throbber
GeneDX 1010, pg. 1
`
`

`
`AMERICAN
`AssOCIATION FOR THE
`ADVANCEMENT OF
`SciENCE
`
`Editorial
`Letters
`
`• CIENCE
`
`ISSN 0036-8075
`5 SEPTEMBER 1986
`VoLUME 233
`NUMBER 4768
`
`1015 This Week in Science
`
`1017 Beauty, Balance, and Mathematics
`
`1027 Probability Estimates: A. M. GRIMWADE • NASA's Bureaucracy:
`A. M. SQUIREs; P. BEARSE • Protein Structure: D . B. WETLAUFER
`
`News & Comment
`
`1029 Chernobyl : Errors and Design Flaws
`
`1031 Briefing: Earthquake Research Center Siting Triggers California Tremors
`1032 Medicine as Business: Are Doctors Entrepreneurs?
`
`1034 B1iejing: Lindow Microbe Test Delayed by Legal Action Until Spring • PHS
`Invites Industry Collaboration on AIDS Vaccine • Will an AIDS Vaccine
`Bankrupt the Company That Makes It? • NASA Council Sees Continued Erosion
`of Space Program • Soviet Union Suspends Plans to Divert Four Rivers
`
`Mat1Mik411~14i¥-
`
`1037 Trying to Crack the Second Half of the Genetic Code
`
`1039 Do California Quakes Portend a Large One?
`
`1040 Washington Embraces Global Earth Sciences
`
`Articles
`
`Research Articles
`
`Reports
`
`1043 Strong Ground Motion from the Michoacan, Mexico, Earthquake:
`]. G. ANDERSON, P. BODIN,] . N. BRUNE,] . PRINCE, s. K. SINGH, R. QUAAS,
`M. ONATE
`
`1050 Multiple DNA-Protein Interactions Governing High-Precision DNA
`Transactions: H. EcHOLS
`
`1056 Natural Philosophy in the Constitution: G. PIEL
`
`1061
`
`Induction of Membrane Ruffling and Fluid-Phase Pinocytosis in Quiescent
`Fibroblasts by ms Proteins: D. BAR-SAGI AND]. R. FERAMISCO
`
`1069 Catalytic H ydration of Terminal Alkenes to Primary Alcohols: C. M. ]ENSEN
`AND W. C. TROGLER
`
`1071 Coastal Uplift and Mortality of Intertidal Organisms Caused by the September
`1985 Mexico Earthquakes: P. BoDIN AND T. KLINGER
`
`1073 Transition State Analogs as Ligands for Affinity Purification of]uvenile Hormone
`Esterase: Y. A. I. ABDEL-AAL AND B. D. HAMMocK
`
`•
`
`•
`
`SCIENCE Is published weekly on Friday, except the last week In December, and with a plus Issue In May by the
`American Association lor the Advancement of Science, 1333 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. Second-class
`postage (publication No. 484460) paid at Washington, DC, and at an additional entry. Now ~ombined with The Scientific
`Monthly® Copyright © 1986 by the American Association lor the Advancement of Science. The title SCIENCE is a reg·
`istered trademark ol the AAAS. Domestic individual membership and subscription (51 issues): $65. Domestic institutional
`subscription (51 issues): $98. Foreign postage ex1ra: Canada $24, other (surface mail) $27, air-surface via-Amsterdam
`$65. First class, airmail, school-year, and student rates on request. Single copies $2.50 ($3 by mail); back issues $4
`($4.50 by mail); Biotechnology issue, $5.50 ($6 by mail); classroom rates on request; Guide to Biotechnology Products
`and Instruments $16 ($17 by mail). Change of address : allow 6 weeks, giving old and new addresses and seven-digit
`account number. Authorization to photocopy material lor internal or personal use under circumstances not falling within
`the fair use provisions of the Copyright Act is granted by AAAS to libraries and other users registered with the Copyright
`Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided that the base fee of $1 per copy plus $0.10 per page
`is paid directly to CCC, 21 Congress Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970. The identification code for Science is 0036·
`8075/83$1 + .10. Postmaster : Send Form 3579 to Science, 1333 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. Science is in·
`dexed in the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature and in several specialized indexes.
`The American Association for the Advancement of Science was founded in 1848 and incorporated in 1874. lis objects
`are to further the work of scientists, to facilitate cooperation among them, to foster scientific freedom and responsibility,
`to improve the effectiveness of science in the promotion of human welfare, and to increase public understanding and ap·
`preciation of the importance and promise of the methods of science in human progress.
`
`1012
`
`SCIENCE, VOL. 233
`
`GeneDX 1010, pg. 2
`
`

`
`13. H. G. Bull, N. A. Thornberry, E. H . Cordes,]. Bioi.
`Cbcm. 260, 2963 (1985).
`14. M. A. Ashour ct nl. , personal communication; M.
`H. Gelb, J. P. Svaren, R. H. Abeles, Bioc!Jwust>)' 24,
`1813 (1985).
`15. R. Wolfenden, A111111. RCI'. Biopbys. Biocng. 5, 271
`(1976); Mct/Jods Enzymo/. 46, 15 (1977); U. Brod(cid:173)
`beck, inEnzyme ln/JibitOI~, U. Brodbeck, Ed. (Verlag
`Chemic, Deerfield, FL, 1980), p. 3.
`
`16. N. 0 . Kaplan ct nl., Proc. Nntl. A end. Sci. U.S.A . 71 ,
`3450 (1974); T. ]. Bazzone ct nl., Bioc!Jcmistl)' 18,
`43~2 (1979); N. ]. Hoogenraad, T. M. Sutherland,
`G. ]. Howlett, Ann/. Bioc/Jcm. 101 , 97 (1980) ; L.
`Andersson and R. Wolfenden, J. Bioi. CIJCm. 225,
`11106 (1980); R. Wolfenden and L. Andersson, in
`C/Jcmicnl Appronc/Jes to Undc>!tnnding Enz_yme Cntnl(cid:173)
`)'sis: Biomimetic C/Jcmist>y nnd Tmnsition State Ann(cid:173)
`logs, B. S. Green, Y . Ashani, D. Chipman, Eds.
`
`(Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982), vol. 10, pp. 287-297.
`17. Supported by grants from the Herman Frasch Foun(cid:173)
`dation and NIEHS , NSF, and USDA (ES02710-
`06, DCB-8518697, and 85-CRCR-1-1715, respcc(cid:173)
`tivcl\•) . vVe thank P. Bartlett, R. Wolfenden, S.
`Duffey, T. Sparks, and other colleagues for valuable
`comments.
`
`27 January 1986; accepted 12 May 1986
`
`Direct Cloning and Sequence Analysis of
`Enzymatically Amplified Genomic Sequences
`
`STEPHEN J. ScHARF, GLENN T. HoRN, HENRY A. ERLICH
`
`A method is described for directly cloning enzymatically amplified segments of
`genomic DNA into an Ml3 ve<;tor for sequence analysis. A llO-base pair fragment of
`the human ~-globin gene an~ a 242-base pair fragment of the human leukocyte
`antigen DQa locus were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction method, a
`procedure based on repeated cycles of denaturation, primer annealing, and extension
`by DNA polymerase I. Oligonucleotide primers with restriction endonuclease sites
`added to their 5' ends were used to facilitate the cloning of the amplified DNA. The
`analysis of cloned products allowed the quantitative evaluation of the amplification
`method's specificity and fidelity. Given the low frequency of sequence errors observed,
`111-is approach promis~,:s to be a rapid method for obtaining reliable genomic sequences
`from nanogram amounts of DNA.
`
`U NDERSTANDING THE MOLECULAR
`
`basis of genetic disease or of com(cid:173)
`plex genetic polymorphisms, such
`as those ·in the human leukocyte antigen
`(HLA) region , requires detailed nucleotide
`sequence information from a variety of indi(cid:173)
`viduals to localize relevant variations. Cur(cid:173)
`rently, the an<! lysis of each allelic variant
`requires a substantial effort in library con(cid:173)
`stmction, screening, mapping, subcloning,
`and sequencing. We report here a method
`for the enzymatic an1plification of specific
`segmepts of genomic DNA and their direct
`cloning into Ml3 vectors for sequence anal(cid:173)
`ysis, using modifications of tl1e polymerase
`chain reaction (PCR) (1, 2). This in vitro
`amplification procedure is based on repeated
`cycles of denaturation, oligonucleotide
`primer annealing, and primer extension by
`the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase,
`and results in an exponential increase in
`copies of the region flanked by the primers.
`This method greatly reduces tl1e nt.Jmber of
`cloned DNA fragments to be screened, cir(cid:173)
`cumvents the need for full genomic libraries,
`and may allow cloning from nanogram
`quantities of genomic DNA. In addition,
`the cloning and sequencing of PCR-ampli(cid:173)
`fied DNA i~ a powerful analytical tool for
`tl1e study of the specificity and fidelity of
`tl1is newly developed teclmique.
`To develop this teclmique for genomic
`sequence determination and to analyze the
`individual products of PCR amplification,
`we chose the oligonucleotide primers and
`
`probes previously described for tl1e diagno(cid:173)
`sis of sickle cell anemia (2) . These primers
`amplifY a 110-bp segment of the hwnan f3-
`hemoglobin gene containing the Hb-S plU(cid:173)
`tation (Fig. 1). They were modified near
`their 5' ends (Fig. l ) to produce convenient
`restriction sites (linkers) for cloning directly
`into the Ml3mpl0 sequencing vector (3).
`These modifications did not affect the effi(cid:173)
`ciency of PCR an1plification of tl1e specific
`f3-globin segment (Fig. 2B), even tl10ugh
`tl1e overall pattern of PCR-amplified prod(cid:173)
`ucts is different (Fig. 2A). After amplifica(cid:173)
`tion, the PCR products were cleaved with
`tl1e appropriate restriction enzymes and dia(cid:173)
`lyzed to remove inhibitors of ligation. These
`fragments were ligated into the Ml3 vector,
`transformed into the JM103 host, and plat(cid:173)
`ed out, and the resulting plaques were
`screened by hybridization witl1 a labeled
`oligonucleotide probe to detect tl1e f3-globin
`clones. The plaques were also screened with
`the labeled PCR oligonucleotide prin1ers to
`identify all of tl1e clones containing ampli(cid:173)
`fied DNA. Individual clones were tl1en se(cid:173)
`quenced directly by using the dideoxy prim(cid:173)
`er-extension method (4).
`The incorporation of different restriction
`sites at the termini of tl1e amplified product
`allows digestion of the vector with two
`restriction enzymes, thereby reducing the
`background of blue plaques from vectors
`without inserts to less tl1an 11% (Table l).
`More tl1an 80% of the clones contained
`tl1e PCR primer se-
`DNA inserts witl1
`
`quences but only about l% of the clones
`hybridized to tl1e internal f3-globin probe.
`These nonglobin fragments presumably rep(cid:173)
`resent amplifications of other segments of
`the genome. This observation is consistent
`witl1 the gel and Soutl1ern blot analysis of
`tl1e PCR-amplified DNA from a f3-globin
`deletion mutant and a normal ceU line (Fig.
`2). The sil11ilarity of the observed gel pro(cid:173)
`files reveals tl1at most of the amplified geno(cid:173)
`mic DNA fragments arise from nonglobin
`templates. Sequence analysis of two of these
`nontarget clones showed tl1at tl1e segments
`between the PCR primer sequences were
`unrelated to the f3-globin gene and con(cid:173)
`tained an abw1dance of dinucleotide repeats,
`sin1ilar to some genomic intergenic spacer
`sequences (5).
`When ten of the clones that hybridized to
`the f3-globin probe were sequenced, nine
`proved to be identical to the f3-globin gene
`and one contained five nucleotide differ(cid:173)
`ences but was identical to the &-globin gene.
`The f3-globin PCR primers each have two
`mismatches witl1
`tl1e &-globin sequence
`(Fig. l) . The preferential PCR an1plification
`of f3-globin relative to &-globin observed in
`our clonal analysis agrees with tl1e results
`obtained with the oligomer restriction assay
`on the PCR reaction (2, 6) . Each of tl1ese
`ten sequenced clones contains a segment of
`70 bp originally syntl1esized from tl1e geno(cid:173)
`mic DNA template during the PCR amplifi (cid:173)
`cation process. Since no sequence alterations
`were seen in tl1ese clones, the frequency of
`nucleotide misincorporation during 20 cy(cid:173)
`cles of PCR amplification is less tl1a11 l in
`700.
`To analyze the molecular basis of genetic
`polymorphism and disease susceptibility in
`tl1e HLA class II loci, tl1is approach has been
`extended to the an1plification and cloning of
`a 242-bp fragment from the second exon of
`tl1e HLA DQo: locus, which exhibits local(cid:173)
`ized aUelic variability. In tlus case the prim(cid:173)
`ers, whose sequence is based on conserved
`regions of this exon, contain 5' -terminal
`restriction sites witl1 no homology to the
`DQo: sequence (Fig. 1). The specificity of
`amplification achieved with tl1ese primers is
`greater than that achieved with tl1e f3-globin
`
`Cetus Corporation , Department of Human Genetics,
`1400 Fifty-Third Street, Emeryville, CA 94608.
`
`SC IEN CE, VOL. 233
`
`J
`
`GeneDX 1010, pg. 3
`
`

`
`A
`
`Human {3 -hemoglobin
`
`PC03: ACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGC ~
`Met .•.
`GH18: CTTCTGcagCAACTGTGTTCACTAGC ~
`... TTACATTTGCTTCTGACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGCAACCTCAAACAGACACCATGGTGCAC ... TGCCCTGTGGGGCAAGGTGAACGTGGATGAAGTTGGTGGTGAGGCCC .. .
`.. . AATGTAAACGAAGACTGTGTTGACACAAGTGATCGTTGGAGTTTGTCTGTGGTACCACGTG ... ACGGGACACCCCGTTCCACTTGCACCTACTTCAACCACCACTCCGGG .. .
`~ CCACTTGCACCTACTTCgAaCAC
`:GH19
`~ CCACTTGCACCTACTTCAAC
`:PC04
`
`B
`
`119 bp
`
`Human HLA DQ a
`
`GH26: gtgctgcaGGTGTAAACTTGTACCAG ~
`... ACCACGTTGCCTCTTGTGGTGTAAACTTGTACCAGTTTTACGGTCCCTCTGGCCAGTACAC ... TTAAACGCTACAACTCTACCGCTGCTACCAATGAGGTTCCTGAGGTC .. .
`... TGGTGCAACGGAGAACACCACATTTGAACATGGTCAAAATGCCAGGGAGACCGGTCATGTG ... AATTTGCGATGTTGAGATGGCGACGATGGTTACTCCAAGGACTCCAG .. .
`~ GTTGAGATGGCGACGATGGcctaggCAc
`:GH27
`
`242 bp
`
`Fig. l. Oligonucleotide primers for PCR amplification. (A) The two central
`sequence lines show both strands of the human l3-hcmoglobi..t1 gene (5) from
`52 bp upstream of the i..t1itiation codon (Met) to 84 bp downstream. Above
`and below this sequence are the oligonucleotide primers used to amplif)r this
`segment of the genome. The 3' end of each primer is marked by an arrow to
`i..t1dicate the direction of extension by DNA polymerase. Dots indicate
`nucleotide differences between 13- and o-globin . The primers PC03 and
`PC04 were used in our previous study (1, 2 ) and are completely homologous
`to the target gene. These sequences were extended and modified to produce
`the linker-primers GH18 and GH19. The modifications (lowercase letters)
`create a Pst I site in GH18 and a Hind III site in GH19. The amplified
`
`segment is 110 bp with PC03 and PC04, and 119 bp with GH18 and
`GH19. (B) The central sequences show a segment of the human HLA DQa
`gene (10 ) from codons 9 to 92 (codons are numbered for the mature
`protei..t1). Tlus region codes for the highly polymorphic outer domain of the
`protein. As above, the oligonucleotide lmker-primcr sequences used to
`an1plif)r this segment arc shown, with lowercase letters dcsignati..t1g nonho(cid:173)
`mologous bases. In this case the desired restriction sites (Pst I for primer
`GH26 and Ban1 HI for GH27) were added to the 5' end of the primers
`without regard to the target sequence. The length of the amplified product
`from HLA DQa is 242 bp.
`
`Table l. Distribution of[3-globin PCR clones. An
`entire PCR reaction was digested at 37"C with Pst
`I (20 U) and Hind III (20 U ) for 90 mi..tmtes (for
`13-globm) or Bam HI (24 U ) and Pst I (20 U ) for
`60 minutes (for HLA DQa ). After phenol extrac(cid:173)
`tion (11 ), the DNA was dialyzed to remove low
`molecular weight inhibitors of ligation (presum(cid:173)
`ably the deoxynucleoside triphosphates used in
`PCR), and concentrated by ethanol precipitation.
`All (13-globin) or one tenth (DQa) of the material
`was ligated to 0.5 fLg of the cut M13 vector under
`standard conditions (11) and transformed into
`approxilllately 6 x 109 cells of freshly prepared,
`competent JM103 (3) in a total volwne of200 fLl.
`Fresh JM103 culture (150 fLl ) was then mixed
`with 10 to 30 fLl of the transformed cells, plated
`on IPTG/X-gal agar plates (3 ), and i..tKubatcd
`overnight. The plates were scored for blue (paren(cid:173)
`tal) plaques and lifted onto BioDyne A filters (3) .
`These filters were hybridized (2) either with the
`labeled PC04 oligonucleotide to visualize aU of
`the clones containi..t1g PCR-an1plified DNA
`(prm1er plaques) or with the RS24 oligonucleo(cid:173)
`tide probe (the exact complement of the RS06 (6)
`probe] to specifically visualize the clones contain(cid:173)
`i..tlg hemoglobin sequences (globin plaques). Ten
`clones from the latter category were sequenced by
`the dideo:-)' extension method (4 ). Nine were
`identical to the expected [3-hemoglobi..t1 target
`sequence and one was identical to the homolo(cid:173)
`gous region of the human o-hemoglobm gene (5).
`
`Category
`
`Number
`
`Total plaques
`White plaques
`Primer plaques
`Globill plaques
`
`1496
`1338
`1206
`15
`
`Frequency
`(%)
`
`100
`89
`81
`1
`
`A
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`B
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`- 242bp -
`
`-119 bp -
`
`Globin
`
`DQ a.
`
`Fig. 2. PCR an1plification with oligonucleotide linker-prm1ers. DNA was amplified by mi..xing 1 fLg of
`genomic DNA in polymerase bufrer (2) with 100 pmol of each primer. San1plcs were subjected to 20
`cycles of PCR, each consisting of 2 mmutes of denaturation at 95°C, 2 minutes of coolillg to 37°C, and
`2 minutes of polymerization with 1 U of Klenow DNA polymerase. After an1plification, the DNA was
`concentrated by ethanol precipitation and half of the total reaction subjected to electrophoresis on a gel
`of 4% NuSievc agarosc in tris-boratc-EDTA butter. The gel was photographed, and the DNA was
`transferred to Genatran nylon membrane and hybridized (2) to a labeled probe specific for the target
`sequence. The blot was then washed and autoradiographed. For the amplification of 13-globm, the
`starti..tlg DNA was either from the Molt-4 cell li..t1e or from the globin deletion mutant GM2064 (2 ). For
`lane 5, the starting material was 11 pg of the 13-globin recombinant plasmid pBR328 :: 13A (6) , the molar
`equivalent ofS fLg of genomic DNA. For lane 6, the reaction was performed as in lane 1 except that no
`enzyme was added. To mcrease the efficiency of an1plification of the longer HLA DQa segment,
`dill1ethyl sulfoxide was added to 10% and the polymerization was carried out at 37°C for 27 cycles. The
`starting DNA for the amplification of DQa was either from the consanguineous HLA-typing ceU line
`LG-2 or from the HLA class II deletion mutant LCL72l.180 (7) . (A) Ethidiwn bronude-stamed gel
`showing total an1plified products. (Lane 1) Pri..tners PC03 and PC04 on Molt-4 DNA; (lane 2) PC03
`and PC04 on GM2064 DNA; (lane 3) GH18 and GH19 on Molt-4; (lane 4) GH18 and GH19 on
`GM2064; (lane 5) GH18 and GH19 on pBR328::13A DNA; (lane 6) PC03 and PC04 on Molt-4, no
`enzyme; (lane 7) primers GH26 and GH27 on LG-2 DNA; (lane 8) GH26 and GH27 on
`LCL72l.l80 DNA. (B) Southern blots showing specific amplified products. Lanes arc nW11bered as m
`(A). Lanes 1 through 6 were hybridized to the labeled RS06 oligonucleotide probe (2). Lanes 7 and 8
`were hybridized to a cloned DQa eDNA probe labeled by nick-translation (11).
`
`5 SEPTEMBER 1986
`
`REPORTS 1077
`
`GeneDX 1010, pg. 4
`
`

`
`primers, since gel electrophoresis of the
`PCR products reveals a discrete band at 240
`bp absent from the HLA deletion mutant
`(7) (Fig. 2). In addition, hybridization
`screening of the Ml3 clones from this am(cid:173)
`plification indicates that about 20% are ho(cid:173)
`mologous to the DQa probe, an increase of
`20 times over the [3-globin amplification.
`The basis for the difference in the specificity
`of amplification, defined as the ratio of
`target to nontarget clones, is not dear. It is
`Likely to reflect the primer sequences and
`their genomic distribution rather than the
`difFerent reaction conditions used (Fig. 2).
`The differences between the sequence of the
`[3-globin primers GH18, GH19 and PC03,
`PC04 (Fig. l ) may account for the observed
`change in the gel profile of the PCR-ampli(cid:173)
`fied products (Fig. 2, lanes l and 2 versus
`lanes 3 and 4), reflecting some difference in
`the amplification of nontarget segments.
`Three HLA DQa PCR clones derived
`from the homozygous typing cell LG2 were
`subjected to sequence analysis (8). Two
`clones were identical to a DQa complemen(cid:173)
`tal)' (eDNA) done from the same cell line.
`One differed by a single nucleotide, indicat(cid:173)
`ing an error rate of approximately l/600,
`assuming the substitution occurred during
`the 27 cycles of amplification. This proce(cid:173)
`dure has also been used to analyze sequences
`from polymorphic regions of the HLA
`DQf3 and DRf3 loci.
`Our rapid method for the cloning of
`specifically an1plified genomic fragments re(cid:173)
`lies on the ability of oligonucleotides to
`function as PCR primers with w1paired
`bases near their 5' ends. In the later cycles of
`amplification these primers anneal primarily
`to the amplified products rather than to the
`original genomic sequences, and are there(cid:173)
`fore fully complementary. The [3-globin
`linker-primers GH18 and GH19 appear to
`be approximately as efficient and specific as
`the fully matched primers. The HLA DQa
`linker-primers GH26 and GH27, with even
`more 5' mismatches, show an amplification
`specificity 20 times higher than the [3-globin
`primers. A large number of DQa clones
`were obtained from just 100 ng of this
`amplified genomic DNA. Our data suggest
`that the error rate over many cycles of
`amplification is sufficiently low so that reli(cid:173)
`able genomic sequences can be determined
`directly from PCR an1plification and don(cid:173)
`mg.
`This procedure offers significant advan(cid:173)
`tages over standard cloning protocols for the
`analysis of sequence polymorph isms in that
`it circumvents the construction and screen(cid:173)
`ing of full genomic libraries and could po(cid:173)
`tentially be
`initiated
`from nanogram
`amounts of DNA. It is capable of isolating
`only a limited region of tl1e genome, howev-
`
`10 78
`
`er, and requires sequence information to
`identify conserved primer and probe seg(cid:173)
`ments.' Unlike direct genomic sequencing
`(9), tl1e cloning of amplified DNA allows
`the separation of related genes and alleles
`prior to sequencing and does not require a
`detailed knowledge of adjacent restriction
`sites. The application of oligonucleotide
`linker-primers to introduce specific restric(cid:173)
`tion sites into PCR-amplified DNA may al(cid:173)
`so prove useful as a general cloning strategy.
`
`REFERENCES AND NOTES
`
`l. F. Faloona and K. B. Mullis, Methods E11zymol., in
`press.
`2. R. K. Saiki et rrl., Scie11ce 230, 1350 (1985 ).
`3. J. Messing, Methods E11zymo/. 101, 20 (1983).
`
`IITG, isopropyl-J3-o·thiogalacto·pyranoside; X-gal,
`5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-J3-o-galactoside.
`4. L Guo and R. Wu, ibid. 100, 60 (1983).
`5. M. Poncz, E. Schwartz, M. Ballantine, S. Surrey, f .
`Bioi. C!Jem. 258, 11 599 (1983).
`6. R. Saiki, N. Arnheim, H . Erlich, Biotech11oiO!fY 3,
`1008 (1985).
`7. H. Erlich, ]. S. Lee, J. W. Petersen, T. Bugawan, R.
`DeMars, Hum. lmmtmol. 16, 205 (1986).
`8. T. L Bugawan et rr/.,unpublished results.
`9. G. M. Church and W. Gilbert, Pl'oc. Nrrtl. Acrrd. Sci.
`U.S.A. 81 , 1991 (1984).
`10. C. Auffray et rrl., Nrrtul'e (Lo11do11) 308, 327 (1984).
`11. T. Maniatis, E. F. Fritsch, J. Sambrook, in .Moleculm·
`Clo11i11g (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold
`Spring Harbor, NY, 1982).
`12. We thank C. Long for the sequencing of PCR
`amplified DNA's; C. Levenson, L Gada, and D.
`Spasic for
`the synthesis of oligonucleotides; ].
`Sninsky, R. Saiki, and K. Mullis for critical review;
`and K. Levenson for the preparation of this manu(cid:173)
`script.
`21 April1986; accepted 17 July 1986
`
`Inhibition of Endothelial Regeneration by Type-Beta
`Transforming Growth Factor from Platelets
`
`RONALD L. HEIMARK, DANIEL R. TWARDZIK, STEPHEN M . SCHWARTZ
`
`Damage to the vessel wall is a signal for endothelial migration and replication and for
`platelet release at the site of injury. Addition of transforming growth factor-beta
`(TGF-f3) purified from platelets to growing aortic endothelial cells inhibited [3H]thy(cid:173)
`midine incorporation in a concentration-dependent marmer. A transient inhibition of
`DNA synthesis was also observed in response to wounding; cell migration and
`replication are inhibited during the first 24 hours after wounding. By 48 hours after
`wounding both TGF-[3-treated and -untreated cultures showed similar responses.
`Flow microfiuorimetric analysis of cell cycle distribution indicated that after 24 hours
`of exposure to TGF-f3 the cells were blocked from entering S phase, and the fraction of
`cells in G 1 was increased. The inhibition of the initiation of regeneration by TGF-f3
`could allow time for recruitment of smooth muscle cells into the site of injury by other
`platelet components.
`
`T HE CONTINUITY OF THE VASCUlAR
`
`endothelium is lost as atherosclerotic
`lesions progress (1) . In contrast,
`even in large wounds the endotheliwn rap(cid:173)
`idly regenerates both in vitro and in vivo
`(2). This raises the possibility that some
`property of the atl1eromatous wall or ele(cid:173)
`ment of the blood interacting with the wall
`at tl1e developing plaque can act to prevent
`the normal processes of endothelial regener(cid:173)
`ation. An obvious source of such an effect at
`sites of denudation is tl1e platelet. Among
`tl1e components released from platelets at a
`site of vascular injury are a group of growth
`regulatory proteins, including platelet-de(cid:173)
`rived growm factor (PDGF), a growth fac(cid:173)
`tor similar
`to epidermal growtl1 factor
`(EGF), and transforming growth factor(cid:173)
`beta (TGF-[3) (3, 4).
`The endotheliwn grows as a strictly densi(cid:173)
`ty-inhibited monolayer. Although endothe(cid:173)
`lial cell growth requires serum or plasma,
`PDGF and EGF are not required (5) . In the
`presence of acid-treated serum, aortic endo-
`
`thelia! cells have been shown to form colo(cid:173)
`nies in soft agar ( 6) . Similar results were
`obtained from mouse embryo cells (AKR-
`2B) or normal rat kidney (NRK) cells and
`tl1e activity that promotes growth in soft
`agar was identified as TGF-[3 (4) . We report
`here that TGF-f3 purified from human plate(cid:173)
`lets can inhibit the endothelial regeneration
`process by inl1ibiting both replication and
`migration.
`Transforming growth factors were orig(cid:173)
`inally found in viral-transformed rodent
`cells, and it was postulated that they were
`involved in neoplastic cell growth (7, 8).
`However, their presence in normal tissues,
`including kidney, placenta, and platelets,
`suggests a more general function ( 4, 9).
`Platelets contain 40 to l 00 times as much
`TGF-f3 as other nonneoplastic tissues. TGF-
`
`R. L. Heimark and S. M. Schwartz, Department of
`Pathology, SJ-60, University of Washington, Seartle,
`WA 98195.
`D. R. Twardzik, Oncogcn, Seattle, WA 98121.
`
`SC I ENCE, VOL. 233
`
`GeneDX 1010, pg. 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket