`ArendiS.A.R.L.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,917,843
`
`IPR 2014-00208 (Ex. 2003)
`
`1
`
`
`
`Relevant excerpt from independent
`claim 1, and dependent claim 2
`
`2
`
`
`
`The Petition omits any explanation of how the
`dictionary search includes a dependency between the
`types of first and second information
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Petition, page 51
`
`3
`
`
`
`The Decision to Institute notes the incomplete
`argument in the Petition regarding dictionary search
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Decision, page 15
`
`4
`
`
`
`As for Add to Address Book, the Petition fails to
`indicate second information found by this action in
`Pandit
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Petition, page 51
`
`5
`
`
`
`Panditfails to disclose a search and fails to disclose
`“second information” associated with the phone
`number
`
`6
`
`
`
`Instead of proving that Panditdiscloses or suggests a
`search using first information, the Petition merely
`concludes that search is obvious and “common sense”
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Petition, page 51
`
`7
`
`
`
`Conclusorystatement lacks any underlying facts
`regarding the disclosed telephone number
`
`Declaration of Daniel A. Menasce, PhD
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case law requires evidence, not “common sense”,
`to show that a feature is known in the art
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 15
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case law requires evidence, not “common sense”,
`to show that a feature is known in the art
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, pages 15-16
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case law requires evidence, not “common sense”,
`to show that a feature is known in the art
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 17
`
`11
`
`
`
`The Board has required evidence, not unsupported,
`conclusory expert testimony, to show that a feature
`is known in the art
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 18
`
`12
`
`
`
`User needs a way to enter a name so that a telephone
`number can be added to address book
`
`Declaration of John Levy,
`PhD, paragraph 21
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 25
`
`13
`
`
`
`Searching an address book for duplicates would still fail
`to “us[ing] at least part of the first information as a
`search term”
`
`Declaration of John Levy,
`PhD, paragraph 22
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 26
`
`14
`
`
`
`Searching an address book for duplicates would still fail
`to “us[ing] at least part of the first information as a
`search term”
`
`Declaration of John Levy,
`PhD, paragraph 22
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 26
`
`15
`
`
`
`Searching an address book for duplicates would still fail
`to “us[ing] at least part of the first information as a
`search term”
`
`Declaration of John Levy,
`PhD, paragraph 27
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 27
`
`16
`
`
`
`The Board proposed a paper address book as an
`underlying fact
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Decision to Institute, page 17
`
`17
`
`
`
`Searching an address book for duplicates is not
`“common sense”
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 22
`
`18
`
`Declaration of John Levy,
`PhD, paragraph 25
`
`
`
`Searching an address book for duplicates is not
`“common sense”
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 22
`
`19
`
`Declaration of John Levy,
`PhD, paragraph 25
`
`
`
`Searching an address book for duplicates is not
`“common sense”
`
`Declaration of John Levy,
`PhD, paragraph 25
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 22
`
`20
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,917,843
`
`21
`
`
`
`User needs a way to enter a name so that a telephone
`number can be added to addresssbook
`
`Declaration of John Levy,
`PhD, paragraph 21
`
`IPR 2014-00208, Patent Owner Response, page 25
`
`22
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
