`
`
`Filed on behalf of HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
`By:
`Irfan A. Lateef
`
`Brian C. Claassen
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Telephone: 949-760-0404
`Facsimile: 949-760-9502
`Email: BoxHTC57@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________________
`
`HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. CBM2017-00054
`U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR REFUND OF
`POST-INSTITUTION PETITION FEES
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2017-00054
`HTC v. Ancora Technologies
`
`Pursuant to the Final Rule Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees (78 Fed. Reg.
`
`4232–34), HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, “HTC” or
`
`“Petitioners”) respectfully request a refund in the amount of $20,200.00 for post-
`
`institution filing fees paid in this proceeding to be credited to Deposit
`
`Account 11-1410 (Customer No. 20,995).
`
`On May 26, 2017, Petitioner filed a petition for covered business method
`
`review of U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941 which was assigned case number
`
`CBM2017-00054. Among the fees paid concurrently with filing the petition were
`
`$20,200 in post institution fees, comprising $18,000 for the base fee and $2,200 in
`
`excess claims fees, as shown below:
`
`
`
`
`
`On December 1, 2017, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board entered a decision
`
`denying
`
`institution of
`
`this covered business method review (Paper 7).
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`CBM2017-00054
`HTC v. Ancora Technologies
`
`Accordingly, Petitioners request a refund in the amount of $20,200 for the post-
`
`institution fees paid in connection with this proceeding
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 12, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`By: /Brian C. Claassen/
`Irfan A. Lateef (Reg. No. 51,922)
`Brian C. Claassen (Reg. No. 63,051)
`Attorneys for Petitioners HTC Corporation and
`HTC America, Inc.
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`CBM2017-00054
`HTC v. Ancora Technologies
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) and with the agreement
`
`
`
`
`of counsel for Patent Owner, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION
`
`PETITION FEES is being served on January 12, 2018, via email on counsel for
`
`Ancora Technologies Inc. at the email address below:
`
`John P. Rondini
`John S. LeRoy
`Marc Lorelli
`Mark A. Cantor
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`ANCC0114CBMR1@brookskushman.com
`
`By: /Brian C. Claassen/
`Irfan A. Lateef (Reg. No. 34,362)
`Brian C. Claassen (Reg. No. 63,051)
`Attorneys for Petitioners HTC Corporation and
`HTC America, Inc.
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 12, 2018
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
