Technical Background ................................................................................12
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`Loyalty Programs..............................................................................13
`
`Conversion of Loyalty Points............................................................15
`
`Loyalty Programs and the Internet ....................................................18
`
`Comparison with Monetary Currency Conversion ............................20
`
`V.
`
`The ’152 Patent...........................................................................................22
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`E.
`
`F.
`
`G.
`
`H.
`
`I.
`
`J.
`
`Claim 1 .............................................................................................24
`
`Claim 2 .............................................................................................46
`
`Claim 3 .............................................................................................48
`
`Claim 4 .............................................................................................50
`
`Claim 5 .............................................................................................55
`
`Claim 6 .............................................................................................61
`
`Claim 7 .............................................................................................62
`
`Claim 8 .............................................................................................86
`
`Claim 9 .............................................................................................88
`
`Claim 10 ...........................................................................................89
`
`- i -
`
`

`

`K.
`
`L.
`
`M.
`
`N.
`
`O.
`
`P.
`
`Q.
`
`R.
`
`S.
`
`T.
`
`Claim 11 ...........................................................................................90
`
`Claim 12 ...........................................................................................93
`
`Claim 13 ...........................................................................................96
`
`Claim 14 .........................................................................................124
`
`Claim 15 .........................................................................................125
`
`Claim 16 .........................................................................................125
`
`Claim 17 .........................................................................................126
`
`Claim 18 .........................................................................................127
`
`Claim 19 .........................................................................................128
`
`Claim 20 .........................................................................................129
`
`- ii -
`
`

`

`I, Matthew Calman, of Charlotte, North Carolina, declare that:
`
`I.
`
`1.
`
`Introduction
`
`In view of my scientific and technical knowledge relating to financial
`
`services, I have been retained in this Inter Partes Review as an independent expert
`
`to provide my opinions on the subject matter recited in the claims of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,540,152 (“‘152 Patent”), particularly in view of the state of the field at the
`
`time of the filing of that patent and various publications (“references”) that predate
`
`the priority date.
`
`II.
`
`2.
`
`Professional Background
`
`I am currently Managing Director of Calman & Co. LLC, a consulting
`
`practice focused on innovation management and intellectual property for financial
`
`services. I am a member of the steering committee of the Federal Reserve Mobile
`
`Payments Industry Workgroup, which was formed by the Federal Reserve Banks
`
`of Boston and Atlanta to facilitate formations of an effective and secure mobile
`
`payments environment in the United States. I am also a board member of the
`
`Association of Managers of Innovation and its affiliated AMI Foundation.
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`A.
`
`Education
`
`3.
`
`I attended Carnegie Mellon University from 1982-1985 for applied
`
`mathematics. In 1999, I obtained my Master of Business Administration from
`
`Georgia State University’s Executive MBA program.
`
`B.
`
`Professional Career
`
`4.
`
`From 1985 until 1986, I was employed as a systems converter at Premier
`
`Systems. During this period, I worked on a variety of bank system conversion
`
`projects for a product called “BondMaster”, which performed bondholder and
`
`corporate debt recordkeeping functions for banks in the Corporate Trust business.
`
`In that work, I was involved in both hardware and software installation,
`
`configuration and programming, data conversion, and training. Generally, these
`
`projects concerned bondholder account computer systems and software for a
`
`variety of banks, including Indiana National Bank, Commerce Union Bank and
`
`Bank of America. These client banks paid for timesharing services of BondMaster
`
`and had the ability to program and customize the BondMaster system to suit their
`
`business needs.
`
`5.
`
`From 1986 until 1995, I was the Vice President of Corporate Trust
`
`Automation for Commerce Union Bank and its successors (Sovran Bank,
`
`C&S/Sovran Bank, and NationsBank). During this time, I managed computer
`
`operations for a datacenter with multiple Prime minicomputers running
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`BondMaster as well as “ShareMaster” and “CertMaster”, which performed
`
`bondholder, shareholder, and corporate debt, equity and hybrid security
`
`recordkeeping functions for banks in the Corporate Trust business. I also provided
`
`system support to a private communications network for multiple bank locations,
`
`both for my employer and for client banks across the United States, such as First
`
`Alabama Bank, Commerce Bank of Kansas City, Star Bank of Cincinnati, and First
`
`Union National Bank. At its peak, the Corporate Trust recordkeeping system
`
`under my management serviced over one million bondholders and shareholders.
`
`Both CertMaster and ShareMaster supported securities and payments in multiple
`
`currencies with the necessary user interfaces, accounting and system controls.
`
`6.
`
`From 1996 until 2003, I was a Senior Vice President in Transaction
`
`Services, first at NationsBank, and continuing following NationsBank’s 1998
`
`acquisition of Bank of America (the resulting entity continued to use the name
`
`Bank of America). During this time period, I led transition projects in facilities,
`
`software, customer conversion and process design for cash, check and ACH
`
`platforms.
`
`7.
`
`From 2003 until 2006, I was Process Design Executive for Bank of
`
`America’s Check 21 check image program, which implemented the Check 21 Act
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`enacted in 2004 to permit use of electronic check images. I led the team that
`
`designed and implemented image check processing.
`
`8.
`
`From 2006 until 2013, I was R&D Executive for Bank of America and
`
`headed the bank’s internal research at the Gateway Innovation Lab, which Bank of
`
`America founded to promote innovation in financial services. At the same time, I
`
`was also in charge of the bank’s external research collaboration with the
`
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) Media Lab (known as “The Center
`
`for Future Banking”), and directed sponsored research for the bank with Carnegie
`
`Mellon University’s Human Computer Interaction Institute. I led the Bank of
`
`America Innovation Enablement team in the development of emerging payment
`
`and loyalty technologies, particularly focused on smartphones and tablets with
`
`technologies such as check image deposits, contactless payments, cloud payments,
`
`machine vision, data analytics, social norms applied to spending, online and
`
`mobile user interfaces, customer loyalty programs and offers, personal budgeting
`
`and goal tracking, and live video interactions. My team at Bank of America tested
`
`hundreds of concepts and prototypes with customers in our lab to assess the
`
`viability and desirability of solutions for online, mobile, merchant, ATM, and
`
`branch channels. In that time, I was named as inventor on 253 worldwide patent
`
`applications assigned to Bank of America with several in the field of customer
`
`loyalty programs with online and mobile interactions.
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`9.
`
`Since my initial employment at Premier Systems beginning in 1985, I
`
`have worked in the fields of financial services technology, payments, customer
`
`interactions and operations. I have worked extensively in software programming,
`
`transaction processing, fraud prevention, currency and payments, systems design
`
`and integration, process design, online and mobile banking, and prototyping. I have
`
`worked in bank operations supporting multi-currency accounting and multi-
`
`currency payments. I have worked with industry standards workgroups, such as
`
`the American National Standards Institute’s X9 workgroup (“ANSI X9”) and the
`
`Financial Services Technology Consortium (“FSTC”), as well as industry security
`
`and fraud-fighting workgroups, such as the Financial Services Information Sharing
`
`and Analysis Center (“FS-ISAC”) and the SmartCard Alliance.
`
`10.
`
`I hold a Six Sigma Black Belt certification (a set of techniques and tools
`
`for process improvement) and have extensive experience in design and
`
`improvement of paper, image, and electronic process design, implementation,
`
`measurement and testing in a high-volume environment processing tens-of-
`
`millions of transactions per day. These process designs include the integration and
`
`incorporation of communications and networking methods that connect bank-to-
`
`bank, bank-to-government, bank-to-customer and bank-to-network. In several
`
`cases, my work directed the development of new standards for communications
`
`network utilization for banking transactions, for example inter-bank check image
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`exchange, remote customer check image deposit, check image quality assurance,
`
`and check image fraud prevention. My work in Corporate Trust involved debt,
`
`equity and hybrid securities, specifically the systems, operations and accounting
`
`for corporate actions such as offerings, mergers, stock splits, reverse splits,
`
`dividend and coupon payments, dividend reinvestment, and redemptions which
`
`involved the conversion, retirement, issuance and management of credit balances
`
`of shares, units, and cash-in-lieu payments.
`
`C.
`
`Honors, Awards, Publications, and Speeches
`
`11.
`
`Since 1986, I have regularly been a speaker and instructor at financial
`
`industry workshops and conferences for organizations including the American
`
`Bankers Association, Bank Administration Institute, Financial Services
`
`Roundtable, KPMG, McKinsey, Microsoft, Mobey Forum, and the Product
`
`Development and Management Association, as well as government agencies and
`
`regulators including the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council, various
`
`Federal Reserve Banks, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Central
`
`Intelligence Agency.
`
`12.
`
`I have taught graduate-level classes as a visiting lecturer at Carnegie
`
`Mellon University, Georgia State University, University of North Carolina, and
`
`Vanderbilt University. My talks emphasize innovation leadership and the
`
`adaptation of emerging technology to the challenges of financial services.
`- 6 -
`
`

`

`13.
`
`I am a named inventor on twenty-eight U.S. patents in the fields of image
`
`processing, transaction processing, financial services technology, and mobile
`
`payments, the first of which was filed in August 4, 2005. I am a named inventor
`
`on four foreign patents in Mexico, Australia and China in the field of image
`
`processing. I am a named inventor on a total of 253 patent applications worldwide,
`
`both published and unpublished, from my career at Bank of America.
`
`14.
`
`My Curriculum Vitae is attached, which provides additional information
`
`regarding my qualifications, including a list of awards and honors I have earned,
`
`publications I have authored, and patents on which I am a named inventor.
`
`III. Basis for Opinion
`
`15.
`
`My opinions set forth below are based on my education, training,
`
`experience, and the content of the references considered. My understanding of the
`
`relevant law, as discussed below, is based on my discussions with counsel for
`
`Askeladden LLC.
`
`16.
`
`I have been asked to consider and provide my opinions on the claims of
`
`the ’152 Patent, including the technical subject matter and the application of
`
`various references that predate the filing of the ’152 Patent. In particular, I have
`
`been asked to consider what one of ordinary skill in the art would have understood
`
`from the ’152 Patent, whether certain references disclose or suggest the features
`
`- 7 -
`
`

`

`recited in the claims of the ’152 Patent, and whether one of ordinary skill in the art
`
`would have had reason to combine certain references to arrive at the claimed
`
`subject matter.
`
`17.
`
`My opinions concerning the application of the references to the claimed
`
`subject matter and the state of the art are provided based on what a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the art (i.e., the technical field of the invention) would have
`
`understood at the time of the alleged invention of the ’152 Patent, which I have
`
`been asked to initially assume is May 25, 2006 (“the priority date”).
`
`18.
`
`In evaluating the content of the prior art references and their application to
`
`the claims of the ’152 Patent, I understand that one must put himself in the position
`
`of a person of ordinary skill in the art. In my opinion, the person of ordinary skill
`
`is a hypothetical concept referring to one who thinks along the lines of
`
`conventional wisdom at the time. I believe a person of ordinary skill in the art at
`
`the time of May 25, 2006, would have had either (i) a Bachelor’s degree with two
`
`(2) years of experience in marketing, or (ii) a Masters of Business Administration
`
`(M.B.A.) degree or higher, as well as knowledge of Internet web page design and
`
`development, and knowledge of customer loyalty programs.
`
`19.
`
`I have been informed that subject matter claimed in a patent is obvious if a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the alleged invention was made would
`
`- 8 -
`
`

`

`have had reason (whether, for instance, common sense, explicit statements in the
`
`references, suggestions in the references, or the state of the art at the time) to
`
`combine or modify the disclosures of one or more references to arrive at the
`
`claimed subject matter.
`
`20.
`
`I am being compensated for this matter at my normal hourly rate of $340.
`
`My compensation is not dependent on the outcome of the matter.
`
`21.
`
`I have reviewed the ’152 Patent, as well as:
`
` Exhibit 1503 ― U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`
`2005/0021399 (“Postrel”);
`
` Exhibit 1504 ― U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`
`2002/0143614 (“MacLean”);
`
` Exhibit 1505 ― U.S. Patent No. 6,721,743 (Sakakibara”);
`
` Exhibit 1506 ― Wayback Machine archive dated June 20, 2000, for
`
`American Express web site: “How to redeem or transfer your points
`
`online”;
`
` Exhibit 1507 ― Wayback Machine archive dated June 20, 2000, for
`
`American Express web site: “Air rewards”;
`
` Exhibit 1508 ― Wayback Machine archive dated January 4, 1997, for
`
`Citibank web site: “Citibank Cards and Services”;
`
`- 9 -
`
`

`

` Exhibit 1509 ― Wayback Machine archive dated December 1, 1998,
`
`for American Express web site: “Rewards Cards”;
`
` Exhibit 1510 ― Wayback Machine archive dated June 21, 2000, for
`
`American Express web site: “Shopping rewards”;
`
` Exhibit 1511 ― Wayback Machine archive dated December 9, 2003,
`
`for Marriott Rewards web site: “Air Mileage”;
`
` Exhibit 1512 ― Wayback Machine archive dated November 25, 2002,
`
`for Starwood Hotels & Resorts web site: “Transfer : Airlines”;
`
` Exhibit 1513 ― Wayback Machine archive dated June 19, 2000, for
`
`United Airlines web site: “Mileage Plus partners”;
`
` Exhibit 1514 ― Wayback Machine archive dated July 17, 2004, for
`
`WebFlyer web site: “Mileage Converter”;
`
` Exhibit 1515 ― MacDonald, Jay, Experience rewards pay off for some
`
`credit card users, Bankrate.com, November 17, 2003 (available at
`
`http://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit-cards/experience-rewards-
`
`pay-off-for-some-credit-card-users-1.aspx);
`
` Exhibit 1521 ― Wayback Machine archive dated August 16, 2000, for
`
`United Airlines web site: “Car Rental Partners”;
`
` Exhibit 1522 ― Wayback Machine archive dated June 20, 2000, for
`
`United Airlines web site: “Cruise Partners”;
`
`- 10 -
`
`

`

` Exhibit 1523 ― S&H Green Points – About S&H (available at
`
`http://www.greenpoints.com/info/inf_aboutsh.asp);
`
` Exhibit 1524 ― Wayback Machine archive dated November 27, 1999,
`
`for Green Points “The Points You’ve Been Waiting For”;
`
` Exhibit 1525 ― Wayback Machine archive dated April 15, 1998 for
`
`American Airlines web site: “Welome to AA.com”;
`
` Exhibit 1526 ― Security and Exchange Commission Letter from the
`
`Chief: Accountant Issues Related to Internet Operations, October 18,
`
`1999, available at
`
`http://www.sec.gov/info/accountants/staffletters/calt1018.htm; and
`
` Exhibit 1527 ― The Emerging Issue Task Force of the Financial
`
`Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), “Accounting for ‘Points’ and
`
`Certain Other Time-Based of Volume-Based Sales Incentive Offers,
`
`and Offers for Free Products or Services to be delivered in the future”,
`
`Issue No. 00-22 (2001), available at
`
`http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobnocache=true&bl
`
`obwhere=1175820904620&blobheader=application/pdf&blobheaderna
`
`me2=Content-Length&blobheadername1=Content-
`
`Disposition&blobheadervalue2=79563&blobheadervalue1=filename=a
`
`bs00-22.pdf&blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs;
`
`- 11 -
`
`

`

` Exhibit 1528 ― Stone et al., User Interface Design and Evaluation,
`
`Interactive Technologies (April 29, 2005);
`
` Exhibit 1529 ― US Patent No 5,513,359; and
`
` Exhibit 1530 ― George Bond, “Gateways to the Internet”, Byte
`
`Magazine, pp. 229-31 (Sept. 1995).
`
`IV. Technical Background
`
`22.
`
`The claims of the ’152 Patent are directed to converting non-negotiable
`
`credits, such as loyalty points as airline miles, into another form of usable credit
`
`independent from the entity, such as credit card points.
`
`23.
`
`As one of ordinary skill in the art would be well familiar with, at the time
`
`of the ’152 Patent, throughout commerce, and particularly in the retail, travel, and
`
`financial industries, businesses have long used creative ways to bring in and retain
`
`customers. This is because businesses recognize the value of building
`
`relationships with customers through repeat business. As customers become more
`
`and more familiar with the business and its products/services, additional sales are
`
`expected from these customers. In addition, once a relationship is established, the
`
`customer is less likely to consider and switch to the business’s competitors for
`
`similar products/services. With customer relationships in mind accordingly, at the
`
`time of the ’152 Patent, the person of ordinary skill would have been familiar with
`
`the fact that many businesses rely on loyalty programs to attract and retain
`
`- 12 -
`
`

`

`customers. With these loyalty programs, customers are rewarded for their frequent
`
`business.
`
`A.
`
`Loyalty Programs
`
`24.
`
`Loyalty programs are designed to encourage customers to stay with a
`
`particular business, by offering various incentives for repeat business. These
`
`programs also entice first-time customers into trying the business’s
`
`products/services with an expectation of building a customer relationship.
`
`25.
`
`The person of ordinary skill in the art would have been familiar with the
`
`commonplace use of loyalty programs for many years in a variety of industries. In
`
`the travel industry, there is ubiquitous use of airline frequent flyer programs and
`
`hotel rewards programs. Likewise in the financial industry, loyalty programs been
`
`used with financial services such as credit cards. The S&H Green Stamps program
`
`dates back to the 19th century, with a variety of merchants, particularly grocers,
`
`giving denominated paper stamps to customers in proportion to the amount of their
`
`spending. (Ex. 1523.)
`
`26.
`
`Generally with respect to these programs, customers earned loyalty points
`
`through repeated transactions with the business offering the program. A
`
`customer’s loyalty points would accumulate, resulting in the customer having a
`
`balance of points with the program.
`
`- 13 -
`
`

`

`27.
`
`The appeal of the loyalty programs was driven by the customer’s ability to
`
`redeem loyalty points for value. With some early loyalty programs, loyalty points
`
`were redeemable only for merchandise and/or services provided by the
`
`corresponding business itself. Often, a variety of merchandise and/or services was
`
`offered in exchange for loyalty point redemption, with the more valuable selections
`
`generally requiring the redemption of more loyalty points. As such, customers had
`
`incentive to accrue loyalty points, for the chance to redeem them for the more
`
`valuable selections.
`
`28.
`
`As mentioned, airline frequent flyer programs have been a popular form of
`
`loyalty program, with these programs first being introduced around the 1970’s.
`
`The programs encouraged customers to earn loyalty program points (generally
`
`known as “frequent flyer miles”) by taking flights on a particular airline. The
`
`quantity of earned points typically depended on the distance of the undertaken
`
`flight. The program points could be redeemed for a free flight or to upgrade an
`
`existing flight. In addition, many such programs contained tiered status levels,
`
`each tier offering greater benefits such as service upgrades or accelerated point
`
`accumulation. In order to reach the next tier, a customer generally accumulated a
`
`threshold quantity of points, often within a certain time period (e.g., annually).
`
`- 14 -
`
`

`

`29.
`
`Credit card loyalty programs were also well-known, and one popular such
`
`program was the American Express Membership Rewards program, which was
`
`affiliated with American Express credit cards and dated at least back to the 1990’s.
`
`(Ex. 1506; see also Ex. 1508; Ex. 1509; Ex. 1515.) I have personal knowledge and
`
`experience with this, as an American Express cardholder and Membership
`
`Rewards program participant during the 1990’s. Under these programs,
`
`participants earned loyalty points through purchases with the credit card, e.g.,
`
`American Express card. The amount of earned loyalty points was typically
`
`calculated based on the monetary amount of purchases that the participant spent
`
`using the credit card. The program points could be redeemed for a variety of
`
`merchandise or services, and the loyalty program often maintained a catalog of
`
`redeemable merchandise/services. I personally recall this based on my experience
`
`as a customer with American Express during the relevant period.
`
`B.
`
`Conversion of Loyalty Points
`
`30.
`
`When loyalty programs were in their infancy, the programs were often
`
`confined to specific businesses, such as grocers, that sponsored the program. I
`
`have personal knowledge and experience with this, as a participant in early airline
`
`mileage loyalty programs dating back to the 1980’s. In the beginning, customer
`
`participants in the program could only earn points by transacting with sponsoring
`
`businesses, and could only redeem the points for the program’s merchandise or
`
`- 15 -
`
`

`

`services. However, as these programs became increasingly popular and branched
`
`out from groceries and merchandise, businesses and programs began forming
`
`partnerships with other businesses and programs, especially those involving
`
`complementary products in adjacent industries. For example, by mid-year 2000,
`
`United Airlines had formed partnerships with various hotel chains such as Hilton
`
`and Marriott, various car rental agencies such as Avis and Hertz, and various cruise
`
`partners such as Norwegian Cruise Line. (Ex. 1521; 1522.) With these
`
`partnerships in place, customers of the United Airlines frequent flyer program were
`
`able to redeem their frequent flyer points (“miles”) for credit with any of these
`
`partner businesses. (Ex. 1513.) I personally recall this, as a customer of air travel
`
`during the relevant period.
`
`31.
`
`Partnerships also expanded for loyalty programs involving credit cards.
`
`For example, by mid-year 2000, the American Express Membership Rewards
`
`program included partnerships with businesses across different industries,
`
`including airlines, retail shopping, car rental agencies, and vacation destinations.
`
`(Ex. 1506; see also Ex. 1511; Ex. 1512.) These partnerships allowed American
`
`Express Membership Rewards participants to redeem their points for merchandise
`
`or credit at any of these partner businesses. For example, their points could be
`
`redeemed for store credit at Saks Fifth Avenue. (Ex. 1510.) Again, I personally
`
`- 16 -
`
`

`

`recall this, based on my customer experience with the American Express
`
`Membership Rewards program during this relevant period.
`
`32.
`
`Accordingly, at the time of the ’152 Patent, one of ordinary skill would
`
`been familiar with the option redemption methodology described above. As is
`
`evidence from the discussion above, not only was the optional redemption of
`
`loyalty points at partnership businesses well-known, so was the conversion of
`
`points to points with the partnership business’s loyalty programs. Using the
`
`American Express Membership Rewards example again, by mid-year 2000, the
`
`program formed partnerships with major airlines such as Delta Airlines, US
`
`Airways, and Continental Airlines, and participants could convert American
`
`Express Membership Rewards points to frequent flyer miles (loyalty points) on a
`
`particular airline (e.g., Delta Airlines SkyMiles). (Ex. 1507.) In another example,
`
`as early as 1988, S&H Green Stamps could be converted to frequent flyer miles
`
`(loyalty points) on a particular airline (e.g., Delta Airlines SkyMiles).
`
`33.
`
`The quantity of converted partnership business loyalty program credit
`
`(e.g., frequent flyer miles) depended both on the quantity of original loyalty
`
`program points (e.g., American Express Membership Rewards points) being
`
`redeemed and on an established conversion ratio of original loyalty program points
`
`to business partner loyalty program points. (Ex. 1507 (“Membership Rewards
`
`- 17 -
`
`

`

`point conversion”).) Using Delta Airlines as a partnership business example, by
`
`mid-year 2000, a participant could convert 1,000 American Express Membership
`
`Rewards points to 1,000 Delta Airlines SkyMiles frequent flyer miles. (Ibid.) As
`
`such, the conversion ratio of Membership Rewards points to SkyMiles was
`
`1000:1000 (i.e., 1:1). (Ibid.) On the other hand, when converting to Southwest
`
`Airlines Rapid Rewards Flight Credits, the conversion ratio was 1000 Membership
`
`Rewards points to 1 Rapid Rewards Flight Credit (i.e., 1000:1). (Ibid.)
`
`C.
`
`Loyalty Programs and the Internet
`
`34.
`
`Loyalty programs were in existence prior to the development of the
`
`Internet. With pre-Internet loyalty programs, customers could redeem points in a
`
`variety of ways, such as by telephone, postal mail, and/or in-person contact with
`
`the business’s loyalty program. I personally recall loyalty programs distributing
`
`catalogs of redeemable items to their customers via postal mail. In many instances,
`
`such catalogs included a blank order form for customers to complete and return, to
`
`place a redemption order. For example, S&H Green Stamps dates from 1896 and
`
`are a perfect example of a tangible currency (stamps) collected into an account
`
`(books) exchanged for goods (S&H Gifts). (Ex. 1523.)
`
`35.
`
`As Internet access became more prevalent in the 1990’s, loyalty programs
`
`started to establish websites that initially contained information about the program,
`
`- 18 -
`
`

`

`such as how loyalty points are earned and redeemed. This provided existing and
`
`potential customers with online access to information about the program.
`
`36.
`
`As online shopping became more prevalent in the 1990’s, loyalty
`
`programs in-turn adapted their web sites to allow customers’ individual access to
`
`their loyalty program accounts online. Even as early as 1998, the web sites of
`
`many loyalty programs had already been well-developed to the level of providing
`
`participants with point balance access and online redemption of merchandise with
`
`their points. (See Ex. 1525.) For example, in 1999, S&H offered an exchange of
`
`“green points” for “valuable rewards: merchandise, frequent flyer miles, and
`
`more.” (Ex. 1524.)
`
`37.
`
`For example, by mid-year 2000, on the American Express Membership
`
`Rewards web site, participants could view their points (Ex. 1506, “View points”
`
`option on left column) and also redeem their points online for various merchandise
`
`(Ibid. (“How to Redeem Points Online for Shopping, Recreation, Home, Travel,
`
`Disney or Car Rental Rewards”).)
`
`38.
`
`In addition to online merchandise redemption, at least by mid-year 2000,
`
`the American Express Membership Rewards web site also permitted the online
`
`conversion of loyalty points into frequent flyer miles. (Ex. 1506 (“How to
`
`Transfer Points Online to my Frequent Flyer/Guest Account”); see also Ex. 1514.)
`
`- 19 -
`
`

`

`39.
`
`By 2005, it was also generally understood by the person of ordinary skill
`
`that web pages presented from web sites were a form of graphical user interface.
`
`(Ex. 1528 p. 5; Ex. 1530, p. 231.)
`
`40.
`
`Likewise, a person of ordinary skill would be very familiar with the fact
`
`that from their inception, personal computers have been equipped with a processor
`
`and memory and/or other data storage to execute operating system functions and
`
`run installed software and store data. (Ex. 1529, col. 1, lines 34-61.) In one form
`
`of PC organization dating back to at least the early 1990’s, operating system data
`
`was typically retrieved from non-volatile storage, such as a floppy disk or hard
`
`disk, and is loaded into memory to provide a user interface with the user. (Ex.
`
`1529, col. 4, lines 17-27.)
`
`D.
`
`Comparison with Monetary Currency Conversion
`
`41.
`
`A person of ordinary skill would be familiar with currency exchange
`
`concepts as they existed at the time of the ’152 Patent. Indeed, my personal
`
`involvement with accounting and payments in multiple currencies dates to the
`
`1980’s and 1990’s, including US Dollars, Canadian Dollars, and British Pounds.
`
`Several of the corporate securities for which my operations team had responsibility
`
`provided a payment feature allowing customers to be paid in the currency of their
`
`choosing. Consequently, my team worked with currency exchange, reconcilement
`
`and payments to satisfy those customers. Conventionally in currency exchange, a
`- 20 -
`
`

`

`first currency (e.g., U.S. Dollars) is converted into a second currency (e.g., British
`
`Pounds) in accordance with a published, floating, market-based exchange rate.
`
`The exchange rate between the first currency and the second currency is a ratio
`
`between quantities of the first currency and the second currency. For example, if 1
`
`U.S. Dollar is worth 0.5 British Pounds, then the exchange rate (i.e., conversion
`
`ratio) is 1:0.5. Often, this ratio is displayed in a fractional format (i.e., 0.500). At
`
`the same time, if 1 U.S. dollar is worth 100 Japanese Yen, then the exchange rate is
`
`1:100, or 100.000. Published market exchange rates may be adjusted up or down
`
`by currency exchange agents to incorporate fees or discounts.
`
`42.
`
`Businesses have always treated loyalty points as having intrinsic monetary
`
`value. With respect to accounting practices, businesses generally tracked the
`
`quantity of outstanding points, assessed monetary values relating to the points, and
`
`recorded corresponding liability entries on their financial statements for future
`
`redemptions. At the same time, any sale of loyalty points from one business to
`
`another, such as airline miles sold to a credit card issuer for use as a reward to their
`
`credit card customers for usage, were recorded as current income by the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket