throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 12
`
` Entered: July 2, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC., and MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Cases IPR2014-00206 (Patent 7,496,854 B2)
`IPR2014-00207 (Patent 7,496,854 B2)
`IPR2014-00208 (Patent 7,917,843 B2)
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and
`TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00206 (Patent 7,496,854 B2)
`IPR2014-00207 (Patent 7,496,854 B2)
`IPR2014-00208 (Patent 7,917,843 B2)
`
`
`On July 1, 2014, the initial conference call1 was held between counsel for
`the respective parties and Judges Blankenship, Medley, and Jefferson.
`
`
`Petitioner
`A discussion was had regarding the constitution of “Petitioner.” As noted,
`the Petition (Paper 32; “Pet.”) in each of the three proceedings lists a lead and
`backup counsel for “Petitioner Apple” and a separate lead and backup counsel for
`“Petitioners Google and Motorola Mobility.” Pet. 2. The Board considers a
`petitioner to consist of a single entity for purposes of the proceeding, no matter
`how many companies are listed as petitioner or petitioners or how many companies
`are identified as a real party-in-interest. According to 37 CFR § 42.2, Petitioner
`means the party filing a petition requesting that a trial be instituted. As such, the
`Board would expect only one lead counsel to represent a petitioner. 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.10(a). When asked whether Petitioner wishes to proceed with more than one
`lead counsel, Petitioner represented that there is one lead counsel, Mr. Fehrman,
`and the remainder counsel should be considered as backup counsel. We further
`understand that Petitioner agrees that it will speak with one voice, both for any
`written submission and for any oral representations made during the proceedings.
`
`
`
`1 The initial conference call is held to discuss the Scheduling Order and any
`motions that the parties anticipate filing during the trial. Office Patent Trial
`Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48765 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`2 Citations are to IPR2014-00206.
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00206 (Patent 7,496,854 B2)
`IPR2014-00207 (Patent 7,496,854 B2)
`IPR2014-00208 (Patent 7,917,843 B2)
`
`
`Motions
`Neither party seeks authorization to file a motion at this time. As explained,
`if Patent Owner determines that it will file a motion to amend, Patent Owner must
`arrange a conference call soon thereafter with the Board and opposing counsel to
`discuss the proposed motion to amend. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a).
`The parties were reminded that if they seek authorization to file a motion not
`contemplated per the Scheduling Order, the party requesting such authorization
`must arrange a conference call with opposing counsel and the Board.
`
`
`Schedule
`Counsel for the respective parties indicated that they have no issues with the
`Scheduling Order entered June 11, 2014.
`To the extent issues arise with DATES 1-5 identified in the Scheduling
`Order, the parties are reminded that, without obtaining prior authorization from the
`Board, they may stipulate to different dates for DATES 1-5, as provided in the
`Scheduling Order, by filing an appropriate notice with the Board. The parties may
`not stipulate to any other changes to the Scheduling Order.
`
`
`Related Matters
`The parties acknowledged that the related district court cases involving the
`’854 and ’843 patents have been stayed.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00206 (Patent 7,496,854 B2)
`IPR2014-00207 (Patent 7,496,854 B2)
`IPR2014-00208 (Patent 7,917,843 B2)
`
`
`Settlement
`The parties have nothing to report with respect to settlement.
`
`
`
`Order
`
`It is
`ORDERED that no motions are authorized at this time.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David L. Fehrman
`dfehrman@mofo.com
`
`Mehran Arjomand
`marjomand@mofo.com
`
`Matthew A. Smith
`smith@turnerboyd.com
`
`Zhuanjja Gu
`gu@turnerboyd.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert Asher
`rasher@sunsteinlaw.com
`
`Bruce Sunstein
`bsunstein@sunsteinlaw.com
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket