throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 6
`Date: March 2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MICHAEL J. SINDONI,
`Petitioner Application 14/834,548,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FCA US LLC,
`Respondent Application 14/209,123,
`Respondent.
`____________
`
`Case DER2016-00003
`____________
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and JAMES T. MOORE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case DER2016-00003
`Petitioner Application 14/834,548
`Respondent Application 14/209.123
`
`
`
`Introduction
`
`
`
`
`
`On February 28, 2017, Petitioner sent an email communication to the Board,
`
`without copying Respondent, that forwarded a previous undelivered email
`
`communication from counsel for Petitioner, dated February 17, 2017, also without
`
`copying Respondent, addressed to trials@uspto.com about this proceeding. The
`
`email of February 28th has been entered as Exhibit 3001. The email dated
`
`February 17, 2017 stated: “This is to confirm that I have withdrawn from this
`
`matter and that all correspondence should be directed to Mr. Michael Sindoni. I
`
`understand he contacted you yesterday and you needed this email to confirm.”
`
`Discussion
`
`
`
`A communication from either Petitioner or Petitioner’s counsel to the Board
`
`about anything other than formalistic or clerical matters without copying the
`
`Respondent is clearly inappropriate and should not occur again. Potential
`
`withdrawal of counsel is not a formalistic or clerical matter.
`
`
`
`Also, counsel may not withdraw from a proceeding unless a motion to
`
`withdraw has been filed by the counsel seeking to withdraw and the motion has
`
`been granted. 37 C.F.R. 42.10(e). The motion to withdraw should include
`
`sufficient facts and reasoning to justify the withdrawal and must leave sufficient
`
`time for Petitioner to seek and obtain other counsel. Additionally, a motion may
`
`not be filed without prior authorization by the Board. 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`Case DER2016-00003
`Petitioner Application 14/834,548
`Respondent Application 14/209.123
`
`
`
`Order
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Mr. Robert Gray is authorized to file a motion to withdraw
`
`from this proceeding, but if the motion contends that Petitioner does not want to be
`
`represented by any counsel in this proceeding, and will not be seeking other
`
`counsel after withdrawal of Mr. Gray, then prior to filing of the motion Mr. Gray
`
`must arrange a joint conference call with the Board, which includes participation of
`
`Petitioner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For Petitioner:
`
`Robert Gray
`robert.gray@thegraylawgroup.com
`
`For Respondent:
`
`Thomas Jurecko
`tom@remarck.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket